Does an IV bolus of methylprednisolone relieve dyspnea in asthma exacerbations?

[Bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation: preclinical differential diagnostic and emergency treatment]

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchial asthma are the most common causes of obstructive pulmonary diseases and acute dyspnoea. In the preclinical emergency situation a distinction between bronchial asthma and exacerbated COPD is difficult because symptoms are similar. Although the preclinical measures differ only marginally, a differential diagnosis from other causes of respiratory obstruction and acute dyspnoea, such as cardiac decompensation, anaphylaxis, aspiration of foreign bodies, tension pneumothorax and inhalation trauma is necessary because alternative treatment options are required. In the treatment of COPD and bronchial asthma inhalative bronchodilatory beta(2)-mimetics are the first choice especially for serious obstructive emergencies because there is an unfavorable relationship between effect and side-effects for the intravenous route. Dosable aerosols, nebulization and if necessary, continuous nebulization, are appropriate application forms even for serious obstructive crises with the need of a respirator. In these cases a minimal inspiratory flow in patients is not required. Theophylline only plays a minor role to beta(2)-mimetics and anticholinergics as a bronchodilator in asthma and COPD guidelines, even in serious obstructive diseases. For severe asthma attacks the administration of magnesium is a possible additional option. Systemic intravenous administration of steroids has an anti-inflammatory effect and for this reason is the second column of treatment for both diseases. Invasive ventilation remains a last resort to ensure respiratory function and indications for this are given in patients with clinical signs of impending exhaustion of breathing.

Relation between inflammation and symptoms in asthma

Asthma symptoms are the main reason for healthcare utilization and are a fundamental parameter for the evaluation of asthma control. Currently, asthma is defined as a chronic inflammatory disease. A French expert group studied the association between inflammation and asthma symptoms by carrying out a critical review of the international literature. Uncontrolled asthmatics have an increased number of polynuclear eosinophils in the induced sputum and an increased production of exhaled NO. Control by anti-inflammatory treatment is accompanied by a reduction in bronchial eosinophilia and exhaled NO. Asthma symptoms are the result of complex mechanisms and many factors modify their perception. Experimental data suggest that there is a relationship between the perception of symptoms and eosinophilic inflammation and that inhaled corticoid therapy improves this perception. Although they are still not applicable in routine practice, follow-up strategies based on the evaluation of inflammation are thought to be more effective in reducing exacerbations than those usually recommended based on symptoms and sequential analysis of respiratory function. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy is the reference disease-modifying therapy for persistent asthma. Recent studies demonstrated that adjustment of anti-inflammatory treatment based on symptoms is an effective strategy to prevent exacerbations and reduce the total number of doses of inhaled corticosteroids.

[The relationship between inflammation and symptoms in asthma]

In asthma, symptoms are the main reason for recourse to healthcare and are a fundamental parameter for the evaluation of asthma control. Currently, asthma is defined as a chronic inflammatory disease. Uncontrolled asthmatics have an increased number of eosinophils in induced sputum and an increased production of exhaled NO. Control by anti-inflammatory treatment is accompanied by a reduction in bronchial eosinophilia and exhaled NO. Asthma symptoms are the result of complex mechanisms and many factors modify their perception. Experimental data suggests that there is a relationship between the perception of symptoms and eosinophilic inflammation, and that inhaled corticoid therapy improves this perception. Although they are still not applicable in routine practice, follow-up strategies based on the evaluation of inflammation are thought to be more effective in reducing exacerbations than those usually recommended based on retrospective evaluation of symptoms and sequential analysis of respiratory function. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy is the reference maintenance therapy for persistent asthma and adjustment of anti-inflammatory treatment based on symptoms is an effective strategy to prevent exacerbations and reduce the total dose of inhaled corticosteroids. A French expert group has undertaken a study of the association between inflammation and asthma symptoms by carrying out a critical review of the international literature.

Perception of airway obstruction and airway inflammation in asthma: a review

Dyspnea has a multifactorial nature and the exact mechanism that causes breathlessness in asthma is not fully understood. There is compelling evidence that factors other than merely mechanical ones take part in the pathophysiology of breathlessness. Some recent reports attribute airway inflammation, which may contribute to the unexplained variability in the perception of dyspnea associated with bronchoconstriction. Eosinophil airway inflammation has been proposed as a determinant of breathlessness via mechanisms affecting either the mechanical pathways that control breathlessness or the afferent nerves involved in perception of dyspnea. In this review, data on the interrelation between inflammation and dyspnea sensation and the impact of treatment on dyspnea sensation are discussed. We conclude that regardless of whether mechanical or chemical inflammatory factors are involved, much variability in dyspnea scores remains unexplained.

The influence of corticosteroids on the perception of dyspnea in asthma

Corticosteroids are effective anti-inflammatory medications that are recommended for the control of persistent asthma. Little, however, is known about their influence on the perception of dyspnea, which, in turn, is important to the successful self-management of asthma. This paper provides a synopsis of available studies examining the impact of corticosteroids on the sensitivity to perceive dyspnea and presents possible mechanisms underlying this relationship. The results of these investigations are conflicting with some studies showing improved perception and other studies showing worsened perception of dyspnea after corticosteroid treatment. Thus, firm conclusions cannot be derived from the currently available data. Implications for future research, which is required to increase our understanding of potential influences of corticosteroids on the perception of dyspnea, are provided.

Cigarette smoking and dyspnea perception

Cigarette smoking has been implicated as an important risk factor for the development of respiratory symptoms in adults. The relationship of dyspnea with cigarette smoking has been examined in smokers and ex-smokers and the beneficial effects of smoking cessation have been demonstrated. Recent studies reported that in subjects who smoke cigarettes the risk of developing respiratory symptoms is higher in a dose-dependent way. Environmental tobacco smoke heavily influences the incidence of respiratory symptoms in both adults and in children. Up to the present time, the mechanisms whereby cigarette smoking causes dyspnea perception remain to be defined. Abnormalities in sensory nerves might diminish the perception of bronchoconstriction in smokers. In this regard, it has been postulated that prolonged exposure to cigarette smoke may lead to chronic depletion of sensory nerve neurotransmitters. Eosinophil airway inflammation has been proposed as a determinant of breathlessness via mechanisms affecting either the mechanical pathways that control breathlessness or the afferent nerves involved in perception of dyspnea. An increased number of eosinophils in some smokers implies the possibility that smoking may trigger immunological or other reactions associated with eosinophilia. In conclusion, cigarette smoking is by far one of the greatest risk factors for most respiratory symptoms, including dyspnea. Smoking is associated with the development of symptoms in a dose-dependent way and eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) increase the risk of developing dyspnea.

Cigarette Smoking and Dyspnea Perception

Cigarette smoking has been implicated as an important risk factor for the development of respiratory symptoms in adults. The relationship of dyspnea with cigarette smoking has been examined in smokers and ex-smokers and the beneficial effects of smoking cessation have been demonstrated. Recent studies reported that in subjects who smoke cigarettes the risk of developing respiratory symptoms is higher in a dose-dependent way. Environmental tobacco smoke heavily influences the incidence of respiratory symptoms in both adults and in children. Up to the present time, the mechanisms whereby cigarette smoking causes dyspnea perception remain to be defined. Abnormalities in sensory nerves might diminish the perception of bronchoconstriction in smokers. In this regard, it has been postulated that prolonged exposure to cigarette smoke may lead to chronic depletion of sensory nerve neurotransmitters. Eosinophil airway inflammation has been proposed as a determinant of breathlessness via mechanisms affecting either the mechanical pathways that control breathlessness or the afferent nerves involved in perception of dyspnea. An increased number of eosinophils in some smokers implies the possibility that smoking may trigger immunological or other reactions associated with eosinophilia. In conclusion, cigarette smoking is by far one of the greatest risk factors for most respiratory symptoms, including dyspnea. Smoking is associated with the development of symptoms in a dose-dependent way and eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) increase the risk of developing dyspnea.

Dyspnea, respiratory function and sputum profile in asthmatic patients during exacerbations

Dyspnea is often used as a marker of asthma severity although a wide variation in dyspnea perception associated with bronchoconstriction (PB) has been described in asthmatic patients. Our hypothesis is that changes of airway inflammation, airway narrowing and hyperinflation may account for a part of the variability of breathlessness in spontaneous asthma attack. In asthmatic patients with exacerbation of the disease, we evaluated respiratory function, dyspnea (using visual Analogue Scale--VAS) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values and variability (amplitude % mean), and sputum cellular and biochemical profile before (day I) and after (day II) therapy with i.v. corticosteroids and inhaled beta2-agonists, as appropriate. By day II, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), inspiratory capacity (IC), PEF or VAS values and variability, sputum eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) had improved. Improvement of dyspnea expressed as a decrease in VAS and reduction in variability of dyspnea sensation significantly correlated with increase in FEV1 %predicted value (%pv) (P=0.03; p=0.72 and P=0.02; p=0.74, respectively). No significant correlation was found between IC and VAS either in absolute values or as changes from days I and II, nor between sputum outcomes and PEF or VAS, regardless of how they were measured. We conclude that in acute asthmatic patients, dyspnea measurement, functional measurements and sputum analysis may be useful in monitoring disease activity, response to therapy and can provide different information on the state of the disease.

Do steroids interfere in dyspnoea sensation?

Dyspnoea remains a remarkable clinical problem and a therapeutic challenge, mainly in chronic respiratory conditions. This study investigated the potential effects of steroids on dyspnoea sensation regardless of their pulmonary anti-inflammatory actions. Sixteen healthy men (mean age +/- SD = 22.5 +/- 1.6 years) developed uncomfortable breathing by the use of inspiratory resistors (loads of 0, 7, 14 and 21 cm H2O/l/s) and breathholding 6 h after taking 40 mg of prednisone (Pred) or placebo (Plac). Respiratory discomfort during breathing with loads was evaluated with a 100 mm visual analog scale. The maximum voluntary apnoea time did not differ between the prednisone and placebo days (Plac = 96 +/- 11.8 s x Pred = 105 +/- 12.2 s) and prednisone did not influence the dyspnoea sensation induced by different inspiratory loads (0 cm H2O/l/s: Pred = 2.8 mm x Plac = 1.9 mm; 7 cm H2O/l/s: Pred = 18.3 mm x Plac = 18.6 mm; 14 cm H2O/l/s; Pred = 33.0 mm x Plac = 34.1 mm; 21 cm H2O/l/s: Pred = 48.1 mm x Plac = 49.6 mm). Prednisone intake was associated with a significant increase in minute ventilation during breathing with no inspiratory loads (Pred = 11.91 +/- 1.28 l/min- x Plac = 9.95 +/- 0.86 l/min). Although steroids certainly may improve respiratory conditions due to anti-inflammatory actions, available evidence does not support any specific beneficial effect of these drugs on these perception of dyspnoea itself.