1
|
Goidel K, Callaghan T, Washburn DJ, Nuzhath T, Scobee J, Spiegelman A, Motta M. Physician Trust in the News Media and Attitudes toward COVID-19. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS, POLICY AND LAW 2023; 48:317-350. [PMID: 36441631 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10358696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Previous research has established the importance of primary care physicians in communicating public health directives. The implicit assumption is that, because of their expertise, doctors provide accurate and up-to-date information to their patients independent of partisan affiliation or media trust. METHODS The authors conducted an online survey of 625 primary care physicians and used the results to test (1) whether physician trust in media outlets is consistent with their political partisanship, and (2) whether trust in media outlets influences (a) personal concern that someone in their family will get sick, (b) perceptions about the seriousness of the pandemic as portrayed in the media, and (c) trust in federal government agencies and scientists. FINDINGS Physicians are better positioned to critically evaluate health-related news, but they are subject to the same biases that influence public opinion. Physicians' partisan commitments influence media trust, and media trust influences concern that a family member will get sick, perceptions regarding the seriousness of the pandemic, and trust in federal government agencies and scientists. CONCLUSIONS Physician trust in specific media outlets shapes their understanding of the pandemic, and-to the extent that they trust conservative media outlets-it may limit their effectiveness as health policy messengers.
Collapse
|
3
|
Warsame R, Riordan L, Jenkins S, Lackore K, Pacyna J, Antiel R, Beebe T, Liebow M, Thorsteinsdottir B, Grover M, Wynia M, Goold SD, DeCamp M, Danis M, Tilburt J. Responsibilities, Strategies, and Practice Factors in Clinical Cost Conversations: a US Physician Survey. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:1971-1978. [PMID: 32399911 PMCID: PMC7351917 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05807-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physicians play a key role in mitigating and managing costs in healthcare which are rising. OBJECTIVE Conduct a cross-sectional survey in 2017, comparing results to a 2012 survey to understand US physicians' evolving attitudes and strategies concerning healthcare costs. PARTICIPANTS Random sample of 1200 US physicians from the AMA Masterfile. MEASURES Physician views on responsibility for costs of care, enthusiasm for cost-saving strategies, cost-consciousness scale, and practice strategies on addressing cost. KEY RESULTS Among 1200 physicians surveyed in 2017, 489 responded (41%). In 2017, slightly more physicians reported that physicians have a major responsibility for addressing healthcare costs (32% vs. 27%, p = 0.03). In 2017, more physicians attributed "major responsibility" for addressing healthcare costs to pharmaceutical companies (68% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and hospital and health systems (63% vs. 56%%, p = 0.008) in contrast to 2012. Fewer respondents in 2017 attributed major responsibility for addressing costs to trial lawyers (53% vs. 59%, p = 0.007) and patients (42% vs. 52%, p < 0.0001) as compared to 2012. Physician enthusiasm for patient-focused cost-containment strategies like high deductible health plans and higher co-pays (62% vs. 42%, p < 0.0001 and 62% vs. 39%, p < 0.0001, not enthusiastic, respectively) declined. Physicians reported that when they discussed cost, it resulted in a change in disease management 56% of the time. Cost-consciousness within surveyed physicians had not changed meaningfully in 2017 since 2012 (31.7 vs. 31.2). Most physicians continued to agree that decision support tools showing costs would be helpful in their practice (> 70%). After adjusting for specialty, political affiliation, practice setting, age, and gender, only democratic/independent affiliation remained a significant predictor of cost-consciousness. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE US physicians increasingly attribute responsibility for rising healthcare costs to organizations and express less enthusiasm for strategies that increase patient out-of-pocket cost. Interventions that focus on physician knowledge and communication strategies regarding cost of care may be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahma Warsame
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. .,Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | | | - Sarah Jenkins
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kandace Lackore
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joel Pacyna
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ryan Antiel
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, St. Louis Children's Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Timothy Beebe
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mark Liebow
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael Grover
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Matthew Wynia
- Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Susan Dorr Goold
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew DeCamp
- Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Marion Danis
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jon Tilburt
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|