Endoscopic ductal drainage may avoid resective surgery in painful chronic pancreatitis without large ductal dilatation

Clinical Profile, Etiology and Role of Endotherapy in Chronic Calcific Pancreatitis: An Experience from North India

Background: In recent years, we have witnessed an evolving landscape in the management of chronic pancreatitis (CP). Endoscopy plays a pivotal role in CP management. Because the management of CP is problematic, we aimed to review and evaluate the role of endoscopy in the management of CP. Methods: This study was carried out in patients with painful chronic calcific pancreatitis who were admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology at the Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Srinagar. This was an observational prospective study. We included 67 patients with painful chronic calcific pancreatitis and pancreatic duct abnormalities (stones, strictures, or ductal variations) in our study. These patients had to access exocrine and endocrine status before any therapeutic measures. All the patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as a therapeutic measure. After ERCP, the patients were followed up for 2 years to assess improvement in pain (visual analog scale score reduction), endocrine status (HBA1C reduction), or exocrine status (Fecal elastase reduction). Results: 67 patients were included in the study. Among them males were 32 (47.8%), females were 35(52.5%) and the age distribution studied were as in the age group of 15-30 years, patients were 23 (34.3%), in 30-45 years, there was 20 (29.9%), in age group of 45-60 year, patients were 20 (29.9%), and in the age group of 60-75 years, the patients were 4 (6%). Etiology was sought in all patients; alcohol-related CP was seen in three patients (4.5%), genetic in 11 (16.4%), IgG4 in one (1.5%), pancreatic divisum in 6 (9.0%), hyperparathyroidism in on1e (1.5%), and idiopathic in 45 (67.2%). All patients underwent ERCP for their symptoms to reduce ductal pressure, which is postulated as one of the hypotheses for pain in CP. Pancreatic duct (PD) clearance was attempted in all patients (complete in 42 [62.7%], partial in 17 [25.4%], and failed in 8 [11.9%]). These patients were followed for a period of two years after endotherapy, and the important predictors for pain reduction were single PD stones, disease in the head and body, and non-stricturing disease. Conclusion: Endotherapy offers a high rate of success in selected patients, clearance being better in distal disease and CP without PD strictures, suggesting early disease usually gets cleared very easily.

Endoscopic management of chronic pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a common gastrointestinal illness, which affects the quality of life with substantial morbidity and mortality. The management includes medical, endoscopic and surgical approaches with the need for interaction between various specialties, calling for a concerted multidisciplinary approach. However, at the time of this publication, guidelines to establish care of these patients are lacking. This review provides the reader with a comprehensive overview of the studies summarizing the various treatment options available, including medical, surgical and endoscopic options. In addition, technological advances such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogrophy, endoscopic shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic ultrasound can now be offered with reasonable success for pancreatic decompression, stricture dilatation with stent placement, stone fragmentation, pseudocyst drainage, and other endoscopic interventions such as celiac plexus block for pain relief. We emphasize the endoscopic options in this review, and attempt to extract the most up to date information from the current literature. The treatment of CP and its complications are discussed extensively. Complications such as biliary strictures. pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pain are common issues that arise as long-term complications of CP. These often require endoscopic or surgical management and possibly a combination of approaches, however choosing amongst the various therapeutic and palliative modalities while weighing the risks and benefits, makes the management of CP challenging. Treatment goals should be not just to control symptoms but also to prevent disease progression. Our aim in this paper is to advocate and emphasize an evidence based approach for the management of CP and associated long term complications.

Effect of pancreatic duct stent diameter on hospitalization in chronic pancreatitis: does size matter?

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic therapy with pancreatic duct (PD) stenting in painful chronic pancreatitis is effective at reducing pain. Few studies have compared response to different PD stent diameters. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the effect of PD stent diameter on hospitalization for abdominal pain in chronic pancreatitis.

METHODS

An existing database was queried to identify individuals who received PD stenting for chronic pancreatitis. Each patient was grouped according to stent diameter: (1) 8.5F stents or smaller and (2) 10F stents. The main outcome was number of hospitalizations adjusting for varying follow-up time and controlling for age, sex, and etiology of pancreatitis using a negative binomial model.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-three patients underwent PD stent placement for chronic pancreatitis from October 1995 to September 2007. One hundred twenty-nine patients (79%) received predominantly PD stents 8.5F or smaller in diameter, and 34 patients (21%) received predominantly PD stents 10F in diameter. There was no statistically significant difference in population characteristics between the 2 groups. The 10F stent group had a statistically significant (P = 0.003) lower rate of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received larger diameter PD stents had fewer hospitalizations for abdominal pain. Outcome-based prospective studies are needed.

Endoscopic pancreatic-stent placement and sphincterotomy for relief of pain in tropical pancreatitis: results of a 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Tropical chronic pancreatitis frequently presents with intractable abdominal pain. Surgical treatment has its own morbidity and mortality, and long-term results may not be satisfactory.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of endoscopic pancreatic-stent placement and sphincterotomy for the pain of tropical pancreatitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary-referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four patients with tropical pancreatitis with severe, persistent pain not responding to standard medical therapy over a period of 30 months beginning January 1998.

INTERVENTIONS

Stent placement of the pancreatic duct, along with sphincterotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

At least 80% global improvement in pain as reported by the patient during follow-up after the procedure.

RESULTS

In the 19 evaluable patients, the intended procedure, pancreatic stent placement along with sphincterotomy, was successful in 14 (73.7%); 3 others had sphincterotomy alone. Over a follow-up period of 6 to 38 months, 12 of the 14 patients (85.7%) who underwent stent placement plus sphincterotomy and 2 of the 3 patients who had sphincterotomy alone responded. Twelve of these were completely free of pain, and the remaining 2 patients had mild infrequent pain that occurred once in 2 to 4 months, lasting a few hours at a time and never needing hospitalization. The only major complication was the development of pancreatic sepsis, which required stent removal in 1 patient. Eight patients were stent free at the end of 6 months, and, over a further follow-up of 6 to 20 months, the pattern of pain relief persisted in them.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature of the study, the limited numbers studied, and the lack of assessment of pain on a standard visual analog scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement of the pancreatic duct with pancreatic sphincterotomy constitutes an important nonsurgical therapeutic option for the intractable pain of tropical pancreatitis.

Endoscopic therapy of chronic pancreatitis

We present an overview of endoscopic therapies for chronic pancreatitis (CP) and its associated conditions. It is evident that endoscopy can be a definite therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts, pancreatic ascites and pancreatic duct (PD) disruption. Endoscopic therapy has also been useful in the short-term and medium therapy of common bile duct strictures due to CP, the best results being obtained if there are no calcifications in the head of the pancreas. Although most experts agree that obstruction to the outflow of pancreatic juice and the resulting increased pressure within the main PD is one of the major factors contributing to pain and that endoscopic therapy has been proven effective to remove stones as well as to dilate PD strictures and place stents across the PD, there is no convincing evidence from randomized trials that the patient's dominant symptom of CP, i.e. pain, is resolved in an appropriate and long-term fashion. We believe that there are other factors which are important in the etiology of chronic pain such as pancreatic inflammation and peripancreatic fibrosis with resulting nerve entrapment around the gland. The reader is reminded that endoscopic therapy is associated with significant and important complications, therefore appropriate patient selection and patient information are of paramount importance. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that one advantage of endoscopic management of CP is that it is less invasive as compared with surgery, often effective for years, does not hinder further surgery, and can be repeated. Finally we want to emphasize that there are many valid surgical, radiological and endoscopic techniques to treat the complications of CP. Therefore, the approach to CP and its complications should be by a multidisciplinary team of gastroenterologists, surgeons, radiologists, endoscopists and pain specialists.

Interventional treatment of chronic pancreatitis

Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis is becoming a reality: more and more endoscopy centres are developing the technique, and it is no longer a matter of extreme specialization. Among treatments which have been shown to be feasible, it is possible to distinguish between those approaches that are now considered as efficient with good results and very low risk (e.g. MPD drainage), or are efficient but with risks that seem to be lower than those of surgery (e.g. drainage of cysts), and drainage of the main bile duct, which is easy to perform, but, so far, has not been demonstrated enough as useful.

Interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic surgery

Interventional endoscopic techniques have been indespensible in almost every area of modern surgery. As surgeons, we need to continue to advance our skills in these areas if we expect to continue to be involved in these aspects of patient care.

Endoscopic treatment of the main pancreatic duct: correlations among morphology, manometry, and clinical follow-up

BACKGROUND AND AIM

During the course of chronic pancreatitis, the gradual increase in the main pancreatic duct pressure is the main pathophysiological factor responsible for pain, but up to now, the intra ductal pressure has never been measured during and after endoscopic stenting and correlated with clinical results. Pressure measurements of this kind could thus provide objective information about the useful duration of stenting period.

METHODS

Main pancreatic duct pressure was measured by performing endoscopic manometry on 13 chronic pancreatitis symptomatic patients (10 men, 3 women, mean age: 45.1+/-7.9 yr); clinical follow-up was carried out for a period of 29.0+/-16.1 mo. Before treatment, the main anatomical alteration present was a localized stenosis of the main pancreatic duct, i.e., one with a diameter of less than 2 mm (chronic pancreatitis alone), 10 cases; chronic pancreatitis associated with pancreas divisum, 3 cases). Stenosis was treated by endoscopic stenting: 7 F stent (7 cases) and 12 F stent (6 cases). The pressure was measured simultaneously in the duodenum (zero level) and within the main pancreatic duct, using an electronic device, The pancreatico-duodenal gradient was taken to be the difference between the pressure in the main pancreatic duct and the duodenum.

RESULTS

The endoscopic stenting induced a nonsignificant decrease in the intraductal pressure (p = 0.16). Among the 9 patients with a normal pressure at the end of the stenting and a successful anatomical outcome, 6 were painless during the follow-up period whereas 3 presented with recurrent pancreatic-type pain. The remaining 4 patients were symptom-free during the entire follow-up period, although the main pancreatic duct pressure was high at the end of the stenting and the stenosis was not completely cured.

CONCLUSION

The intraductal pressure at the end of the stenting period was perfectly correlated with the anatomical result, whether or not it was successful, but was not an accurate predictor of a favorable clinical outcome in patients with a poor anatomical result.

Pancreatic surgery

According to epidemiologic studies, the incidence of acute and chronic pancreatitis and carcinoma of the pancreas are increasing worldwide. This is the result not only of improved diagnostic methods introduced in the last decades (eg, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, "all-in-one" magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) but also of changes in the environment and nutritional behavior. Once a specific diagnosis has been made, the first-choice interventions in acute and chronic inflammatory pancreatic diseases are predominantly organ-and organ function-preserving surgical procedures. In pancreatic cancer, extended radical surgery and multimodal therapies seem to offer the most benefit. This article provides an overview of recently published articles focusing on surgical treatment options in acute and chronic pancreatitis and carcinoma of the pancreas.