Measurement of airborne particle emission during surgical and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy COVID-19 adapted procedures in a swine model: Experimental report and review of literature

Outcomes for COVID-19 Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy With or Without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to the more common use of venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). While tracheostomy is generally understood to decrease the risks of prolonged endotracheal intubation, there is conflicting data regarding the benefit of tracheostomy in patients on ECMO. The purpose of this study is to determine whether ECMO cannulation before tracheostomy impacted patient outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent tracheostomy for COVID-19-related ARDS at a tertiary academic center from March 2020 through March 2022. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether they were cannulated for ECMO prior to tracheostomy. Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the two groups. Results A total of 24 patients were included in the study, with 13 in the ECMO group and 11 in the non-ECMO group. There was no significant difference in age, comorbidities, race, or gender between the groups. Patients on ECMO had a longer time from admission to intubation (seven days vs. three days, p=.002), were more likely to have multiple intubations (54% vs 9%, p= .033), had increased rates of postoperative bleeding (62% vs. 18%, p = .047), and had a higher mortality rate (39% vs. 0%, p= .041). Conclusions ECMO cannulation prior to tracheostomy for COVID-19-related ARDS is associated with poorer outcomes. It is unclear whether this is related to a more severe disease burden in these patients. Further study is needed to evaluate this and guide future management.

Porcine model for tracheostomy training: evaluation of the content and construct validity

PURPOSE

Tracheostomy is a key procedure that residents in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck surgery must master as a fundamental component of their training. Swine is a potential model for tracheostomy training as it mimics human anatomy and provides realistic haptic feedback. The purpose of this study is to evaluate its content and construct validity in surgical tracheostomy training.

METHODS

We carried out training sessions on dead swine with three groups of volunteers: young residents [postgraduate year (PGY)-1 to 3], experienced residents (PGY-4 to 6) and senior surgeons. Content validity was studied using questionnaires sent to senior surgeons. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the OSATS score on video analysis, between the three groups.

RESULTS

19 individuals participated in the training sessions. OSATS score were statistically different between groups (p < 0.05) with a mean score of 19 for young residents, 24.7 for experienced residents and 31.3 for senior surgeon, with a good inter-rater reliability (Pearson coefficient > 0.9). Experienced surgeons agreed that the model was a useful training tool, strongly agreed that it improved performance, and that it would be used to train their students.

CONCLUSIONS

The dead pig is a suitable model to train for human tracheotomy, with good content and construction validity.

Safety of tracheostomy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Some patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) require prolonged mechanical ventilation. An early tracheostomy strategy while on ECMO has appeared to be beneficial for these patients. This study aims to explore the safety of tracheostomy in ECMO patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational single-center study.

RESULTS

Hundred and nine patients underwent tracheostomy (76 percutaneous and 33 surgical) during V-V ECMO support over an 8-year period. Patients with a percutaneous tracheostomy showed a significantly shorter ECMO duration [25.5 (17.3-40.1) vs 37.2 (26.5-53.2) days, p = 0.013] and a shorter ECMO-to-tracheostomy time [13.3 (8.5-19.7) vs 27.8 (16.3-36.9) days, p < 0.001] compared to those who underwent a surgical approach. There was no difference between the two strategies regarding both major and minor/no bleeding (p = 0.756). There was no difference in survival rate between patients who underwent percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy (p = 0.173). Patients who underwent an early tracheostomy (within 10 days from ECMO insertion) showed a significantly shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001) and a shorter duration of V-V ECMO support (p < 0.001). Our series includes 24 patients affected by COVID-19, who did not show significantly higher rates of major bleeding when compared to non-COVID-19 patients (p = 0.297). Within the COVID-19 subgroup, there was no difference in major bleeding rates between surgical and percutaneous approach (p = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy during ECMO have a similar safety profile in terms of bleeding risk and mortality. Percutaneous tracheostomy may favor a shorter duration of ECMO support and hospital stay and can be considered a safe alternative to surgical tracheostomy, even in COVID-19 patients, if relevant clinical expertise is available.

A Modified Technique for Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy

Purpose: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is widely used in mechanical ventilation patients to facilitate weaning. This modified technique aims to reduce accidental intraprocedural airway loss and desaturation associated with current PDT techniques. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center, prospective cohort study of 100 patients who underwent a modified technique between September 8, 2022, and January 18, 2023. The procedure was performed at Shiraz University of medical science at the tertiary center, Namazi teaching hospital. In this method instead of withdrawing the endotracheal tube (ETT) up close to the vocal cord and subglottic area at the beginning of the procedure, which is a common theme in PDT techniques with accidental extubation risk, we kept the ETT and gradually withdraw it. Results: Of the 100 patients, the average age was 53.5 years, and 66% were males. On average, the procedure lasted 255 (67) seconds. All patients successfully underwent PDT with no life-threatening complications, accidental intraprocedural airway loss, or desaturation. Conclusions: As a result of this modified technique, PDT for airway management can be a safe and low-complication procedure without the risk of accidental intraprocedural airway loss. Moreover, omitting bronchoscopy and sonography during these procedures is cost-effective and secure.