Cervical spine immobilisation following blunt trauma in pre-hospital and emergency care: A systematic review

Extrication following a motor vehicle collision: a consensus statement on behalf of The Faculty of Pre-hospital Care, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

BACKGROUND

Road traffic injury is the leading cause of death among young people globally, with motor vehicle collisions often resulting in severe injuries and entrapment. Traditional extrication techniques focus on limiting movement to prevent spinal cord injuries, but recent findings from the EXIT project challenge this approach. This paper presents updated recommendations from the Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care (FPHC) that reflect the latest evidence on extrication practices.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review identified 170 relevant articles from 7083 records. Findings, together with EXIT project data, informed the development of 12 core and supplemental statements on extrication. In April 2024, 43 subject matter experts from diverse backgrounds participated in a consensus process. Statements were discussed, voted on, and synthesised into the updated statement, ratified by FPHC.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for all 12 statements, emphasising self-extrication as a preferred, primary approach, reducing extrication time, and moving away from absolute movement minimisation. The U-STEP OUT algorithm was endorsed as a decision-making tool. Key themes included interdisciplinary collaboration, use of operational and clinical decision aids, and enhanced training.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus statement marks a paradigm shift in extrication practice, moving away from traditional movement minimisation to a focus on time-sensitive, patient-centred care. The findings advocate for empowering both clinical and non-clinical responders and improving interdisciplinary training and communication. Further research is needed to assess the broader implementation of this statement and to explore the psychological impacts of entrapment and extrication on patients.

Incidence of cervical spine injury in victims of dismounted blast: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Dismounted blast has the potential to cause life-threatening injuries to multiple simultaneous casualties, including injury to the cervical spine (c-spine). Spinal immobilisation can be costly in terms of time and personnel required to apply and sustain it. C-spine 'clearing' tools frequently do not apply to the blast-injured casualty, so clinical judgement must be used to determine those requiring c-spine immobilisation. This will be strongly influenced by the likelihood of such an injury, but currently, the incidence of c-spine injury in dismounted blasts is not known.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health for original research reporting the number of patients suffering c-spine injury as a result of the dismounted blast, as well as indices of injury severity such as incidence of limb amputation. Rates were combined to give an overall incidence. The systematic review was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527592).

RESULTS

2775 unique studies were identified, 13 of which were analysed. Reported incidences of c-spine injuries ranged from 0% to 5.85% across all 13 studies, and unstable injuries ranged from 0% to 1.23% in the nine studies in which this could be calculated. After excluding one study due to an overlapping population, in 7889 patients the rate of c-spine injury was 0.89%. In the 4618 patients for which the incidence of unstable c-spine injury could be calculated, the rate was 0.30%. There was no correlation between the rate of amputation and the rate of c-spine injury (Spearman's ρ=0.226, p=0.667).

CONCLUSION

Dismounted blasts result in a very low rate of c-spine injury. The populations sampled included a number of seriously injured casualties with potentially life-threatening wounds, such as limb amputation. We recommend deprioritising c-spine control in dismounted victims of the blast in favour of focusing the limited time and resources on addressing potentially life-threatening injuries.

Development and validation of assessment instruments for cervical collar and spinal board placement in simulated environments for nursing students in the care of polytrauma patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple trauma injuries are the leading cause of death and disability in people under the age of 45 and require prompt and specialised care. However, medical and nursing education programmes do not always include specific training in emergency pre-hospital care, resulting in a lack of basic practical skills in trauma management.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate two instruments for assessing nursing students' competence in cervical collar and spinal board application in simulated pre-hospital emergency scenarios.

METHOD

This is an instrumental study that involves the development of two assessment instruments and the evaluation of their psychometric properties in a sample of 392 nursing students. Content validity was assessed using expert judgement, by calculating the content validity ratio (CVR) for each item and the scale level content validity index average (S-CVI/Ave) for the instruments. Exploratory factor analysis using the MINRES extraction method and Promax rotation was performed to analyse the performance of the items and structure of the rubrics. Internal consistency was analysed using the Omega coefficient and inter-rater agreement was assessed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Initially, two rubrics were obtained: one with six items for cervical collar placement (S-CVI/Ave = 0.86) and one with nine items for spinal board placement (S-CVI/Ave = 0.81). Both had a single-factor structure, with all items having factor loadings greater than 0.34 for the cervical collar rubric and 0.56 for the spinal board rubric, except for item 2 of the cervical collar rubric (λ = 0.24), which was subsequently removed. The final cervical collar rubric (five items) had an overall internal consistency of 0.84 and the spinal board rubric had an overall internal consistency of 0.90, calculated using the Omega statistic. The weighted Kappa coefficient for each item ranged from acceptable (0.32) to substantial (0.79). These results show that we have successfully developed two sufficiently valid instruments to assess the immobilisation competencies proposed in the objective of the study.

CONCLUSION

Whilst further research is needed to fully establish their psychometric properties, these instruments offer a valuable starting point for evaluating nursing students' competence in cervical collar and spinal board application in simulated pre-hospital scenarios.

Cervical spine immobilisation following blunt trauma in pre-hospital and emergency care: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether different cervical spine immobilisation strategies (full immobilisation, movement minimisation or no immobilisation), impact neurological and/or other outcomes for patients with suspected cervical spinal injury in the pre-hospital and emergency department setting.

DESIGN

Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and two research registers were searched until September 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All comparative studies (prospective or retrospective) that examined the potential benefits and/or harms of immobilisation practices during pre-hospital and emergency care of patients with a potential cervical spine injury (pre-imaging) following blunt trauma.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two authors independently selected and extracted data. Risk of bias was appraised using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. Data were synthesised without meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was variable, with most studies having serious or critical risk of bias. The effect of cervical spine immobilisation practices such as full immobilisation or movement minimisation during pre-hospital and emergency care did not show clear evidence of benefit for the prevention of neurological deterioration, spinal injuries and death compared with no immobilisation. However, increased pain, discomfort and anatomical complications were associated with collar application during immobilisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limited evidence, weak designs and limited generalisability, the available data suggest that pre-hospital cervical spine immobilisation (full immobilisation or movement minimisation) was of uncertain value due to the lack of demonstrable benefit and may lead to potential complications and adverse outcomes. High-quality randomised comparative studies are required to address this important question.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO REGISTRATION Fiona Lecky, Abdullah Pandor, Munira Essat, Anthea Sutton, Carl Marincowitz, Gordon Fuller, Stuart Reid, Jason Smith. A systematic review of cervical spine immobilisation following blunt trauma in pre-hospital and emergency care. PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022349600 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022349600.