The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique

Twelve-month Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Glass Carbomer Restorative System

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the clinical one-year follow-up of a silica- and flouroapatite-reinforced glass carbomer filling material as compared to a resin composite restorative material.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this study, a total of 100 restorations were performed. Caries were removed conventionally with diamond burs. Half of the restorations were restored with nanocomposite resin (TEP) (Tokuyama Estelite, Tokuyama Dental, Japan) and the other half were restored with glass carbomer (GC) material (GCP Dental, The Netherlands). Each restorative material was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Restorations were evaluated with modified USPHS criteria at the end of the first week, 6 months, and 12 months. Data were analyzed using Fisher's Exact Chi-Square test, Fisher Freeman Halton Test, and Continuity (Yates) Correction. The Wilcoxon sign test was used for intra-group comparisons of the parameters.

RESULTS

When the filling materials were compared with one another, a statistically significant difference was observed in the 12th month on the marginal discoloration. A statistically significant difference was observed between the two materials in the 6th month on the marginal adaptation (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In view of these results, there is a need to improve the physical properties of the GC filling material in further in vivo studies.

Effect of Layering Techniques on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress of High- and Low-viscosity Bulk-fill Resins

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of layering techniques is still advisable with many bulk-fill resins and should be the default unless a particular resin is known to not need it.

SUMMARY

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate how layering techniques affect polymerization shrinkage stresses of high-and low-viscosity bulk-fill resins.Method: Six high-viscosity and six low-viscosity bulk-fill resins were evaluated. Aluminum blocks with a mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavity were machined and randomly divided into groups for different filling techniques (bulk-fill vs horizontal layering vs oblique layering) and further subdivided according to type of resin (high- vs low-viscosity). The cuspal deflection resulting from the polymerization of bulk-fill resin bonded to a MOD cavity within an aluminum block was measured with a digimatic micrometer. Scanning electron microscopy analyses of tested resins were also conducted.Results: In the high-viscosity bulk-fill resins, cuspal deflection of the MOD cavity ranged from 11.2 to 18.2 μm with the bulk-filling technique, from 10.7 to 15.5 μm with the horizontal layering technique, and from 10.9 to 15.2 μm with the oblique layering technique. In the low-viscosity bulk-fill resins, cuspal deflection of the material ranged from 9.2 to 19.8 μm with the bulk-filling technique, from 8.2 to 15.7 μm with the horizontal layering technique, and from 8.4 to 16.4 μm with the oblique layering technique.Conclusion: Cuspal deflections for some high-and low-viscosity bulk-fill resins were significantly reduced by using layering techniques, but the resultant improvement of layering techniques was not applicable to all the bulk-fill resins used in this study.

The effect of two composite placement techniques on fracture resistance of MOD restorations with various resin composites

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of two restorative placement techniques, centripetal incremental technique (CIT) and bulk-fill technique (BT) on the fracture resistance of Class II MOD restorations with various resin composites in molar teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six extracted, caries free third molars were prepared with MOD preparations and restored with resin composites. The specimens were divided into two groups by placement technique, centripetal incremental technique (CIT) and bulk-fill technique (BT). Each group was subdivided into four groups according to resin composite: hybrid (Aelite LS), nano-hybrid (Virtuoso Universal), bulk fill (Filtek One Bulk Fill) and the micro-hybrid (Herculite XRV) as the control.

RESULTS

Two-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) followed by the multiple comparison procedure, Student-Newman-Keuls Method showed no a statistically significant difference between placement techniques and fracture resistance of Class II resin composite restorations (P > 0.05). Herculite XRV resisted a significantly higher load before fracture than the other three materials at a 0.05 level of significance, while Virtuoso Universal scored the lowest load.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant effect of the two placement techniques on the fracture resistance of Class II resin composite restorations CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Resin composite restorations in Class II MODs using a simplified bulk fill placement technique showed no significant difference in fracture resistance with the centripetal technique in molar teeth.

Antibacterial quaternary ammonium compounds in dental materials: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) represent one of the most effective classes of disinfectant agents in dental materials and resin nanocomposites. This reviews aims to give a wide overview on the research in the field of antibacterial QACs in dental materials and nanocomposites.

METHOD

An introduction to dental materials components as well as the microorganisms and methods of evaluation for the antimicrobial assays are presented. Then, the properties and synthesis route of QACs, as monomer and filler, are shown. Finally, antimicrobial monomers and fillers, specifically those contain quaternary ammonium salts (QASs), in dental materials are reviewed.

RESULTS

QACs have been used as monomer and micro/nanofiller in restorative dentistry. They possess one or more methacrylate functional groups to participate in polymerization reactions. QACs with multiple methacrylate groups can also be used as crosslinking agents. Furthermore, QACs with chain length from ∼12 to 16 have higher antimicrobial activity in cured dental resins. In general, increasing the chain length leads to a threshold value (critical point) and then it causes decrease in the antimicrobial activity.

SIGNIFICANCE

The current state of the art of dental materials and resin nanocomposites includes a wide variety of antimicrobial materials. Among them, QACs presents low cytotoxicity and excellent long-term antimicrobial activity without leaching out over time.

Degradation Potential of Bulk Versus Incrementally Applied and Indirect Composites: Color, Microhardness, and Surface Deterioration

This study investigated the color stability and microhardness of five composites exposed to four beverages with different pH values. Composite discs were produced (n=10); Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) and Filtek P90 (3M ESPE) were applied in two layers (2 mm, 20 seconds), and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TetricBF, Ivoclar Vivadent) and SonicFill (Kerr) were applied in bulk (4 mm) and then light cured (40 seconds, Ortholux-LED, 1600 mW/cm²). Indirect composite Sinfony (3M ESPE) was applied in two layers (2 mm) and cured (Visio system, 3M ESPE). The specimens were polished and tested for color stability; ΔE was calculated using spectrophotometer readings. Vickers microhardness (50 g, dwell time=45 seconds) was assessed on the top and bottom surfaces at baseline, 40 days of storage, subsequent repolishing, and 60 days of immersion in distilled water (pH=7.0), Coca-Cola (pH=2.3), orange juice (pH=3.75), or anise (pH=8.5) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The materials had similar ΔE values (40 days, p>0.05), but TetricBF had a significantly greater ΔE than P90 or SF (40 days). The ΔE was less for P90 and TetricBF than for Z250, SonicFill, and Sinfony (60 days). Repolishing and further immersion significantly affected the ΔE (p<0.05) except for P90. All composites had significantly different top vs bottom baseline microhardnesses. This was insignificant for the Z250/water, P90/orange juice (40 days), and Sinfony groups (40 and 60 days). Immersion produced variable time-dependent deterioration of microhardness in all groups. Multivariate repeated measures analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni tests were used to compare the results. ΔE and microhardness changes were significantly inversely correlated at 40 days, but this relationship was insignificant at 60 days (Pearson test). SEM showed degradation (40 days) that worsened (60 days). Bulk-fill composites differ regarding color-stability and top-to-bottom microhardness changes compared with those of other composites. P90 showed better surface degradation resistance. In conclusion, bulk-fill composites are not promising alternatives to incremental and indirect composites regarding biodegradation.

Bulk Fill Composites: An Anatomic Sculpting Technique

Composite resins have been routinely used for posterior cavities due to a phasedown on amalgam as a restorative option. However, clinical problems related to polymerization shrinkage demands careful and specific techniques for placement of the composite layers. New low shrinkage composites are now marketed for bulk filling of cavities without the need of a traditional layering. With this new concept, the restoration can be built in one or two layers, depending on the classification of the bulk fill material. This article discusses and presents two alternative techniques using the low shrinkage composites, suggesting a called "amalgam-like sculpting technique," one using a flowable bulk fill and other a regular bulk fill material. Clinical cases illustrate these two alternatives compared with the layered technique.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

New techniques using low shrinkage composites for bulk filling can provide a simpler technical approach for the clinician in sculpting and generating highly esthetic posterior composites.

Reinforcement of teeth with simulated coronal fracture and immature weakened roots using resin composite cured by a modified layering technique

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the strengthening effect of resin composite, cured by a modified layering protocol, for teeth with simulated coronal fracture and weakened immature roots.

METHODS

Fifty maxillary teeth were decoronated and their apices sectioned to standardize the length to 12 mm. Prepared teeth were equally distributed into five groups. Group 1VF root apices were flared with Pesso drills up to size 6. The roots were flared until a dentin thickness of only 1 ± 0.2 mm remained. Root ends were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate. The canals were backfilled with Vertise Flow following a modified layering protocol using two light-transmitting posts size 6 and 3. Next, a DT light post size 2 was cemented using the same material. Groups 2TS/MF and 3ED/PF were prepared and cured in the same way as group 1VF but filled with Clearfil Tri-S Bond/Majesty Flow and ED Primer II/Panavia F2.0 respectively. Group 4UF was similarly prepared but left unfilled (control). In group 5NW, roots were unflared but similarly filled as in group 3ED/PF. After 24 hours of storage, the fracture load was measured. The degree of cure for each tested material was indirectly measured using microhardness at different root levels (cervical, middle, and apical). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test.

RESULTS

Fracture load results revealed that groups 1VF and 2TS/MF had no statistically significant difference from group 5NW (p>0.05). For each tested material, no significant difference was found among microhardness values at different root levels.

CONCLUSION

It may be possible to reinforce the teeth with coronal fracture and immature weakened roots to be comparable with unweakened ones when composite is applied and cured by the modified layering technique.

Interfacial Nanoleakage and Bonding of Self-Adhesive Systems Cured with a Modified-Layering Technique to Dentin of Weakened Roots

Objective

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the nanoleakage and bond strength of different self adhesive systems cured with a modified-layering technique (MLT) to dentin of weakened roots.

Methods

Twenty-one maxillary incisors were decoronated and then root canals were instrumented and obturated with the cold lateral compaction technique. Weakened roots were simulated by flaring root canals until only 1 mm dentin thickness remained. Teeth were distributed into three groups. The canals were backfilled with Vertise Flow (VF group), a self-adhering system, following a modified-layering technique using two light-transmitting posts, sizes 6 and 3. DT Light Post size 2 was cemented using the same material. Remaining roots were prepared and cured in the same way as the VF group. However, in the TS/MF group, Clearfil Tri-S Bond (TS) adhesive and Clearfil Majesty Flow (MF) composite were used, while in the ED/PF group, ED primer II (ED)/Panavia F2.0 (PF) were used. After one week of storage, each root was sectioned to obtain six slices (two slices from each root third: coronal, middle and apical) of 0.9 ± 0.1 mm thickness. Interfacial nanoleakage expression was analyzed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM), and the micro push-out bond strength (μPOBS) was measured at different root regions. Modes of failure were also determined using SEM. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures and Tukey post hoc test (p≤0.05).

Results

With MLT, all adhesive systems showed nanoleakage. For μPOBS, there was a statistically significant effect for adhesive systems (p&lt;0.001) but not for root region (p&lt;0.64) or for their interaction (p=0.99). Tukey post hoc test revealed that the bond strength of the VF group was significantly higher than the TS/MF and ED/PF groups for all root regions.

Conclusion

All of the tested self-adhesive systems cured using MLT had slight nanoleakage and were not sensitive to root regional differences. Self-adhering systems had higher bond strength than self-etch adhesives.

Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management

Polymerization contraction stress of dental composites is often associated with marginal and interfacial failure of bonded restorations. The magnitude of the stress depends on the composite's composition (filler content and matrix composition) and its ability to flow before gelation, which is related to the cavity configuration and curing characteristics of the composite. This article reviews the variations found among studies regarding the contraction stress testing method, contraction stress values of current composites, and discusses the validity of contraction stress studies in relation to results from microleakage tests. The effect of lower curing rates and alternative curing routines on contraction stress values is also discussed, as well as the use of low elastic modulus liners. Moreover, studies with experimental Bis-GMA-based composites and recent developments in low-shrinkage monomers are described.

Fracture resistance of premolars restored by various types and placement techniques of resin composites

To verify the fracture resistance of premolars with mesioocclusodistal preparations restored by different resin composites and placement techniques. Sixty premolars were randomly divided into two groups based on type of composite resin: Filtek P60 or Nulite F, and then each group was separated into three subgroups: bulk, centripetal, and fiber insert according to the type of placement method (n = 10). Single-bond adhesive system was used as composite bonding according to the manufacturer's instructions. Specimens were restored in Groups 1, 2, and 3 with Filtek P60 and in Groups 4, 5, and 6 with Nulite F. After being stored 24 hours at 37°C, a 4 mm diameter steel sphere in a universal testing machine was applied on tooth buccal and lingual cusps at a cross-head speed of 5 mm/min until fracture occurred. Groups 3 and 6 showed higher fracture resistance than Groups 1, 2, 4, and 5. Among the placement techniques, the fiber insert method had a significant effect, but the type of composite was ineffective. The insertion technique in contrast to the type of material had a significant influence on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.

Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations

Aim:

The study aims to evaluate and compare marginal microleakage in deep class II cavities restored with various techniques using different composites.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty freshly extracted teeth were divided into six groups of 10 teeth each. Standardized class II cavities were made and were restored using composites of different consistencies with different placement techniques. Group 1 with Microhybrid composite, Group 2 with Packable composite, Group 3 Microhybrid composite with a flowable composite liner, Group 4 Packable composite with a flowable composite liner, Group 5 Microhybrid composite with precured composite insert in second increment and Group 6 Packable composite with precured insert in second increment. Specimens then were stored in distilled water, thermocycled and immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution. These specimens were sectioned and evaluated for microleakage at the occlusal and cervical walls separately using stereomicroscope.

Results:

The results demonstrated that in the occlusal wall, packable composite, showed significantly more marginal microleakage than the other groups. In the cervical wall, teeth restored with a flowable composite liner showed less marginal microleakage when compared to all other groups.

Conclusion:

Based on the results of this study, the use of flowable composite as the first increment is recommended in deep class II cavities.

Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the proximal contact on class II composite restorations constructed using various restorative approaches by a morphological analysis.

METHODS

Sixty plastic premolar teeth were prepared for class II cavities. These teeth were divided into six groups and restored using different materials and matrix systems. Two composite materials used were a microhybrid composite Filtek Z100 (3M/ESPE) and a packable composite P60 (3M/ESPE). Three interproximal matrix systems were two circumferential metal matrices (0.05 mm and 0.03 mm thin, respectively) combined with a Tofflemire retainer, and a pre-contoured sectional matrix system (Palodent). The contact morphologies of the restorations were visually inspected with regard to their buccolinugal and mesiodistal aspects. The contact tightness was measured by inserting different amounts of metal strips. For quantitatively morphologic analysis, three-dimensional (3D) scans of proximal contacts were performed. The results were analysed with two-way ANOVA and the Tukey test.

RESULTS

Under visual observation, contact surfaces in sectional matrix groups showed anatomic profile but concave in the centre, whilst the circumferential matrix groups showed flat profiles. The sectional matrix improved the contact tightness. The 3D analysis revealed that the matrix system was correlated with the contact morphology, since the sectional matrix generated significantly deeper and wider surface concavity.

CONCLUSIONS

All the interproximal matrix systems presented some deficiency in either the contact tightness or contours. Although the sectional matrix system enhanced contact tightness, it caused contact concavity by formation of interproximal marginal overhang. The quantitative morphologic analysis helps to examine improper proximal contact and the associated problems.

In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Composite restorations frequently have gingival margins apical to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). Microleakage at the cementodentinal margins is one of the most important causes of failure in these restorations. The current study evaluated microleakage at the occlusal and gingival margins of Class II packable composite restorations using resin-modified glass ionomer and flowable composite as liners, using the two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin-bonding systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This in vitro study was carried out on 48 intact human premolars. Class II preparations were made with the gingival margins placed 1.0 mm apical to the CEJ. The teeth were randomly assigned to six groups of 16 boxes and restored using the following techniques: Group 1: Single Bond (3M ESPE) + Filtek P60 (3M ESPE); Group 2: Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) + Filtek P60; Group 3: Single Bond + Filtek Flow (3M ESPE) + Filtek P60; Group 4: Clearfil SE Bond + Filtek Flow + Filtek P60. Group 5: Single Bond + Fuji II LC (GC) + Filtek P60; Group 6: Clearfil SE Bond + Fuji II LC + Filtek P60. The restorations were thermocycled for 1000 cycles at 5{degree sign}C and 55°C, soaked in 2% methylene blue for 48 hours, then sectioned mesiodistally and viewed under a stereomicroscope for leakage at the gingival margin. The data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, two-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-tests.

RESULTS

The resin-modified glass-ionomer liner demonstrated significantly less leakage than flowable composite (p<0.05). There was no difference between restorations with flowable resin composite liners and those without the liner; in addition, no significant difference was observed between the two kinds of adhesive systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study supports the use of resin-modified glass ionomer as a liner in closed-sandwich technique to decrease microleakage of Class II packable composite restorations, applying either the two-step etch-and-rinse or the self-etch dentin adhesive system.

Indirect resin composites

Aesthetic dentistry continues to evolve through innovations in bonding agents, restorative materials, and conservative preparation techniques. The use of direct composite restoration in posterior teeth is limited to relatively small cavities due to polymerization stresses. Indirect composites offer an esthetic alternative to ceramics for posterior teeth. This review article focuses on the material aspect of the newer generation of composites. This review was based on a PubMed database search which we limited to peer-reviewed articles in English that were published between 1990 and 2010 in dental journals. The key words used were 'indirect resin composites,' composite inlays,' and 'fiber-reinforced composites.'

Effect of filler content of flowable composites on resin-cavity interface

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate marginal integrity and wall adaptation in 1- and 2-mm-deep cavities restored with a high filler-loaded flowable composite in comparison to a flowable composite with lower filler content and a conventional hybrid composite. 1-mm-deep dentin and 2-mm-deep enamel-dentin Class I cavities were prepared and restored with a self-etch adhesive and with one of the composites. Samples were crosscut and evaluated for marginal integrity and gap formation using a digital microscope. Selected samples were also observed using a scanning electron microscope. For 1-mm-deep cavities, no differences in marginal integrity and wall adaptation were observed among the three composites. For 2-mm-deep cavities, those restored with the bulk technique and with the higher filler-loaded flowable composite demonstrated a similar outcome as that of the conventional hybrid composite. On the effect of restorative techniques, cohesive enamel defects were observed in bulk-filled 2-mm-deep cavities. However, when the incremental technique was used in conjunction with the higher filler-loaded flowable composite and the conventional hybrid composite for 2-mm-deep cavities, superior results were obtained.

The Art and Science of the Direct Posterior Restoration: Recreating Form, Color, and Translucency

In the past two decades the major advances bonding has experienced are directly related to material improvements and significant advances in adhesive technology. It is because of the superior physical properties of the posterior composite that we can provide patients with a long-lasting restoration if a meticulous bonding protocol was followed. It is possible simultaneously to preserve healthy tooth structure; reproduce its original shape, color, and translucency; and strengthen the affected tooth. Although the main focus in the past was on improving the bonding adhesive properties and the development of strength and polishability of the restorative materials, the current objective is to simplify the bonding technique and to create a shrinkage-free composite while simultaneously improving its optical properties.

The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate if incremental-filling technique and cavity size would affect the bond strength of resin composite.

METHODS

Two sizes of Class I cavities were prepared in bovine dentin (large cavities: pi x (5/2)2 x 5 mm3; small cavity: pi x (3/2)2 x 3 mm3). Light-cure resin composite (Clearfil Photocore) with a self-etching primer adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) was placed into the cavities by bulk filling (C-factor=5) or incremental filling (two layers, C-factor=3) and light-cured. As a control, 3 or 5mm thick resin composite was bonded to the flat dentin surface. After 24h storage in 37 degrees C water, the micro-tensile bond strength was measured at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The results obtained were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and t-test at a significance level of P=0.05.

RESULTS

The results obtained showed that there was no significant difference among the filling techniques in small cavities (P>0.05). However, in large cavities, bulk filling presented the lowest bond strength (P<0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Not only the filling technique affected the bonding strength to the cavity floor, but the cavity size was also an influential factor in Class I cavities.

In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo the interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable liner. In 24 premolars scheduled to be extracted after 1 month, 48 box-shaped, enamel-bordered class II cavities were prepared and restored with a flowable liner (FRC, Tetric Flow/Tetric Ceram/Syntac Single-Component) or without (TRC), cured with three different curing modes: soft start and 500- or 700-mW/cm2 continuous irradiation. Interfacial adaptation was evaluated by quantitative scanning electron microscopic analysis using replica method. Gap-free adaptation in the cervical enamel (CE) was observed for FRC and TRC in 96.2 and 90.2%, for the dentin (D) in 63.6 and 64.9%, and for occlusal enamel (OE) in 99.7 and 99.5%, respectively. The difference between the two restorations was not statistically significant (ns). Significant better adaptation was observed for OE than CE and D (p<0.01), and for CE than D (p<0.01). Gap-free adaptation with the soft-start and 500- and 700-mW/cm2 continuous-curing modes was observed for CE: 88.7%, 92.7%, 97.9% (ns); OE: 99.8%, 98.7%, 100% (ns); and D: 64.0%, 63.9%, and 64.6% (ns), respectively. It can be concluded that neither the use of flowable resin composite liner nor the curing mode used influenced the interfacial adaptation.

Selection Defines Design

The era of "extension for prevention" used restorative materials and cavity preparation designs in an attempt to arrest the caries process. In the new era of "prevention to eliminate extension," many of the old limitations are no longer applicable because of advances in research and technology. The advances in restorative materials and adhesive technology require the use of an adhesive design concept when considering restorative material selection, preparation designs, and adhesive protocol and placement procedures and techniques. This adhesive design concept has been instrumental in the paradigm shift from the principles of extension for prevention to an ultraconservative principle of prevention to eliminate extension. From the early onset of the disease to initial placement of the restoration, this modern philosophy has three clinical objectives: prevention, preservation, and conservation. The clinician should strive to preserve the maximum integrity of the natural dentition by preventing the placement of the initial restoration, preserving and conserving tooth structure during the preparation of restoration, and conserving the tooth and restoration by increasing the longevity of the restoration between replacements. This article describes an incremental layering technique that uses a conservative restorative adhesive design concept (adhesive preparation design and protocol) for preparing, restoring, and finishing a Class IV restoration, and it demonstrates how the selection of a small-particle hybrid composite influences the preparation design. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Selection of improved restorative materials that simulate the physical properties and other characteristics of natural teeth in combination with an adhesive design concept and preoperative considerations during the diagnostic and treatment planning phases of the restorative procedures provide the framework that ensures the optimal development of an esthetic restoration while preserving, conserving, and reinforcing the tooth-restoration complex.

Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management

Polymerization contraction stress of dental composites is often associated with marginal and interfacial failures of bonded restorations. The magnitude of stress depends on composite composition (filler content and matrix composition) and its ability to flow before gelation, which is related to the cavity configuration and curing characteristics of the composite. This article reviews variations among studies regarding contraction-stress-testing methods and contraction stress values of current composites, and discusses the validity of contraction stress studies in relation to results from microleakage tests. The effects of lower curing rates and alternative curing routines on contraction stress values are also discussed, as well as the use of low-elastic-modulus liners. Moreover, studies with experimental dimethacrylate-based composites and recent developments in low-shrinkage monomers are described.

Direct Composite Resin Restorations: A Review of Some Clinical Procedures to Achieve Predictable Results in Posterior Teeth

The interest of patients in having tooth-colored restorations and the development of techniques and materials that make these restorations easier have contributed to make the esthetic restoration of posterior teeth popular. The direct use of composites in posterior teeth is a technique-sensitive procedure. Some difficulties, nevertheless, can be overcome or at least minimized by a heedful clinician by paying thorough attention to the various stages of the restorative technique. The present article seeks to review some concepts about this adhesive restorative procedure and to illustrate the possibilities of the technique with clinical reports.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The direct posterior composite restorative technique offers the possibility of closely matching the natural optical characteristics of the lost tooth structure. Aimed at showing the potential of this technique, this article presents two step-by-step case reports and also reviews some concepts related to these clinical procedures.

Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a packable fine hybrid dental composite (Prodigy Condensable) and the influence of the additional application of a flowable resin composite (Revolution, SDS Kerr) layer on marginal integrity after 2 years in stress-bearing posterior cavities according to the Ryge criteria. In 50 patients (40.5+/-17.5 years of age), 116 class II fillings (metal matrix system, glass ionomer-cement-base in 36%, rubberdam isolation in 70%) were placed, with at least two restorations per patient. The adhesive Optibond Solo Plus was used for all the restorations. In one of the two fillings in each patient, an additional layer of the flowable composite Revolution was applied in the entire cavity and separately light-cured. Baseline scores have been rated Alfa in > or =95% and Bravo in <5%. After 2 years, the results [%] of the Ryge evaluation for the two groups with/without the additional use of Revolution were: (1) Marginal Adaptation: Alfa:78/70, Bravo:16/27, Charlie:0/0, Delta:6/4; (2) Anatomic Form: Alfa:89/95, Bravo:6/2, Charlie:6/4; (3) Secondary Caries: Alfa:98/100, Bravo:2/0; (4) Marginal Discoloration: Alfa:76/68, Bravo:24/32, Charlie:0/0; (5) Surface: Alfa:90/91, Bravo:4/5, Charlie:0/0, Delta:6/4; (6) Color Match: Oscar:56/57, Alfa:44/39, Bravo:0/4, Charlie:0/0. Within the observation period (recall rate: 95%), three restorations out of 116 at baseline fractured, one restoration showed a secondary caries, one tooth received endodontic treatment, and all other restored teeth remained vital. After 2 years, no statistically significant difference (Chi-square test) in the overall survival rate between the group with the additional use of Revolution (92.8%) and that without Revolution (94.6%) was found. The combined survival rate for both groups together was 93.7% of clinically acceptable restorations.

Blending incremental and stratified layering techniques to produce an esthetic posterior composite resin restoration with a predictable prognosis

Composite resin restorations play an ever-increasing role as routine restorations in everyday clinical practice. However, the long-term prognosis of these restorations is still widely debated and open to question. The restorative protocols are still evolving, whether for direct or indirect placement, and little evidence is available in the scientific literature as to the ideal choice of site, technique, and category for placement. This article discusses the problems encountered and suggests a clinical restorative protocol to optimize composite resin placement.

Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success

Resin-based composites are increasingly used for the restoration of defects in posterior teeth. This review describes, illustrates and discusses important clinical aspects of the posterior composite technique. A relatively new stratification concept oriented to the development of functional and anatomic restorations is proposed.