1
|
Segelman M, Hariharan D, Fletcher D, Gasdaska A, Ingber MJ, Khatutsky G, Bercaw L, Feng Z. Outcomes for Long-Stay Nursing Facility Residents Following On-Site Acute Care under a CMS Initiative. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:12-16.e3. [PMID: 37301224 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to describe outcomes of long-term nursing facility (NF) residents treated for one of 6 conditions on-site in the NF and to compare outcomes to those treated for the same conditions in the hospital. DESIGN Cross-sectional retrospective study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Initiative to Reduce Avoidable Hospitalizations among Nursing Facility Residents-Payment Reform enabled participating NFs to bill Medicare for providing on-site care to eligible long-stay residents meeting specified severity criteria due to any of 6 medical conditions, as an alternative to hospitalization. For billing purposes, residents were required to meet clinical criteria severe enough to warrant hospitalization. METHODS We used the Minimum Data Set assessments to identify eligible long-stay NF residents. We used Medicare data to identify residents who were treated, either on-site or in the hospital, for the 6 conditions and measure outcomes including subsequent hospitalization and death. To compare residents treated in the 2 modes, we used logistic regression models and adjusted for demographics, functional and cognitive status, and comorbidities. RESULTS Among residents treated on-site for the 6 conditions, 13.6% were subsequently hospitalized and 7.8% died, within 30 days, compared to 26.5% and 17.0%, respectively, among those treated in the hospital. Based on multivariate analysis, those treated in the hospital were more likely to be readmitted (OR = 1.666, P < .001) or to die (OR = 2.251, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Although unable to fully account for differences in unobserved severity of illness between residents treated on-site vs in the hospital, our results do not indicate any harm, but rather a possible benefit, to being treated on-site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dhwani Hariharan
- Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA; RTI International, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gayot C, Laubarie-Mouret C, Zarca K, Mimouni M, Cardinaud N, Luce S, Tovena I, Durand-Zaleski I, Laroche ML, Preux PM, Tchalla A. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine programme for preventing unplanned hospitalisations of older adults living in nursing homes: the GERONTACCESS cluster randomized clinical trial. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:991. [PMID: 36550496 PMCID: PMC9773573 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03575-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The GERONTACCESS trial evaluated the utility and cost-effectiveness of a gerontological telemedicine (TLM) programme for preventing unplanned hospitalisation of residents living in nursing homes (NHs) in regions lacking medical facilities and/or qualified medical providers ("medical deserts"). DESIGN GERONTACCESS was a 12-month, multicentre, prospective cluster-randomised trial conducted in NHs. The intervention group underwent TLM assessments every 3 months. The control group received the usual care. In both groups, comprehensive on-site assessments were conducted at baseline and the final visit. Care requirements were documented throughout the study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS NH residents aged ≥ 60 years with multiple chronic diseases. METHODS The study outcomes were the proportion of patients who experienced avoidable and unplanned hospitalisation, and the incremental cost savings per quality-adjusted life years from baseline to the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS Of the 426 randomised participants (mean ± standard deviation age, 87.2 ± 7.6 years; 311 [73.0%] women), 23.4% in the intervention group and 32.5% in the control group experienced unplanned hospitalisation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.97; p = 0.034). Each avoided hospitalisation in the intervention group saved $US 3,846. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The results of GERONTACCESS revealed that our gerontological, preventative TLM program significantly reduced unplanned hospitalisations. This innovative intervention limited disease progression and promoted a healthy lifestyle among NH residents. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02816177, registered June 28, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gayot
- Laboratoire VieSanté - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, E-Santé), Institut OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France
- CHU de Limoges, Pôle HU Gérontologie Clinique, 2 Avenue Martin-Luther King, Limoges, F-87042, France
- Unité de Recherche Clinique Et d'Innovation (URCI) en Gérontologie, CHU de Limoges, Pôle HU Gérontologie Clinique, Limoges, France
| | - Cécile Laubarie-Mouret
- Laboratoire VieSanté - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, E-Santé), Institut OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France
- CHU de Limoges, Pôle HU Gérontologie Clinique, 2 Avenue Martin-Luther King, Limoges, F-87042, France
| | - Kevin Zarca
- DRCI-URC Eco Ile-de-France, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Maroua Mimouni
- DRCI-URC Eco Ile-de-France, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Noelle Cardinaud
- Laboratoire VieSanté - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, E-Santé), Institut OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France
- CHU de Limoges, Pôle HU Gérontologie Clinique, 2 Avenue Martin-Luther King, Limoges, F-87042, France
| | - Sandrine Luce
- Centre d'Épidémiologie, de Bio Statistique Et de Méthodologie de La Recherche (CEBIMER), CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin-Luther King, Limoges, F-87042, France
| | - Isabelle Tovena
- Laboratoire VieSanté - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, E-Santé), Institut OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | | | - Marie-Laure Laroche
- Laboratoire VieSanté - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, E-Santé), Institut OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Pierre-Marie Preux
- Centre d'Épidémiologie, de Bio Statistique Et de Méthodologie de La Recherche (CEBIMER), CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin-Luther King, Limoges, F-87042, France
| | - Achille Tchalla
- Laboratoire VieSanté - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, E-Santé), Institut OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
- CHU de Limoges, Pôle HU Gérontologie Clinique, 2 Avenue Martin-Luther King, Limoges, F-87042, France.
- Unité de Recherche Clinique Et d'Innovation (URCI) en Gérontologie, CHU de Limoges, Pôle HU Gérontologie Clinique, Limoges, France.
- Geriatric Medicine, University of Limoges, CHU Limoges, Laboratoire VieSanté - UR 24134, Limoges, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Facility and resident characteristics associated with variation in nursing home transfers: evidence from the OPTIMISTIC demonstration project. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:492. [PMID: 34030672 PMCID: PMC8142645 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06419-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) funded demonstration project to evaluate financial incentives for nursing facilities providing care for 6 clinical conditions to reduce potentially avoidable hospitalizations (PAHs). The Optimizing Patient Transfers, Impacting Medical Quality, and Improving Symptoms: Transforming Institutional Care (OPTIMISTIC) site tested payment incentives alone and in combination with the successful nurse-led OPTIMISTIC clinical model. Our objective was to identify facility and resident characteristics associated with transfers, including financial incentives with or without the clinical model. METHODS This was a longitudinal analysis from April 2017 to June 2018 of transfers among nursing home residents in 40 nursing facilities, 17 had the full clinical + payment model (1726 residents) and 23 had payment only model (2142 residents). Using CMS claims data, the Minimum Data Set, and Nursing Home Compare, multilevel logit models estimated the likelihood of all-cause transfers and PAHs (based on CMS claims data and ICD-codes) associated with facility and resident characteristics. RESULTS The clinical + payment model was associated with 4.1 percentage points (pps) lower risk of all-cause transfers (95% confidence interval [CI] - 6.2 to - 2.1). Characteristics associated with lower PAH risk included residents aged 95+ years (- 2.4 pps; 95% CI - 3.8 to - 1.1), Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligibility (- 2.5 pps; 95% CI - 3.3 to - 1.7), advanced and moderate cognitive impairment (- 3.3 pps; 95% CI - 4.4 to - 2.1; - 1.2 pps; 95% CI - 2.2 to - 0.2). Changes in Health, End-stage disease and Symptoms and Signs (CHESS) score above most stable (CHESS score 4) increased the risk of PAH by 7.3 pps (95% CI 1.5 to 13.1). CONCLUSIONS Multiple resident and facility characteristics are associated with transfers. Facilities with the clinical + payment model demonstrated lower risk of all-cause transfers compared to those with payment only, but not for PAHs.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
There is a growing recognition of significant, unmet palliative care needs in nursing facilities, yet limitations in the workforce limit access to palliative care services. Attention to palliation is particularly important when there are efforts to reduce hospitalizations to help ensure there are no unintended harms associated with treating residents in place. A specialized palliative care registered nurse (PCRN) role was developed as part of the OPTIMISTIC (Optimizing Patient Transfers, Impacting Medical quality, and Improving Symptoms: Transforming Institutional Care) program, a federally funded project to reduce potentially avoidable hospitalizations. Working in collaboration with existing clinical staff and medical providers, the PCRN focuses on managing symptoms, advance care planning, achieving goal concordant care, and promoting quality of life. The PCRN serves as a resource for families through education and support. The PCRN also provides education and mentorship to staff to increase their comfort, knowledge, and skills with end-of-life care. The goals of this article are to provide an overview of the PCRN role and its implementation in nursing facilities and describe core functions that are transferrable to other contexts.
Collapse
|
5
|
Vadnais AJ, Vreeland E, Coomer NM, Feng Z, Ingber MJ. Reducing Transfers among Long-Stay Nursing Facility Residents to Acute Care Settings: Effect of the 2013‒2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Initiative. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21:1341-1345. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
6
|
Anderson TS, Marcantonio ER, McCarthy EP, Herzig SJ. National Trends in Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations of Older Adults with Dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68:2240-2248. [PMID: 32700399 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Dementia is associated with higher healthcare expenditures, in large part due to increased hospitalization rates relative to patients without dementia. Data on contemporary trends in the incidence and outcomes of potentially preventable hospitalizations of patients with dementia are lacking. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2016. SETTING U.S. acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1,843,632 unique hospitalizations of older adults (aged ≥65 years) with diagnosed dementia. MEASUREMENTS Annual trends in the incidence of hospitalizations for all causes and for potentially preventable conditions including acute ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs), chronic ACSCs, and injuries. In-hospital outcomes including mortality, discharge disposition, and hospital costs. RESULTS The survey weighted sample represented an estimated 9.27 million hospitalizations for patients with diagnosed dementia (mean [standard deviation] age = 82.6 [6.7] years; 61.4% female). In total, 3.72 million hospitalizations were for potentially preventable conditions (40.1%), 2.07 million for acute ACSCs, .76 million for chronic ACSCs, and .89 million for injuries. Between 2012 and 2016, the incidence of all-cause hospitalizations declined from 1.87 million to 1.85 million per year (P = .04) while the incidence of potentially preventable hospitalizations increased from .75 million to .87 million per year (P < .001), driven by an increased number of hospitalizations of community-dwelling older adults. Among patients with dementia hospitalized for potentially preventable conditions, inpatient mortality declined from 6.4% to 6.1% (P < .001), inflation-adjusted median costs increased from $7,319 to $7,543 (P < .001), and total annual costs increased from $7.4 to $9.3 billion. Although 86.0% of hospitalized patients were admitted from the community, only 32.7% were discharged to the community. CONCLUSION The number of potentially preventable hospitalizations of older adults with dementia is increasing, driven by hospitalizations of community-dwelling older adults. Improved strategies for early detection and goal-directed treatment of potentially preventable conditions in patients with dementia are urgently needed. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:2240-2248, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy S Anderson
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward R Marcantonio
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ellen P McCarthy
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shoshana J Herzig
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leduc S, Cantor Z, Kelly P, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Wells G, Vaillancourt C. The Safety and Effectiveness of On-Site Paramedic and Allied Health Treatment Interventions Targeting the Reduction of Emergency Department Visits by Long-Term Care Patients: Systematic Review. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2020; 25:556-565. [PMID: 32644902 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1794084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Programs that seek to avoid emergency department (ED) visits from patients residing in long-term care facilities are increasing. We sought to identify existing programs where allied healthcare personnel are the primary providers of the intervention and, to evaluate their effectiveness and safety. METHODS We systematically searched Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE with terms relating to long-term care, emergency services, hospitalization and allied health personnel. We reviewed 11,176 abstracts and included 22 studies in our narrative synthesis, which we grouped by intervention category. RESULTS We found five categories of interventions including: 1) use of advanced practice nursing; 2) a program called Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT); 3) end-of-life care; 4) condition specific interventions; and 5) use of extended care paramedics. Among studies measuring that outcome, 13/13 reported a decrease in ED visits, and 16/17 reported a decrease hospitalization in the intervention groups. Patient adverse events such as functional status and relapse were seldom reported (6/22) as were measures of emergency system function such as crowding/inability of paramedics to transfer care to the ED (1/22). Only 4/22 studies evaluated patient mortality and 3/4 found a non-statistically significant worsening. CONCLUSION We found five types of programs/interventions which all demonstrated a decrease in ED visits or hospitalization. However, most studies were observational and few assessed patient safety. Many identified programs focused on increased primary care for patients, and interventions addressing acute care issues, such as community paramedics, deserve more study.
Collapse
|
8
|
Blackburn J, Stump TE, Carnahan JL, Hickman SE, Tu W, Fowler NR, Unroe KT. Reducing the Risk of Hospitalization for Nursing Home Residents: Effects and Facility Variation From OPTIMISTIC. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21:545-549.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
9
|
McCarthy EP, Ogarek JA, Loomer L, Gozalo PL, Mor V, Hamel MB, Mitchell SL. Hospital Transfer Rates Among US Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Illness Before and After Initiatives to Reduce Hospitalizations. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180:385-394. [PMID: 31886827 PMCID: PMC6990757 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Hospital transfers among nursing home residents in the United States who have been diagnosed with advanced illnesses and have limited life expectancy are often burdensome, costly, and of little clinical benefit. National initiatives, introduced since 2012, have focused on reducing such hospitalizations, but little is known about the consequences of these initiatives in this population. OBJECTIVE To investigate the change in hospital transfer rates among nursing home residents with advanced illnesses, such as dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), from 2011 to 2017-before and after the introduction of national initiatives to reduce hospitalizations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cross-sectional study, nationwide Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016 (with the follow-up for transfer rates until December 31, 2017), were used to identify annual inception cohorts of long-stay (>100 days) nursing home residents who had recently progressed to the advanced stages of dementia, CHF, or COPD. The data were analyzed from October 24, 2018, to October 3, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The number of hospital transfers (hospitalizations, observation stays, and emergency department visits) per person-year alive was calculated from the MDS assessment from the date when residents first met the criteria for advanced illness up to 12 months afterward using Medicare claims from 2011 to 2017. Transfer rates for all causes, potentially avoidable conditions (sepsis, pneumonia, dehydration, urinary tract infections, CHF, and COPD), and serious bone fractures (pelvis, hip, wrist, ankle, and long bones of arms or legs) were investigated. Hospice enrollment and mortality were also ascertained. RESULTS The proportions of residents in the 2011 and 2016 cohorts who underwent any hospital transfer were 56.1% and 45.4% of those with advanced dementia, 77.6% and 69.5% of those with CHF, and 76.2% and 67.2% of those with COPD. The mean (SD) number of transfers per person-year alive for potentially avoidable conditions was higher in the 2011 cohort vs 2016 cohort: advanced dementia, 2.4 (14.0) vs 1.6 (11.2) (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65-0.81); CHF, 8.5 (32.0) vs 6.7 (26.8) (aRR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.81); and COPD, 7.8 (30.9) vs 5.5 (24.8) (aRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.57-0.72). Transfers for bone fractures remained unchanged, and mortality did not increase. Hospice enrollment was low across all illness groups and years (range, 23%-30%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that concurrent with new initiatives aimed at reducing hospitalizations, hospital transfers declined between 2011 and 2017 among nursing home residents with advanced illnesses without increased mortality rates. Opportunities remain to further reduce unnecessary hospital transfers in this population and improve goal-directed care for those residents who opt to forgo hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen P McCarthy
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jessica A Ogarek
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Lacey Loomer
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Pedro L Gozalo
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.,Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports for Vulnerable Veterans, US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Vincent Mor
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.,Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports for Vulnerable Veterans, US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mary Beth Hamel
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|