Adjustable gastric banding in a public university hospital: prospective analysis of 400 patients

Perioperative Factors Affecting Ambulatory Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Adjustable Gastric Banding

Objective

Morbidly obese patients are traditionally hospitalised following bariatric surgery. However, laparoscopic-adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is amenable for ambulatory care. We hypothesised that the majority of patients can receive an ambulatory LAGB and that both surgical and anaesthetic perioperative factors will significantly affect non-ambulatory LAGB outcomes.

Methods

Medical records of 201 consecutive LAGB patients performed at the University of Kansas Medical Centre during a 3-y period were reviewed. Demographic, medical, laboratory, anaesthetic, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. Factors associated with non-ambulatory outcomes were identified and analysed using logistic regression, and a classification tree analysis was used to rank the descriptive model factor to the non-ambulatory outcome.

Results

Average patient age was 43.4±11.4 years, and average body mass index was 48.2±10.3 kg m^2-1. A total of 155 patients (77.1%; 95% confidence interval, 71%-83%; p<0.0001) were discharged home within 2-3 hours of surgery, whereas 36 stayed for 23 hours and 10 required hospital admission for 1-2 days. Increased surgical port numbers (p=0.007), ≥50% of total intraoperative fentanyl administered in the recovery room (post-anaesthesia care unit) for the treatment of postoperative pain (p=0.007) and a lack of prophylactic beta-blockade (p=0.001) were three factors associated with non-ambulatory outcomes. Obstructive sleep apnoea was not associated with a non-ambulatory outcome (p=0.83).

Conclusion

The majority of patients received an ambulatory LAGB. Meticulous laparoscopic surgical technique with the least feasible number of access ports and multimodal analgesic technique aimed at reduction of postoperative opioid consumption are the most important factors for a successful ambulatory LAGB outcome.

Endoscopic treatment of gastric band prolapse

Complications of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are well documented including migration, erosion, prolapse, infection, pouch dilatation, and gastric perforation. Band prolapse within the first 5 years after LAGB is observed in about 5% of cases, requiring an operative procedure. Here we report our experience of endoscopic treatment of band prolapses. From December 2007 to December 2013, 1,347 consecutive patients (202 male, 1,145 female) underwent LAGB; 47 patients had band prolapses and 7 were treated by endoscopy. All patients were women (median age, 34 years). The mean preoperative body mass index was 38.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2. The mean duration to band prolapse after LAGB was 10.6 ± 5.6 months. The mean duration of endoscopy was 12 ± 3 min. One patient had recurrence of the prolapse 3 months after the first endoscopy and was treated by endoscopy again. There was no operative procedure required and no mortality. Endoscopic treatment of band prolapses is effective without the need for an operative procedure.

Influence of peri-duodenal non-constrictive cuff on the body weight of rats

BACKGROUND

Weight loss has been found to improve or resolve cardiovascular comorbidities. There is a significant need for reversible device approaches to weight loss.

METHODS

Non-constrictive cuff (NCC) is made of implantable silicone rubber with an internal diameter greater than the duodenum. Ten or 11 NCC were individually mounted along the duodenum from the pyloric sphincter toward the distal duodenum to cover ~22 mm in the length. Twelve Wistar rats were implanted with NCC, and six served as sham, and both groups were observed over 4 months. Six rats with implant had their NCC removed and were observed for additional 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The food intake decreased from 40.1 to 28.1 g/day after 4 months of NCC implant. The body weight gain decreased from 1.76 to 0.46 g/day after 4 months of NCC implant. The fasting glucose decreased from 87.7 to 75.3 mg/dl at terminal day. The duodenal muscle layer covered by the NCC increased from 0.133 to 0.334 mm. After 4 weeks of NCC removal, the food intake, body weight gain, and fasting glucose recovered to 36.2, 2.51 g/day, and 83.9 mg/dl. The duodenal muscle layer covered by the NCC decreased to 0.217 mm.

CONCLUSION

The NCC implant placed on the proximal duodenum is safe in rats for a 4-month period. The efficacy of the NCC implant is significant for decrease in food intake, body weight gain, and fasting glucose in a normal rat model. The removal of NCC implant confirmed a cause-effect relation with food intake and hence body weight.

Three-year experience of pouch dilatation and slippage management after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

PURPOSE

Pouch dilatation and band slippage are the most common long-term complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The aim of the study is to present our experience of diagnosis and management of these complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pars flaccida technique with anterior fixation of the fundus was routinely used. All band adjustments were performed under fluoroscopy. We analyzed the incidence, clinico-radiologic features, management, and revisional surgeries for treatment of these complications. We further presented the outcome of gastric plication techniques as a measure for prevention of these complications.

RESULTS

From March 2009 to March 2012, we performed LAGB on 126 morbidly obese patients. Among them, 14 patients (11.1%) were diagnosed as having these complications. Four patients (3.2%) had concentric pouch dilatations, which were corrected by band adjustment. Ten (7.9%) had eccentric pouch with band slippage. Among the ten patients, there were three cases of posterior slippage, which were corrected by reoperation, and seven cases of eccentric pouch dilatation with anterior slippage. Three were early anterior slippage, which was managed conservatively. Two were acute anterior slippage, one of whom underwent a revision. There were two cases of chronic anterior slippage, one of whom underwent a revision. The 27 patients who underwent gastric plication did not present with eccentric pouch with band slippage during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of pouch dilatation with/without band slippage was 11.1%. Management should be individualized according to clinico-radiologic patterns. Gastric plication below the band might prevent these complications.

Complications and outcome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: LAGB versus LRYGB

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Unsatisfactory patient compliance and unfavorable results of weight loss let centers prefer the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as a combined restrictive and malabsorptive procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) versus laparoscopic RYGB.

SETTING

The study was conducted at Centre Hospitalier Emil Mayrisch Clinic for specialized care (n = 618 beds) in Luxembourg (South).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 620 procedures, 204 patients had LAGB and 416 LRYGB. Short-term (t(1), 6 months to 2 years), middle-term (t(2), 2 to 5 years), and long-term follow-up (t(3), >5 years) were performed, including weight loss evolution, Bariatric Analysis, and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS).

RESULTS

Percent EBWL mean values for LAGB vs. LRYGB were at t(1) 64.3 vs. 79.5, p = 0.01; at t(2) 49.4 vs. 91, p < 0.0001; and at t(3) 52.6 vs. 79.9, p < 0.0001. The BAROS mean values were at t(1) 3.81 vs. 4.00, p = 0.183; at t(2) 3.57 vs. 4.12, p < 0.001; and at t(3) 3.71 vs. 4.04, p = 0.02. Major complication rate (<30 days) was similar (p = 0.601). Long-term (>30 days) complications were more common after LAGB (14.3 versus 3.6%, p < 0.001). Fifty patients (25%) required a second and 36 patients (18%) a third operation (LRYGB).

CONCLUSION

The significant difference in %EBWL and BAROS and late adverse events with high re-operation rates in LAGB made the LRYGB more attractive.

Is gastro-gastric fixation suture necessary in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding? A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The reason for gastro-gastric suture (GGS) in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is to prevent migration, slippage, and pouch dilatation. Despite various suturing techniques, these complications are still quite common. In our study, we prospectively randomized patients for GGS and analyzed outcome.

METHODS

Between September 2006 and February 2008, eighty patients were randomized before LAGB procedure with pars flaccida technique. Forty patients had GGS for band fixation (Group 1), and 40 patients did not (Group 2). Groups were compared for length of surgery (LOS), length of hospital stay (LOHS), early and late complications, and percent of excess weight loss (%EWL). Mann-Whitney U test was used to define statistical differences between groups. P<.05 was accepted as significant.

RESULTS

Mean body mass index (BMI) of groups 1 and 2 were 43.3±4.9 and 42.2±4.3 kg/m(2), respectively. Mean LOHS was 29.2±9.3 and 25.2±10.5 hours in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in comparison of %EWL (P=.344 and P=.132, respectively). There was a significant difference in LOS between groups, and it was shorter in group 2 (P<.05). In terms of complications, slippage rate was higher, migration and port complications were lower in group 2 although not statistically significant (P>.05). Pouch dilatation rate was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LOS is shorter without GGS. There is no difference in rates of slippage, migration, pouch dilatation complications, and %EWL between either approach. In light of our findings, we think that routine use of GGSs should be revisited.

An unusual cause of dysuria

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) insertion has become an increasingly common treatment for severe obesity worldwide. As a consequence, LAGB complications are reported in increasing numbers and usually present to acute surgical units. This report describes the development of lower abdominal pain and dysuria in a patient who had undergone LAGB surgery 20 months previously. Repeated symptomatic treatment for a possible urinary tract infection in the community setting had been unsuccessful. The cause was found to be a fracture in the tubing connecting the LAGB device with its subcutaneous adjusting port, which was causing persistent bladder irritation. It is recommended that when LAGB patients present with acute lower abdominal pain, consideration should be made as to whether a tubing disconnection has occurred. Such a complication may be visualised by abdominal radiography. Advice can be sought on this and other complications of bariatric surgery by contacting the regional bariatric surgical centre where definitive management would be undertaken.

Distension-induced gastric contraction is attenuated in an experimental model of gastric restraint

BACKGROUND

Gastric distension has important implications for motility and satiety. The hypothesis of this study was that distension affects the amplitude and duration of gastric contraction and that these parameters are largely mediated by efferent vagus stimulation.

METHODS

A novel isovolumic myograph was introduced to test these hypotheses. The isovolumic myograph isolates the stomach and records the pressure generated by the gastric contraction under isovolumic conditions. Accordingly, the phasic changes of gastric contractility can be documented. A group of 12 rats were used under in vivo conditions and isolated ex vivo conditions and with two different gastric restraints (small and large) to determine the effect of degree of restraint.

RESULTS

The comparison of the in vivo and ex vivo contractility provided information on the efferent vagus mediation of gastric contraction, i.e., the in vivo amplitude and duration reached maximum of 12.6 ± 2.7 mmHg and 19.8 ± 5.6 s in contrast to maximum of 5.7 ± 0.9 mmHg and 7.3 ± 1.3 s in ex vivo amplitude and duration, respectively. The comparison of gastric restraint and control groups highlights the role of distension on in vivo gastric contractility. The limitation of gastric distension by restraint drastically reduced the maximal amplitude to below 2.9 ± 0.2 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that distension-induced gastric contractility is regulated by both central nervous system and local mechanisms with the former being more substantial. Furthermore, the gastric restraint significantly attenuates gastric contractility (decreased amplitude and shortened duration of contraction) which is mediated by the efferent vagus activation. These findings have important implications for gastric motility and physiology and may improve our understanding of satiety.

A systematic review of laparoscopic port site hernias in gastrointestinal surgery

INTRODUCTION

Port site hernia is an important yet under-recognised complication of laparoscopic surgery, which carries a high risk of strangulation due to the small size of the defect involved. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence, classification, and pathogenesis of this complication, and to evaluate strategies to prevent and treat it.

METHODS

Medline was searched using the words "port site hernia", "laparoscopic port hernia" "laparoscopic complications" and "trocar site hernias". The search was limited to articles on cholecystectomy, colorectal, bariatric or anti-reflux surgery published in English. A total of 42 articles were analysed and of these 35 were deemed eligible for review. Inclusion criteria were laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery in English only with reported incidence of port site herniation. Studies were excluded if insufficient data was provided. Eligible studies were also cross-referenced.

RESULTS

Analysis of 11,699 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal procedures demonstrated an incidence of port site hernias of 0.74% with a mean follow-up of 23.9 months. The lowest incidence of port site herniation was for bariatric surgery with 0.57% in 2644 patients with a mean follow-up of 67.4 months while the highest incidence was for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an incidence of 1.47% in 477 patients with a mean follow-up of 71.5 months.

CONCLUSION

All fascial defects larger than or equal to 10mm should be closed with peritoneum, while smaller defects may require closure in certain circumstances to prevent herniation. Laparoscopic port site herniation is a completely preventable cause of morbidity that requires a second surgical procedure to repair.

[Trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic surgery]

Trocar site incisional hernias (TSIH) are the most common complications in laparoscopic surgery. We have carried out a review of the literature with the aim of establishing their incidence, the reasons for them happening, and their prevention. After a search in the MEDLINE PubMed and PubMed CENTRAL data bases from 1991 to 2009, combining the words: "hernia", "laparoscopy" and "trocar", we obtained 545 articles, of which we analysed 60 of them. The incidence of TSIH varies between 0.18% and 2.8%. The diameter of the trocar, obesity and age play a fundamental role when proceeding to close the fascia, a closure which is the most important factor to prevent these incisional hernias appearing. The appearance of new laparoscopic material and the increasing more common closure of defects of the fascia means that new and more extensive prospective studies should be performed.

Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients lost to follow-up

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) in patients lost to follow-up.

METHODS

Patients lost to follow-up were identified from a consecutive cohort of 495 patients who underwent LAGB between November 1995 and September 2006. These patients were asked to return to follow-up and their actual weight was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 93 patients lost to follow-up, 73 were motivated to reattend. Of these, 60 per cent (44 patients) had lost less than 25 per cent of excess weight, compared with 16.3 per cent (P < 0.001), 27.0 per cent (P < 0.001) and 42 per cent (P = 0.026) of patients after 2, 4 and 8 years of regular follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients lost to follow-up are more likely to have poor weight loss, emphasizing the importance of follow-up after LAGB. Outcome after surgery for morbid obesity should include patients lost to follow-up as a measure of overall success.

The effectiveness of adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective 6-year U.S. follow-up study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) during a 6-year follow-up period.

METHODS

A retrospective database analysis of patients who underwent LAGB at New York University Medical Center between 1 January 2000 and 29 February 2008 was conducted. Patients were included for the efficacy analysis if they were 18 years old or older at the surgery date and had one or more visits with a recorded weight after surgery. Efficacy was assessed using percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1-year intervals after surgery. Missing weight values were interpolated using a cubic spline function. Linear regression models were used to assess the characteristics that affected the last available %EWL. All patients had implantation of the LAP-BAND system.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria for the efficacy analysis were met by 2,909 patients. The majority of the patients were white (83.3%) and female (68.4%). The mean patient age was 44.6 years, and the mean baseline body mass index (BMI) was 45.3 kg/m2. The %EWL 3 years after surgery was 52.9%, which was sustained thereafter. In multivariate models, increased number of office visits, younger age, female gender, and Caucasian race were significantly associated with a higher maximum %EWL.

CONCLUSIONS

The LAP-BAND patients achieved a substantial and sustainable weight loss of approximately 50% at 6 years after surgery.

The gastric band: first-choice procedure for obesity surgery

The advent of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) during the latter part of the 20th century represents a watershed in the management of chronic obesity. In this paper we provide an overview of LAGB with respect to its development, clinical outcomes, and future role. We also address current controversies, including a comparison of LAGB with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). At present LAGB seems to be increasing in popularity in the United States, whereas in Europe there seems to be a trend away from gastric banding toward RYGBP. Optimal outcomes after LAGB are a function of correct laparoscopic technique, an experienced surgical team, a well-engineered device, and intensive long-term follow-up. The majority of studies show that LAGB is an extremely safe and effective procedure, with an operative mortality of 0-0.1% and excess weight loss (%EWL) of 50-60%. Commensurate with this degree of weight loss, almost all studies show substantial improvements in obesity-related co-morbidities, such as hypertension, type II diabetes, and dyslipidemia. In addition, LAGB has been shown to be both safe and effective in the super-obese, in adolescents, and in older patients and can be delivered as an ambulatory procedure. Operative mortality and early complication rates are significantly higher for RYGBP and, whilst gastric bypass results in greater weight loss than LAGB in the first 2 years, at 3 years and beyond the difference appears to be less marked. Overall, LAGB provides a safe, effective intervention for obese patients and remains our first-choice procedure for bariatric surgery.

Outcome of gastroplasty and gastric bypass in a single centre in the UK

Background

Morbid obesity is defined as BMI>40 kg/m². It affects 124,000 men and 412,000 women in England and Wales (NICE, July 2002). According to NICE guidelines, Bariatric surgery is indicated if the treatments for obesity such as exercise, diet and drugs fail. Procedures include laparoscopic gastric banding (LGB), vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), and Gastric Bypass (GB).

Aims

The aim of this audit was to determine if NICE guidelines on the use of Bariatric surgery in the Manor Hospital, Walsall was being adhered to. Secondary aims were also to establish if Bariatric surgery is achieving its goal in the long-term and if weight reduction is being maintained in this group of patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was carried out on patients who underwent Bariatric surgery between 1990 and 2004. Retrieved records were scrutinised and the following parameters were collated: pre-operative morbidities, intra and post-operative complication rates and weight reduction on follow-up.

Results

129 patients were operated on in the 14 year period. For VBG, 40 out of 105 patients had weight gain by the 5th follow-up visit. This compared with 5 out of 18 patients after the same timescale for the GB group and 1 out of 6 in the LGB group. The most common post-operative complication was stenosis (28% of VBG group).

Conclusion

Bariatric surgery is relatively safe as an intervention for morbid obesity. Weight loss however is not maintained in the long term. VBG and LGB are short term interventions. Further research is required to look into the merits of gastric bypass surgery.

Gastro-Esophageal Reflux and Esophageal Motility Disorders in Morbidly Obese Patients before and after Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a predisposing factor to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), but esophageal function remains poorly studied in morbidly obese patients and could be modified by bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Every morbidly obese patient (BMI > or =40 kg/m2 or > or =35 in association with co-morbidity) was prospectively included with an evaluation of GERD symptoms, endoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring and esophageal manometry before and after adjustable gastric banding (AGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP).

RESULTS

Before surgery, 100 patients were included (84 F, age 38.4 +/- 10.9 years, BMI 45.1 +/- 6.02 kg/m2), of whom 73% reported GERD symptoms. Endoscopy evidenced hiatus hernia in 39.4% and esophagitis in 6.4%. The DeMeester score was pathological in 53.3%; 69% of patients had lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure <15 mmHg and 7 had esophageal dyskinesia. BMI was significantly related to the DeMeester score (P = 0.018) but not to LES tone or esophageal dyskinesia. Postoperative data were available in 27 patients (AGB n = 12/60, RYGBP n = 15/36). The DeMeester score (normal < 14.72) was significantly decreased after RYGBP (24.8 +/- 13.7 before vs. 5.8 +/- 4.9 after; P < 0.001) but tended to increase after AGB (11.5 +/- 5.1 before vs. 51.7 +/- 70.7 after; P = 0.09), with severe dyskinesia in 2 cases.

CONCLUSION

GERD and LES incompetence are highly prevalent in morbidly obese patients. Preliminary postoperative data show different effects of RYGBP and AGB on esophageal function, with worsening of pH-metric data with occasional severe dyskinesia after AGB.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: ends justify the means?

BACKGROUND

In the United States, the most frequently performed bariatric procedure is the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Worldwide, the most common operation performed is the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB). The expanding use of LAGB is probably driven by the encouraging data on its safety and effectiveness, in contrast to the disappointing morbidity and mortality rates reported for RYGB. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of LAGB versus RYGB at a single institution.

METHODS

Between November 2000 and July 2004, 590 bariatric procedures were performed. Of these, 120 patients (20%) had laparoscopic RYGB and 470 patients (80%) had LAGB. A retrospective review was performed.

RESULTS

In the LAGB group, 376 patients (80%) were female, and the mean age was 41 years (range, 17-65). In the RYGB group, 110 patients (91%) were female, and the mean age was 41 years (range, 20-61). Preoperative body mass index was 47 +/- 8 and 46 +/- 5, respectively (p = not significant). Operative time and hospitalization were significantly shorter in LAGB patients (p < 0.001). Complications and the need for reoperation were comparable in both groups. Weight loss at 12, 18, 24, and 36 months for LAGB and RYGB was 39 +/- 21 versus 65 +/- 13, 39 +/- 20 versus 62 +/- 17, 45 +/- 25 versus 67 +/- 8, and 55 +/- 20 versus 63 +/- 9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates that LAGB is a simpler, less invasive, and safer procedure than RYGB. Although mean percentage excess body weight loss (%EBWL) in RYGB patients increased rapidly during the first postoperative year, it remained nearly unchanged at 3 years. In contrast, in LAGB patients weight loss was slower but steady, achieving satisfactory %EBWL at 3 years. Therefore, we believe that LAGB should be considered the initial approach since it is safer than RYGB and is very effective at achieving weight loss.

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Evolving Clinical Experience

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was first introduced in the early 1990s as a potentially safe, controllable, and reversible method for achieving significant weight loss in the severely obese. It is timely to review the existing data on this procedure derived from European, Australian, and American studies and compare and contrast their results. Special emphasis is placed on clinical outcomes and reported complications of LAGB. In general, international studies support use of the LAGB procedure,while American studies are generally better designed but more equivocal in their results.

Gastric Banding: chirurgisch-technische Aspekte

Morbid obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m(2)) is a risk factor for cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, neoplastic, and psychologic sequelae. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has been established for more than 10 years as a good, safe therapy for morbid obesity if strict operational indications are observed and there is multidisciplinary, long-term follow-up. The technical aspects of LAGB are important for its long-term success. The pars flaccida technique is standard and leads to fewer complications. The bands should be placed above the bursa omentalis. Different types of bands are available. Band fixation by suturing with nonabsorbable stitches prevents slippage. The port system also must be fixated by nonabsorbable sutures.

Complications of gastric banding presenting to the ED

Although laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has become a widely used surgical modality for the treatment of morbid obesity, the technique and its complications remain fairly unknown to the medical community in general. Late complications occur in 10% to 20% of patients and usually manifest as upper gastrointestinal symptoms such as total food intolerance. However, seemingly unrelated symptoms such as chest pain may be the primary complaint. A rare but important complication to recognize and treat is gastric necrosis due to herniation of the stomach through the band. From the lessons learned with 2 patients and review of the literature, the diagnostic pitfalls and means for achieving a prompt diagnosis are discussed and a management protocol intended for emergency department staff is provided.

Band slippage after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: etiology and treatment

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a safe and effective procedure for the management of morbid obesity. However, band slippage is a common complication with variable presentation that can be rectified by a second laparoscopic procedure.

METHODS

We studied case series of 125 consecutive patients who suffered from band slippage between November 1996 and May 2001 from a group of 1,480 laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedures performed during this time. The decision of whether to remove or replace/reposition the band was made prior to the operation, although the specific method used when replacement or repositioning was deemed suitable was determined by the operative findings. A laparoscopic approach was used in all but three patients.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients (8.4%) suffered band slippage (posterior slippage, 82.4%; anterior slippage, 17.6%). In 70 patients (56%), the band was removed, whereas in 55 patients (44%) it was repositioned or replaced immediately. Of these 55 patients, six underwent later removal, five due to recurrent slippage and one due to erosion. Fourteen patients suffered complications, including gastric perforation (n = 8), intraoperative bleeding (n = 1), postoperative fever (n = 3), aspiration pneumonia (n = 1), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1), and pulmonary embolism (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Band slippage is not a rare complication after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. The decision to remove or replace the band or convert to another bariatric procedure should be made preoperatively, taking both patient preference and etiology into consideration. Short-term results indicate that band salvage is successful when the patient population is chosen correctly.

Laparoscopic gastric banding: safe and modestly successful

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an increasing problem in Australia. It is defined as a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2). It is associated with a number of significant medical conditions, as well as psychological morbidity related to poor body image and the social stigma of obesity. Conservative management is rarely successful in patients with morbid obesity and bariatric surgery is an alternative more likely to produce sustained results.

METHODS

To compare the initial results of the Lap-Band (Inamed Health, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) procedure when performed by experienced general laparoscopic surgeons, new to the procedure and those achieved by dedicated bariatric practitioners.

RESULTS

The results of the present study showed forty-seven per cent excess weight lost at 2 years, 49% excess BMI lost at 2 years. Reoperation rate for band removal, prolapse/slippage was 25.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable results with Lap-Band are technically achievable by experienced laparoscopic surgeons with a low morbidity and mortality. The results of the present study are inferior to those reported by dedicated bariatric practices who have performed large numbers of this operation. The rate of band slippage was unacceptably high and there was a significant problem with patients being lost to follow up. Possible reasons for this are discussed.

Retrospective study of laparascopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: results and complications in 127 patients

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic gastric banding is currently the most popular surgical technique for morbId obesity. This wIdespread use of surgery has been evaluated by a number of clinical studies, particularly on weight change.

METHODS

In a retrospective study of 127 obese patients operated between 1996 and 2000, data were collected for weight change, medical and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Of 127 patients, failures of gastric banding were noted during 2 surgical operations. The average follow-up period was 33 +/- 20 Months. Average weight loss in all patients was 19.9 +/- 5.3 kg (15.3 +/- 4.2%). No difference in weight loss was observed between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. During the follow-up, data were collected on 53 complications (42.4% of all gastric banding operations). 3 main types of complication were found: access port related complications (22.6% of the total), band slippage (20.7% of the total) and tubing related complications (16.9% of the total). No prognostic factor for these complications could be Identified from multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are very similar to those of other weight evolution studies. We found that there was a significant incIdence of surgical and medical complications during the follow-up because of the meticulous way all complications were recorded, even the most insignificant. This morbIdity must be borne in mind before surgery is performed.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: is there a learning curve?

BACKGROUND

To be certified for laparoscopic placement of adjustable gastric banding, surgeons must have advanced laparoscopic experience. Despite previous exposure to other kinds of laparoscopy, there may a learning curve specific to Lap-Band placement.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients were prospectively separated into two groups: the first 30 patients operated on (group 1) and the second 30 patients operated on (group 2).

RESULTS

Both groups were similar statistically in regard to gender, age, and body mass index. Operative time for group 1 was 79 +/- 31.1 min. There were 11 (37%) complications in 10 patients. Operative time for group 2 was 59 +/- 19.9 min. There were two complications (7%). All operations were completed laparoscopically. Operative time was significantly lower in group 2 ( t-test; p = 004). Complications were also significantly lower (chi-square; p = 0.005). The number of reoperations was also reduced and approached statistical significance (chi-square; p = 0.054). Readmissions, although reduced, were not statistically significant. There were no deaths in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a surgeon's history of advanced laparoscopic experience, there is a definite learning curve associated with the laparoscopically placed adjustable gastric band.

Port function after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LGB) has gained wide popularity, but information on port function is limited.

METHODS

In a prospective nonrandomized study, we analyzed port function and related symptoms in 50 consecutive patients with severe obesity. All patients underwent LGP in a five trocar technique. In 11 patients, the port was placed subcutaneously in the subxiphoid region. In 39 patients, the port was implanted in the left upper abdomen. Mean duration of follow-up was 2.8 years.

RESULTS

Patients (12 males and 38 females) had an initial body mass index (BMI) of 47.1 kg/m2. Puncturing the subxiphoidal port was without problems in all 11 patients. However, seven women reported pain and inconvenience when wearing a brassiere. Two underwent port reimplantation in the left upper abdomen (one due to infection; one due to pain). Among the 39 patients with abdominal port implantation, nine patients required port correction (two of them twice). The causes were port dislocation (four cases), difficult puncturing (three), tube leakage (three), and infection (one).

CONCLUSION

The high number of complications suggests that the port is the Achilles' heel of LGB. Ports at the subxiphoid site were easier to puncture, but frequently caused pain in female patients.

Evolution of a paradigm for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

The first human laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure, using the LAP-BAND device (INAMED Health, Santa Barbara, CA), was performed on September 1, 1993. Because of its minimal invasiveness, reversibility, and adjustability, it is considered a breakthrough in bariatric surgery. Placement of the LAP-BAND is the least invasive operative procedure that can be offered to patients with morbid obesity. The technique has evolved since it was first performed on humans. This evolution mainly concerns the band's position in relation to the gastric wall, which necessitated modifying the posterior dissection for band passage and placement. These technical changes have been aimed at reducing morbidity, especially the major complication, prolapse/slippage or pouch dilatation above the band. Based on personal experience and a review of the literature, the authors describe how the surgical technique has developed since the introduction of the LAP-BAND. The advantages of the LAP-BAND have contributed to its increasing use throughout the world. The authors believe that the approach represents a paradigm shift in bariatric surgery.

Avoiding postoperative complications with the LAP-BAND system

The most frequently occurring complications associated with the LAP-BAND (INAMED Health, Santa Barbara, CA) include gastric prolapse, stoma obstruction, esophageal and gastric pouch dilatation, erosion, and access port problems. This article describes the causes of these complications and details some points for their prevention and treatment. As techniques for placement of the LAP-BAND have evolved, complication rates have declined. For example, occurrence of gastric prolapse was reduced from the initially reported rates of 22% to less than 5%. The emergence of many problems, such as gastric pouch dilatation or prolapse, can be minimized with proper operative technique and close postoperative management and follow-up. As with other major surgical procedures, particularly those performed in the bariatric population, complications associated with the LAP-BAND system are unavoidable but are rarely life-threatening if managed appropriately. Surgeons and patients should adopt strategies that will help avoid complications and be sensitive to any indication of their emergence.