Is direct collection of pleural fluid into a heparinized syringe important for determination of pleural pH? A brief report

Factors influencing the measurement of pleural fluid pH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pleural fluid pH measurement is important in the management of patients with exudative pleural effusions, especially in guiding treatment of parapneumonic effusions. Common variations in the method used to sample pleural fluid affect the accuracy of the value obtained. This article reviews the effects of these variations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pleural fluid pH is decreased by exposure to acidic fluids, such as retention of local anesthetic or heparin in the syringe or sampling following infiltration of local anesthetic. Exposure of the sample to air leads to an increase in pH. If immediate analysis is not possible, delay of up to 4 h does not cause a significant change in pH, even when the sample is kept at room temperature. It is essential that a blood gas analyzer is used to obtain accurate pH measurement.These factors have less effect on the glucose concentration, which may be used to guide management if an accurate pH value is not available.

SUMMARY

Several common variables in collection method can lead to a clinically significant alteration in the pH value obtained. An evidence-based method for sampling and handling pleural fluid in order to obtain an accurate pH measurement is described.

Prognostic significance of pleural fluid data in patients with malignant effusion

BACKGROUND

To determine the effects of the biochemical and cytological properties of the pleural fluid (PF) on the survival of patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE).

METHODS

A retrospective study of 284 patients with MPE was performed, which measured overall survival, survival of patients with different types of primary tumors, and survival as a function of PF biochemical variables transformed into quartiles.

RESULTS

Median overall survival of MPE patients was 5.4 months following diagnosis. Survival varied significantly depending on the type of the primary tumor: 17.4 months for mesothelioma, 13.2 months for breast cancer, 7 months for lymphoma and 2.6 months for lung cancer. A multivariate analysis of PF biochemical parameters showed that survival was lower as the concentration of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increased (11.3 months if LDH was between 140 U/L and 358 U/L vs 2.8 months if LDH was between 1027 U/L and 10,110 U/L) or the concentration of pleural proteins decreased (9.4 months if proteins were between 4.92 g/dL and 7.94 g/dL vs 2.2 months if proteins were between 0.97 g/dL and 3.85 g/dL). We also found that when mesotheliomas were excluded from the analysis, survival was lower in patients with a PF pH lower than 7.3 (2.4 months vs 6.8 months, p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor type as well as some biochemical features of the pleural fluid, such as pH and concentrations of proteins and LDH, influence survival in patients with MPE.

Clinically important factors influencing the diagnostic measurement of pleural fluid pH and glucose

RATIONALE

Accurate pleural fluid pH and glucose measurement is a key component in the diagnosis and management of patients with pleural effusion. Standardized methods of pleural fluid collection have not been defined.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of common clinical factors that may distort measurement accuracy of pleural fluid pH and glucose.

METHODS

Ninety-two exudative pleural aspirates were collected in commercially available blood gas syringes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Samples were analyzed immediately using a blood gas analyzer. The effects of residual air, lidocaine, heparin, and delay in analysis (24 h) on pH and glucose measurement accuracy were assessed. Pleural fluid pH was significantly increased by residual air (mean +/- SD, 0.08 +/- 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.09; P < 0.001) and significantly decreased by residual lidocaine (0.2 ml; mean change in pH, -0.15 +/- 0.09; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.18; P < 0.001) and residual heparin (mean change in pH, -0.02 +/- 0.05; 95% CI, -0.01 to -0.04; P = 0.027). Pleural fluid pH was stable at room temperature for 1 hour and significantly increased at 4 (mean +/- SD, 0.03 +/- 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.04; P = 0.003) and 24 hours (0.05 +/- 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.08; P < 0.001). Pleural fluid glucose concentration was not clinically significantly altered by residual air, lidocaine (up to 0.4 ml), or 24-hour analysis delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of measured pleural pH is critically dependent on sample collection method. Residual air, lidocaine, and analysis delay significantly alter pH and may impact on clinical management. Pleural fluid glucose concentration is not significantly influenced by these factors. Protocols defining appropriate sampling and analysis methods are needed.

Use of Heparinized versus Non-Heparinized Syringes for Measurements of the Pleural Fluid pH

BACKGROUND

Pleural fluid (PF) pH measurement is important for establishing a diagnosis and for guiding clinical management. The current standard practice is to collect PF samples for pH measurement in heparinized syringes at room temperature and to instantaneously process these samples.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of collecting PF in heparinized versus non-heparinized syringes at room temperature on PF pH measurements when processed at various time intervals.

METHODS

From 50 consecutive thoracenteses, 1 ml of PF was collected anaerobically in each of six 3-ml syringes. Only three syringes were coated with heparin. The samples were processed for PF pH measurements at time 0 (T(0)) and 1 h (T(1)) and 2 h (T(2)) after collection. All specimens were preserved at room temperature, until the measurements were carried out in duplicates by a calibrated blood gas analyzer.

RESULTS

PF pH values were significantly lower with heparinized versus non-heparinized syringes at all time intervals (T(0): pH heparinized = 7.378 +/- 0.107 vs. pH non-heparinized = 7.390 +/- 0.108; T(1): pH heparinized = 7.378 +/- 0.115 vs. pH non-heparinized = 7.389 +/- 0.111; T(2): pH heparinized = 7.367 +/- 0.105 vs. pH non-heparinized = 7.389 +/- 0.121). In the heparinized syringes, there was a significant decrease in PF pH values at T(2) versus T(0) and T(1). There were no significant changes in PF pH values over time in the non-heparinized syringes.

CONCLUSIONS

For serial PF pH measurements, the same type of syringes (either heparinized or non-heparinized) should be consistently used. With heparinized syringes, processing of PF pH measurements should be performed within 1 h after collection.

[Changes in the acid-base equilibrium of pleural fluid during the first 2 hours after thoracentesis]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess changes in the acid-base equilibrium of pleural fluid during the first 2 hours after thoracentesis and to determine whether, as with arterial blood, it is important to keep the fluid on ice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, descriptive, comparative study was performed in 53 consecutive patients with pleural effusion. Thoracentesis was performed and pleural fluid was collected in 5 heparinized syringes to determine the pH, PO2, and PCO2 at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. In the first 26 patients, pleural fluid was collected in a further 4 syringes that were kept on ice prior to performing the same measurements at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes.

RESULTS

The patients had a mean (SD) age of 70 (14) years, 66% were smokers, 72% were men, 63% had right-sided pleural effusion, 85% had unilateral effusion, and 15% had massive effusion. In 10 patients the effusion was a transudate, in 35 it was lymphocytic, and in 8 it was neutrophilic. The etiology was benign in 34 cases and neoplastic in 19 cases. The baseline pH was 7.35 (0.1) and baseline values of PO2 and PCO2 were 57.8 (20) mm Hg and 53.7 (15) mm Hg, respectively. No significant changes were observed in the first 2 hours for either pH or PCO2, whereas PO2 did undergo a significant change over this period. The difference between the baseline value and the value obtained at 120 minutes was 0.005 (0.02) for pH, 12.5 (19) mm Hg for PO2, and 0.8 (3) mm Hg for PCO2, with correlation coefficients of 0.97, 0.49, and 0.98, respectively. Comparison of values by simple regression analysis did not reveal a significant difference in the changes in pH, PO2, or PCO2 associated with keeping samples on ice. Multivariate analysis revealed that neoplastic effusion and a higher red blood cell count in pleural fluid had a significant influence on pH changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The pH and PCO2 of pleural fluid did not change significantly during the first 2 hours following thoracentesis, whereas PO2 did undergo a significant change. Keeping samples on ice during this period is unnecessary. Only a higher red blood cell count in pleural fluid and neoplastic effusion had a limited effect on changes in the pH of samples from our patients during the first 2 hours following thoracentesis.

Does pleural fluid pH change significantly at room temperature during the first hour following thoracentesis?

BACKGROUND

Usually, pleural fluid (PF) pH is measured immediately following thoracentesis, and if there is any delay in the measurement, the PF sample is preserved on ice.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if PF pH changes significantly at room temperature during the first hour following thoracentesis.

DESIGN

Prospective, self-controlled.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing thoracentesis.

MEASUREMENTS

The PF pH of a sample collected in an arterial blood gas syringe was measured immediately following thoracentesis by an arterial blood pH/gas analyzer. Additional measurements were made at 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min from the first pH measurement (pH0), maintained at room temperature.

RESULTS

For 28 PF samples, pH0 (mean +/- SD) was 7.351 +/- 0.158, and the 60-min pH (pH60) was 7.359 +/- 0.161. The mean difference between pH60 and pH0 was 0.008 +/- 0.026, which was not significant, either clinically or statistically (p = 0.13). Similarly, the interim pH values (for measures at 5, 15, 30, 45 min after pH0) were not significantly different from pH0 (mean differences, 0.002, 0.003, 0.005, and 0.004, respectively; p values, 0.51, 0.21, 0.06, and 0.22, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The pleural fluid pH of a sample preserved at room temperature does not change significantly during the first hour following thoracentesis. Hence, contrary to the common medical practice, there is no need to perform the pH measurement within minutes after thoracentesis and to preserve a pleural fluid sample on ice.

Infection of the pleural space

Parapneumonic effusions are common accompaniments of pneumonia that require proper management to prevent progression to empyema. Management decisions require thoughtful individualization of care because of the multiple factors that affect outcome; no one algorithmic approach exists for all patients. Basic principles of care, however, apply to all patients and center on the early detection of infected pleural fluid and the rapid completion of effective pleural drainage and lung re-expansion, when indicated to decrease morbidity and mortality.