Clinical strategies to reduce utilization of chest physiotherapy without compromising patient care

A respiratory critical care nurse training program for settings without a registered respiratory therapists: A protocol for a multimethod study

BACKGROUND

The increasing elderly population and prevalence of chronic diseases have raised the need for ICU beds. However, limited bed availability often causes delays in admission, leading to wasted treatment time.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to create and implement a training program for respiratory critical care nurses (RCCNs) in settings without registered respiratory therapists (RRTs).

RESEARCH

METHODOLOGY/DESIGN

The study will use a multimethod sequential research design, including a scoping review, content analysis, Delphi methods, and a randomized clinical trial. The scoping review will gather extensive information on respiratory care for critically ill patients and the responsibilities of RCCNs. Content analysis and expert interviews will identify opportunities and challenges in RCCNs' provision of respiratory care. The Delphi method will integrate the results to develop a comprehensive training program for RCCNs. Subsequently, five RCCNs will undergo theoretical and practical examinations after completing the three-month training program, and the impact of RCCNs on critically ill patients' outcomes will be evaluated through a clinical trial.

ANTICIPATED FINDINGS

The study aims to provide a comprehensive training program for RCCNs and investigate its impact on the outcomes of critically ill patients through a clinical trial.

CONCLUSION

The training program will equip RCCNs with the necessary skills and knowledge to provide respiratory critical care from the emergency department to hospital discharge. This pioneering study aims to improve patient outcomes in settings without RRTs by offering a unique program for RCCNs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The development and implementation of this training program for RCCNs in settings without RRTs will address the gap in respiratory care and potentially improve patient outcomes. By empowering RCCNs with specialized training, healthcare facilities can ensure the provision of high-quality respiratory care throughout a patient's critical illness journey, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare teams, especially in resource-limited settings.

Reporting of costs and economic impacts in randomized trials of de-implementation interventions for low-value care: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

De-implementation of low-value care can increase health care sustainability. We evaluated the reporting of direct costs of de-implementation and subsequent change (increase or decrease) in health care costs in randomized trials of de-implementation research.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Scopus databases without any language restrictions up to May 2021. We conducted study screening and data extraction independently and in duplicate. We extracted information related to study characteristics, types and characteristics of interventions, de-implementation costs, and impacts on health care costs. We assessed risk of bias using a modified Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

We screened 10,733 articles, with 227 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 50 included information on direct cost of de-implementation or impact of de-implementation on health care costs. Studies were mostly conducted in North America (36%) or Europe (32%) and in the primary care context (70%). The most common practice of interest was reduction in the use of antibiotics or other medications (74%). Most studies used education strategies (meetings, materials) (64%). Studies used either a single strategy (52%) or were multifaceted (48%). Of the 227 eligible studies, 18 (8%) reported on direct costs of the used de-implementation strategy; of which, 13 reported total costs, and 12 reported per unit costs (7 reported both). The costs of de-implementation strategies varied considerably. Of the 227 eligible studies, 43 (19%) reported on impact of de-implementation on health care costs. Health care costs decreased in 27 studies (63%), increased in 2 (5%), and were unchanged in 14 (33%).

CONCLUSION

De-implementation randomized controlled trials typically did not report direct costs of the de-implementation strategies (92%) or the impacts of de-implementation on health care costs (81%). Lack of cost information may limit the value of de-implementation trials to decision-makers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OSF (Open Science Framework): https://osf.io/ueq32 .

Effectiveness of a chest physiotherapy care map in hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Conventional chest physiotherapy (chest PT) has been widely used to facilitate airway clearance. However, conventional chest PT is time consuming, unnecessary prescriptions result in heavier workloads for therapists. Therefore, judicious prescription of chest PT is important.

PURPOSE

To develop a chest physiotherapy care-map and evaluate its efficacy.

METHOD

Seventy-eight hospitalized patients who were consulted for chest PT were enrolled and consecutively allocated into two groups of 39 patients. Group I and II was enrolled before and after the implementation of the chest PT map, respectively.

RESULT

After the care-map was implemented, the chest PT prescription rate decreased from 56.4% to 33.3%, (p = 0.040). The duration of conventional chest PT trended to lower but not reaching significance from 4.5 (1-28) to 4 (2-9) days, (p = 0.582). The mean cost of chest PT was reduced by 38.2% (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Chest PT care-map is an effective tool to reduce unnecessary chest PT prescriptions, lower costs, and more effectively allocate therapist time.

Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy around the Clock: Experience at a University Hospital

Purpose: To document and describe the use of a hospital-wide, 24-hour cardiorespiratory physiotherapy service run by an intensive care unit (ICU) team of physiotherapists. Methods: We prospectively collected data on all non-ICU hospital patients who used the 24-hours-per-day cardiorespiratory physiotherapy service over a 1-year period between July 2013 and June 2014. The ICU physiotherapists documented the reason, origin of referral, time of call, and type and frequency of treatment of each patient. Results: Over the 1-year period, the ICU physiotherapists administered 2,192 out-of-hours cardiorespiratory physiotherapy treatments (n=685 patients) outside the ICU. Most referrals originated from the emergency department (25%), the cardiopulmonary transplant unit (20%), and the pulmonology department (16%). Referrals were from a physiotherapist in 49% of cases, from a nurse in 32%, and from a physician in 19%. Of these, 89% were made between 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., and sputum retention was the most frequent reason (86%). Conclusion: Although proving its cost effectiveness is difficult, organizing a 24-hours-per-day, 7-days-per-week cardiorespiratory physiotherapy service in a large hospital is feasible.

Chest physiotherapy prolongs duration of ventilation in the critically ill ventilated for more than 48 hours

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the impact of providing chest physiotherapy after routine clinical assessment on the duration of mechanical ventilation, outcome and intensive care length of stay.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Single-centre, single-blind, prospective, randomised, controlled trial in a university hospital general intensive care unit.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

180 patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients randomly allocated, one group receiving physiotherapy as deemed appropriate by physiotherapists after routine daily assessments and another group acting as controls were limited to receiving decubitus care and tracheal suctioning.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Primary endpoints were initial time to become ventilator-free, secondary endpoints included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality and ICU length of stay. Kaplan-Meier analysis censored for death revealed a significant prolongation of median time to become ventilator-free among patients receiving physiotherapy (p=0.047). The time taken for 50% of patients (median time) to become ventilator-free was 15 and 11 days, respectively, for physiotherapy and control groups. There were no differences between groups in ICU or hospital mortality rates, or length of ICU stay. The number of patients needing re-ventilation for respiratory reasons was similar in both groups.

Mechanical ventilator weaning protocols driven by nonphysician health-care professionals: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

Health-care professionals (HCPs) can provide protocol-based care that has a measurable impact on critically ill patients beyond their liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV). Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that protocols for liberating patients from MV driven by nonphysician HCPs can reduce the duration of MV. The structure and features of protocols should be adapted from published protocols to incorporate patient-specific needs, clinician preferences, and institutional resources. As a general approach, shortly after patients demonstrate that their condition has been stabilized on the ventilator, a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is safe to perform and is indicated. Ventilator management strategies for patients who fail a trial of spontaneous breathing include the following: (1) consideration of all remediable factors (such as electrolyte derangements, bronchospasm, malnutrition, patient positioning, and excess secretions) to enhance the prospects of successful liberation from MV; (2) use of a comfortable, safe, and well-monitored mode of MV (such as pressure support ventilation); and (3) repeating a trial of spontaneous breathing on the following day. For patients who pass the SBT, the decision to extubate must be guided by clinical judgment and objective data to minimize the risk of unnecessary reintubations and self-extubations. Protocols should not represent rigid rules but, rather, guides to patient care. Moreover, the protocols may evolve over time as clinical and institutional experience with them increases. Useful protocols aim to safely and efficiently liberate patients from MV, reducing unnecessary or harmful variations in approach.

The effect of respiratory therapist-initiated treatment protocols on patient outcomes and resource utilization

CONTEXT

Physicians frequently prescribe respiratory treatments to hospitalized patients, but the influence of such treatments on clinical outcomes is difficult to assess.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients receiving respiratory treatments managed by respiratory care practitioner (RCP)-directed treatment protocols or physician-directed orders.

DESIGN

A single center, quasi-randomized, clinical study.

SETTING

Three internal medicine firms from an urban teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Six hundred ninety-four consecutive hospitalized non-ICU patients ordered to receive respiratory treatments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discordant respiratory care orders, respiratory care charges, hospital length of stay, and patient-specific complications. Discordant orders were defined as written orders for respiratory treatments that were not clinically indicated as well as orders omitting treatments that were clinically indicated according to protocol-based treatment algorithms.

RESULTS

Firm A patients (n = 239) received RCP-directed treatments and had a statistically lower rate of discordant respiratory care orders (24.3%) as compared with patients receiving physician-directed treatments in firms B (n = 205; 58.5%) and C (n = 250; 56.8%; p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in patient complications were observed. The average number of respiratory treatments and respiratory care charges were statistically less for firm A patients (10.7 +/- 13.7 treatments; $868 +/- 1,519) as compared with patients in firms B (12.4 +/- 12.7 treatments, $1,124 +/- 1,339) and C (12.3 +/- 13.4 treatments, $1, 054 +/- 1,346; p = 0.009 [treatments] and p < 0.001 [respiratory care charges]).

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory care managed by RCP-directed treatment protocols for non-ICU patients is safe and showed greater agreement with institutional treatment algorithms as compared with physician-directed respiratory care. Additionally, the overall utilization of respiratory treatments was significantly less among patients receiving RCP-directed respiratory care.