PET-FDG imaging and transthoracic needle lung aspiration biopsy in evaluation of pulmonary lesions. A comparative risk-benefit analysis

Utility of 18F-FDG-PET for detecting acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case series of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia without hematological symptoms

Acute leukemia is typically diagnosed from presenting features related to hematological symptoms, but certain patients present with prominent musculoskeletal pain without signs of hematological abnormality. We reviewed the medical records of 58 children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at our hospital to evaluate initial features. Forty six of these patients had hematological symptoms, anemia, or hemorrhage (Group H), while 12 patients had prominent musculoskeletal pain without hematological symptoms (Group P). Diagnosis of leukemia took significantly more time for those 12 patients (Group H, 17.1 days; Group P, 48.5 days). In three of the 12 patients in Group P, localized abnormal imaging findings and unremarkable blood test results led to initial diagnoses of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis, bone fracture, and septic osteomyelitis. However, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) revealed multiple intense bone foci or systemic bone marrow uptake, leading to the diagnosis of ALL. A review of 18F-FDG-PET results from 23 patients with ALL who underwent a PET scan (Group H, n = 15; Group P, n = 8) showed multiple bone foci or systemic bone marrow uptake in all cases. In conclusion, lack of hematological symptoms in ALL patients can delay diagnosis, and 18F-FDG-PET is useful for diagnosing leukemia in such cases.

Comparison of FDG-PET/CT for Cancer Detection in Populations With Different Risks of Underlying Malignancy

Background/Aim: Whole-body positron-emission tomography/computed tomography with the glucose analog 2-[ 18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET/CT) has been used to screen examinees for underlying malignancy in many countries. The aim of this study was to compare the potential value of FDG-PET/CT application in asymptomatic individuals with those with suspected malignancy. Patients and Methods: A total of 9,408 examinees underwent whole-body FDG-PET/CT at our hospital from July 2006 to August 2013. Three thousand and seven hundred asymptomatic individuals and 848 individuals with laboratory and clinical/radiologicaI suspicion of malignancy who had undergone FDG-PET/CT for cancer screening were recruited. The final confirmation of cancer and outcomes were based on a pathological report and continuous follow-up. Results: Forty-five out of 3,700 asymptomatic individuals (1.2%) had proven malignancy, and 42 of them (93.3%) were found by FDG-PET/CT. Two hundred and twelve out of 848 with suspected malignancy (25%) had proven malignancy, and 196 of them (92.5%) were detected by FDG-PET/CT. Most of these cancers in asymptomatic individuals were clinically at an early stage. The discovery rate in asymptomatic individuals and those with suspected malignancy was 1.1% and 23.1%, respectively. The overall survival of patients with cancer diagnosed with PET/CT was higher than those with suspected malignancy (78.6% vs. 48.5%, p<0.001). Patients with a resectable lesion, early-stage disease, and lower maximal standardized uptake value had significantly better survival than those without. Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT is useful in the early diagnosis of cancer and thus might improve the survival rates of these patients. Considering the costs and risk of radiation exposure, it would be better used as a priority in patients with laboratory and clinical/radiologic suspicion of malignancy.

Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET-CT in the initial evaluation of lung cancer

PURPOSE

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a resource-demanding imaging modality with increasing popularity in the workup of patients with suspected or proven lung cancer.

METHODS

To review the clinical usefulness of this imaging modality in the diagnosis, staging, and pre-operative evaluation, we conducted a systematic literature search, review, and quality assessment using the rapid evidence assessment toolkit and the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine methodology. The literature search resulted in 4,208 records including 918 reviews, of which 139 met the predefined criteria and were read in full to identify relevant original articles on F-18 FDG PET-CT (1) in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules (n = 14), (2) in curative-intent treatment trials (n = 9), and (3) in planning of invasive procedures (n = 18).

RESULTS

We found the following important results from the literature review: 1) PET-CT can rule out malignancy in most solitary pulmonary nodules due to high sensitivity (recommendation level A). 2) PET-CT reduces the number of futile treatment trials (recommendation level A). 3) The sensitivity of PET-CT in general is insufficient to rule out mediastinal lymph node metastasis (recommendation level A).

CONCLUSIONS

ᅟ 1) With few exceptions, solitary pulmonary nodules can safely be considered benign if the PET-CT scan is negative. Exceptions consist of small (<1 cm) and non-solid, solitary pulmonary nodules. These abnormalities should be followed up by CT in a structured programme. 2) No curative-intent treatment should be commenced until a PET-CT scan has excluded occult distant metastases. 3) In general, lymph node metastasis in the mediastinum cannot be ruled out on the basis of a negative PET-CT, and confirmative invasive staging should be performed in most patients before mediastinal metastasis is confirmed or ruled out.

Imaging of Tumor Metabolism Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Molecular imaging employing PET/CT enables in vivo visualization, characterization, and measurement of biologic processes in tumors at a molecular and cellular level. Using specific metabolic tracers, information about the integrated function of multiple transporters and enzymes involved in tumor metabolic pathways can be depicted, and the tracers can be directly applied as biomarkers of tumor biology. In this review, we discuss the role of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) as an in vivo glycolytic marker which reflects alterations of glucose metabolism in cancer cells. This functional molecular imaging technique offers a complementary approach to anatomic imaging such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and has found widespread application as a diagnostic modality in oncology to monitor tumor biology, optimize the therapeutic management, and guide patient care. Moreover, emerging methods for PET imaging of further biologic processes relevant to cancer are reviewed, with a focus on tumor hypoxia and aberrant tumor perfusion. Hypoxic tumors are associated with poor disease control and increased resistance to cytotoxic and radiation treatment. In vivo imaging of hypoxia, perfusion, and mismatch of metabolism and perfusion has the potential to identify specific features of tumor microenvironment associated with poor treatment outcome and, thus, contribute to personalized treatment approaches.

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric lymph-node acute lymphoblastic leukemia involvement

In pediatric oncology, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is emerging as an essential diagnostic tool in characterizing suspicious neoplastic lesions and staging malignant diseases. Most studies regarding the possible role of FDG-PET/CT in the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients are limited to adults. Here we report a pediatric patient with recurrent ALL, in which FDG-PET/CT was used both to define more precisely the cause of lymphadenopathy and to assess the effect of the second-line therapy.

The role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules

Even with the recent advance in diagnostic tools and techniques, solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) remains a major clinical challenge for all doctors involved in their study. There are a wide range of diagnoses of benign and malignant lesions that can manifest as SPNs. Positron emission tomography (PET) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) makes a great contribution to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SPNs due to the high sensitivity of pathological accumulation of (18)F-FDG. Owing to integrates the anatomical morphological and metabolic aspects in a single examination, high sensitivity and the ability to perform whole-body scans, combined PET/CT improving overall diagnosis accuracy.

Granulomatous inflammation and organizing pneumonia: Role of computed tomography-guided lung fine needle aspirations, touch preparations and core biopsies in the evaluation of common non-neoplastic diagnoses

Background:

Fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) and core biopsies (CBs), with or without touch preparations (TPs), are performed to characterize pulmonary lesions. Although a positive (P) or suspicious report is sufficient for further management, the significance of unsatisfactory (U), negative (N) and atypical (A) cytological diagnoses remains uncertain. The aims of the study were to correlate U, N and A cytological diagnoses with histological and/or clinical/radiological follow-up and evaluate the utility of FNAs, TPs and CBs.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a retrospective search and examined 30 consecutive computed tomography-guided transthoracic U, N and A lung FNAs (n = 23) and TPs (n = 7) with surgical pathology (SP) (n = 17) and/or clinical/radiological follow-up (n = 13) and compared them to 10 SP-confirmed P FNAs, which served as controls.

Results:

The 30 FNAs and TPs were from 29 patients. All 6 U specimens were scantly cellular. Granulomas, the most common specific benign cytological diagnosis, were evident in 8 (of 13) and 7 (of 11) N and A cytology cases, respectively. Histology corroborated the presence of granulomas identified on cytology. Organizing pneumonia was the second leading benign specific diagnosis (5/17), but it was rendered on histology (n = 5) and not FNAs or TPs. Evaluation of the A cases revealed that type II pneumocytes were the source of “atypical”, diagnoses often associated with granulomas or organizing pneumonia and lacked 3-D clusters evident in all P cases.

Discussion:

U, N and A FNAs and TPs lacked 3-D clusters seen in carcinomas and were negative on follow-up. Granulomas and organizing pneumonia were the most common specific benign diagnoses, but the latter was recognized on histology only. In the absence of a definitive FNA result at the time of on-site assessment, a CB with a TP containing type II pneumocytes increases the likelihood of a specific benign diagnosis.

Dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for differentiation between 18F-FDG-avid non-small cell lung cancer and benign lesions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to clarify the difference of F-18 FDG uptake kinetics between FDG-avid non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lesions associated with various etiologies on dual-time point PET/CT scan, and to determine the optimal parameter for differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The materials were 76 FDG-avid solitary NSCLC in 76 patients and 57 FDG-avid solitary benign lesions associated with various etiologies in 61 patients. FDG PET/CT scan was performed at 60 and 120 min after intravenous injection of 4.4 MBq/kg F-18 FDG. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on early and delayed scans and the percent change of SUVmax (%DeltaSUVmax) between the two time points were measured. The optimal differential parameter was determined by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD of early SUV max, delayed SUVmax and %DeltaSUVmax were 8.3 +/- 5.2, and 10.2 +/- 6.5, and 21.9% +/- 18.9 in FDG-avid NSCLC, and 3.8 +/- 3.2, 4.0 +/- 3.7, and 11.3% +/- 26.0 in FDG-avid benign lesions, respectively. Delayed SUVmax in NSCLC was significantly higher than early SUVmax (P < 0.0001); while not different in benign lesions. Percent change of SUVmax in NSCLC was also significantly higher than that in benign lesions (P < 0.01). The optimal parameter for the differentiation was delayed SUVmax > 5.5 and yielded sensitivity of 77.6%, specificity of 80.7% and accuracy of 78.9%, which provided better differentiation than the use of %DeltaSUVmax or the traditional parameter of early SUVmax > 2.5. However, 11 (19.2%) benign lesions were indistinguishable from NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Although delayed PET/CT scan enhances the difference of FDG uptake between FDG-avid NSCLC and benign lesions, and the use of delayed SUVmax > 5.5 appears to improve the differentiation of these hypermetabolic lesions compared with an early scan, careful interpretation and management for correct differentiation are still required.

Does the availability of positron emission tomography modify diagnostic strategies for solitary pulmonary nodules? An observational study in France

Background

Previous studies showed that at the individual level, positron emission tomography (PET) has some benefits for patients and physicians in terms of cancer management and staging. We aimed to describe the benefits of (PET) in the management of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) in a population level, in terms of the number of diagnostic and invasive tests performed, time to diagnosis and factors determining PET utilization.

Methods

In an observational study, we examined reports of computed tomography (CT) performed and mentioning "spherical lesion", "nodule" or synonymous terms. We found 11,515 reports in a before-PET period, 2002–2003, and 20,075 in an after-PET period, 2004–2005. Patients were followed through their physician, who was responsible for diagnostic management.

Results

We had complete data for 112 patients (73.7%) with new cases of SPN in the before-PET period and 250 (81.4%) in the after-PET period. Patients did not differ in mean age (64.9 vs. 64.8 years). The before-PET patients underwent a mean of 4 tests as compared with 3 tests for the after-PET patients (p = 0.08). Patients in the before-PET period had to wait 41.4 days, on average, before receiving a diagnosis as compared with 24.0 days, on average, for patients in the after-PET period who did not undergo PET (p < 0.001). In the after-PET period, 11% of patients underwent PET during the diagnostic process. A spiculated nodule was more likely to determine prescription for PET (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients in both periods underwent fewer tests when PET was prescribed by general practitioners (p < 0.001) and if the nodule was not spiculated (p < 0.001). The proportion of unnecessary invasive approaches prescribed (47% vs. 49%) did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion

In our study, 1 year after the availability of PET, the technology was not the first choice for diagnostic management of SPN. Even though we observed a tendency for reduced number of tests and mean time to diagnosis with PET, these phenomena did not fully relate to PET availability in health communities. In addition, the availability of PET in the management of SPN diagnosis did not reduce the overall rate of unnecessary invasive approaches.

Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests

The purpose was to assess the clinical utility of diagnostic tests for identifying malignancy within a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), and to create a nomogram or "look-up" table using clinical data and non-invasive radiology (positive) test results to estimate post-test probability of malignancy. Studies that examined computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the evaluation of SPN. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed study quality. Study-specific and overall positive likelihood ratios (LRs) for each diagnostic test confirming a diagnosis of malignancy and negative LR for each diagnostic test excluding a diagnosis of malignancy within an SPN were calculated. Forty-four of 242 articles were included. Positive LRs for diagnostic tests were: CT 3.91 (95% confidence interval 2.42, 5.40), MRI 4.57 (3.03, 6.1), PET 5.44 (3.56, 7.32) and SPECT 5.16 (4.03, 6.30). Negative LRs were: CT 0.10 (0.03, 0.16), MRI 0.08 (0.03, 0.12), PET 0.06 (0.02, 0.09) and SPECT 0.06 (0.04, 0.08). Differences in performance for all tests were negligible; therefore, the clinician may confidently use any of the four tests presented in further evaluating an SPN. Given the low cost and prevalence of the technology, SPECT appears to be the leading choice for additional testing in SPN evaluation.

[Imaging and PET/CT of lung cancer]

Lung cancer is one of the most frequently occurring cancer in the world. Imaging plays a critical role for screening, diagnosing, staging, and following patients. Although morphologic imaging such as chest X-ray and CT are still useful for these purpose, major limitations occur in the proper evaluation of diagnosing and staging. Metabolic imaging using PET significantly increases the accuracy of staging. This paper will review the role of imaging in patients suspected or diagnosed with lung cancer.

Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and technetium 99m ((99m)Tc) depreotide single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data sources were studies published in PubMed between January 1990 and December 2005. The selected investigations were comparative and noncomparative diagnostic cohort studies to examine the operating characteristics of the four imaging modalities for evaluation of SPNs, involving at least 10 enrolled participants with histologic confirmation and having sufficient data to calculate contingency tables. A random coefficient binary regression model with disease probability conditioned on test results was used to summarize test performance and construct summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivities, specificities, predictive values, diagnostic odds ratios, and areas under the ROC curve were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies--10 dynamic CT, six dynamic MR, 22 FDG PET, and seven (99m)Tc-depreotide SPECT--met the inclusion criteria. (One study was included in both the FDG PET and SPECT groups.) Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, diagnostic odds ratios, and areas under the ROC curve were, respectively, 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88, 0.97), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.97), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.86), 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.98), 39.91 (95% CI: 1.21, 81.04), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.97) for dynamic CT; 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.86), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.89), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.96), 60.59 (95% CI: 5.56, 115.62), and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.98) for dynamic MR; 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.98), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.88), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.94), 97.31 (95% CI: 6.26, 188.37), and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.98) for FDG PET; and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.85), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.97), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.98), 84.50 (95% CI: 34.28, 134.73), and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.98) for (99m)Tc-depreotide SPECT.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic CT and MR, FDG PET, and (99m)Tc-depreotide SPECT are noninvasive and accurate in distinguishing malignant from benign SPNs; differences among these tests are nonsignificant.

Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary nodules are spherical radiographic opacities that measure up to 30 mm in diameter. Nodules are extremely common in clinical practice and challenging to manage, especially small, "subcentimeter" nodules. Identification of malignant nodules is important because they represent a potentially curable form of lung cancer.

METHODS

We developed evidence-based clinical practice guidelines based on a systematic literature review and discussion with a large, multidisciplinary group of clinical experts and other stakeholders.

RESULTS

We generated a list of 29 recommendations for managing the solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) that measures at least 8 to 10 mm in diameter; small, subcentimeter nodules that measure < 8 mm to 10 mm in diameter; and multiple nodules when they are detected incidentally during evaluation of the SPN. Recommendations stress the value of risk factor assessment, the utility of imaging tests (especially old films), the need to weigh the risks and benefits of various management strategies (biopsy, surgery, and observation with serial imaging tests), and the importance of eliciting patient preferences.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pulmonary nodules should be evaluated by estimation of the probability of malignancy, performance of imaging tests to characterize the lesion(s) better, evaluation of the risks associated with various management alternatives, and elicitation of patient preferences for treatment.

Evidence for the Treatment of Patients With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?

BACKGROUND

The solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is a frequent incidental finding that may represent primary lung cancer or other malignant or benign lesions. The optimal management of the SPN remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review to address the following questions: (1) the prevalence of SPN; (2) the prevalence of malignancy in nodules with varying characteristics (size, morphology, and type of opacity); (3) the relationships between growth rates, histology, and other nodule characteristics; and (4) the performance characteristics and complication rates of tests for SPN diagnosis. We searched MEDLINE and other databases and used previous systematic reviews and recent primary studies.

RESULTS

Eight large trials of lung cancer screening showed that both the prevalence of at least one nodule (8 to 51%) and the prevalence of malignancy in patients with nodules (1.1 to 12%) varied considerably across studies. The prevalence of malignancy varied by size (0 to 1% for nodules < 5 mm, 6 to 28% for nodules 5 to 10 mm, and 64 to 82% for nodules > 20 mm). Data from six studies of patients with incidental or screening-detected nodules showed that the risk for malignancy was approximately 20 to 30% in nodules with smooth edges; in nodules with irregular, lobulated, or spiculated borders, the rate of malignancy was higher but varied across studies from 33 to 100%. Nodules that were pure ground-glass opacities were more likely to be malignant (59 to 73%) than solid nodules (7 to 9%). The sensitivity of positron emission tomography imaging for identifying a malignant SPN was consistently high (80 to 100%), whereas specificity was lower and more variable across studies (40 to 100%). Dynamic CT with nodule enhancement yielded the most promising sensitivity (sensitivity, 98 to 100%; specificity, 54 to 93%) among imaging tests. In studies of CT-guided needle biopsy, nondiagnostic results were seen approximately 20% of the time, but sensitivity and specificity were excellent when biopsy yielded a specific benign or malignant result.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of an SPN and the prevalence of malignancy in patients with an SPN vary widely across studies. The interpretation of these variable prevalence rates should take into consideration not only the nodule characteristics but also the population at risk. Modern imaging tests and CT-guided needle biopsy are highly sensitive for identifying a malignant SPN, but the specificity of imaging tests is variable and often poor.

Improvement in sensitivity with delayed imaging of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to determine the value of using dual-time point 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging to distinguish malignant from benign pulmonary lesions after lesion detection by conventional computed tomography chest imaging.

METHODS

Patients referred for characterization of lung lesions were included in this prospective study. Eighty-three patients had histopathologic confirmation of disease. Patients underwent FDG-PET coincidence imaging, performed with a dual-headed gamma camera at 1 h ("early" scan) and 3 h ("late" scan) after injection of 185 MBq of FDG. Studies were read independently by 2 physicians who had knowledge of the lesion location but not the final diagnosis. For both early and late images, readers graded FDG lesion uptake intensity on a scale of 1 (definitively benign) to 5 (definitively malignant) and classified studies dichotomously for malignancy. Tumor-to-background (T:B) ratios were computed using contralateral lung sites as controls.

RESULTS

Sixty one lesions (74 %) were non-small cell lung cancer, and 10 (12 %) were other primary tumors or metastases. Twelve lesions (14 %) were benign. T:B ratios were significantly higher for early versus late scans (+ 5.1 +/- 4.9 versus + 8.2 +/- 8.7, p = 0.01, n = 71) for malignancies but not for benign lesions (+ 3.1 +/- 3.4 versus + 2.6 +/- 2.2, n = 12). The percent change of T:B ratios was higher for malignant than benign lesions (+ 48.3 +/- 40.2 % versus + 7.2 +/- 22.8 %, p = 0.0009). No malignant lesion of any type demonstrated a time-decrease in FDG T:B ratios. The accuracy and sensitivity of lesion characterization were significantly higher for late scans than early scans for dichotomous visual readings. Quantitative analysis was found to provide significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than visual analysis for lesion characterization, with no significant difference in test specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

In malignant pulmonary nodules, there is a progressive, although variable, increase in FDG uptake over time. Increasing FDG uptake is a nonspecific finding, as some benign lesions also demonstrate increasing uptake, particularly those associated with granulomas. The use of late PET images increases the accuracy and sensitivity of visual detection of malignancy.

Evaluation of amplitude-based sorting algorithm to reduce lung tumor blurring in PET images using 4D NCAT phantom

PURPOSE

develop and validate a PET sorting algorithm based on the respiratory amplitude to correct for abnormal respiratory cycles.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

using the 4D NCAT phantom model, 3D PET images were simulated in lung and other structures at different times within a respiratory cycle and noise was added. To validate the amplitude binning algorithm, NCAT phantom was used to simulate one case of five different respiratory periods and another case of five respiratory periods alone with five respiratory amplitudes. Comparison was performed for gated and un-gated images and for the new amplitude binning algorithm with the time binning algorithm by calculating the mean number of counts in the ROI (region of interest).

RESULTS

an average of 8.87+/-5.10% improvement was reported for total 16 tumors with different tumor sizes and different T/B (tumor to background) ratios using the new sorting algorithm. As both the T/B ratio and tumor size decreases, image degradation due to respiration increases. The greater benefit for smaller diameter tumor and lower T/B ratio indicates a potential improvement in detecting more problematic tumors.

Positron emission tomography in oncology: a review

Positron emission tomography is an evolving imaging tool that is becoming increasingly available for use in clinical practice. This overview will look at the current evidence for the use of positron emission tomography in imaging different tumour types and the different radiotracers that are either available or being evaluated in an investigational setting.

[PET in primary pulmonary or pleural cancer]

In our hospital as in many others, primary lung cancer is the most frequent indication for FDG PET. Studies have assessed the clinical utility of this imaging modality in characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules or masses, initial staging, defining tumor volume in radiotherapy and searching for recurrence of or restaging non-small cell carcinoma; studies are currently underway to evaluate its use in early assessment of chemotherapy response. Small cell lung cancer has a high FDG uptake and PET/CT can be useful for rapid staging. False negative results may be due to pure bronchioloalveolar carcinomas and endocrine tumors. FDG-PET will certainly play a more important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of pleural cancers in the future. An unexpected positive FDG PET focus should be considered as a warning, but histological proof should precede any irrevocable decisions.

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: a review

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) is classified as a subset of lung adenocarcinoma but has a distinct clinical presentation, tumor biology, response to therapy, and prognosis compared with other subtypes of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma disproportionately affects women, never-smokers, and Asians and is characterized by growth along alveolar septae without evidence of stromal, vascular, or pleural invasion. Although pure BAC accounts for approximately 4% of lung cancers, tumors with histologically mixed BAC and adenocarcinoma account for > 20% of all NSCLCs, and the incidence of BAC might be increasing. Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma histology is most commonly found in small lesions identified incidentally on chest radiographs or computed tomography scans and might represent a precursor lesion to invasive adenocarcinoma. As with other subsets of NSCLC, surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment. Patients with unresectable BAC are more likely to respond to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib than patients with other subtypes of NSCLC. Stage for stage, patients with BAC have a higher rate of long-term survival but might have an increased rate of intrathoracic recurrence than patients with other subtypes of NSCLC.

Combining Bronchoscopy and Positron Emission Tomography for the Diagnosis of the Small Pulmonary Nodule ≤ 3 cm

AIM

To assess the role of bronchoscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in an integrated approach for the diagnosis of noncalcified, small, chest radiologic lesions (< or = 3 cm).

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutive patients (29 men; mean age, 64 years) with a pulmonary nodule < or = 3 cm undergoing both combined PET and bronchoscopy were included. When bronchoscopy and PET findings were negative, a multidisciplinary decision was taken to perform further invasive diagnostics or follow-up.

RESULTS

Malignancy was diagnosed in 51 patients (69%), and a positive benign diagnosis was made in 9 patients (12%). Six patients (8%) had endobronchial lesions. Bronchoscopy was diagnostic in 53% patients (cancer, n = 35; benign, n = 4). PET findings were positive in 19 of 35 patients with a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. In these 19 patients, malignant diagnosis was made in 14 patients (CT-fine needle aspiration [FNA], n = 3; thoracoscopic biopsy, n = 3; resection, n = 7; FNA of PET-positive supraclaviclar lymph node, n = 1), and a benign diagnosis was made in 5 patients (CT-FNA, n = 1; thoracoscopic biopsy, n = 1; resection, n = 1; follow-up, n = 2). In 16 patients with nondiagnostic bronchoscopy and negative PET findings, 5 patients had a tissue diagnosis (cancer, n = 2 [< 1 cm]; benign, n = 3) and 11 patients were followed up. Sixty-seven patients had a lesion 11 mm to 3 cm; among these, all 12 patients who were bronchoscopy negative and PET negative had benign lesions. In 24 patients without mediastinal adenopathy (solitary pulmonary nodule), bronchoscopy was diagnostic in 12 patients (cancer, n = 11; bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia, n = 1). In the remaining 12 patients, PET findings were positive in 6 patients (cancer, n = 3; resection, n = 2; CT-FNA, n = 1) and negative in 6 patients (benign, n = 2, both on resection; follow-up, n = 4).

CONCLUSION

Combining bronchoscopy and PET scanning has an useful role in the diagnosis of noncalcified chest radiologic lesions < or = 3 cm in size. Bronchoscopy has a diagnostic yield of > 50% and also allows the diagnosis of endobronchial lesions. If bronchoscopy is nondiagnostic, a PET scan should be performed.

Use of a decision analysis model to assess the medicoeconomic implications of FDG PET imaging in diagnosing a solitary pulmonary nodule

This study assessed the use of positron emission tomography (PET) in identifying and diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). For this a decision analysis model was constructed, and three alternatives were compared: wait and watch (WW), PET and anatomical computed tomography (PET), and CT plus PET (CT+PET). Transition probabilities were estimated from published data and consultations with experts. Costs of diagnosis were derived from the French reimbursement scale, and treatment costs from a national hospital database of diagnosis-related groups. The base case was defined as a 65-year-old male smoker with a 2-cm SPN and an associated high risk of malignancy of 43%. Evaluation criteria included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and the proportion of unnecessary operations avoided in patients without malignant SPN. For the base case WW was the least effective and cheapest strategy. CT+PET was more effective and presented lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (<euro>3,022 per life-year gained). It also was superior to PET in cost-effectiveness terms and resulted in 4.3% fewer unnecessary resections of benign SPN than did PET. Risk profile analyses performed on SPN malignancy risk showed that CT + PET remains the most cost-effective strategy in the range of 5.7-87%, and that WW is more cost-effective in the range of 0.3-5.0%. CT+PET is thus cost-effective in detecting malignant SPN in patients with a risk of malignity of at least 5.7% and may avoid inappropriate resections of benign SPN. These findings support the attempts to introduce a larger number of PETs in France for SPN diagnosis.

Transthoracic Endosonography for the Intraoperative Localization of Lung Nodules

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic ultrasonography has been advocated for the localization of lung nodules during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for nonperipheral nodules.

METHODS

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung nodules was performed in 54 consecutive patients. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) diagnosed 65 lesions. Positron emission tomography (PET) identified 2 lesions not revealed by CT. All nodules were judged whether visible and/or palpable. Diameter and distance of the nodule from the anterior, lateral, and posterior chest wall were measured on CT scan and served in a discriminant analysis to predict which nodule would be neither visible nor palpable. The deflectable multifrequency (7.5 to 10 MHz) endosonography probe was used to identify the nonvisible and nonpalpable nodules.

RESULTS

Resected nodules were 69; 67 diagnosed preoperatively, and 2 intraoperatively by ultrasonography. At VATS exploration 16 of 65 (25%) of the CT diagnosed nodules were nonvisible and nonpalpable. The discriminant analysis failed to predict correctly whether nodules would be visible and/or palpable in 33% because of surrounding severe emphysema, proximity to a fissure, or to the hylum. The endosonography identified 15 out of 16 of the nonvisible and nonpalpable nodules, thus conversion to thoracotomy was necessary for one nodule. The combination of video, palpatory, and endosonographic inspections had 98% sensitivity and 100% specificity in localizing the nodules.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative transthoracic ultrasonography is useful to guide VATS resection of lung nodules. It is a bedside tool, not requiring planning and coordination with the interventional radiology suite, thus you use it if you need it. It has no related morbidity, and may also have a role in revealing lesions occult at preoperative work-up.

A case of lung cancer associated with pneumoconiosis diagnosed by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

We report a case of lung cancer arising from progressive massive fibrosis (PMF) associated with pneumoconiosis. In this case, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was able to clearly distinguish the lung cancer from PMF, suggesting a potential usefulness of FDG-PET in cancer screening in patients with pneumoconiosis. To our knowledge, this is the first description of an FDG-PET image of lung cancer arising from PMF.

Seeking a home for a PET, part 1: Defining the appropriate place for positron emission tomography imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules or masses

There is a growing experience with positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with pulmonary nodules or masses. As PET imaging becomes more widely available, it is important to thoughtfully define when application of this technology is warranted. Review of the literature to date suggests that PET imaging for diagnosis of pulmonary lesions is most useful in patients who have a low or intermediate risk of lung cancer as determined by an evaluation of symptoms, risk factors, and radiographic appearance. There is little role for PET in diagnosis in patients with a very low or a high risk of lung cancer, and there is little role in patients with lesions < 1 cm in diameter, or lesions suspected to be an infection, a bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, or a typical carcinoid tumor.

Transthoracic needle biopsy in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules: a survey of canadian physicians

OBJECTIVE

To describe Canadian physicians' opinions relative to the choice of diagnostic procedures in patients presenting with a solitary pulmonary nodule and to identify the attributes that may influence their decision.

METHODS

We conducted a mailed survey among Canadian physicians including pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, radiologists, and internists. Five hypothetical clinical scenarios designed to illustrate a wide spectrum of clinical situations (including nodules associated to very low, indeterminate, and high probabilities of malignancy in patients medically fit or unfit to undergo surgical resection) were submitted to each physician who had to choose among options of diagnostic procedures and to estimate the pretest probability of malignancy.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 47%. Overall, the physicians tended to overestimate the probability of malignancy. Twenty-eight percent of the respondents would have ordered a transthoracic needle biopsy in a medically fit patient presenting with a very low probability (< 2%) of malignancy, whereas 53% would have done so in a medically fit patient presenting with a very high probability (75%) of malignancy. In a regression analysis, the significant predictors of the use of transthoracic needle biopsy were (1) the pretest probability of cancer, (2) the patient's operability, (3) specialty (pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons being less likely to order a transthoracic needle biopsy than radiologists), and (4) the respondent's gender.

CONCLUSIONS

There are widespread variations in clinical opinions among Canadian physicians regarding the use of transthoracic needle biopsy in the investigation of solitary nodules. Hypothetical transthoracic needle biopsy was often preferred when the result was unlikely to affect patient management.

The cost of positron emission tomography in six United States Veterans Affairs hospitals and two academic medical centers

OBJECTIVE

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a high-cost imaging tool primarily used in oncology, cardiology, and neuropsychiatry. Accurate estimates of the cost of PET are needed to assess its cost effectiveness and determine the appropriate role for this modality in clinical applications. We performed a survey-based cost analysis of PET with FDG by estimating direct, indirect, and capital costs from eight PET centers. A breakdown of the operational budget of PET centers and FDG-compounding facilities is presented along with the costs per scan. Differences in costs between sites that purchase FDG and those that manufacture FDG are also examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We sent surveys to managers of eight Veterans Affairs and two non-Veterans Affairs PET scanning and FDG-compounding facilities. The survey included questions about service volume and the direct costs of equipment, personnel, space, supplies, and repairs needed for FDG compounding and PET scanning and interpretation. We estimated the indirect costs associated with FDG compounding, PET scanning, and PET interpretation.

RESULTS

Of the eight sites that responded to our survey, three sites manufacture FDG on-site, three sites purchase FDG, and two sites do both. The total mean cost per scan using manufactured FDG is 1885 US dollars, and it is 1898 US dollars using purchased FDG.

CONCLUSION

PET is expensive. The cost is similar when FDG is manufactured or purchased. Because both PET and cyclotron facilities have high fixed costs, increasing the number of scans obtained and the number of FDG doses manufactured may lead to a decrease in unit costs.

Differentiating solitary pulmonary metastases in patients with extrapulmonary neoplasmas using FDG-PET

The purpose of this preliminary study is to evaluate the characteristics of solitary pulmonary lesions in patients using extrapulmonary neoplasmas with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Thirty-two patients with extrapulmonary neoplasmas who had solitary pulmonary lesions and were suspected for pulmonary metastasis underwent an oncological survey with FDG-PET. Standard uptake value (SUV) and the ratio of lesion-to-background (L/B ratio) were used as parameters to differentiate and characterize the solitary pulmonary lesions. Using SUV > 2.5 or L/B ratio > 3 as the cutoff to diagnose malignancy, FDG-PET correctly identified 29 true-positive cases. However, FDG-PET failed to interpret two false-positive and one false-negative cases. The accuracy of FDG-PET was 91%. We concluded that FDG-PET is an accurate modality to differentiate solitary pulmonary lesions in patients with extrapulmonary neoplasmas.

Value of FDG-PET in the management of non-small cell lung cancer

In the past 5 years, metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (FDG) has become an important imaging modality in lung cancer patients. FDG-PET consistently proved to be superior to structure-based imaging modalities in both the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. At this moment the use of FDG-PET in these indications needs further validation in multi-centre large-scale randomised studies, focusing mainly on treatment outcome parameters, survival and cost-efficacy. More recently, interesting findings have also been reported in the response assessment to cytotoxic treatments providing information of greater prognostic significance than can be obtained using conventional approaches. This review focuses on the potential role of FDG-PET in the diagnosis of lung nodules and masses, and in locoregional and extrathoracic staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Emphasis is put on the potential clinical implementation of the numerous data of the last decade.

Positron emission tomography in lung cancer

Carcinoma of the lung is one of the most frequent malignancies and a major cause of mortality. The use of positron emission tomography (PET) has been extensively investigated in patients with carcinoma of the lung and has established clinical utility and cost-effectiveness in characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules and preoperative staging of carcinoma of the lung. Evolving applications in carcinoma of the lung include detection of recurrence, assessment of treatment response, radiotherapy planning, and prognosis. In addition, there is developing interest in combined anatomic/metabolic imaging and new tracer techniques, in particular gene expression imaging. This review aims to present existing data supporting the use of PET in carcinoma of the lung and to explore the evolving indications and future prospects of PET and lung cancer.

Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies

Percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsies are commonly performed for the investigation of lung masses. We describe current practice and complication rates in the UK. A postal questionnaire was sent to all centres in the British Thoracic Society directory. 157 replies (61% response rate) were received, providing data on 5444 biopsies. Mean number of biopsies performed per annum was 30.5 per centre; 8% of centres did not perform biopsies, 36% performed <25 biopsies per annum, 34% <50, 16% <100 and 6% >100. Consultant radiologists perform 91% of biopsies. Written consent was obtained at all centres. The operator obtained consent at 50% of centres. Written information for patients was provided at 35 (24%) centres. Biopsies are performed on a day case basis at 103 (71%) centres. Prior to biopsy the following were obtained routinely: CT scan (73% of centres), platelet count (73%), full clotting screen (70%), lung function (55%). Complications included pneumothorax (20.5% of biopsies), pneumothorax requiring chest drain (3.1%), haemoptysis (5.3%) and death (0.15%). The timing of post-procedure chest radiography was variable. Those centres that performed predominantly cutting needle biopsies had similar pneumothorax rates to centres performing mainly fine needle biopsies (18.9% vs 18.3%). There is great variation in practice throughout the UK. Most procedures are performed on a daycase basis. Small pneumothoraces are common but infrequently require treatment. National guidelines are needed to ensure consistency of standards.

PET scanning and the solitary pulmonary nodule

The finding of a solitary pulmonary nodule on a chest radiograph is a common problem in pulmonary medicine and is seen in about 1 in 500 chest radiographs. Of the benign lesions, 80% are infectious granulomas, 10% are hamartomas, and the remaining 10% are caused by a variety of rarer disorders including noninfectious granulomas and other benign tumors. The prevalence of malignancy ranges from 10% to 68% in the literature. Because of the high prevalence of malignancy and the poor survival for lung cancer, early detection, characterization, and directed treatment are important. Positron emission tomography with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) can play an important role in the evaluation and management of solitary pulmonary nodules. This includes improved characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules with very high negative predictive value and improved staging information when performed in association with CT, especially for nodal staging and identification of unsuspected stage IV disease. PET also provides additional information for management of solitary pulmonary nodules by estimating the probability of malignancy.

Imaging of the chest after lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a well-accepted treatment for numerous lung diseases when medical or surgical therapy is ineffective or unavailable and the patient has a limited life expectancy (usually less than 2 to 3 years). When appropriate, single-lung transplantation is the preferred procedure because of a critical shortage of available donor lungs. Preoperative imaging is useful for selecting which lung should be transplanted, size matching between donor lung and recipient thorax, and screening for malignancy. Cardiac-related deaths, infection, and primary graft failure are the leading causes of perioperative death. Obliterative bronchiolitis is the "Achilles heel" of lung transplantation and accounts for the largest number of late deaths. This article reviews the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative considerations and the utility of radiologic imaging after lung transplantation.

Performance of sodium iodide based (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the characterization of indeterminate pulmonary nodules or masses

The purpose of this study was to document the accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with sodium iodide detectors in characterizing indeterminate lung nodules or masses and in identifying additional extra-lesional findings. 50 consecutive patients without a confident diagnosis of malignancy on CT underwent (18)FDG PET with and without attenuation correction. The diagnosis of malignancy was made using visual diagnostic criteria, and tumour-to-blood pool ratios were calculated. The final diagnosis was established by surgery, biopsy or long-term follow-up. Any additional findings made at PET were recorded and similarly verified. Using blinded visual diagnostic criteria for the differentiation of malignant from benign nodules, sodium iodide PET achieved a sensitivity of 91% (30 of 33 cases), a specificity of 88% (15 of 17 cases), a positive predictive value for malignancy of 94% (30 of 32 cases) and a negative predictive value of 83% (15 of 18 cases). False positives occurred with active tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. False negatives were a 3 cm bronchoalveolar carcinoma, a 1.3 cm sarcoma metastasis and a 1 cm carcinoma. Use of tumour-to-blood pool ratios did not improve performance. PET suggested the presence of nodal or distant metastases in 13 of 33 patients with a malignant pulmonary lesion. These PET findings were confirmed in 11 patients. These results indicate that sodium iodide PET is an accurate tool for the characterization of indeterminate pulmonary masses or nodules and simultaneously provides non-invasive staging information that can alter patient management in up to one-third of such patients. Performance of sodium iodide PET is comparable with reported results for PET scanners using other detector materials.

Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is increasingly used for the management of patients with cancer. The technique is now well accepted by most physicians as an effective complement to the existing imaging modalities. For many malignancies, PET achieves high sensitivity and specificity. The critical role of this powerful technique is realized increasingly in the day-to-day practice of oncology. This is particularly true for the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The contribution of PET for the selection of patients eligible for curative treatments in this setting is well established. Convincing data also exist to support the use of PET for evaluating patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma, for staging and restaging lymphomas, and for diagnosing recurrent thyroid carcinoma in the presence of elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scans. Other indications include staging of various recurrent malignancies, such as breast cancer, melanoma, and head and neck and gynecologic carcinomas. Existing data are limited for the determination of the impact of PET in certain malignancies, and further studies, which should include outcome information, will allow clarification of the role of this modality for such indications. Despite the small number of studies specifically designed to assess changes in management plans for some malignancies after performing PET the overall favorable results are encouraging enough at this time to include this modality as an essential element of the practice of modern oncology. Finally, the evolving role of PET imaging as a predictor of response after local or systemic treatment may add a major dimension to the application of this novel technique.

Positron emission tomography (PET) of non-small cell lung cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET) with FDG has shown to be of substantial value in differential diagnosis of pulmonary lesions and in the assessment of lymph node involvement with higher sensitivity and specificity than CT. A negative PET scan of the mediastinum suggests that mediastinoscopy is unnecessary and that these patients can proceed directly to thoracotomy. The method is also useful for the visualization of distant metastases. Since changes of treatment may result after identification of distant metastases PET is also cost-effective [Eur J Nucl Med 27(2000)1598; Australas Radiol 45(2001)9]. Furthermore, changes of tumor metabolism can be detected with PET at early stages after treatment, which can be used for therapy monitoring and for the detection of recurrent tumor tissue after completion of treatment.

Imaging of lung cancer with CT, MRT and PET

The staging of non-small lung cancer has to be performed in an interdisciplinary approach considering all clinical, radiological and histologic results. The staging using imaging procedures is done according to the TNM classification with T describing the extent of the primary tumor, N the presence and location of metastatic lymph nodes and M the presence or absence of distant metastases. It is important to remember that the individual stages of the TNM classification have undergone numerous revisions and thus need to be considered in their most recent version [Chest 111 (1997) 1718; Chest 111 (1997) 1710]. Noninvasive information about the stage of the disease is important for the planning and optimization of therapy. This may be done with imaging procedures such as, CT, MRT or PET.

Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: a systematic, quantitative review

Lung cancer is the cause of 32% of all male cancer deaths and 25% of all female cancer deaths. Because the prognosis depends on early diagnosis and staging, continuous evaluation of the diagnostic tools available is important. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) and gamma-camera PET in the diagnostic investigation of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A systematic literature search was carried out in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. We identified 55 original works on the diagnostic performance of PET with fluorodeoxyglucose in the investigation of NSCLC. For diagnosis of NSCLC, the mean sensitivities and specificities were, respectively, 0.96 (SE 0.01) and 0.78 (0.03) for dedicated PET, and 0.92 (0.04) and 0.86 (0.04) for gamma-camera PET. In the mediastinal staging of NSCLC, the results were 0.83 (0.02) and 0.96 (0.01) for dedicated PET and 0.81 (0.04) and 0.95 (0.02) for ganuna-camera PET. We conclude that dedicated PET could be a valuable tool in the diagnosis and staging of NSCLC. However, studies of populations with a lower prevalence of NSCLC are recommended.

PET-FDG scan enhances but does not replace preoperative surgical staging in non-small cell lung carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of positron emission tomography with radiolabeled [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (PET-FDG) imaging in mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and to compare it to conventional clinical and surgical staging.

METHODS

From June 1998 to February 2000, we enrolled 64 potentially resectable NSCLC patients in a prospective study of PET-FDG imaging of the mediastinum to assess LN involvement. Results of this technique were compared to conventional clinical and surgical staging. Diagnostic efficacy was determined by calculating sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for each method.

RESULTS

PET-FDG imaging correctly identified nodal stage (N0-N1 vs. N2) in 50 out of 61 patients (82%), overstaging occurred in eight patients (13%), and understaging in three patients (4.9%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for PET-FDG scan imaging were 67, 85, 82, 43, and 93.6%, respectively. Conventional staging correctly identified nodal stage (N0-N1 vs. N2) in 51 out of 62 patients (82%), overstaging occurred in five patients (8.1%), and understaging in six patients (9.7%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for conventional staging were 33, 90.6, 82, 37, and 89%, respectively. With regard to N2 disease, conventional staging showed a poor sensitivity (33%). Indeed, six out of 64 patients were understaged for mediastinal LN involvement. Even though the improvement was not statistically significant (McNemar P=0.08), the combined use of PET-FDG scan and computerized tomography (CT) scan allowed a two-fold increase in the sensitivity of our clinical preoperative staging. Moreover, relying on the PET-scan high negative predictive value might have contributed to a three-fold decrease in the number of required surgical staging procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the PET-FDG imaging strength lies in its very high negative predictive value and increased sensitivity. In this study, the overall accuracy of PET-FDG scan (82%) was lower than previously reported. Combined with chest CT-scan preoperatively, it may alleviate the need for surgical staging when PET-FDG studies of the mediastinum are negative. However, with a positive PET-FDG scan result, further diagnostic procedures should be pursued in order to avoid overstaging and allow better surgical patient selection.

Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology

Positron emission tomography (PET) is now in routine use in oncology, through the success of metabolic imaging, mainly with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Clear benefit is obtained with FDG PET in the assessment of patients with recurrent or residual disease, especially colorectal cancer and lymphoma. Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG PET is of proven benefit. Staging and restaging of patients with melanoma of stage II or greater is useful, and FDG PET has also been successfully used to investigate single pulmonary nodules. Tumour grading has been assessed, especially in the brain, but an important and emerging indication is the evaluation of tumour response with PET. Rapid decline of FDG uptake has been observed in responsive cancers. Further advances are being made with other fluorine-18-labelled and generator-based PET tracers, the only ones that can be used in units without dedicated cyclotrons.