In vivo and in vitro production of monoclonal antibodies. Bioreactors vs immune ascites

A Call for a European Prohibition of Monoclonal Antibody Production by the Ascites Procedure in Laboratory Animals

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are particularly valuable in therapeutics and research. Unfortunately, one of the most familiar methods of producing mAbs, the ascites induction method, causes pain and distress to the animals used. In most cases, non-animal or in vitro alternatives can be employed to reduce or eliminate the use of animals for mAb production. Prohibition of the use of animals in the production of mAbs is recommended, except when the replacement in vitro methods prove to be insufficient, and in a limited number of other well-documented cases, such as an exceptional need for an emergency therapeutic application. A total ban on the use of animals for mAb production is impractical and it is imperative that an appeals process should accompany the prohibition. The need for the establishment of core facilities for in vitro mAb production is emphasised.

Development of optimal medium for production of commercially important monoclonal antibody 520C9 by hybridoma cell

Hybridoma HB-8696 produces monoclonal antibody (mAb) 520C9 (mouse IgG(1)), which recognizes breast cancer oncoprotein c-erbB2. The objective of this study was to optimize the medium recipe of HB 8696 cell for production of mAb 520C9. The optimization consisted of two steps: (1) screening of significant nutrients to make subsequent experiments more efficient with less runs and (2) locating their optimal concentrations. 29 variables including essential and non-essential amino acids, glucose, serum and 6 salts, namely NaCl, KCl, CaCl(2), NaH(2)PO(4), MgSO(4) and Na-pyruvate were chosen in screening phase. The Plackett-Burman method was used to screen the variables influencing mAb production. Seven factors namely glucose, serum, asparagine, threonine, serine, NaCl and NaH(2)PO(4) were identified to have a positive influencing role on mAb production with a confidence level >90 % (p < 0.1). Finally, Response surface methodology revealed the optimal level of the variables. The mAb production and average specific mAb production rate were enhanced by 111.05 and 105 %, respectively, compared to control medium.