Biomarker assays for phosphorylated MAP kinase. Their utility for measurement of MEK inhibition

Establishment of a novel method to assess MEK1/2 inhibition in PBMCs for clinical drug development

The Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway plays a key role in regulating cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, cytokine production, and immune responses. However, it is also involved in diseases such as cancer, and numerous viruses rely on an active Raf/MEK/ERK pathway for propagation. This pathway, and particularly MEK1/2, are therefore promising therapeutic targets. Assessment of target engagement is crucial to determine pharmacodynamics or the efficacy of a MEK1/2 inhibitor. In the field of infectious diseases, this is usually first determined in clinical trials with healthy volunteers. One method to detect MEK1/2 inhibitor target engagement is to assess the degree of ERK1/2 phosphorylation, as ERK1/2 is the only known substrate of MEK1/2. As healthy subjects, however, only feature a low baseline MEK1/2 activation and therefore low ERK1/2 phosphorylation in most tissues, assessing target engagement is challenging, and robust methods are urgently needed. We hence developed a method using PBMCs isolated from whole blood of healthy blood donors, followed by ex vivo treatment with the MEK1/2 inhibitor zapnometinib and stimulation with PMA to first inhibit and then induce MEK1/2 activation. As PMA cannot activate MEK1/2 upon MEK1/2 inhibition, MEK1/2 inhibition results in impaired MEK1/2 activation. In contrast, PMA stimulation without MEK1/2 inhibition results in high MEK1/2 activation. We demonstrated that, without MEK1/2 inhibitor treatment, MEK1/2 stimulation with PMA induces high MEK1/2 activation, which is clearly distinguishable from baseline MEK1/2 activation in human PBMCs. Furthermore, we showed that treatment with the MEK1/2 inhibitor zapnometinib maintains the MEK1/2 activation at approximately baseline level despite subsequent stimulation with PMA. As our protocol is easy to follow and preserves the cells in an in vivo-like condition throughout the whole handling process, this approach can be a major advance for the easy assessment of MEK1/2 inhibitor target engagement in healthy probands for clinical drug development.

A phase II evaluation of selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886), a selective MEK-1/2 inhibitor in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Activation of the mitogen activated protein kinase pathway plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation and is frequently activated in endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate the efficacy/safety of selumetinib, a selective MEK-1/2 inhibitor in women with recurrent endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This was a phase II, single-arm, open-label study evaluating response and 6-month event-free survival (EFS) as primary endpoints. Eligible patients had measurable disease, 1-2 prior cytotoxic regimens, and performance status 0-2. Selumetinib 75mg PO BID was administered daily until progression or intolerance. One cycle was 28days.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled; 2 were excluded due to improper pre-study treatment (1) and never treated (1), leaving 52 evaluable for efficacy/safety. Median age was 62; histology included endometrioid (58%), serous (17%) and mixed (23%). Seventeen patients (33%) had 2 prior cytotoxic regimens. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (1-34). Three (6%) patients had objective response (1 CR, 2 PR); 13 had SD as best response. The proportion of patients with 6-month EFS was 12%. Median EFS, progression-free and overall survival was 2.1, 2.3, and 8.5months, respectively. Drug-attributed grade 3/4 adverse events were observed (≥5%) were fatigue (15%), anemia (10%), pain (10%), extremity edema (8%), and dyspnea (6%). There was 1 grade 4 infection (renal), 1 grade 4 anemia, and 1 death due to hemorrhage (rectum).

CONCLUSIONS

Selumetinib was tolerable in this population but did not meet pre-trial specifications for clinical efficacy.

KRAS or BRAF mutation status is a useful predictor of sensitivity to MEK inhibition in ovarian cancer

This study examined the status of KRAS and BRAF mutations, in relation to extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) activation in 58 ovarian carcinomas to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of KRAS/BRAF mutations. Somatic mutations of either KRAS or BRAF were identified in 12 (20.6%) out of 58 ovarian carcinomas. The frequency of KRAS/BRAF mutations in conventional serous high-grade carcinomas (4.0% : 1/25) was significantly lower than that in the other histological type (32.3% : 10/31). Phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) expression was identified in 18 (38.2%) out of 45 ovarian carcinomas. KRAS/BRAF mutation was significantly correlated with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, II (P<0.001), and p-ERK1/2 (P<0.001). No significant correlations between KRAS/BRAF mutations or p-ERK1/2 expression and overall survival were found in patients with ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum and taxane chemotherapy (P=0.2460, P=0.9339, respectively). Next, to clarify the roles of ERK1/2 activation in ovarian cancers harbouring KRAS or BRAF mutations, we inactivated ERK1/2 in ovarian cancer cells using CI-1040. Cl-1040 is a compound that selectively inhibits MAP kinase kinase (MEK), an upstream regulator of ERK1/2, and thus prevents ERK1/2 activation. Profound growth inhibition and apoptosis were observed in CI-1040-treated cancer cells with mutations in either KRAS or BRAF in comparison with the ovarian cancer cells containing wild-type sequences. This was evident in both in vitro and in vivo studies. The findings in this study indicate that an activated ERK1/2 pathway is critical to tumour growth and survival of ovarian cancers with KRAS or BRAF mutations. Furthermore, they suggest that the CI-1040-induced phenotypes depend on the mutational status of KRAS and BRAF in ovarian cancers. Therefore, ovarian cancer patients with KRAS or BRAF mutations may benefit from CI-1040 treatment.

Overcoming resistance to molecularly targeted anticancer therapies: Rational drug combinations based on EGFR and MAPK inhibition for solid tumours and haematologic malignancies

Accumulating evidence suggests that cancer can be envisioned as a "signaling disease", in which alterations in the cellular genome affect the expression and/or function of oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. This ultimately disrupts the physiologic transmission of biochemical signals that normally regulate cell growth, differentiation and programmed cell death (apoptosis). From a clinical standpoint, signal transduction inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for human malignancies has recently achieved remarkable success. However, as additional drugs move forward into the clinical arena, intrinsic and acquired resistance to "targeted" agents becomes an issue for their clinical utility. One way to overcome resistance to targeted agents is to identify genetic and epigenetic aberrations underlying sensitivity/resistance, thus enabling the selection of patients that will most likely benefit from a specific therapy. Since resistance often ensues as a result of the concomitant activation of multiple, often overlapping, signaling pathways, another possibility is to interfere with multiple, cross-talking pathways involved in growth and survival control in a rational, mechanism-based, fashion. These concepts may be usefully applied, among others, to agents that target two major signal transduction pathways: the one initiated by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and the one converging on mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms of sensitivity/resistance to EGFR inhibitors, as well as the rationale for combining them with other targeted agents, in an attempt to overcome resistance. In the second part of the paper, we review MAPK-targeted agents, focusing on their therapeutic potential in haematologic malignancies, and examine the prospects for combinations of MAPK inhibitors with cytotoxic agents or other signal transduction-targeted agents to obtain synergistic anti-tumour effects.

Inactivation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a potential target-based therapy in ovarian serous tumors with KRAS or BRAF mutations

Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) occurs in response to various growth stimulating signals and as a result of activating mutations of the upstream regulators, KRAS and BRAF, which can be found in many types of human cancer. To investigate the roles of MAPK activation in tumors harboring KRAS or BRAF mutations, we inactivated MAPK in ovarian tumor cells using CI-1040, a compound that selectively inhibits MAPK kinase, an upstream regulator of MAPK and thus prevents MAPK activation. Profound growth inhibition and apoptosis were observed in CI-1040-treated tumor cells with mutations in either KRAS or BRAF in comparison with the ovarian cancer cells containing wild-type sequences. Long serial analysis of gene expression identified several differentially expressed genes in CI-1040-treated MPSC1 cells harboring an activating mutation in BRAF (V599L). The most striking changes were down-regulation of cyclin D1, COBRA1, and transglutaminase-2 and up-regulation of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-induced ligand, thrombospondin-1, optineurin, and palladin. These patterns of gene expression were validated in other CI-1040-treated tumor cells based on quantitative PCR. Constitutive expression of cyclin D1 partially reversed the growth inhibitory effect of CI-1040 in MPSC1 cells. Our findings indicate that an activated MAPK pathway is critical in tumor growth and survival of ovarian tumors with KRAS or BRAF mutations and suggest that the CI-1040 induced phenotypes depend on the mutational status of KRAS and BRAF in ovarian tumors.

Unraveling the complexities of the Raf/MAP kinase pathway for pharmacological intervention

The Ras-MAP kinase pathway has attracted much attention from academic and pharmaceutical laboratories because of its central role in regulating tumor cell growth and survival, differentiation and angiogenesis. Although the central players in this pathway -Ras, Raf, and MEK - have been well studied, how best to exploit them for therapeutic gain has eluded oncology researchers in the past. Several small-molecule inhibitors that target specific steps of the MAP kinase cascade have recently entered the clinical arena. While we await answers on their ultimate therapeutic use, the availability of translational assays for monitoring target suppression will no doubt play a significant role in optimizing our chances of success.