Should all Twins be Delivered by Caesarean Section? A Preliminary Report

Long term respiratory morbidity of cesarean-delivered second twin compared to their vaginally-delivered sibling: A retrospective population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Offspring born via cesarean delivery (CD) may be more prone to develope long-term respiratory diseases, compared to those delivered vaginally (VD). In this study, we compared the rates of respiratory diseases between first twins VD and second twins delivered via CD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective database study. All twin deliveries encompassed at the Soroka University Medical Center, a large tertiary hospital in southern Israel, between 1991 and 2020, in which the first twin was VD and the second via CD were included. Respiratory diseases included respiratory tract diseases such as bronchiolitis and bronchial asthma. The cumulative incidence of respiratory diseases was compared between the twins using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox models to adjust for confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 395,408 deliveries occurred during the study period, with 13,402 (3.4%) of all deliveries being twins. Of these, 184 (1.4%) were first twins VD and second twins delivered via CD. The second CD twin was more likely to have a non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern and an Apgar score less than 7 at 5 min. No other differences were found between the siblings. The incidence of long-term respiratory diseases was not statistically different between the CD and VD siblings (7.6% vs. 9.4%, respectively; OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.23-1.26). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of respiratory diseases was not statistically different (Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, p = .59), and in the multivariable analysis which adjusted for birthweight and fetal distress during delivery (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.43-26.25).

CONCLUSIONS

While the immediate outcomes for the CD twin were slightly worse compared to the VD twin, there was no difference in long-term respiratory diseases between the siblings.

Mode of delivery of twin pregnancies with the first twin in breech position after the introduction of a policy of planned caesarean delivery for nulliparous women

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the impact of the mode of delivery of twin pregnancies with the first twin in breech position for all parities combined after introduction of a policy of planned caesarean section in 38 weeks' gestation in nulliparas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of the mode of delivery of twin pregnancies with the first twin in breech position was conducted from January 2007 to December 2015 after the implementation of a planned caesarean section in 38 weeks' gestation in nulliparas. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared according to the decision of attempted vaginal or planned caesarean delivery.

RESULTS

Among the 134 women included, an attempted vaginal delivery was decided for 30.6% women (n = 41), with 95% (n = 39) who delivered vaginally and 5% (n = 2) by caesarean section during labour. Among the 69.4% women (n = 93) with a planned caesarean section, 64.5% (n = 60) and 11.8% (n = 11) delivered by caesarean before labour and during labour, respectively, and 23.7% (n = 22) delivered vaginally. The overall vaginal delivery rate was 45.5%, and the overall rate of caesarean section was 54.5% for all parities combined. In nulliparous women, the rate of caesarean section during labour was 33%. There were no significant differences in maternal mortality or morbidity between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

A selective policy of attempted vaginal delivery based on parity for twin pregnancies with the first twin in breech position can lead to a reduction in the overall rate of caesarean section in this population.

Neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal delivery of noncephalic second twins

BACKGROUND

Management of noncephalic second twin delivery rests on the results of population-based retrospective studies of twin births that have shown higher neonatal mortality and morbidity for second twins with noncephalic, compared with cephalic, presentations after vaginal delivery of the first twin. Because these studies are flawed by data of questionable validity, do not report the obstetrical practices at delivery, and do not allow collection of potential confounding variables, we performed a national prospective study specially designed to evaluate the management of twins' delivery.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess neonatal mortality and morbidity according to second twin presentation after vaginal birth of the first twin.

STUDY DESIGN

The Jumeaux Mode d'Accouchement study was a nationwide prospective population-based cohort study of twin deliveries performed in 176 maternity units in France from February 2014 through March 2015. The primary outcome was a composite of intrapartum mortality and neonatal mortality and morbidity. Neonatal outcomes of second twins born ≥32 weeks of gestation after vaginal delivery of the first cephalic or breech twin were compared according to the noncephalic or cephalic second twin presentation. Multivariable logistic regression models controlled for potential confounders. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the breech or transverse presentation of the noncephalic second twin, and gestational age at delivery, before or after 37 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

Among 3903 second twins enrolled in the study, 2384 (61.1%) were in cephalic and 1519 (38.9%) in noncephalic presentations, of whom 999 (25.6%) were in breech and 520 (13.3%) in transverse presentation. Composite neonatal mortality and morbidity did not differ between the noncephalic and cephalic group (47/1519 [3.1%] vs 59/2384 [2.5%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.85). No significant difference between groups was shown for the primary outcome in subgroup analyses according to type of noncephalic second twin presentation or gestational age at delivery. Cesarean delivery rates for the second twin were lower in the breech than in the cephalic group (14/999 [1.4%] vs 75/2384 [3.1%], P = .003) and lower in the cephalic than in the transverse group (75/2384 [3.1%] vs 35/520 [6.7%], P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Noncephalic and cephalic second twin presentations after vaginal delivery of the first twin ≥32 weeks of gestation are associated with similar low composite neonatal mortality and morbidity. Vaginal delivery of noncephalic second twin is a reasonable option.

Neonatal mortality and morbidity in vertex-vertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity in vertex-vertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from a historical cohort study based on a twin registry in the US (1995-1997) were used. Multivariate logistic regression was used to control for maternal age, race, marital status, cigarette smoking during pregnancy, parity, medical complications, gestational age, and other confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 86 041 vertex-vertex second twins were classified into two groups: second twins delivered by cesarean section after cesarean delivery of first twin (C-C) (43.0%), second twins whose co-twins delivered vaginally (V-X) (57.0%). In infants of birth weight>or=2500 g group, the risks of noncongenital anomaly-related death (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 4.64, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.90, 13.92), low Apgar score (aOR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.43, 4.14), and ventilation use (aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.47) were higher in the V-X group compared with the C-C group. No asphyxia-related neonatal deaths occurred in C-C group, whereas the incidence of this death was 0.04% in the V-X group.

CONCLUSION

The risks of neonatal mortality and morbidity are increased in vertex-vertex second twins with birth weight>or=2500 g whose co-twins delivered vaginally compared with second twins delivered by cesarean section after cesarean delivery of first twin.