Differences of Opinion

Impact of Targeted Therapy on the Quality of End-of-Life Care for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study in Taiwan

CONTEXT

Targeted therapies with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been widely used in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little research has focused on the use of targeted therapies at the end of life (EOL).

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the determinants of receiving targeted therapy during the last month of life and how targeted therapies affect the quality of EOL care.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective population-based study using a cancer registry and National Health Insurance claims data among 42,678 Taiwanese NSCLC decedents in 2005-2012. Propensity score matching and generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate associations.

RESULTS

We identified 3439 (21.3%) NSCLC patients who received targeted therapy within 30 days of death. Younger age, adenocarcinoma histology, postdiagnosis survival exceeding six months, and later year of death were associated with receiving targeted agents at EOL. The odds increased when patients were treated by pulmonologists or oncologists or in district hospitals or facilities with a higher case volume. Patients who were prescribed targeted therapy near death were significantly more likely to undergo aggressive EOL care (odds ratio = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.83-3.02) including multiple emergency department visits, hospitalization exceeding 14 days, admission to intensive care units, use of intubation and mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and late hospice referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted therapy at EOL should be considered a quality-of-care indicator. Guidance in the cessation of targeted therapy and the ongoing monitoring of practice initiatives are warranted. The decision-making processes associated with EOL care also require further investigation.

Variations in Oncologist Recommendations for Chemotherapy for Stage IV Lung Cancer: What Is the Role of Performance Status?

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy prolongs survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, few studies have included patients with poor performance status. This study examined rates of oncologists' recommendations for chemotherapy by patient performance status and symptoms and how physician characteristics influence chemotherapy recommendations.

METHODS

We surveyed medical oncologists involved in the care of a population-based cohort of patients with lung cancer from the CanCORS (Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance) study. Physicians were queried about their likelihood to recommend chemotherapy to patients with stage IV lung cancer with varying performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 [good] v 3 [poor]) and presence or absence of tumor-related pain. Repeated measures logistic regression was used to estimate the independent associations of patients' performance status and symptoms and physicians' demographic and practice characteristics with chemotherapy recommendations.

RESULTS

Nearly all physicians (adjusted rate, 97% to 99%) recommended chemotherapy for patients with good performance status, and approximately half (adjusted rate, 38% to 53%) recommended chemotherapy for patients with poor performance status (P < .001). Compared with patient factors, physician and practice characteristics were less strongly associated with chemotherapy recommendations in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSION

Strong consensus among oncologists exists for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status. However, the relatively high rate of chemotherapy recommendations for patients with poor performance status despite the unfavorable risk-benefit profile highlights the need for ongoing work to define high-value care in oncology and to implement and evaluate strategies to align incentives for such care.

Clinician perceptions of care difficulty, quality of life, and symptom reports for lung cancer patients: an analysis from the Symptom Outcomes and Practice patterns (SOAPP) study

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent therapeutic advances, lung cancer is a difficult disease to manage. This study assessed clinicians' perceptions of care difficulty, quality of life (QOL), and symptom reports for their lung cancer patients compared with their patients with breast, prostate, and colon cancer.

METHODS

This report focused on secondary analyses from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns (SOAPP) study (E2Z02); outcome measures included clinician ratings of 3106 solid tumor patients. Univariate analyses focused on patterns of disease-specific perceptions; multivariable analyses examined whether disease-specific differences persisted after covariate inclusion.

RESULTS

In univariate comparisons, clinicians rated lung cancer patients as more difficult to treat than other solid tumor patients, with poorer QOL and higher symptom reports. After covariates were adjusted, the odds of clinicians perceiving lower QOL for their lung cancer patients were 3.6 times larger than for patients with other solid tumors (odds ratio = 3.6 [95% confidence interval, 2.0-6.6]; p < 0.0001). In addition, the odds of clinicians perceiving weight difficulties for their lung cancer patients were 3.2 times larger (odds ratio = 3.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.7-6.0]; p = 0.0004). No other outcome showed significant differences between lung versus other cancers in multivariable models.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians were more pessimistic about the well-being of their lung cancer patients compared with patients with other solid tumors. Differences remained for clinician perceptions of patient QOL and weight difficulty, even after controlling for such variables as stage, performance status, and patient-reported outcomes. These continuing disparities suggest possible perception bias. More research is needed to confirm this disparity and explore the underpinnings.

Patient versus clinician preferences for chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY Decisions about systemic treatment options for non-small-cell lung cancer are becoming increasingly complex for both patients and clinicians, and involve trade-offs between the benefits, harms and inconveniences of treatments. These trade-offs result in an individual’s (e.g., a patient or clinician) preference for a treatment. Optimal clinical decision-making about an individual’s cancer treatment is ideally shared between the patient and their clinician(s), but this requires clinicians to understand their patient’s preferences, as well as their own. Patients’ preferences for chemotherapy often differ from those of clinicians’, with patients generally needing smaller survival benefits, or accepting more toxicity, to make chemotherapy worthwhile. This review summarizes and compares recent studies of patients’ and clinicians’ preferences for chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, to help clinicians and their patients make more informed and patient-centered decisions about chemotherapy.

Stigma among patients with lung cancer: a patient-reported measurement model

BACKGROUND

Although stigma may have negative psychosocial and behavioral outcomes for patients with lung cancer, its measurement has been limited. A conceptual model of lung cancer stigma and a patient-reported outcome measure are needed to mitigate these sequelae. This study identified key stigma-related themes to provide a blueprint for item development through a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews and focus groups with lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from two outpatient oncology clinics and included (i) 42 lung cancer patients who participated in individual interviews and (ii) 5 focus groups (inclusive of 23 new lung cancer patients). Never smokers, long-term quitters, recent quitters, and current smokers participated. Individual interviews facilitated theme development and a conceptual model of lung cancer stigma, whereas subsequent focus groups provided feedback on the conceptual model. Qualitative data analyses included iterative coding and validation with existing theory.

RESULTS

Two main thematic elements emerged from interviews with lung cancer patients: perceived (felt) stigma and internalized (self) stigma. Discussions of perceived stigma were pervasive, whereas those of internalized stigma were more commonly endorsed among current and recently quit smokers. Participants also discussed maladaptive (e.g., decreased disclosure) and adaptive (e.g., increased advocacy) stigma-related consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate widespread acknowledgment of perceived stigma among lung cancer patients but varying degrees of internalized stigma and associated consequences. Next steps for patient-reported outcome measure development are item consolidation, item development, expert input, and cognitive interviews before field testing and psychometric analysis. Future work should address stigma-related consequences and interventions for reducing lung cancer stigma.

A systematic review of the impact of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer outcomes

Background

This study systematically reviewed the evidence on the influence of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer patterns of care; patients’ psychosocial and quality of life (QOL) outcomes; and how this may link to public health programs.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE, ProQuest, CINAHL, PsycINFO databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were: included lung cancer patients and/or partners or caregivers and/or health professionals (either at least 80% of participants had lung cancer or were partners or caregivers of lung cancer patients, or there was a lung cancer specific sub-group focus or analysis), assessed stigma or nihilism with respect to lung cancer and published in English between 1^st January 1999 and 31^st January 2011. Trial quality and levels of evidence were assessed.

Results

Eighteen articles describing 15 studies met inclusion criteria. The seven qualitative studies were high quality with regard to data collection, analysis and reporting; however most lacked a clear theoretical framework; did not address interviewer bias; or provide a rationale for sample size. The eight quantitative studies were generally of low quality with highly selected samples, non-comparable groups and low participation rates and employed divergent theoretical and measurement approaches. Stigma about lung cancer was reported by patients and health professionals and was related to poorer QOL and higher psychological distress in patients. Clear empirical explorations of nihilism were not evident. There is qualitative evidence that from the patients’ perspectives public health programs contribute to stigma about lung cancer and this was supported by published commentary.

Conclusions

Health-related stigma presents as a part of the lung cancer experience however there are clear limitations in the research to date. Future longitudinal and multi-level research is needed and this should be more clearly linked to relevant theory.

Thoroughness of mediastinal staging in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend that patients with clinical stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergo histologic confirmation of pathologic lymph nodes. Studies have suggested that invasive mediastinal staging is underutilized, although practice patterns have not been rigorously evaluated.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database to identify patients with stage IIIA NSCLC diagnosed from 1998 through 2005. Invasive staging and use of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning were assessed using Medicare claims. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with use of invasive staging.

RESULTS

Of 7583 stage IIIA NSCLC patients, 1678 (22%) underwent invasive staging. Patients who received curative intent cancer treatment were more likely to undergo invasive staging than patients who did not receive cancer-specific therapy (30% versus 9.8%, adjusted odds ratio, 3.31; 95% confidence interval, 2.78-3.95). The oldest patients (age, 85-94 years) were less likely to receive invasive staging than the youngest (age, 67-69 years; 27.6% versus 11.9%; odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.61). Sex, marital status, income, and race were not associated with the use of the invasive staging. The use of invasive staging was stable throughout the study period, despite an increase in the use of PET scanning from less than 10% of patients before 2000 to almost 70% in 2005.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 80% of Medicare beneficiaries with stage IIIA NSCLC do not receive guideline adherent mediastinal staging; this failure cannot be entirely explained by patient factors or a reliance on PET imaging. Incentives to encourage use of invasive staging may improve care.

Use of chemotherapy at the end of life among Taiwanese cancer decedents, 2001-2006

INTRODUCTION

The availability of new chemotherapeutic agents has lengthened the treatment timeline for advanced cancers and increases the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy near death. Use of chemotherapy near the end of life may not benefit cancer patients. However, no population-based study has examined the determinants for continuing chemotherapy at the end of life for all ages and cancer groups as well as for a whole country. This population-based study assessed the association between continuation of chemotherapy in the last month of life and patient demographics, disease characteristics, primary physician's specialty, hospital characteristics, and healthcare resource availability at the hospital and regional levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective population-based cohort study using administrative data among 204 850 Taiwanese cancer decedents in 2001-2006.

RESULTS

Rates of continued chemotherapy in the last month of life for each study year were 17.5%, 17.4%, 17.3%, 19.0%, 20.0%, and 21.0%, respectively and have remained steady since 2001. Taiwanese cancer patients had greater odds for continuation of chemotherapy in the last month of life if they were male [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.25], younger, single [1.21 (1.09-1.35)], had lower comorbidity levels, were diagnosed with hematologic malignancies [1.90 (1.09-1.35)] and breast cancer [1.24 (1.08-1.43)], had metastatic disease [1.36 (1.27-1.46)], and survived < 1 year but longer than two months post-diagnosis. The odds for continued chemotherapy in patients' last month was significantly increased by being cared for by a medical oncologist [3.49 (3.04-3.99)] or in a teaching hospital [1.39 (1.11-1.74)] and with the highest intensity of total inpatient hospital beds [1.63 (0.99-2.68)], but was not influenced by regional healthcare resources (total hospital and hospice beds).

CONCLUSION

The relative risk for continuation of chemotherapy in the last month of life was determined by patient demographics and disease characteristics, physician specialty, and healthcare resources at the primary hospital level.

Chemotherapy treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer: is evidence-based medicine in practice?

Treatment options for colorectal cancer have expanded to include multiple oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based regimens and more biological/targeted therapies.

Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders-preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists

A new questionnaire of clinicians' attitudes and practices in relation to screening for mood disorder was distributed to 300 cancer professionals (specialists and non-specialists) working across the UK. From 226 (75.3%) health professionals working in cancer care who responded, approximately two-thirds always or regularly attempted to detect mood disorder during consultations but a substantial minority relied on patients spontaneously mentioning an emotional issue. The highest rate of routine questioning was performed by clinicians working in palliative medicine (76.3%) as well as nurse specialists working in all areas (72%). Despite these relatively high rates of enquiry, 10% or less of all specialists used a validated questionnaire, most preferring to rely on their own clinical skills or recalling the two simple questions of the short Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2). Staff suggested that ideal screening practice was to use one, two or three simple questions or a short validated questionnaire but not to refer to a specialist for a diagnosis. The main barrier to successful screening was lack of time but insufficient training and low confidence were also influential. Once distress was detected, 90% of nurses but only 40% of doctors were prepared to give distressed patients as much time as they needed. Predictors of clinicians' willingness to use more advanced screening methods were length of follow-up appointments and time clinicians were prepared to spend detecting distress. We suggest that future field studies of screening tools should also measure the issue of acceptability.

Treatment of lung cancer in older patients

Lung cancer is a disease of older persons. It is the most common cause of cancer death in men and women in the United States. A comprehensive evaluation of medical comorbidities and functional status is important in all patients but perhaps more so in older adults, and it should be included in the assessment of older patients who have lung cancer. Age, per se, should not be a limiting factor to treatment, because a large body of evidence demonstrates that fit older patients who have lung cancer can safely undergo the same treatments as their younger counterparts with equally good results.

Beliefs among Physicians in the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) has established evidence-based guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of patients with lung cancer. Physicians' beliefs and practice patterns may differ significantly from established guidelines. We conducted a survey to assess and compare physician beliefs against the evidence-based guidelines.

METHODS

A survey was sent by electronic mail (e-mail) in March 2006 to 2100 randomly selected physicians who were members of the ACCP practicing in the United States, followed by two reminder e-mails.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-seven surveys were completed and evaluable. The majority (84%) of the respondents reported having read, consulted, or used the guidelines to set practice policies, and 75% found the guidelines helpful. The respondents' practice beliefs were in agreement with the guidelines on the evaluation of operable patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes, the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III disease, and the evaluation of a solitary pulmonary nodule. Nevertheless, a significant percentage of respondents' practice beliefs differed from the guidelines on issues such as screening for lung cancer, the survival benefit of chemotherapy in stage IV disease, and postoperative radiation therapy. Only a minority of respondents believed that chemotherapy improved quality of life in stage IV disease. The survey results indicate that there has been acceptance of the adjuvant chemotherapy and increasing integration of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of a solitary pulmonary nodule and in staging the mediastinum.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of physicians found the evidence-based guidelines beneficial; nevertheless, practice beliefs differ from the guidelines in select areas.

Patient attitudes towards chemotherapy as assessed by patient versus physician: a prospective observational study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of advanced cancer, a physician's ability to accurately identify a patient's attitude towards treatment is critical. This paper describes the extent of any differences observed between patient attitudes towards chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as assessed by patients themselves versus their physicians.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who received gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin were enrolled into this prospective observational study. Patients and their physicians completed questionnaires containing descriptions of seven patient-specific attitudes. A pre-defined algorithm was used to categorize patients into one of the three 'need' categories based on the questionnaire responses: (A) "maximum extension of survival with acceptance of high toxicity", (B) "maximum extension of survival only if coupled with normal life style", and (C) "relief of symptoms". Each patient was categorized based on his own response, as well as his physician's response.

RESULTS

A total of 1895 patients were enrolled from 19 countries across 3 continents. Data from 1884 patients were analysed. Based on patient versus physician responses, respectively, the distribution of patients was 60% versus 39% in need category A, 26% versus 33% in B, and 14% versus 29% in C. Patient self-assessed versus physician-assessed need category identification was aligned for 891 patients (47.3%): 541 (29%) in A, 218 (12%) in B, 132 (7%) in C. While there was slight agreement between the identification of 'need' categories by physicians and patients (kappa=0.18, 95% CI: 0.15-0.21), physicians also tended to place patients further down the scale (towards C) than patients placed themselves (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients have varying needs from cancer chemotherapy and it may not always be correctly identified by the treating physician. Physicians may underestimate patient's desire for extended survival compared with symptom relief.

[Chemotherapy and survival in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: is pneumologists' skepticism justified?]

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have assessed whether the advantage chemotherapy has been shown to have in treating advanced non-small lung carcinoma in clinical trials is transferrable to normal health care activity. This could explain the skepticism of a large number of pneumologists towards this treatment. The objective of our study was to analyze prognostic factors related to survival and to see whether cytostatic treatment was an independent predictor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients enrolled in the study had been diagnosed with non-small cell carcinoma in stages IV or IIIB with pleural or N2-N3 involvement and with a performance status of 2 or below according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Survival was analyzed with regard to the following variables: age, sex, comorbidity, weight loss, laboratory test results, histological type, ECOG score, TNM staging, and treatment. The Student t test, the chi(2) test, the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis were used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 190 patients (157 men and 33 women) with a mean (SD) age of 61.75 (10.85) years (range, 33-85 years). Of these patients, 144 received cytostatic treatment and 46 palliative treatment. The median survival was 31 weeks and was related to absence of weight loss (hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.39; P=.001), cytostatic treatment (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.25-2.76; P=.002), and ECOG score of 0 to 1 (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.62-5.00; P=.0001). In patients with ECOG scores of 0 to 1, weight loss and treatment were significant prognostic factors. Survival in the ECOG 2 group was 15 weeks for patients undergoing cytostatic treatment and 11 weeks for patients with symptomatic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In normal clinical practice, chemotherapy significantly prolongs survival in patients with performance status of less than 2, more time being gained if there is no associated weight loss. We conclude that the reluctance shown by many pneumologists toward using this treatment is not entirely justified.