Primary Care Providers and a System Problem: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Caring for Patients With Incidental Pulmonary Nodules

Development of a Pulmonary Nodule Service and Clinical Pathway: A Pragmatic Approach Addressing an Unmet Need

Background/Objectives: The surveillance of patients with incidental pulmonary nodules overloads existing respiratory and lung cancer clinics, as well as multidisciplinary team meetings. In our clinical setting, until 2018, we had numerous patients with incidental pulmonary nodules inundating our outpatient clinics; therefore, the need to develop a novel service and dedicated clinical pathway arose. The aims of this study are to 1. provide (a) a model of setting up a novel pulmonary nodule service, and (b) a pragmatic clinical pathway to address the increasing need for surveillance of patients with incidental pulmonary nodules. 2. share real-world data from a dedicated pulmonary nodule service running in a tertiary setting with existing resources. Methods: A retrospective review of established processes and referral mechanisms to our tertiary pulmonary nodule service was conducted. We have also performed a retrospective collection and review of data for patients reviewed and discussed in our tertiary pulmonary nodule service between April 2018 and April 2024. Results: Our tertiary pulmonary nodule service (PNS) comprises a dedicated pulmonary nodule clinic, a nodule multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting and a dedicated proforma referral system. Due to the current national health system legislation and relevant processes, patients are required to physically attend clinic appointments. There are various sources of referral, including other departments within the hospital, other hospitals, various specialties in primary care and self-referrals. Between 15 April 2018 and 15 April 2024, 2203 patients were reviewed in the pulmonary nodule clinic (903 females, 1300 males, mean age 64 ± 19 years). Of those patients, 65% (1432/2203) were current smokers. A total of 1365 new patients and 838 follow-up patients were reviewed in total. Emphysema was radiologically present in 72% of patients, and 75% of those (1189/1586) already had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Coronary calcification was identified in 32% (705/2203), and 78% of those (550/705) were already known to cardiology services. Interestingly, 27% (368/1365) of the new patients were discharged following their first MDT meeting discussion, and 67% of these were discharged as the reason for their referral was an intrapulmonary lymph node which did not warrant any further action. Among all patients, 11% (246/2203) were referred to the multidisciplinary thoracic oncology service (MTOS) due to suspicious appearances/changes in their nodules that warranted further investigation, and from those, 37% were discharged (92/246) from the MTOS. The lung cancer diagnosis rate was 7% (154/2203). Conclusions: The applied pathway offers a pragmatic approach in setting up a service that addresses an increasing patient need. Its application is feasible in a tertiary care setting, and admin support is of vital importance to ensure patients are appropriately tracked and not lost to follow-up. Real-world data from pulmonary nodules services provide a clear overview and contribute to understanding patients' characteristics and improving service provision.

Lung Cancer Screening and Incidental Findings: A Research Agenda: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Background: Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) may uncover incidental findings (IFs) unrelated to lung cancer. There may be potential benefits from identifying clinically significant IFs that warrant intervention and potential harms related to identifying IFs that are not clinically significant but may result in additional evaluation, clinician effort, patient anxiety, complications, and excess cost. Objectives: To identify knowledge and research gaps and develop and prioritize research questions to address the approach to and management of IFs. Methods: We convened a multidisciplinary panel to review the available literature on IFs detected in lung cancer screening LDCT examinations, focusing on variability and standardizing reporting, management of IFs, and evaluation of the benefits and harms of IFs, particularly cardiovascular-related IFs. We used a three-round modified Delphi process to prioritize research questions. Results: This statement identifies knowledge gaps in 1) reporting of IFs, 2) management of IFs, and 3) identifying and reporting coronary artery calcification found on lung cancer screening LDCT. Finally, we present the panel's initial 36 research questions and the final 20 prioritized questions. Conclusions: This statement provides a prioritized research agenda to further efforts focused on evaluating, managing, and increasing awareness of IFs in lung cancer screening.

The psychological disorder and personality traits of individuals with pulmonary nodules

INTRODUCTION

With the widespread use of Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in the chest, more and more people will be detected with pulmonary nodules. The presence of uncertainty following the detection of these nodules can impose significant psychological distress. This study aimed to investigate personality traits, psychological distress, and their impact on pulmonary nodule patients in China.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults with pulmonary nodules accidently discovered by LDCT in the chest from the respiratory outpatient department.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients with pulmonary nodules were included in this study. The prevalence of anxiety among patients with pulmonary nodules was found to be 47.8 %, while the prevalence of depression was reported to be 44.2 %. The present study also demonstrated a higher prevalence of anxiety among female patients with pulmonary nodules compared to their male counterparts, with mild anxiety being the predominant manifestation. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (OR = 0.926, P < 0.01), gender (OR = 3.24, P < 0.01), number of pulmonary nodules (OR = 0.586, P < 0.05), lung cancer-related characteristics (OR = 5.423, P < 0.01), PTSD (OR = 5.715, P < 0.01), and Extroversion personality traits (OR = 1.087, P < 0.05) were significant factors contributing to anxiety in patients with pulmonary nodules. Similarly, (OR = 0.891, P < 0.01), gender (OR = 2.981, P < 0.05), duration (OR = 0.663, P < 0.05), lung cancer-related characteristics (OR = 5.707, P < 0.01), PTSD (OR = 4.420, P < 0.01)emerged as key factors associated with depression in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 50 % of patients with pulmonary nodules exhibit negative affective states. Furthermore, as time progresses, the negative emotional burden of anxiety and depression in individuals with pulmonary nodules tends to alleviate.

Incidental pulmonary nodules: Natural language processing analysis of radiology reports

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary nodules are a common incidental finding on chest Computed Tomography scans (CT), most of the time outside of lung cancer screening (LCS). We aimed to evaluate the number of incidental pulmonary nodules (IPN) found in 1 year in our hospital, as well as the follow-up (FUP) rate and the clinical and radiological features associated with FUP.

METHODS

We trained a Natural Language Processing (NLP) tool to identify the transcripts mentioning the presence of a pulmonary nodule, among a large population of patients from a French hospital. We extracted nodule characteristics using keyword analysis. NLP algorithm accuracy was determined through manual reading from a sample of our population. Electronic health database and medical record analysis by clinician allowed us to obtain information about FUP and cancer diagnoses.

RESULTS

In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed 101,703 transcripts corresponding to the entire CTs performed in 2020. We identified 1,991 (2 %) patients with an IPN. NLP accuracy for nodule detection in CT reports was 99 %. Only 41 % received a FUP between January 2020 and December 2021. Patient age, nodule size, and the mention of the nodule in the impression part were positively associated with FUP, while nodules diagnosed in the context of COVID-19 were less followed. 36 (2 %) lung cancers were subsequently diagnosed, with 16 (45 %) at a non-metastatic stage.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a high prevalence of IPN with a low FUP rate, encouraging the implementation of IPN management program. We also highlighted the potential of NLP for database analysis in clinical research.

Exploring experiences and coping strategies of the surveillance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules: a qualitative content analysis among participants in the SCAPIS trial

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate experiences and coping strategies among adults in the surveillance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected with CT in the population-based Swedish CardioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS).

DESIGN

A qualitative study of conventional content analysis.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a university hospital in a southern region of Sweden. The SCAPIS setting is similar to the first round of a population-based lung cancer screening programme.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants in SCAPIS who had experienced psychosocial consequences of the surveillance were eligible. Participants of both genders, current, former and non-smokers and of different follow-ups in the surveillance were included. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 19 participants were performed using an interview guide with open-ended questions. The participants were aged 56-68 years. Nine were women, 6 and 13 were non-smokers and smokers or former smokers, respectively, and all participants had undergone at least one follow-up of the lungs in the surveillance programme.

RESULTS

The results depicted an emotional and mental journey for the participants from being distressed when informed about the need of surveillance, and realising their risks of getting sick if they did not take care of their own health, to eventually gathering the strength to cope with the situation, so the surveillance was finally valued with trust and satisfaction. The experiences and coping strategies in the surveillance programme developed a revelation of the value of health consciousness among the participants.

CONCLUSION

The study results demonstrated that a surveillance programme of pulmonary nodules might develop health consciousness among people. Still, some individuals might experience psychosocial consequences of the surveillance of indeterminate nodules. Therefore, healthcare professionals should be facilitated to perform person-centred communication to support individuals under surveillance. Preventive care to engage individuals as partners in the management of their own health should receive more attention and needs to be explored.

Shared decision-making in the management of pulmonary nodules: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to explore the evidence regarding shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of pulmonary nodules.

DESIGN

Systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

DATA SOURCE

Studies published in English or Chinese up to April 2022 were extracted from nine databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and SinoMed Data.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies were eligible if patients or healthcare providers are faced with pulmonary nodule management options or the interventions or experiences were focused on the patient-healthcare provider relationship or health education to make, increase or support shared decisions. All types of studies were included, including quantitative and qualitative studies. Grey literature and literature that had not been peer reviewed were excluded. Poster abstracts and non-empirical publications such as editorials, letters, opinion papers and review articles were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, assessed quality using Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools, and extracted data from included studies. Thematic syntheses were used to identify prominent themes emerging from the data.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, 11 of which were conducted in USA. These included six qualitative studies and six quantitative studies (including both survey and quasi-experimental designs). Three major themes with specific subthemes emerged: (1) Opportunity (uncertainty in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary nodules, willingness to participate in decision-making); (2) Ability (patient's lack of knowledge, physician's experience); and (3) Different worldview (misconception, distress among patients, preference for diagnosis and treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

Uncertainty in the management of pulmonary nodules is the opportunity to implement SDM. Patients' lack of knowledge, distress, and misunderstandings between healthcare providers and patients are both the main obstacles and the causes of the application of SDM.

Association of patient and health care organization factors with incidental nodule guidelines adherence: A multi-system observational study

BACKGROUND

Health care organizations are increasingly developing systems to ensure patients with pulmonary nodules receive guideline-adherent care. Our goal was to determine patient and organization factors that are associated with radiologist adherence as well as clinician and patient concordance to 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines for incidental pulmonary nodule follow-up.

MATERIALS

Trained researchers abstracted data from the electronic health record from two Veterans Affairs health care systems for patients with incidental pulmonary nodules as identified by interpreting radiologists from 2008 to 2016.

METHODS

We classified radiology reports and patient follow-up into two categories. Radiologist-Fleischner Adherence was the agreement between the radiologist's recommendation in the computed tomography report and the 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines. Clinician/Patient-Fleischner Concordance was agreement between patient follow-up and the guidelines. We calculated multivariable-adjusted predicted probabilities for factors associated with Radiologist-Fleischner Adherence and Clinician/Patient-Fleischner Concordance.

RESULTS

Among 3150 patients, 69% of radiologist recommendations were adherent to 2005 Fleischner guidelines, 4% were more aggressive, and 27% recommended less aggressive follow-up. Overall, only 48% of patients underwent follow-up concordant with 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines, 37% had less aggressive follow-up, and 15% had more aggressive follow-up. Radiologist-Fleischner Adherence was associated with Clinician/Patient-Fleischner Concordance with evidence for effect modification by health care system.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians and patients seem to follow radiologists' recommendations but often do not obtain concordant follow-up, likely due to downstream differential processes in each health care system. Health care organizations need to develop comprehensive and rigorous tools to ensure high levels of appropriate follow-up for patients with pulmonary nodules.

What Goes into Patient Selection for Lung Cancer Screening? Factors Associated with Clinician Judgments of Suitability for Screening

Rationale: Achieving the net benefit of lung cancer screening (LCS) depends on optimizing patient selection. Objective: To identify factors associated with clinician assessments that a patient was unlikely to benefit from LCS ("LCS-inappropriate") because of comorbidities or limited life expectancy. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients assessed for LCS at 30 Veterans Health Administration facilities from January 1, 2015 to February 1, 2021. We conducted hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression analyses to determine factors associated with clinicians' designations of LCS inappropriateness (primary outcome), accounting for 3-year predicted probability (i.e., competing risk) of non-lung cancer death. Measurements and Main Results: Among 38,487 LCS-eligible patients, 1,671 (4.3%) were deemed LCS-inappropriate by clinicians, whereas 4,383 (11.4%) had an estimated 3-year competing risk of non-lung cancer death greater than 20%. Patients with higher competing risks of non-lung cancer death were more likely to be deemed LCS-inappropriate (odds ratio [OR], 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.32-3.05). Older patients (ages 75-80; OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.18-1.78) and those with interstitial lung disease (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.51-2.59) were more likely to be deemed LCS-inappropriate than would be explained by competing risk of non-lung cancer death, whereas patients currently smoking (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58-0.73) were less likely to be deemed LCS-inappropriate, suggesting that clinicians over- or underweighted these factors. The probability of being deemed LCS-inappropriate varied from 0.4% to 74%, depending on the clinician making the assessment (median OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 2.89-3.25). Conclusion: Concerningly, the likelihood that a patient is deemed LCS-inappropriate is more strongly associated with the clinician making the assessment than with patient characteristics. Patient selection may be optimized by providing decision support to help clinicians assess net LCS benefit.

Distress and its influencing factors among Chinese patients with incidental pulmonary nodules: a cross-sectional study

The study aims to investigate the distress level and its influencing factors in Chinese pulmonary nodules patients. A total of 163 outpatients in a tertiary hospital in Xi'an, China, were recruited and investigated by using the Impact of Event Scale, Decision Conflict Scale, Consultation Care Measure, Lung Cancer Worry Scale and a demographic questionnaire. The logistic regression model was used to identify the factors of distress. The mean IES score was 37.35 ± 16.65, which was a moderate level. Patients aged 50-60 years, with higher decision conflicts scores, lower physician-patient communication quality score, and who are anxious about the results of future tests or treatments had higher distress score. Distress levels were moderate in patients with pulmonary nodules. Communication between medical staff and patients is extremely important for the management of pulmonary nodules, which affects the quality of the patient's decision-making and his level of distress.

Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening in a Centralized Academic Program

BACKGROUND

Adherence to lung cancer screening (LCS) protocols is critical for achieving mortality reductions. However, adherence rates, particularly for recommended annual screening among patients with low-risk findings, are often sub-optimal. We evaluated annual LCS adherence for patients with low-risk findings participating in a centralized screening program at a tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study of a centralized lung cancer screening program launched in July 2018. We performed electronic medical review of 337 patients who underwent low-dose CT (LDCT) screening before February 1, 2021 (to ensure ≥ 15 months follow up) and had a low-risk Lung-RADS score of 1 or 2. Captured data included patient characteristics (smoking history, Fagerstrom score, environmental exposures, lung cancer risk score), LDCT imaging dates, and Lung-RADS results. The primary outcome measure was adherence to annual screening. We used multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with adherence.

RESULTS

Overall, 337 patients had an initial Lung-RADS result of 1 (n = 189) or 2 (n = 148). Among this cohort, 139 (73.5%) of Lung-RADS 1 and 111 (75.0%) of Lung-RADS 2 patients completed the annual repeat LDCT within 15 months, respectively. The only patient characteristic associated with adherence was having Medicaid coverage; compared to having private insurance, Medicaid patients were less adherent (adjusted OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.15-0.92). No other patient characteristic was associated with adherence.

CONCLUSION

Our centralized screening program achieved a high initial annual adherence rate. Although LCS has first-dollar insurance coverage, other socioeconomic concerns may present barriers to annual screening for Medicaid recipients.

A Standardized Radiology Template Improves Incidental Adrenal Mass Follow-Up: A Prospective Effectiveness and Implementation Study

PURPOSE

Incidental adrenal masses (IAMs) are common but rarely evaluated. To improve this, we developed a standardized radiology report recommendation template and investigated its implementation and effectiveness.

METHODS

We prospectively studied implementation of a standardized IAM reporting template as part of an ongoing quality improvement initiative, which also included primary care provider (PCP) notifications and a straightforward clinical algorithm. Data were obtained via medical record review and a survey of radiologists. Outcomes included template adoption rates and acceptability (implementation measures), as well as the proportion of patients evaluated and time to follow-up (effectiveness outcomes).

RESULTS

Of 4,995 imaging studies, 200 (4.0%) detected a new IAM. The standardized template was used in 54 reports (27.0%). All radiologists surveyed were aware of the template, and 91% affirmed that standardized recommendations are useful. Patients whose reports included the template were more likely to have PCP follow-up after IAM discovery compared with those with no template (53.7% versus 36.3%, P = .03). After adjusting for sex, current or prior malignancy, and provider ordering the initial imaging (PCP, other outpatient provider, or emergency department or inpatient provider), odds of PCP follow-up remained 2.0 times higher (95% confidence interval 1.02-3.9). Patients whose reports included the template had a shorter time to PCP follow-up (log-rank P = .018). PCPs ultimately placed orders for biochemical testing (35.2% versus 18.5%, P = .01), follow-up imaging (40.7% versus 23.3%, P = .02), and specialist referral (22.2% versus 4.8%, P < .01) for a higher proportion of patients who received the template compared with those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a standardized template to communicate IAM recommendations was associated with improved IAM evaluation. Our template demonstrated high acceptability, but additional strategies are necessary to optimize adoption.

The mediating role of decision-making conflict in the association between patient's participation satisfaction and distress during medical decision-making among Chinese patients with pulmonary nodules

OBJECTIVE

When diagnosed as having pulmonary nodules, patients may be mired in the conflict of medical decision-making and suffered from distress. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mediating role of decision-making conflict in the relationship between participation satisfaction in medical decision-making (PSMD) and distress among Chinese patients with incidental pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

A total of 163 outpatients with incidental pulmonary nodules detected in a tertiary hospital were recruited and investigated by Impact of Event Scale (IES), Decision Conflict Scale (DCS), participation satisfaction in medical decision-making Scale (PSMDS), and demographic questionnaire.

RESULTS

The mean IES score was 37.35 ± 16.65, representing a moderate level. PSMD was negatively associated with distress, while decision-making conflict was positively associated with distress. The final regression model contained three factors: having a first-degree relative diagnosed with lung cancer, worrying about getting lung cancer someday, and decision-making conflict. These three factors explained 49.4 % of the variance of distress. The total effect of PSMD on distress and indirect effect of SPMD on distress caused-by decision-making conflict were significant (P < 0.05). However, the direct effect of PSMD on distress was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation of patients in medical decision-making can lower their distress by reducing patient's decision-making conflict.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Interventions targeting at the decision-making conflict will help alleviate the distress level of patients with pulmonary nodules.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Patient responses to passive enrollment into a large, pragmatic clinical trial: A qualitative content analysis

BACKGROUND

While passive enrollment or "opt-out" recruitment methods facilitate pragmatic clinical trials, they pose unique challenges, and it is unclear how participants feel about them. Here, we describe patient responses to passive enrollment into the Watch the Spot Trial, a pragmatic trial comparing two sets of guidelines for small lung nodule follow-up.

METHODS

For this nested qualitative study, we analyzed participant-initiated calls and emails. We performed a qualitative content analysis, using a team-coding approach to identify reasons that eligible participants contacted the study team. We calculated the proportion of contacts containing each code, and how often each code coincided with study opt-outs and other codes.

RESULTS

Of 23,412 eligible participants across seven sites, 1494 (6.4%) contacted the study team, with 1560 total contacts. Among the total contacts, the most common codes (i.e., reasons for contacting the team) were study opt-outs (n = 614, 39.0%), clarification of study procedures (n = 328, 21.0%), and unawareness of the nodule prior to research notification (n = 244, 15.6%). The least common codes were concerns about sharing of protected health information with the study team (n = 22, 1.4%) or outside of the healthcare system (n = 26, 1.7%), and disapproval of the opt-out approach (n = 10, 0.6%); most patients with these concerns opted-out. Nodule unawareness sometimes coincided with anger (n = 24) or distress (n = 15), and questions about nodule care sometimes coincided with distress (n = 20) and questions about follow-up surveys (n = 26).

CONCLUSION

Most participants did not report concerns about passive enrollment. Patient perspectives are an invaluable resource for minimizing risks and inconveniences of future pragmatic trials using this recruitment method.

The Chain of Adherence for Incidentally Detected Pulmonary Nodules after an Initial Radiologic Imaging Study: A Multisystem Observational Study

Rationale: Millions of people are diagnosed with incidental pulmonary nodules every year. Although most nodules are benign, it is universally recommended that all patients be assessed to determine appropriate follow-up and ensure that it is obtained. Objectives: To determine the degree of concordance and adherence to 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines among radiologists, clinicians, and patients at two Veterans Affairs healthcare systems with incidental nodule tracking systems. Methods: Trained researchers abstracted data from the electronic health records of patients with incidental pulmonary nodules as identified by interpreting radiologists from 2008 to 2016. We classified radiology reports and patient follow-up into three categories. Radiologist-Fleischner adherence was the agreement between the radiologist's recommendation in the computed tomography (CT) report and the 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines. Clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance was agreement between patient follow-up and the guidelines. Clinician/patient-radiologist adherence was agreement between the radiologist's recommendation and patient follow-up. We evaluated whether the recommendation or follow-up was more (e.g., sooner) or less (e.g., later) aggressive than recommended. Results: After exclusions, 4,586 patients with 7,408 imaging tests (n = 4,586 initial chest CT scans; n = 2,717 follow-up chest CT scans; n = 105 follow-up low-dose CT scans) were included. Among radiology reports that could be classified in terms of Fleischner Society guidelines (n = 3,150), 80% had nonmissing radiologist recommendations. Among those reports, radiologist-Fleischner adherence was 86.6%, with 4.8% more aggressive and 8.6% less aggressive. Among patients whose initial scans could be classified, clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance was 46.0%, 14.5% were more aggressive, and 39.5% were less aggressive. Clinician/patient-radiologist adherence was 54.3%. Veterans whose radiology reports were adherent to Fleischner Society guidelines had a substantially higher proportion of clinician/patient-Fleischner concordance: 52.0% concordance among radiologist-Fleischner adherent versus 11.6% concordance among radiologist-Fleischner nonadherent. Conclusions: In this multi-health system observational study of incidental pulmonary nodule follow-up, we found that radiologist adherence to 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines may be necessary but not sufficient. Our results highlight the many facets of care processes that must occur to achieve guideline-concordant care.

Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Found on Shoulder Arthroplasty Preoperative CT Scans

With current emphasis on preoperative templating of anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA, respectively), patients often receive thin slice (<1.0 mm) computerized tomography (CT) scans of the operative shoulder, which includes about two-thirds of the ipsilateral lung. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and management of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules on preoperative CT scans for shoulder arthroplasty. In this single-center retrospective study, we queried records of aTSA and rTSA patients from 2015 to 2020 who received preoperative CT imaging of the shoulder. Compared to patients with negative CT findings, there were significantly more females (63.8% vs. 46.4%; P = .011), COPD (13.0% vs. 4.7%; P = .015), and asthma (18.8% vs. 6.9%; P = .003) among the patients with incidental nodules on CT. Binary logistic regression confirmed that female sex (odds ratio = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.04 to 3.88; P = .037), COPD history (OR = 3.02; 95% CI = 1.05 to 8.65; P = .040), and asthma history (OR = 3.17; 95% CI = 1.30 to 7.77; P = .011) were significantly associated with an incidental nodule finding. Incidental pulmonary nodules found on shoulder arthroplasty preoperative CT scans are often low risk in size with low risk of malignancy, and do not require further workup. This study may provide guidance to orthopedic surgeons on how to manage patients with incidental pulmonary nodules to increase chances of early cancer detection, avoid unnecessary referrals, reduce potentially harmful radiation exposure of serial CT scans, and improve cost efficiency.

Nodule net: A centralized prospective lung nodule tracking and safety-net program

BACKGROUND

Inadequate follow-up of suspicious lung nodules can result in diagnostic delays and potential progression to advanced lung cancer. In 2015, a multidisciplinary lung nodule management program, Nodule Net, was implemented to increase the timely follow-up rate. In this study, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the program.

METHODS

2398 chest CT reports were reviewed for the presence of a lung nodule. Baseline demographics, nodule characteristics, and follow-up recommendations were collected. For reports that did not include structured recommendations, Fleischner Society guidelines were applied if appropriate. The rate of follow-up imaging was recorded and compared with historical rates.

RESULTS

Lung nodules were reported on 1367 (57%) of scans. Of the 632 participants with recommendations for follow-up, the Nodule Net nurse navigator was notified on 523 (83%). Of these, 408 (78%) completed follow-up, compared to 57/109 (52%) in those who were not reported to Nodule Net tracking system (risk ratio: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.24-1.79, p-value < 0.05). Out of these 408, nodule net outreach was required to prompt the follow-up in 116 (28%). Of these, a lung malignancy was diagnosed in 4 (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Management of lung nodules is a complex process. Implementation of a lung nodule tracking program led to a significant increase in the completion of recommended follow-up imaging compared with usual care. Developing a comprehensive lung nodule program using an automated software system rather than manual processes to refer and track incidental findings may further reduce barriers to completion of follow-up.

The person behind the nodule: a narrative review of the psychological impact of lung cancer screening

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality globally, responsible for an estimated 1.76 million deaths worldwide in 2018 alone. Screening adults at high risk of lung cancer using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) significantly reduces lung cancer mortality by finding the disease at an early, treatable stage. Many countries are actively considering whether to implement screening for their high-risk populations in light of the recently published Dutch-Belgian trial 'NELSON'. In deciding whether to implement a national screening programme, policymakers must weigh up the evidence for the relative risks posed to the entire screened population, including the potential psychological burden. This narrative review aimed to critically summarise the evidence for both negative and positive psychological responses experienced throughout the LDCT screening pathway, to describe their magnitude, duration and clinical relevance, and to draw out different aspects of measurement design crucial to their interpretation. A further aim was to discuss the available evidence for individual differences in psychological response, as well as interventions designed to promote psychological well-being. In summary, there was no evidence that the LDCT screening process caused adverse psychological outcomes overall, although those receiving indeterminate and suspicious LDCT results did report clinically raised anxiety and lung cancer-specific distress in the short-term. There was early evidence that demographic factors, smoking status and screening-ineligibility could be associated with individual differences in propensity to experience distress. Qualitative data suggested health beliefs could be modifiable mediators of these individual differences, but their aetiology requires quantitative and prospective research. There was also some evidence of positive psychological responses that could be capitalised on, and of the potential for person-centred communication interventions to achieve this. Further research needs to be embedded in real-world LDCT lung cancer screening services and use condition-specific measures to monitor outcomes and test evidence-based communication interventions in promoting psychological well-being.

Management Strategies to Promote Follow-Up Care for Incidental Findings: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Incidentalomas, or unexpectedly identified masses, are frequently identified in diagnostic imaging studies. Incidentalomas may require timely follow-up care to determine if they are benign, disease-causing, or malignant lesions; however, many incidentalomas do not receive diagnostic workup. The most effective strategies to manage incidentalomas and optimal metrics for judging the efficacy of these strategies remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify management strategies used to promote guideline-concordant follow-up for incidentalomas and commonly reported performance metrics associated with these strategies.

DATA SOURCES

We searched peer-reviewed literature for incidentaloma management studies published between 2003 and 2020.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction included anatomical location, imaging modality, clinical setting, management strategy characteristics, and metrics used to assess the management strategy. Eligible studies were analyzed qualitatively to describe strategies and metrics.

RESULTS

In all, 15 studies met inclusion criteria. Four types of interventions designed to promote guideline-concordant follow-up care for incidentalomas were identified: (1) physical or verbal guideline reminders (n = 3); (2) electronic guideline references (n = 4); (3) enhanced radiology templates (n = 3); (4) restructured clinical and communication pathways (n = 5). Strategy efficacy was assessed by measuring rates of patients who received recommended follow-up care (n = 6) or had care recommendations documented in clinical records (n = 5). Few studies measured diagnostic outcomes associated with incidentalomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Most management strategies target changes in radiologists' behavior. Few studies address barriers to improving incidentaloma follow-up from interpretation to patient education of findings and care delivery. Hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies are needed to better address workflow barriers and rigorously evaluate care delivery outcomes.

Association of the Intensity of Diagnostic Evaluation With Outcomes in Incidentally Detected Lung Nodules

IMPORTANCE

Whether guideline-concordant lung nodule evaluations lead to better outcomes remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the intensity of lung nodule diagnostic evaluations and outcomes, safety, and health expenditures.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This comparative effectiveness research study analyzed health plan enrollees at Kaiser Permanente Washington in Seattle, Washington, and Marshfield Clinic in Marshfield, Wisconsin, with an incidental lung nodule detected between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015. Included patients were 35 years or older, had no high suspicion of infection, had no history of malignant neoplasm, and had no evidence of advanced lung cancer on nodule detection. Data analysis was conducted from January 7 to August 19, 2020.

EXPOSURES

With the 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines (selected for their applicability to the time frame under investigation) as the comparator, 2 other intensities of lung nodule evaluation were defined. Guideline-concordant evaluation followed the guidelines. Less intensive evaluation was the absence of recommended testing, longer-than-recommended surveillance intervals, or less invasive testing than recommended. More intensive evaluation consisted of testing when the guidelines recommended no further testing, shorter-than-recommended surveillance intervals, or more invasive testing than recommended.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was the proportion of patients with lung cancer who had stage III or IV disease, radiation exposure, procedure-related adverse events, and health expenditures 2 years after nodule detection.

RESULTS

Among the 5057 individuals included in this comparative effectiveness research study, 1925 (38%) received guideline-concordant, 1863 (37%) less intensive, and 1269 (25%) more intensive diagnostic evaluations. The entire cohort comprised 2786 female patients (55%), and the mean (SD) age was 67 (13) years. Adjusted analyses showed that compared with guideline-concordant evaluations, less intensive evaluations were associated with fewer procedure-related adverse events (risk difference [RD], -5.9%; 95% CI, -7.2% to -4.6%), lower mean radiation exposure (-9.5 milliSieverts [mSv]; 95% CI, -10.3 mSv to -8.7 mSv), and lower mean health expenditures (-$10 916; 95% CI, -$16 112 to -$5719); no difference in stage III or IV disease was found among patients diagnosed with lung cancer (RD, 4.6%; 95% CI, -22% to +31%). More intensive evaluations were associated with more procedure-related adverse events (RD, +8.1%; 95% CI, +5.6% to +11%), higher mean radiation exposure (+6.8 mSv; 95% CI, +5.8 mSv to +7.8 mSv), and higher mean health expenditures ($20 132; 95% CI, +$14 398 to +$25 868); no difference in stage III or IV disease was observed (RD, -0.5%; 95% CI, -28% to +27%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found inconclusive evidence of an association between less intensive diagnostic evaluations and more advanced stage at lung cancer diagnosis compared with guideline-concordant care; higher intensities of diagnostic evaluations were associated with greater procedural complications, radiation exposure, and expenditures. These findings underscore the need for more evidence on better ways to evaluate lung nodules and to avoid unnecessarily intensive diagnostic evaluations of lung nodules.

Patient characteristics associated with adherence to pulmonary nodule guidelines

BACKGROUND

While pulmonary nodule guidelines provide follow-up recommendations based on nodule size and malignancy risk, these are inconsistently followed in clinical practice. In this study, we sought to identify patient characteristics associated with guideline-concordant nodule follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with a pulmonary nodule between 2011 and 2014 at Boston Medical Center. Appropriate nodule follow-up evaluation was based upon the 2005 Fleischner Society Guidelines. In primary analysis, we compared patients with guideline-concordant follow-up to those with delayed or absent follow-up. In secondary analysis, we compared those with any follow-up to those without follow-up as well as the rate of guideline-concordant follow-up in patients seen by a pulmonologist.

RESULTS

Of 3916 patients diagnosed with a pulmonary nodule, 1117 were included for analysis. Overall, 598 (53.5%) patients received guideline-concordant follow-up. Lower rates of guideline concordance were seen in patients of Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-1.00), while higher rates were seen for nodules 7-8 mm (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.35) and nodules >8 mm (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.20). Having a history of COPD (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.43), and being seen by a pulmonologist (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.51-2.58) were also associated with guideline concordance. Among patients seen by a pulmonologist, 62.2% received guideline-concordant follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Overall rates of pulmonary nodule follow-up are low. Patient ethnicity, COPD history, nodule size and involvement of a pulmonologist may impact follow-up rates and are potential targets for implementation interventions to improve pulmonary nodule follow-up.

"We Just Never Have Enough Time": Clinician Views of Lung Cancer Screening Processes and Implementation

RATIONALE

Despite a known mortality benefit, lung cancer screening (LCS) implementation has been unexpectedly slow. New programs face barriers to implementation, which may include lack of clinician engagement or beliefs that the intervention is not beneficial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate diverse clinician perspectives on their views of LCS and their experience with LCS implementation and processes.

METHODS

We performed a qualitative study of clinicians participating in LCS. Clinicians were drawn from three medical centers, representing diverse specialties and practice settings. All participants practiced at sites with formal lung cancer screening programs. We performed semi-structured interviews with probes designed to elicit opinions of LCS, perceived evidence gaps, and recommendations for improvements. Transcribed interviews were iteratively reviewed and coded using directed content analysis.

RESULTS

Participants (n=24) included LCS coordinators, pulmonologists, physician and non-physician primary care providers (PCPs), a surgeon, and a radiologist. Most clinicians expressed that the evidence supporting LCS was adequate to support clinical adoption, though most PCPs had little direct knowledge and based decisions on local recommendations or endorsement by the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF). Many PCPs endorsed lack of knowledge of eligibility requirements and screening strategy (e.g. annual while eligible). Clinicians with more lung cancer screening knowledge, including several PCPs, identified a number of gaps in the current evidence that tempered enthusiasm, including: unclear ideal screening interval, populations with high cancer risk that do not qualify under USPSTF, indications to stop screening, and the role of serious comorbidities. Support for centralized programs and LCS coordinators was strong, but not uniform. Clinicians were frustrated by time limitations during a patient encounter, costs to the patient, and issues with insurance coverage. Many gaps in informatics support were identified. Clinicians recommended working to improve informatics support, continuing to clarify clinician responsibilities, and working on increasing public awareness of LCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite working within programs that have adopted many recommended care processes to support LCS, clinicians identified a number of issues in providing high-quality LCS. Many of these issues are best addressed by improved support of LCS within the electronic health record and continued education of staff and patients.

Why do delays to diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer occur? A mixed methods study of insights from Australian clinicians

AIMS

Delays in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can impact survival. We explored reasons for delays experienced by patients with lung cancer to identify themes and strategies for improvement.

METHODS

We used national timeframe recommendations and standardized definitions to identify General Practitioners and specialists caring for 34 patients who experienced delays in our previous Medicare data linkage study. Clinicians participated in a survey and interview, including qualitative (exploratory, open-ended questions) and quantitative (rating scales) components. Exploratory content analysis, cross-case triangulation, and descriptive statistics were performed. Krippendorff's coefficient was used to assess level of agreement between clinicians and patients, and among clinicians, on perceived delays.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 out of 50 (54%) eligible clinicians participated (including 11 respiratory physicians and seven medical oncologists). Dominant themes for perceived causes of delay included referral barriers, limited General Practitioner (GP) awareness of subtle clinical presentations, insufficient radiology interpretation, and lack of cancer coordinators. "Unavoidable" delays may occur due to clinical circumstances. Awareness and uptake of referral and timeframe guidelines were low, with clinicians using professional networks over guidelines. There was no consistent agreement on perceived delays between patients and clinicians, and among clinicians (Krippendorff's coefficient .03 [P = .8]).

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies for minimizing avoidable delays include efficient GP to specialist referral and more lung cancer coordinators to assist with patient expectations and waitlist management. Clinicians' reliance on experience, rather than guidelines, indicates need to review guideline utility. Raising awareness of benchmarks and unavoidable barriers may recalibrate perceptions of "delays" to diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.

Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and association with mortality in a safety-net cohort

Background Though incidental pulmonary nodules are common, rates of guideline-recommended surveillance and associations between surveillance and mortality are unclear. In this study, we describe adherence (categorized as complete, partial, late and none) to guideline-recommended surveillance among patients with incidental 5-8 mm pulmonary nodules and assess associations between adherence and mortality. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 551 patients (≥35 years) with incidental pulmonary nodules conducted from September 1, 2008 to December 31, 2016, in an integrated safety-net health network. Results Of the 551 patients, 156 (28%) had complete, 87 (16%) had partial, 93 (17%) had late and 215 (39%) had no documented surveillance. Patients were followed for a median of 5.2 years [interquartile range (IQR), 3.6-6.7 years] and 82 (15%) died during follow-up. Adjusted all-cause mortality rates ranged from 2.24 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-3.25] deaths per 100 person-years for complete follow-up to 3.30 (95% CI, 2.36-4.23) for no follow-up. In multivariable models, there were no statistically significant associations between the levels of surveillance and mortality (p > 0.16 for each comparison with complete surveillance). Compared with complete surveillance, adjusted mortality rates were non-significantly increased by 0.45 deaths per 100 person-years (95% CI, -1.10 to 2.01) for partial, 0.55 (95% CI, -1.08 to 2.17) for late and 1.05 (95% CI, -0.35 to 2.45) for no surveillance. Conclusions Although guideline-recommended surveillance of small incidental pulmonary nodules was incomplete or absent in most patients, gaps in surveillance were not associated with statistically significant increases in mortality in a safety-net population.

Patient-Centered, Guideline-Concordant Discussion and Management of Pulmonary Nodules

Providing guideline-concordant management of pulmonary nodules can present challenges when a patient's anxiety about cancer or fear of invasive procedures colors judgment. The way in which providers discuss and make decisions about how to evaluate a pulmonary nodule can affect patient satisfaction, distress, and adherence to evaluation. This article discusses the complexity of tailoring patient-provider communication, decision-making, and implementation of guidelines for pulmonary nodule evaluation to the individual patient, emphasizing the importance of how information is conveyed and the value of listening to and addressing patients' concerns. We summarize the relevant guideline recommendations and literature, and provide two case scenarios to illustrate a patient-centered approach to discussing and managing pulmonary nodules from our perspectives as a pulmonologist and thoracic surgeon.

What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making (SDM) is widely recommended and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid for patients considering lung cancer screening (LCS).

OBJECTIVE

We examined clinicians' communication practices and perceived barriers of SDM for LCS at three medical centers with established screening programs.

DESIGN

Multicenter qualitative study of clinicians participating in LCS.

APPROACH

We performed semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis, guided by a theoretical model of patient-clinician communication.

PARTICIPANTS

We interviewed 24 clinicians including LCS coordinators (2), pulmonologists (3), and primary care providers (17), 4 of whom worked for the LCS program, a thoracic surgeon, and a radiologist.

RESULTS

All clinicians agreed with the goal of SDM, to ensure the screening decision was congruent with the patient's values. The depth and type of information presented by each clinician role varied considerably. LCS coordinators presented detailed information including numeric estimates of benefit and harm. Most PCPs explained the process more generally, focusing on logistics and the high rate of nodule detection. No clinician explicitly elicited values or communication preferences. Many PCPs tailored the conversation based on their implicit understanding of patients' values and preferences, gained from past experiences. PCPs reported that time, lack of detailed personal knowledge of LCS, and patient preferences were barriers to SDM. Many clinicians perceived that a significant proportion of patients were not interested in specific percentages and preferred to receive a clinician recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that clinicians support the goal of SDM for LCS decisions but PCPs may not perform some of its elements. The lack of completion of some elements, such as PCPs' lack of in-depth information exchange, may reflect perceived patient preferences for communication. As LCS is implemented, further research is needed to support a personalized, patient-centered approach to produce better outcomes.

Integrated, Multidisciplinary Management of Pulmonary Nodules Can Streamline Care and Improve Adherence to Recommendations

Every year millions of pulmonary nodules are discovered incidentally and through lung cancer screening programs. Management of these nodules is often suboptimal, with low follow-up rates and poor provider understanding of management approaches. There is an emerging body of literature about how to optimize management of pulmonary nodules. The Pulmonary Nodule and Lung Cancer Screening Clinic (PNLCSC) at Massachusetts General Hospital was founded in 2012 to manage pulmonary nodules via a multidisciplinary approach with optimized support staff. Recommendations from clinic providers and treatment details were recorded for all patients seen at the PNLCSC. Adherence to recommendations and outcomes were also tracked and reviewed. From October 2012 to September 2019, 1,136 patients were seen at the PNLCSC, each for a mean of 1.8 appointments (range, 1-10). A total of 356 procedures were recommended by the clinic and 271 patients were referred for surgery and/or radiation. The majority of interventions (74%) were recommended at the initial PNLCSC appointment. In total, 211 patients (19%) evaluated at the PNLCSC had pathologically confirmed pulmonary malignancies or were treated empirically with radiation. Among patients followed by the clinic, the adherence rate to clinic recommendations was 95%. This study shows how a multidisciplinary approach to pulmonary nodule management can streamline care and optimize follow-up. The PNLCSC provides a template that can be replicated in other health systems. It also provides an example of how multidisciplinary approaches can be applied to other complex conditions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work demonstrates how an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to management of pulmonary nodules can streamline patient care and improve adherence to provider recommendations. This approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs.

Multidisciplinary Team-Based Management of Incidentally Detected Lung Nodules

BACKGROUND

Each year, > 1.5 million Americans are diagnosed with an incidentally detected lung nodule. Practice guidelines attempt to balance the benefit of early detection of lung cancer with the risks of diagnostic testing, but adherence to guidelines is low. The goal of this study was to determine guideline adherence rates in the setting of a multidisciplinary nodule clinic and describe reasons for nonadherence as well as associated outcomes.

METHODS

This cohort study included 3 years of follow-up of patients aged ≥ 35 years with an incidentally detected lung nodule evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic that used the 2005 Fleischner Society Guidelines.

RESULTS

Among 113 patients, 67% (95% CI, 58-76) were recommended a guideline-concordant nodule evaluation; 7.1% (95% CI, 3.1-13) and 26% (95% CI, 18-25) were recommended less or more intense evaluation, respectively. In contrast, 58% (95% CI, 48-67), 22% (95% CI, 18-25), and 23% (95% CI, 16-32) received a guideline-concordant, less intense, or more intense evaluation. The most common reason for recommending guideline-discordant care was concern for two different diagnoses that would each benefit from early detection and treatment. A majority of lung cancer diagnoses (88%) occurred in patients who received guideline-concordant care. There were no lung cancer cases in those who received less intense nodule care.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary nodule clinic may serve as a system-level intervention to promote guideline-concordant care, while also providing a multidisciplinary basis by which to deviate from guidelines to address the needs of a heterogeneous patient population.

An Assessment of Primary Care and Pulmonary Provider Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening

RATIONALE

Lung cancer screening has a mortality benefit to high-risk smokers, but implementation remains suboptimal. Providers represent the key entry point to screening, and an understanding of provider perspectives on lung cancer screening is necessary to improve referral and overall implementation.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to understand knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators to screening in a diverse group of referring pulmonologists and primary care providers.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic survey of primary care and pulmonary providers within a tertiary care medical center across different practice sites. The survey covered the following domains: 1) beliefs and assessment of evidence, 2) knowledge of lung cancer screening and guidelines, 3) current screening practices, 4) barriers and facilitators, and 5) demographic and practice characteristics.

RESULTS

The 196 participants included 80% primary care clinicians and 19% pulmonologists (1% others). Forty-one percent practiced at university-based or affiliated clinics, 47% at county hospital-based clinics, and 12% at other or unidentified sites. The majority endorsed lung cancer screening effectiveness (74%); however, performance on knowledge-based assessments of screening eligibility, documentation, and nodule management was suboptimal. Key barriers included inadequate time (36%), inadequate staffing (36%), and patients having too many other illnesses to address screening (38%). Decision aids, which are used at the point of referral, were commonly identified both as important lung cancer screening clinical facilitators (51%) and as provider knowledge facilitators (59%). There were several differences by provider specialty, including primary care providers more frequently reporting time constraints and their patients having too many other illnesses to address screening as significant barriers to lung cancer screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers endorsed the benefits of lung cancer screening, but there are limitations in provider knowledge of key screening components. The most frequently reported barriers to screening represent a lack of clinical time or resources to address lung cancer screening in clinical practice. Facilitators for nodule management as well as point-of-care referral materials may be helpful in reducing knowledge gaps and the clinical burden of referral. These are all modifiable factors, which could be addressed to increase screening referral. Differences in attitudes and barriers by specialty should also be considered to optimize screening implementation.

Peripheral blood telomere alterations in ground glass opacity (GGO) lesions may suggest malignancy

A ground glass opacity (GGO) lung lesion may represent early stage adenocarcinoma, which has an excellent prognosis upon prompt surgical resection. However, GGO lesions have broad differential diagnoses, including both benign and malignant lesions. Our objective was to study telomere length and telomerase activity in patients with suspected lung cancer in which GGO was the predominant radiographic feature. Knowledge of telomere biology may help distinguish malignant from benign radiographic lesions and guide risk assessment of these lesions. Peripheral blood samples were taken from 22 patients with suspected adenocarcinoma with the GGO radiographic presentation. Multidisciplinary discussion confirmed the need for surgery in all cases. We used an age and gender‐matched group without known lung disease as a control. Telomere length and aggregates were assessed by quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (QFISH) and quantitative PCR. Cell senescence was evaluated by senescence‐associated heterochromatin foci. Subjects with GGO lesions had a higher percentage of lymphocytes with shorter telomeres (Q‐FISH, P = 0.003). Furthermore, relative telomere length was also reduced among the GGO cases (qPCR, P < 0.05). Increased senescence was observed in the GGO group compared to controls (P < 0.001), with significant correlation between the senescence‐associated heterochromatin foci and aggregate formation (r = −0.7 and r = −0.44 for cases and controls, respectively). In conclusion, patients with resectable early adenocarcinoma demonstrate abnormal telomere length and cell senescence in peripheral blood leukocytes compared to control subjects. Abnormal telomere biology in the peripheral blood may increase suspicion of early adenocarcinoma among patients with GGO lesions.

A Community-based Pulmonary Nodule Clinic: Improving Lung Cancer Stage at Diagnosis

Objective

Pulmonary nodules (PNs) are a common incidental finding and are often how lung cancer is discovered. Our goal was to determine if establishing a pulmonary nodule clinic (PNC) in a community healthcare setting would lead to an earlier stage at diagnosis.

Methods

A single healthcare system retrospective review was conducted of all PNC patients from 2010-2015 diagnosed with lung cancer. The stage at diagnosis was analyzed and compared to lung cancer patients in our healthcare system outside the PNC and to national data. Five-year survival rates for PNC patients from 2010-2012 were also analyzed.

Results

 A total of 119 patients and 127 lung cancers were diagnosed through the PNC from 2010-2015. There were 990 lung cancers, with a known stage, diagnosed outside the PNC in our healthcare system from 2010 to 2015. Two hundred and eighty one (28.4%) cancers were Stage I, compared to 69 (54.3%) (p <0.0001) through the PNC; 110 (11.1%) cancers were diagnosed at Stage II compared to 17 (13.4%) through the PNC (0.4471); 277 (25.7%) cancers were diagnosed at Stage III, compared to 21 (16.5%) through the PNC (p 0.0060); 598 (60.4%) cancers were diagnosed at Stage IV, compared to 20 (15.7%) through the PNC (p <0.0001). Five-year survival rates for patients diagnosed in 2010 were 80% (four of five patients), 79.2% (19/24) in 2011, and 62.2% (23/37) in 2012.

Conclusions

 Lung cancer survival is directly related to the stage at diagnosis. Establishment of our PNC has led to an earlier stage at diagnosis compared to the general lung cancer population in our community.

Rheumatoid pulmonary nodules: clinical and imaging features compared with malignancy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to identify clinical and imaging features that distinguish rheumatoid lung nodules from malignancy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 73 rheumatoid patients with histologically-proven rheumatoid and malignant lung nodules encountered at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (2001-2016). Medical records and imaging were reviewed including a retrospective blinded review of CT and PET/CT studies.

RESULTS

The study cohort had a mean age of 67 ± 11 years (range 45-86) including 44 (60%) women, 82% with a smoking history, 38% with subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules, and 78% with rheumatoid factor seropositivity. Subjects with rheumatoid lung nodules compared to malignancy were younger (59 ± 12 vs 71 ± 9 years, p < 0.001), more likely to manifest subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules (73% vs 20%, p < 0.001) and rheumatoid factor seropositivity (93% vs 68%, p = 0.034) but a history of smoking was common in both groups (p = 0.36). CT features more commonly associated with rheumatoid lung nodules compared to malignancy included multiplicity, smooth border, cavitation, satellite nodules, pleural contact, and a subpleural rind of soft tissue. Optimal sensitivity (77%) and specificity (92%) (AUC 0.85, CI 0.75-0.94) for rheumatoid lung nodule were obtained with ≥ 3 CT findings (≥ 4 nodules, peripheral location, cavitation, satellite nodules, smooth border, and subpleural rind). Key ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT features included low-level metabolism (SUV_max 2.7 ± 2 vs 7.2 ± 4.8, p = 0.007) and lack of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid draining lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Rheumatoid lung nodules have distinct CT and PET/CT features compared to malignancy. Patients with rheumatoid lung nodules are younger and more likely to manifest subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules and seropositivity.

KEY POINTS

• Rheumatoid lung nodules have distinct clinical and imaging features compared to lung malignancy. • CT features of rheumatoid lung nodules include multiplicity, cavitation, satellite nodules, smooth border, peripheral location, and subpleural rind. • Key PET/CT features include low-level metabolism and lack of FDG-avid draining lymph nodes.

Pulmonary Nodules: A Small Problem for Many, Severe Distress for Some, and How to Communicate About It

Every year, millions of patients are diagnosed with pulmonary nodules, and as increasing numbers of people undergo lung cancer screening, even more patients will be found to have a nodule. The vast majority of patients cannot benefit from the detection of a pulmonary nodule because most are benign. Accordingly, it is important to develop strategies to minimize harm, in particular the distress of a "near-cancer" diagnosis. In other settings, communication strategies are critical mediators of patient-centered outcomes for those with cancer and those at-risk of cancer. We conducted multiple studies to characterize the experience of patients with the diagnosis and evaluation of incidental pulmonary nodules, measure patient-centered outcomes for patients with pulmonary nodules, and determine the association of patient-clinician communication practices with those outcomes. We learned that a substantial proportion of patients experience distress and inadequate communication about pulmonary nodules and their evaluation, and yet many clinicians are unaware of the degree to which some patients are affected by the finding of a pulmonary nodule. The present review provides a comprehensive summary of our results and offers suggestions for how clinicians can best provide high-quality communication for their patients.

Patient and Clinician Characteristics Associated with Adherence. A Cohort Study of Veterans with Incidental Pulmonary Nodules

RATIONALE

Many patients are diagnosed with small pulmonary nodules for which professional societies recommend subsequent imaging surveillance. Adherence to these guidelines involves many steps from both clinicians and patients but has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVES

In a health care setting with a nodule tracking system, we evaluated the association of communication processes and distress with patient and clinician adherence to recommended follow up and Fleischner Society guidelines, respectively.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, longitudinally assessed, cohort study of patients with incidentally detected nodules who received care at one Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We measured patient-centered communication with the Consultation Care Measure and distress with the Impact of Event Scale. We abstracted data regarding participant adherence to clinician recommendations (defined as receiving the follow-up scan within 30 d of the recommended date) and clinician adherence to Fleischner guidelines (defined as planning the follow-up scan within 30 d of the recommended interval) from the electronic medical record. We measured associations of communication and distress with adherence using multivariable-adjusted generalized estimating equations.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 138 veterans, 39% were nonadherent at least once during follow up. Clinicians were nonadherent to Fleischner guidelines for 27% of follow-up scans. High-quality communication (adjusted odds ratio, 3.65; P = 0.02) and distress (adjusted odds ratio, 0.38; P = 0.02) were associated with increased and decreased participant adherence, respectively. Neither was associated with clinician adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and clinicians often do not adhere to nodule follow-up recommendations. Interventions designed to improve communication quality and decrease distress may also improve patient adherence to nodule follow-up recommendations.

A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to assess differences in patient distress, risk perception, and treatment preferences for incidental renal findings with descriptive versus combined descriptive and numeric graphical risk information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized survey study was conducted for adult patients about to undergo outpatient imaging studies at a large urban academic institution. Two survey arms contained either descriptive or a combination of descriptive and numeric graphical risk information about three hypothetical incidental renal findings at CT: 2-cm (low risk) and 5-cm (high risk) renal tumors and a 2-cm (low risk) renal artery aneurysm. The main outcomes were patient distress, perceived risk (qualitative and quantitative), treatment preference, and valuation of lesion discovery.

RESULTS

Of 374 patients, 299 participated (79.9% response rate). With inclusion of numeric and graphical, rather than only descriptive, risk information about disease progression for a 2-cm renal tumor, patients reported less worry (3.56 vs 4.12 on a 5-point scale; p < 0.001) and favored surgical consultation less often (29.3% vs 46.9%; p = 0.003). The proportion choosing surgical consultation for the 2-cm renal tumor decreased to a similar level as for the renal artery aneurysm with numeric risk information (29.3% [95% CI, 21.7-36.8%] and 27.9% [95% CI, 20.5-35.3%], respectively). Patients overestimated the absolute risk of adverse events regardless of risk information type, but significantly more so when given descriptive information only, and valued the discovery of lesions regardless of risk information type (range, 4.41-4.81 on a 5-point scale).

CONCLUSION

Numeric graphical risk communication for patients about incidental renal lesions may facilitate accurate risk comprehension and support patients in informed decision making.

What's in a Name? Factors Associated with Documentation and Evaluation of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules

RATIONALE

Radiologist reports of pulmonary nodules discovered incidentally on computed tomographic (CT) images of the chest may influence subsequent evaluation and management.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the impact of the terminology used by radiologists to report incidental pulmonary nodules on subsequent documentation and evaluation of the nodules by the ordering or primary care provider.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with incidentally discovered pulmonary nodules detected on CT chest examinations performed during 2010 in a large urban safety net medical system located in northeastern Ohio.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twelve different terms were used to describe 344 incidental pulmonary nodules. Most nodules (181 [53%]) were documented in a subsequent progress note by the provider, and 140 (41%) triggered subsequent clinical activity. In a multivariable analysis, incidental pulmonary nodules described in radiology reports using the terms density (odds ratio [OR], 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.47), granuloma (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.65), or opacity (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68) were less likely to be documented by the provider than those that used the term mass. Patients with nodules described in radiology reports using the term nodule (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.99), nodular density (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.63), granuloma (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.69), or opacity (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.43) were less likely to receive follow-up than were patients with nodules described using the term mass. The factor most strongly associated with follow-up of pulmonary nodules was documentation by the provider (OR, 5.85; 95% CI, 2.93-11.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Within one multifacility urban health system in the United States, the terms used by radiologists to describe incidental pulmonary nodules were associated with documentation of the nodule by the ordering physician and subsequent follow-up. Standard terminology should be used to describe pulmonary nodules to improve patient outcomes.

Clinical Equipoise and Shared Decision-making in Pulmonary Nodule Management. A Survey of American Thoracic Society Clinicians

RATIONALE

Guidelines for pulmonary nodule evaluation suggest a variety of strategies, reflecting the lack of high-quality evidence demonstrating the superiority of any one approach. It is unclear whether clinicians agree that multiple management options are appropriate at different levels of risk and whether this impacts their decision-making approaches with patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess clinicians' perceptions of the appropriateness of various diagnostic strategies, approach to decision-making, and perceived clinical equipoise in pulmonary nodule evaluation.

METHODS

We developed and administered a web-based survey in March and April, 2014 to clinician members of the American Thoracic Society. The primary outcome was perceived appropriateness of pulmonary nodule evaluation strategies in three clinical vignettes with different malignancy risk. We compared responses to guideline recommendations and analyzed clinician characteristics associated with a reported shared decision-making approach. We also assessed clinicians' likelihood to enroll patients in hypothetical randomized trials comparing nodule evaluation strategies.

RESULTS

Of 5,872 American Thoracic Society members e-mailed, 1,444 opened the e-mail and 428 eligible clinicians participated in the survey (response rate, 30.0% among those who opened the invitation; 7% overall). The mean number of options considered appropriate increased with pretest probability of cancer, ranging from 1.8 (SD, 1.2) for the low-risk case to 3.5 (1.1) for the high-risk case (P < 0.0001). As recommended by guidelines, the proportion that deemed surgical resection as an appropriate option also increased with cancer risk (P < 0.0001). One-half of clinicians (50.4%) reported engaging in shared decision-making with patients for pulmonary nodule management; this was more commonly reported by clinicians with more years of experience (P = 0.01) and those who reported greater comfort in managing pulmonary nodules (P = 0.005). Although one-half (49.9%) deemed the evidence for pulmonary nodule evaluation to be strong, most clinicians were willing to enroll patients in randomized trials to compare nodule management strategies in all risk categories (low risk, 87.6%; moderate risk, 89.7%; high risk, 63.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with guideline recommendations, clinicians embrace multiple options for pulmonary nodule evaluation and many are open to shared decision-making. Clinicians support the need for randomized clinical trials to strengthen the evidence for nodule evaluation, which will further improve decision-making.

Perspectives on Managing Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: A Survey of Primary Care Physicians

Primary care physicians (PCPs) may be involved in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) detected through lung cancer screening. Little is known about their perspectives on the management or the referral of SPN. Using the American Medical Association's Physician Masterfile, we randomly surveyed 1384 PCPs between January and October 2015 with an 18% response rate. A subset analysis was performed on SPN management and referral practices of PCP. These results and those relating to practice characteristics were compared between family practice and internal medicine physicians. Responders and nonresponders did not differ by demographic characteristics. A total of 137 (55.5%) PCPs reported feeling confident in managing the workup of imaging-detected SPN. However, only 53 PCPs (21.3%) were inclined to manage the evaluation and follow-up of SPN. There was no significant difference between family practice and internal medicine physicians with regard to years in practice, size of practice, or referral to specialists. Family practitioners and internists similarly disagreed or were neutral to self-managing SPN (P = 0.60). Internists were twice as likely to express confidence as family practitioners (odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.48). Among all PCPs, 75.4% would refer management of these patients to a pulmonologist, 28.9% to a surgeon, and 24.2% to an oncologist. Confidence did not predict lung cancer screening practices. Although more than half of PCPs expressed confidence in the workup of SPN, most preferred referral to specialists. Additional research is needed to understand barriers to PCP management of incidental SPN in the effort to facilitate lung cancer screening.

Evaluations of Implementation at Early-Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: Lessons Learned

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend lung cancer screening (LCS), and it is currently being adopted nationwide. The American College of Chest Physicians advises inclusion of specific programmatic components to ensure high-quality screening. However, little is known about how LCS has been implemented in practice. We sought to evaluate the experience of early-adopting programs, characterize barriers faced, and identify strategies to achieve successful implementation.

METHODS

We performed qualitative evaluations of LCS implementation at three Veterans Administration facilities, conducting semistructured interviews with key staff (n = 29). Guided by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, we analyzed transcripts using principals of grounded theory.

RESULTS

Programs successfully incorporated most recommended elements of LCS, although varying in approaches to patient selection, tobacco treatment, and quality audits. Barriers to implementation included managing workload to ensure appropriate evaluation of pulmonary nodules detected by screening and difficulty obtaining primary care "buy-in." To manage workload, programs used nurse coordinators to actively maintain screening registries, held multidisciplinary conferences that generated explicit management recommendations, and rolled out implementation in a staged fashion. Successful strategies to engage primary care providers included educational sessions, audit and feedback of local outcomes, and assisting with and assigning clear responsibility for nodule evaluation. Capitalizing on pre-existing relationships and including a designated program champion helped facilitate intradisciplinary communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer screening implementation is a complex undertaking requiring coordination at many levels. The insight gained from evaluation of these early-adopting programs may inform subsequent design and implementation of LCS programs.

A Qualitative Study of Sleep-Wake Disturbance Among Veterans With Post-Acute Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

Examine sleep-wake disturbance (SWD) characteristics, factors, consequences, and management strategies from the perspective of veterans with chronic stage, moderate/severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

SETTING

VA Medical Center, Rocky Mountain.

US PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen male veterans with post-acute TBI and SWD in the VA Health Administration.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive.

MEASURES

Semistructured interviews, Ohio State University TBI-Identification Method, Insomnia Severity Index.

RESULTS

Two main dimensions emerged: "Messed up sleep" and Surviving and Managing SWD. Sleep-wake disturbance has long-term multidimensional features, etiology, consequences, and practice implications. Although SWD may not be consistently discussed with providers, the problem appears to be pervasive in many aspects of the lives of the informants. Difficulty falling asleep, frequent awakenings, and poor sleep quality were common symptoms that were described as intrusive, isolating, and difficult to self-manage. Veterans discussed a host of physical symptoms, mental health issues, environmental, and behavioral factors that contributed to SWD. Medications, sleep apnea treatment, and self-imposed isolation were frequent management strategies. Veterans expressed a willingness to try new approaches and work with providers.

CONCLUSION

Sleep-wake disturbance among veterans with chronic stage TBI is a multidimensional phenomenon with interplay between comorbidities, contributing factors, effects on functioning, and sleep management strategies. Implications for practice include early and routine evaluation, monitoring, and treatment of SWD. Research is needed to test interventions that address SWD and common TBI comorbidities.

Incidental nodule management-should there be a formal process?

Indeterminate pulmonary nodules are commonly encountered and often result in costly and invasive procedures that eventually turn out to be unnecessary. Current prediction models can help to estimate the pretest probability of cancer and assist in determining a strategy of observation with serial imaging for a low pretest probability of cancer, and a more aggressive approach for those patients with a high pretest probability. However, the majority of patients will have an intermediate pretest probability which becomes complex. Decisions for further management are often based on preference by the clinician with the majority of physicians not following current guidelines in the management of pulmonary nodules. Poor adherence to pulmonary nodule guidelines is multifactorial with a variety of factors coming into play. These include inappropriate advice given by the radiologist, patient age, comorbidities, patient preference, and physician's technical skill all influencing the decision making.

Patients' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Distress Associated with Detection and Evaluation of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules for Cancer: Results from a Multicenter Survey

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary nodules are detected in more than 1 million Americans each year. Prior qualitative work suggests that the detection of incidental pulmonary nodules can be burdensome for patients, but whether these findings generalize to a broader sample of patients is unknown. We categorized patients' knowledge, beliefs, and distress associated with detection and evaluation of a pulmonary nodule, as well as their impressions of clinician communication.

METHODS

We administered a cross-sectional survey to adults with an incidental pulmonary nodule who were recruited from a rural medical center, an urban safety net hospital, and a Veterans Affairs hospital.

RESULTS

Of the 490 individuals mailed surveys, 244 (50%) responded. Median nodule size was 7 mm, mean patient age was 67 years, 29% of respondents were female, and 86% were white. A quarter of the respondents (26%) reported clinically significant distress related to their nodule, our primary outcome, as measured by the Impact of Event Scale. Patients reported multiple concerns, including uncertainty about the nodule's cause (78%), the possibility of cancer (73%), and the possible need for surgery (64%). Only 25% of patients accurately estimated their lung cancer risk (within 15% of their actual risk); overall, there was no correlation between perceived and actual risk (r = -0.007, p = 0.93). The 23% of patients who did receive information on cancer risk from their provider were more likely to find this information reassuring (16%) than scary (7%).

CONCLUSION

A quarter of patients with incidental pulmonary nodules experienced clinically significant distress. Knowledge about cancer risk and evaluation was poor. Clinician communication may help bridge knowledge gaps and alleviate distress in some patients.

Pulmonologists' Reported Use of Guidelines and Shared Decision-making in Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Selecting a strategy (surveillance, biopsy, resection) for pulmonary nodule evaluation can be complex given the absence of high-quality data comparing strategies and the important tradeoffs among strategies. Guidelines recommend a three-step approach: (1) assess the likelihood of malignancy, (2) evaluate whether the patient is a candidate for invasive intervention, and (3) elicit the patient's preferences and engage in shared decision-making. We sought to characterize how pulmonologists select a pulmonary nodule evaluation strategy and the extent to which they report following the guideline-recommended approach.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with 14 pulmonologists who manage patients with pulmonary nodules at four clinical sites. Transcripts of audiorecorded interviews were analyzed using the principles of grounded theory.

RESULTS

Pulmonologists reported consistently performing steps 1 and 2 but described diverse approaches to step 3 that ranged from always engaging the patient in decision-making to never doing so. Many described incorporating patients' preferences only in particular circumstances, such as when the patient appeared particularly anxious or was aggressive in questioning management options. Indeed, other factors, including convenience, physician preferences, physician anxiety, malpractice concerns, and physician experience, appeared to drive decision-making as much as, if not more than, patient preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pulmonologists appear to routinely personalize pulmonary nodule evaluation strategies based on the individual patient's risk-benefit tradeoffs, they may not consistently take patient preferences into account during the decision-making process. In the absence of high-quality evidence regarding the optimal methods of pulmonary nodule evaluation, physicians should strive to ensure that management decisions are consistent with patients' values.