A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems

Effect of surgical modification of deep brain stimulation lead trajectories on radiofrequency heating during MRI at 3T: from phantom experiments to clinical implementation

OBJECTIVE

Radiofrequency (RF) tissue heating around deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads is a well-known safety risk during MRI, resulting in strict imaging guidelines and limited allowable protocols. The implanted lead's trajectory and orientation with respect to the MRI electric fields contribute to variations in the magnitude of RF heating across patients. Currently, there are no surgical requirements for implanting the extracranial portion of the DBS lead, resulting in substantial variations in clinical lead trajectories and consequently RF heating. Recent studies have shown that incorporating concentric loops in the extracranial lead trajectory can reduce RF heating. However, optimal positioning of the loops and the quantitative benefit of trajectory modification in terms of added safety margins during MRI remain unknown. In this study, the authors systematically evaluated the characteristics of DBS lead trajectories that minimize RF heating during 3T MRI to develop the best surgical practices for safe access to postoperative MRI, and they present the first surgical implementation of these modified trajectories.

METHODS

The authors performed experiments to assess the maximum temperature increase of 244 distinct lead trajectories. They investigated the effect of the position, number, and size of the concentric loops on the skull. Experiments were performed in an anthropomorphic phantom implanted with a commercial DBS system, and RF exposure was generated by applying a high specific absorption rate sequence (B1+rms = 2.7 µT). The authors conducted test-retest experiments to assess the reliability of measurements. Additionally, they evaluated the effect of imaging landmarks and perturbations to the DBS device configuration on the efficacy of low-heating trajectories. Finally, two neurosurgeons implanted the recommended modified trajectories in patients, and the authors characterized their RF heating in comparison with unmodified trajectories.

RESULTS

The maximum temperature increase ranged from 0.09°C to 7.34°C. The authors found that increasing the number of loops and positioning them closer to the surgical burr hole, particularly for the contralateral lead, substantially reduced RF heating. These trajectory modifications were easily incorporated during the surgical procedure and resulted in a threefold reduction in RF heating.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgically modifying the extracranial portion of the DBS lead trajectory can substantially reduce RF heating during 3T MRI. The authors' results indicate that simple adjustments to the lead's configuration, such as small, concentric loops near the burr hole, can be readily adopted during DBS lead implantation to improve patient safety during MRI.

Managing Patients With Unlabeled Passive Implants on MR Systems Operating Below 1.5 T

The standard of care for managing a patient with an implant is to identify the item and to assess the relative safety of scanning the patient. Because the 1.5 T MR system is the most prevalent scanner in the world and 3 T is the highest field strength in widespread use, implants typically have "MR Conditional" (i.e., an item with demonstrated safety in the MR environment within defined conditions) labeling at 1.5 and/or 3 T only. This presents challenges for a facility that has a scanner operating at a field strength below 1.5 T when encountering a patient with an implant, because scanning the patient is considered "off-label." In this case, the supervising physician is responsible for deciding whether to scan the patient based on the risks associated with the implant and the benefit of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For a passive implant, the MRI safety-related concerns are static magnetic field interactions (i.e., force and torque) and radiofrequency (RF) field-induced heating. The worldwide utilization of scanners operating below 1.5 T combined with the increasing incidence of patients with implants that need MRI creates circumstances that include patients potentially being subjected to unsafe imaging conditions or being denied access to MRI because physicians often lack the knowledge to perform an assessment of risk vs. benefit. Thus, physicians must have a complete understanding of the MRI-related safety issues that impact passive implants when managing patients with these products on scanners operating below 1.5 T. This monograph provides an overview of the various clinical MR systems operating below 1.5 T and discusses the MRI-related factors that influence safety for passive implants. Suggestions are provided for the management of patients with passive implants labeled MR Conditional at 1.5 and/or 3 T, referred to scanners operating below 1.5 T. The purpose of this information is to empower supervising physicians with the essential knowledge to perform MRI exams confidently and safely in patients with passive implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

A workflow for predicting radiofrequency-induced heating around bilateral deep brain stimulation electrodes in MRI

BACKGROUND

Heating around deep brain stimulation (DBS) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) occurs when the time-varying electromagnetic (EM) fields induce currents in the electrodes which can generate heat and potentially cause tissue damage. Predicting the heating around the electrode contacts is important to ensure the safety of patients with DBS implants undergoing an MRI scan. We previously proposed a workflow to predict heating around DBS contacts and introduced a parameter, equivalent transimpedance, that is independent of electrode trajectories, termination, and radiofrequency (RF) excitations. The workflow performance was validated in a unilateral DBS system.

PURPOSE

To predict RF heating around the contacts of bilateral (DBS) electrodes during an MRI scan in an anthropomorphic head phantom.

METHODS

Bilateral electrodes were fixed in a skull phantom filled with hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) gel. The electrode shafts were suspended extracranially, in a head and torso phantom filled with the same gel material. The current induced on the electrode shaft was experimentally measured using an MR-based technique 3 cm above the tip. A transimpedance value determined in a previous offline calibration was used to scale the shaft current and calculate the contact voltage. The voltage was assigned as a boundary condition on the electrical contacts of the electrode in a quasi-static (EM) simulation. The resulting specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution became the input for a transient thermal simulation and was used to predict the heating around the contacts. RF heating experiments were performed for eight different lead trajectories using circularly polarized (CP) excitation and two linear excitations for one trajectory. The measured temperatures for all experiments were compared with the simulated temperatures and the root-mean-squared errors (RMSE) were calculated.

RESULTS

The RF heating around the contacts of both bilateral electrodes was predicted with ≤ 0.29°C of RMSE for 20 heating scenarios.

CONCLUSION

The workflow successfully predicted the heating for different bilateral DBS trajectories and excitation patterns in an anthropomorphic head phantom.

Variations in Determining Actual Orientations of Segmented Deep Brain Stimulation Leads Using the DiODe Algorithm: A Retrospective Study Across Different Lead Designs and Medical Institutions

INTRODUCTION

Directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads have become widely used in the past decade. Understanding the asymmetric stimulation provided by directional leads requires precise knowledge of the exact orientation of the lead in respect to its anatomical target. Recently, the DiODe algorithm was developed to automatically determine the orientation angle of leads from the artifact on postoperative computed tomography (CT) images. However, manual DiODe results are user-dependent. This study analyzed the extent of lead rotation as well as the user agreement of DiODe calculations across the two most common DBS systems, namely, Boston Scientific's Vercise and Abbott's Infinity, and two independent medical institutions.

METHODS

Data from 104 patients who underwent an anterior-facing unilateral/bilateral directional DBS implantation at either Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH) or Albany Medical Center (AMC) were retrospectively analyzed. Actual orientations of the implanted leads were independently calculated by three individual users using the DiODe algorithm in Lead-DBS and patients' postoperative CT images. The deviation from the intended orientation and user agreement were assessed.

RESULTS

All leads significantly deviated from the intended 0° orientation (p < 0.001), regardless of DBS lead design (p < 0.05) or institution (p < 0.05). However, the Boston Scientific leads showed an implantation bias toward the left at both institutions (p = 0.014 at NMH, p = 0.029 at AMC). A difference of 10° between at least two users occurred in 28% (NMH) and 39% (AMC) of all Boston Scientific and 76% (NMH) and 53% (AMC) of all Abbott leads.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that there is a significant lead rotation from the intended surgical orientation across both DBS systems and both medical institutions; however, a bias toward a single direction was only seen in the Boston Scientific leads. Additionally, these results raise questions into the user error that occurs when manually refining the orientation angles calculated with DiODe.

Implants talk to each-other: RF heating changes when two DBS leads are present simultaneously during MRI

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven to be an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease and other brain disorders. The procedure often involves implanting two elongated leads aimed at specific brain nuclei in both the left and right hemispheres. However, evaluating the safety of MRI in patients with such implants has only been done on an individual lead basis, ignoring the possibility of crosstalk between the leads. This study evaluates the impact of crosstalk on power deposition at the lead tip through numerical simulation and phantom experiments. We used CT images to obtain patient-specific lead trajectories and compared the power deposition at the lead tip in cases with bilateral and unilateral DBS implants. Our results indicate that the RF power deposition at the lead tip can vary by up to 6-fold when two DBS leads are present together compared to when only one lead is present. Experimental measurements in a simplified case of two lead-only DBS systems confirmed the existence of crosstalk.Clinical Relevance-Our results indicate that RF heating of implanted leads during MRI can be affected by the presence of another lead in the body, which may increase or decrease the power deposition in the tissue depending on the position and configuration of the leads.

Low-field MRI's Spark on Implant Safety: A Closer Look at Radiofrequency Heating

Advances in low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are making imaging more accessible without significant losses in image quality. In addition to being more cost-effective and easier to place without as much needed infrastructure, it has been publicized that the lower field strengths make MRI safer for patients with implants. To test this claim, we conducted a total of 368 simulations with wires of various lengths and geometries in a gel phantom during radiofrequency (RF) exposure at 23 MHz and 63.6 MHz (corresponding to MRI at 0.55 T and 1.5 T). Our results showed that heating in the gel around wire tips could be higher in certain cases at 0.55 T. To examine the impact on real patients, we simulated two models of patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants of different lengths. These simulations provide quantitative evidence that low-field MRI is not always safer, and this paper serves to illustrate some of the basic principles involved in RF heating of elongated implants in MRI environments.Clinical Relevance- This paper illustrates the physical concepts of resonance and inductive coupling in RF heating during MRI scanning with implants through systematic simulations and discusses the impact of these principles in practice.

Rapid prediction of MRI-induced RF heating of active implantable medical devices using machine learning

The interaction between an active implantable medical device and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiofrequency (RF) fields can cause excessive tissue heating. Existing methods for predicting RF heating in the presence of an implant rely on either extensive phantom experiments or electromagnetic (EM) simulations with varying degrees of approximation of the MR environment, the patient, or the implant. On the contrary, fast MR thermometry techniques can provide a reliable real-time map of temperature rise in the tissue in the vicinity of conductive implants. In this proof-of-concept study, we examined whether a machine learning (ML) based model could predict the temperature increase in the tissue near the tip of an implanted lead after several minutes of RF exposure based on only a few seconds of experimentally measured temperature values. We performed phantom experiments with a commercial deep brain stimulation (DBS) system to train a fully connected feedforward neural network (NN) to predict temperature rise after ~3 minutes of scanning at a 3 T scanner using only data from the first 5 seconds. The NN effectively predicted ΔTmax-R2 = 0.99 for predictions in the test dataset. Our model also showed potential in predicting RF heating for other various scenarios, including a DBS system at a different field strength (1.5 T MRI, R2 = 0.87), different field polarization (1.2 T vertical MRI, R2 = 0.79), and an unseen implant (cardiac leads at 1.5 T MRI, R2 = 0.91). Our results indicate great potential for the application of ML in combination with fast MR thermometry techniques for rapid prediction of RF heating for implants in various MR environments.Clinical Relevance- Machine learning-based algorithms can potentially enable rapid prediction of MRI-induced RF heating in the presence of unknown AIMDs in various MR environments.

Optimizing the trajectory of deep brain stimulation leads reduces RF heating during MRI at 3 T: Characteristics and clinical translation

Radiofrequency (RF) induced tissue heating around deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads is a well-known safety risk during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hindering routine protocols for patients. Known factors that contribute to variations in the magnitude of RF heating across patients include the implanted lead's trajectory and its orientation with respect to the MRI electric fields. Currently, there are no consistent requirements for surgically implanting the extracranial portion of the DBS lead. Recent studies have shown that incorporating concentric loops in the extracranial trajectory of the lead can reduce RF heating, but the optimal positioning of the loop is unknown. In this study, we evaluated RF heating of 77 unique lead trajectories to determine how different characteristics of the trajectory affect RF heating during MRI at 3 T. We performed phantom experiments with commercial DBS systems from two manufacturers to determine how consistently modifying the lead trajectory mitigates RF heating. We also presented the first surgical implementation of these modified trajectories in patients. Low-heating trajectories included small concentric loops near the surgical burr hole which were readily implemented during the surgical procedure; these trajectories generated nearly a 2-fold reduction in RF heating compared to unmodified trajectories.Clinical Relevance- Surgically modifying the DBS lead trajectory can be a cost-effective strategy for reducing RF-induced heating during MRI at 3 T.