Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy; A Review of the Latest Advances and Future Directions in Management

Laminoplasty vs Laminectomy and Fusion for Cervical Myelopathy: Alarming Rates of Bias

Study DesignCross-sectional.ObjectivesLaminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LF) are surgical approaches for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), but their comparative effectiveness remains controversial. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are crucial for guiding clinical decision-making; however, spin bias, which distorts results and misleads readers, is prevalent in the orthopaedic literature, and can hinder clinical decision making. We aim to determine the prevalence of spin bias and assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing LP with LF in the treatment of DCM.MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, identifying systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing LP and LF for DCM. Spin bias was assessed using the Yavchitz classification system, and methodological quality was graded using the AMSTAR-2 tool.ResultsFourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Spin bias was identified in 64% of the reviews, with the most common type being Type 9 (inappropriately claiming superiority of treatment despite reporting bias). Spin types 3, 4, and 6 were each present in 14% of studies. AMSTAR-2 quality assessments rated 21% of studies as critically low, 36% as low, and 43% as moderate; none achieved a high-quality rating.ConclusionSpin bias is prevalent in systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing LP and LF for DCM, and the overall methodological quality remain suboptimal. Addressing spin bias and improving adherence to rigorous reporting standards are essential to enhance the reliability of evidence guiding clinical decision-making.

Predictive Factors for Postoperative Outcomes of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in Individuals With Cerebral Palsy

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesThis study aimed to identify factors influencing postoperative outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP).MethodsData from admitted individuals were retrospectively reviewed. Individuals whose modified Barthel index score, assessed at least 6 months after surgery, declined by 1 or more grades compared to their preoperative score were classified into the poor outcome (PO) group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for poor postoperative outcomes.ResultsOf the 73 participants, 15 were in the PO group and 58 in the non-PO group. Duration (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.25-3.65, P = .01), signal change grade 2 (OR 10.44, 95% CI 1.32-118.01, P = .034), and spinal cord compression ratio, M2 (OR 0.85, 95% CI, 0.73-0.96, P = .02) on preoperative MRI were identified as significant factors associated with the risk of poor postoperative outcomes. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff values for duration and cord compression metric were determined as 2 years (AUC = 0.689, 95% CI 0.532-0.845) and 76.2% (AUC = 0.841, 95% CI 0.696-0.987), respectively.ConclusionsThis study identified key predictors of poor postoperative outcomes in individuals with CP undergoing surgery for CSM. Symptom duration exceeding 2 years, signal change grade 2, and spinal cord compression ratio below 76.2% on preoperative MRI were found to be predictors of poor outcome. These results underscore the importance of early intervention and detailed preoperative radiological assessment to improve surgical outcomes in this population.

Conservative and newer drug treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction in adults worldwide. Conservative treatments, such as physical therapy, activity modification, cervical traction, and the use of cervical collars, have been employed primarily for symptomatic relief in mild cases or for patients deemed unfit for surgery. Advances in our understanding of the molecular pathways involved in neuroinflammation and neuronal injury in DCM have spurred the development of newer pharmacological treatments aimed at neuroprotection and inflammation control. We found limited evidence that conservative treatment enhances functional recovery in patients with DCM. Patients with mild DCM who opt for conservative therapy should be aware of likely neurological deterioration and higher spinal cord injury risk following neck trauma. Nonoperative management could benefit patients with mild DCM who presented early (at least less than a year), have soft disc herniation as the cause of the myelopathy, have one level of myelopathic compression, and whose MRI does not show circumferential compression of the spinal cord. Riluzole did not replicate its promising animal results in human trials, using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score as an outcome measure. Cerebrolysin is promising but needs more RCTs to define its role in the management algorithm. Limaprost Alfadex provided inconclusive evidence, however, is in an ongoing phase III trial. Erythropoietin showed benefit in animal and human trials but concerns over side effects may limit use. G-CSF demonstrated evidence of preserved neurological function in mice but needs human studies. Steroids did not show benefit and are likely deleterious to tissue healing and can increase infection risk. Anti-Fas ligand antibody has not been studied in humans but demonstrated benefit in animal models. Research should focus on large-scale RCTs for these drugs with careful attention to long-term effects, side effects, and finding the most effective doses.

Is neck pain a marker for something serious? Like myelopathy

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is a chronic progressive condition of the cervical spine that leads to compression of the spinal cord. It is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults, and it occurs due to age-related changes or genetically associated pathologies. DCM is a clinical and radiological diagnosis and presents with a spectrum of symptoms ranging from neck pain and stiffness to paralysis. While neck pain is prevalent amongst patients attending specialist clinics, its predictive value for DCM is limited. This paper focuses on elucidating the relationship between DCM and chronic neck pain, and we discuss the underlying aetiology and broader neurological implications in the context of the literature. The progression of DCM can be slow and insidious with symptoms worsening gradually over time. Neck pain should not be discounted in the evaluation of DCM.

Cervical myelopathy mistaken for complex regional pain syndrome: A case report

RATIONALE

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is characterized by spastic gait impairment, upper limb dysfunction, and sphincter disturbances. The pathological mechanism involves a combination of mechanical compression and ischemic processes, which are most commonly associated with the narrowing of the vertebral canal. However, DCM requires differential diagnosis from diseases of the central nervous system that cause neuropathic pain, such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and postherpetic neuralgia.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This report presents a case of DCM misdiagnosed as CRPS. Delayed diagnosis can lead to residual symptoms and functional disability.

DIAGNOSES

Definitive diagnosis requires a correlation between physical findings and imaging results. Magnetic resonance imaging is the modality of choice, and spinal cord compression is the hallmark finding.

INTERVENTIONS

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

OUTCOMES

At the 8-week postoperative follow-up, the patient reported reduced pain. Arm function was almost normal, and although the gait was unstable, he was able to walk without assistance.

LESSONS

DCM can be easily confused with CRPS or postherpetic neuralgia. Therefore, physicians should consider the presence of different neuropathic pain syndromes when neuropathic pain develops. Patients with prior conditions affecting the cervical spine should be aware of the potential development of cervical myelopathy.

Machine-learning-based models for the optimization of post-cervical spinal laminoplasty outpatient follow-up schedules

BACKGROUND

Patients undergo regular clinical follow-up after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. However, those whose symptoms significantly improve and remain stable do not need to conform to a regular follow-up schedule. Based on the 1-year postoperative outcomes, we aimed to use a machine-learning (ML) algorithm to predict 2-year postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

We enrolled 80 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. The patients' Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores (range: 0-17) were analyzed at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative timepoints to evaluate their ability to predict the 2-year postoperative outcomes. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was defined as a JOA score ≥ 14.25 at 24 months postoperatively and, based on clinical outcomes recorded up to the 1-year postoperative timepoint, eight ML algorithms were developed to predict PASS status at the 24-month postoperative timepoint. The performance of each of these algorithms was evaluated, and its generalizability was assessed using a prospective internal test set.

RESULTS

The long short-term memory (LSTM)-based algorithm demonstrated the best performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90 ± 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

The LSTM-based algorithm accurately predicted which group was likely to achieve PASS at the 24-month postoperative timepoint. Although this study included a small number of patients with limited available clinical data, the concept of using past outcomes to predict further outcomes presented herein may provide insights for optimizing clinical schedules and efficient medical resource utilization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered as a clinical trial (Clinical Trial No. NCT02487901), and the study protocol was approved by the Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 1505-037-670).

Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review

Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery. As scientific evidence accumulates, the efficacy and safety of cervical endoscopic spine surgery are continually affirmed. Both anterior and posterior endoscopic approaches have surfaced as viable alternative treatments for various cervical spine pathologies. Newer techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted fusion, the anterior transcorporeal approach, and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression, have been developed to enhance clinical outcomes and broaden surgical indications. Despite its advantages, this approach faces challenges, including a steep learning curve, increased radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients, and a relative limitation in addressing multi-level pathologies. However, the future of cervical endoscopic spine surgery is promising, with potential enhancements in clinical outcomes and safety on the horizon. This progress is fueled by integrating advanced imaging and navigation technologies, applying regional anesthesia for improved and facilitated postoperative recovery, and incorporating cutting-edge technologies, such as augmented reality. With these advancements, cervical endoscopic spine surgery is poised to broaden its scope in treating cervical spine pathologies while maintaining the benefits of minimized tissue damage and rapid recovery.

A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in the Geriatric Patient Population: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database 2010-2020

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2020.

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term complication rates of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical laminoplasty (LP), and posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCF) in a geriatric population.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

The geriatric population in the United States has increased significantly. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is caused by cervical spinal stenosis, and its prevalence increases with age. Therefore, the incidence of multilevel DCM requiring surgical intervention is likely to increase. ACDF, LP, and PCF are the most commonly used surgical techniques for treating multilevel DCM. However, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical technique for the decompression of DCM in geriatric patients.

METHODS

Patients aged 65 years who had undergone either multilevel ACDF, LP, or PCF for the treatment of DCM were analyzed. Additional analysis was performed by standardizing the data for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification scores and preoperative functional status.

RESULTS

A total of 23,129 patients were identified. Patients with ACDF were younger, more often female, and preoperatively healthier than those in the other two groups. The estimated postoperative mortality and morbidity, mean operation time, and length of hospital stay were the lowest for ACDF, second lowest for LP, and highest for PCF. The readmission and reoperation rates were comparable between ACDF and LP; however, both were significantly lower than PCF.

CONCLUSIONS

PCF is associated with the highest risk of mortality, morbidity, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned readmission in the short-term postoperative period in patients aged 65 years. In contrast, ACDF carries the lowest risk. However, some disease-specific factors may require posterior treatment. For these cases, LP should be included in the preoperative discussion when determining the ideal surgical approach for geriatric patients.

The Scope of Physiotherapy Rehabilitation in Compressive Myelopathy Managed by Spinal Fusion: A Case Report

Cervical myelopathy is a sequence of alterations that cause etiological ailments such as spondylosis, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and compression of nerve roots at various levels. The reduced diameter of the vertebral canal is because of degenerative changes in the structure of the disc, along with the formation of osteophytic spurs that compress the surrounding structures, such as nerve roots, at one or more levels. Radiography, CT, MRI, and dynamic study help identify cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surgical methods such as anterior, posterior, or combined approaches are used to stabilize and potentially improve the subject's neurologic status. The spine's alignment, the number of mobility segments implicated, the morphology, and the location of the spondylotic compression guide surgical decision-making. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is a condition of the cervical spine that causes narrowing of the spinal canal with symptoms such as neck pain, numbness in the hands, gait problems, and sphincter dysfunction. We present the case of a 52-year-old male diagnosed with compressive myelopathy from C3 to C7 with a history of falling from the bed. On MRI, there were degenerative changes, spondylosis, and compressive myelopathy, and a disc bulge at multiple levels was seen. The patient underwent a spinal fusion at C3 to C7 level followed by structured physical therapy rehabilitation to gain a good recovery and functional independence to improve quality of life.

Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) may seriously affect quality of life. In the literature, there is scarce evidence of the pros and cons of full endoscopic spine surgery in the treatment of CSM. The main purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to elucidate the efficacy of full endoscopic spine surgery in the management of patients with CSM.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted from the database inception to February 1, 2023.

RESULTS

The study included 183 patients and their age was 56.78 ± 7.87 years. The average surgical time calculated was 96.34 ± 33.58 minutes. Intraoperative blood loss ranged from a minimal amount to 51 mL. The average duration of hospital stay was 3.56 ± 1.6 days. The average span for follow-up was on an interval of 18.7 ± 6.76 months. Significant improvements were noted in all aspects of functional outcomes and image results after full endoscopic cervical spine surgery, with no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found that both anterior transcorporeal and posterior surgical approaches could be used for the treatment of CSM with a full endoscopic technique. Indications of full endoscopic cervical spine surgery for CSM included cervical disc herniation, central canal stenosis, calcified ligamentum flavum, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Improved postoperative outcomes with acceptable surgical complications were noted in this systematic review.

A Longer Duration of Myelopathy Symptoms is Associated With the Lack of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Improvement During Decompressive Cervical Myelopathy Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to investigate the relationship between the intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) signal changes during surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy with postoperative functional outcomes and determine what factors correlate with MEP signal changes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring with MEP for cervical cord decompression can potentially predict postoperative neurological complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively collected data from 114 consecutive cervical compressive myelopathy patients who underwent decompressive cervical spine surgery. Functional outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at the 6-month mark, using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score.

RESULTS

Among the 114 patients, 87 patients showed significant MEP improvement, 1 patient with MEP degeneration, 3 patients with no change in MEP, and 23 patients with MEP change, but which eventually returned to baseline. Univariate analysis showed that patients with MEP improvement had similar 6-month functional and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores compared with patients who did not have MEP improvement. Critically, a longer duration of symptoms was shown to have a statistically significant relationship with patients who did not have MEP improvement on univariate analysis (49.2 wk in patients with no MEP improvement compared with 34.59 wk in patients with MEP improvement, P = 0.03) but this did not translate to differences in functional outcomes. There was also no statistically significant association between the functional outcome scores and demographics, surgical, or radiologic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the duration of symptoms is not attributed to lower functional outcomes but is associated with a lack of MEP improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Influence of Preoperative Sagittal Alignment on Functional Recovery in Operated Cases of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Objective  We examine the influence of preoperative cervical sagittal curvature (lordotic or nonlordotic) on the functional recovery of surgically managed cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The impact of sagittal alignment on the functional improvement of operated CSM cases has not been thoroughly investigated. Materials and Methods  We did retrospective analysis of consecutively operated cases of CSM from March 2019 to April 2021. Patients were grouped into two categories: lordotic curvature (with Cobb angle > 10 degrees) and nonlordotic curvature (including neutral [Cobb angle 0-10 degrees] and kyphotic [Cobb angle < 0 degrees]). Demographic data, and preoperative and postoperative functional outcome scores (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] and Nurick grade) were analyzed for dependency on preoperative curvature, and correlations between outcomes and sagittal parameters were assessed. Results  In the analysis of 124 cases, 63.1% (78 cases) were lordotic (mean Cobb angle of 23.57 ± 9.1 degrees; 11-50 degrees) and 36.9% (46 cases) were nonlordotic (mean Cobb angle of 0.89 ± 6.5 degrees; -11 to 10 degrees), 32 cases (24.6%) had neutral alignment, and 14 cases (12.3%) had kyphotic alignment. At the final follow-up, the mean change in mJOA score, Nurick grade, and functional recovery rate (mJOArr) were not significantly different between the lordotic and nonlordotic group. In the nonlordotic group, cases with anterior surgery had a significantly better mJOArr than those with posterior surgery ( p  = 0.04), whereas there was similar improvement with either approach in lordotic cases. In the nonlordotic group, patients who gained lordosis (78.1%) had better recovery rates than those who had lost lordosis (21.9%). However, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion  We report noninferiority of the functional outcome in the cases with preoperative nonlordotic alignment when compared with those with lordotic alignment. Further, nonlordotic patients who were approached anteriorly fared better than those approached posteriorly. Although increasing sagittal imbalance in nonlordotic spines portend toward higher preoperative disability, gain in lordosis in such cases may improve results. We recommend further studies with larger nonlordotic subjects to elucidate the impact of sagittal alignment on functional outcome.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy: Where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we going?

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), a recently coined term, encompasses a group of age-related and genetically associated pathologies that affect the cervical spine, including cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Given the significant contribution of DCM to global disease and disability, there are worldwide efforts to promote research and innovation in this area. An AO Spine effort termed 'RECODE-DCM' was initiated to create an international multistakeholder consensus group, involving patients, caregivers, physicians and researchers, to focus on launching actionable discourse on DCM. In order to improve the management, treatment and results for DCM, the RECODE-DCM consensus group recently identified ten priority areas for translational research. The current article summarizes recent advancements in the field of DCM. We first discuss the comprehensive definition recently refined by the RECODE-DCM group, including steps taken to arrive at this definition and the supporting rationale. We then provide an overview of the recent advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of DCM and modalities to clinically assess and diagnose DCM. A focus will be set on advanced imaging techniques that may offer the opportunity to improve characterization and diagnosis of DCM. A summary of treatment modalities, including surgical and nonoperative options, is then provided along with future neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies. This review concludes with final remarks pertaining to the genetics involved in DCM and the opportunity to leverage this knowledge toward a personalized medicine approach.

Contribution of dynamic cervical MRI to surgical planning for degenerative cervical myelopathy: Revision rate and clinical outcomes at 5 years' postoperative

INTRODUCTION

Cervical MRI is the gold standard for surgical planning of degenerative cervical myelopathy; however, the symptomatic postoperative recurrence rate is high in the medium and long terms (9.1% to 10.7%) and may bring into question the quality of the preoperative surgical plan. The objective of this study was to evaluate cervical spinal stenosis and intramedullary hyperintensity with dynamic cervical MRI to determine the recurrence rate and clinical improvement in a cohort of patients who had dynamic cervical MRI incorporated into their surgical plan.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center study. Upon enrolment and at each follow-up visit, patients completed the mJOA score, NDI, cervical pain on visual analog scale (VAS) and radicular pain on VAS. Every enrolled patient underwent dynamic cervical MRI (in neutral, flexion and extension positions). Five levels were measured in the three positions, resulting in 915 levels for analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included. Eighty-four levels had an intramedullary hyperintensity in neutral position, 93 in extension and 112 in flexion. The mean sagittal diameter varied the most at C4-C5, going from 7.13mm (SD 2.32) on average in neutral to 6.30mm (SD 2.22) in extension and 8.29mm (SD 2.10) in flexion, a variation of -12% and +16%, respectively. A Mühle grade≥2 was found in 134 levels in neutral position versus 189 in extension and 110 in flexion. None of the patients had worse neurological symptoms following the dynamic cervical MRI. The mean postoperative follow-up was 4.4 years (SD 0.88). Two patients (3.1%) required surgical revision because the implants had shifted. One patient developed symptomatic adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative surgical planning that incorporates dynamic cervical MRI before the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy appears to be a safe and reliable method and one that helps reduce symptoms in the long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The role of Artificial intelligence in the assessment of the spine and spinal cord

Artificial intelligence (AI) application development is underway in all areas of radiology where many promising tools are focused on the spine and spinal cord. In the past decade, multiple spine AI algorithms have been created based on radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. These algorithms have wide-ranging purposes including automatic labeling of vertebral levels, automated description of disc degenerative changes, detection and classification of spine trauma, identification of osseous lesions, and the assessment of cord pathology. The overarching goals for these algorithms include improved patient throughput, reducing radiologist workload burden, and improving diagnostic accuracy. There are several pre-requisite tasks required in order to achieve these goals, such as automatic image segmentation, facilitating image acquisition and postprocessing. In this narrative review, we discuss some of the important imaging AI solutions that have been developed for the assessment of the spine and spinal cord. We focus on their practical applications and briefly discuss some key requirements for the successful integration of these tools into practice. The potential impact of AI in the imaging assessment of the spine and cord is vast and promises to provide broad reaching improvements for clinicians, radiologists, and patients alike.

Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the predominant cause of spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly. The patients are often frail and susceptible to complications. Posterior surgical techniques involving non-fusion are complicated by postlaminectomy kyphosis and instrumented fusion techniques by distal junction kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, or implant failure. The optimal surgical approach is still a matter of controversy. Since anterior and posterior fusion techniques have been compared without presenting any superiority, the objective of this study is to compare stand-alone laminectomy with laminectomy and fusion to determine which treatment has the lowest frequency of reoperations.

METHODS

This is a multicenter randomized, controlled, parallel-group non-inferiority trial. A total of 300 adult patients are allocated in a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint is reoperation for any reason at 5 years of follow-up. Sample size and power calculation were performed by estimating the reoperation rate after laminectomy to 3.5% and after laminectomy with fusion to 7.4% based on the data from the Swedish spine registry (Swespine) on patients with CSM. Secondary outcomes are the patient-derived Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P-mJOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), development of kyphosis measured as the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and death. Clinical and radiological follow-up is performed at 3, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery. The main inclusion criterium is 1-4 levels of CSM in the subaxial spine, C3-C7. The REDcap software will be used for safe data management. Data will be analyzed according to the modified intention to treat (mITT) population, defined as randomized patients who are still alive without having emigrated or left the study after 2 and 5 years.

DISCUSSION

This will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing two of the most common surgical treatments for CSM: the posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and posterior laminectomy with instrumented fusion. The results of the myelopathy randomized controlled (MyRanC) study will provide surgical treatment recommendations for CSM. This may result in improvements in surgical treatment and clinical practice regarding CSM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04936074 . Registered on 23 June 2021.

Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has long been regarded as a gold standard in the treatment of cervical myelopathy. Subsequently, cervical artificial disc replacement (c-ADR) was developed and provides the advantage of motion preservation at the level of the intervertebral disc surgical site, which may also reduce stress at adjacent levels. The goal of this study was to compare clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing ACDF with those in patients undergoing c-ADR for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from database inception to November 21, 2021. The authors compared Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores; complication rates; and reoperation rates for these two surgical procedures in CSM patients. The Mantel-Haenszel method and variance-weighted means were used to analyze outcomes after identifying articles that met study inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

More surgical time was consumed in the c-ADR surgery (p = 0.04). Shorter hospital stays were noted in patients who had undergone c-ADR (p = 0.04). Patients who had undergone c-ADR tended to have better NDI scores (p = 0.02) and SF-36 scores (p = 0.001). Comparable outcomes in terms of JOA scores (p = 0.24) and neurological success rate (p = 0.12) were noted after the surgery. There was no significant between-group difference in the overall complication rates (c-ADR: 18% vs ACDF: 25%, p = 0.17). However, patients in the ACDF group had a higher reoperation rate than patients in the c-ADR group (4.6% vs 1.5%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

At the midterm follow-up after treatment of CSM, better functional outcomes as reflected by NDI and SF-36 scores were noted in the c-ADR group than those in the ACDF group. c-ADR had the advantage of retaining range of motion at the level of the intervertebral disc surgical site without causing more complications. A large sample size with long-term follow-up studies may be required to confirm these findings in the future.

Clinical efficacy and learning curve of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical laminoforaminotomy for patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and learning curve of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical laminoforaminotomy (PPECLF) in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). A total of 64 patients with CSR received PPECLF. Clinical outcome scores included the visual analog scale, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, neck disability index, and modified Macnab criteria. Radiological outcomes included the disc height, C2 to C7 Cobb angle, and range of motion. The learning curve was evaluated using cumulative sum analysis. Patients were divided into accumulation phase and mastery phase groups (A and B), and general data and surgical efficacy were compared between the 2 groups. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. Clinical outcome scores improved significantly at the final follow-up, and there were no differences in radiological outcomes. Surgical efficacy was excellent and good in 82.8% of patients. The operative time showed a decreasing trend with the accumulation of cases. Patients were divided and the 26th case was the cutoff point according to the learning curve. No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Decompression with PPECLF was safe and effective in the treatment of CSR. With the accumulation of cases, the operative time was gradually shortened, and the clinical efficacy was significant. The PPECLF procedure can be performed efficiently and safely to treat CSR.

Importance of Differential Diagnosis of a Possible Brain Tumor in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy

Lesions occurring simultaneously in the somatosensory or motor cortex of the brain and the cervical spine are rare. Brain tumors can cause similar symptoms to cervical lesions which can lead to confusion in treatment priorities. Moreover, if cervical disease is noticeably observed in radiologic findings of a patient complaining of cervical radiculopathy with non-specific electromyography results, it is common to no longer perform further evaluation. Here we introduce two cases where the cause of cervical radiculopathy was first considered to be the result of a degenerative cervical disease but was later discovered to be a result of a brain tumor.

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Towards a Personalized Approach

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a recently coined term encompassing a variety of age-related and genetically associated pathologies, including cervical spondylotic myelopathy, degenerative disc disease, and ligamentous aberrations such as ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. All of these pathologies produce chronic compression of the spinal cord causing a clinical syndrome characterized by decreased hand dexterity, gait imbalance, and potential genitourinary or sensorimotor disturbances. Substantial variability in the underlying etiology of DCM and its natural history has generated heterogeneity in practice patterns. Ongoing debates in DCM management most commonly center around clinical decision-making, timing of intervention, and the ideal surgical approach. Pivotal basic science studies during the past two decades have deepened our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms surrounding DCM. Growing knowledge of the key pathophysiologic processes will help us tailor personalized approaches in an increasingly heterogeneous patient population. This article focuses on summarizing the most exciting approaches in personalizing DCM patient treatments including biomarkers, factors affecting clinical decision-making, and choice of the optimal surgical approach. Throughout we provide a concise review on the conditions encompassing DCM and discuss the underlying pathophysiology of chronic spinal cord compression. We also provide an overview on clinical-radiologic diagnostic modalities as well as operative and nonoperative treatment strategies, thereby addressing knowledge gaps and controversies in the field of DCM.

Using Smartphones for Clinical Assessment in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy a Feasibility Study

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is characterized by a progressive deterioration in spinal cord function. Its evaluation requires subjective clinical examination with wide interobserver variability. Objective quantification of spinal cord function remains imprecise, even though validated myelopathy-grading scales have emerged and are now widely used. We created a Smartphone Application, the N-Outcome App, with the aim of quantifying accurately and reliably spinal cord dysfunction using a 5-minute Test. A patient suffering from DCM was clinically evaluated before surgery, at 3 and 6 months follow-up after surgical decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Standard scores (Nurick grade, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score) were documented at these time points. A 5-minute motor and proprioceptive performance test aided by a smartphone with the N-outcome App was also performed. Motor performance in rapid alternating movements and finger tapping improved in correlation with improvements in standard grading scale scores. Clinical improvements were seen in maximum reflex acceleration and in Romberg testing which showed less closed/open eyes variation, suggesting pyramidal and proprioceptive function recovery. We demonstrate that using the N-Outcome App as an adjunct to clinical evaluation of compressive myelopathy is feasible and potentially useful. The results correlate with the results of clinical assessment obtained by standard validated myelopathy scores.

Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) cervical myelopathy score in an Arabic speaking population

Introduction: Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is a growing disorder. Standardization of its assessment tools is an integral part of its management. The modified Japanese orthopedic association (mJOA) score is one of the most commonly used tools. Currently, there is no available Arabic translated version of any cervical myelopathy functional score. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and measure the psychometric properties of an Arabic translated version of the mJOA. Methods: After translation of the score using the standard forward-backward translation procedure, a validation study including 100 patients was carried out from June 2019 to June 2020. The following psychometric properties were measured: feasibility, reliability, internal consistency, validity, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), ceiling, and floor effect. Results: No problems were encountered during the process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the score. The mJOA-AR was found to be a feasible score. It showed high inter-observer reliability (r = 0.833, P < 0.001), test-retest reliability (r = 0.987, P < 0.001) and good internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha (0.777) and Pearson interclass correlation coefficient (r = 0.717). The score showed good convergent and divergent construct validity correlating it to the Arabic validated version of the neck disability index (NDI). The mJOA-AR had an MCID of 1.506. Both the ceiling and floor effects of the total score and the first and second domains were within the acceptable range, while the third and fourth domains had a high ceiling effect (30% and 39%, respectively). Discussion: Our translated version of the mJOA score was found to be a feasible score with acceptable psychometric properties. This score can be utilized as a good outcome measure tool in Arabic-speaking countries.

Preoperative Radiological Parameters to Predict Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Laminoplasty

Many studies have focused on pre-operative sagittal alignment parameters which could predict poor clinical or radiological outcomes after laminoplasty. However, the influx of too many new factors causes confusion. This study reviewed sagittal alignment parameters, predictive of clinical or radiological outcomes, in the literature. Preoperative kyphotic alignment was initially proposed as a predictor of clinical outcomes. The clinical significance of the K-line and K-line variants also has been studied. Sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope (T1s), T1s-cervical lordosis (CL), anterolisthesis, local kyphosis, the longitudinal distance index, and range of motion were proposed to have relationships with clinical outcomes. The relationship between loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) and T1s has been widely studied, but controversy remains. Extension function, the ratio of CL to T1s (CL/T1s), and Sharma classification were recently proposed as LCL predictors. In predicting postoperative kyphosis, T1s cannot predict postoperative kyphosis, but a low CL/T1s ratio was associated with postoperative kyphosis.

Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: What Really Counts?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study (data analysis).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of different factors on postoperative outcome of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Ongoing degenerative changes of DCM lead to progressive neurological deficits. The optimal timing of surgical treatment is still unclear, especially in patients with mild DCM.

METHODS

Patients with DCM treated in our clinic between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and postoperative neurological function was assessed by the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (mJOA Score) at different stages. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was used to evaluate the improvement after surgery. The comorbidities were recorded using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Possible associations between age, sex, CCI, preoperative symptoms duration, high signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with mJOA Score and MCID were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariate regression models. Additionally, subgroup analysis was performed according to the severity of DCM (mild: mJOA Score ≥15 points; moderate: mJOA Score of 12-14 points; and severe: mJOA Score <12 points).

RESULTS

The mean age of the final cohort (n = 411) was 62.6 years (range: 31-96 years), 36.0% were females. High SI on T2-weighted MRI was detected in 60.3% of the cases. In the multivariate analysis, patients' age (P = 0.005), higher CCI (P = 0.001), and presence of high SI on T2-weighted MRI (P = 0.0005) were associated independently with lower pre- and postoperative mJOA Score and postoperative MCID. Subgroup analysis revealed age and high SI on T2-weighted MRI as predictors of pre- and postoperative mJOA. However, symptom duration did not influence neurological outcome according to the severity of DCM.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for DCM leads to significant functional improvement. However, better outcome was observed in younger individuals with lower CCI and absence of radiographic myelopathy signs. Therefore, DCM surgery, particularly before occurrence of high SI on MRI, seems to be essential for postoperative functional improvement regardless the above-mentioned confounders.Level of Evidence: 3.

Effects of Preservation of the Semispinalis Cervicis Inserted into C2 on Craniocervical Alignment After Laminoplasty

OBJECTIVE

The preservation of nuchal musculature is essential for preventing axial pain and cervical malalignment after laminoplasty. A few studies have examined the effect of preservation of nuchal musculature on the degenerative progression after laminoplasty. We aimed to clarify the influence of preservation of the semispinalis cervicis inserted into C2 on cervical degenerative change and alignment after laminoplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 106 consecutive patients who underwent C3-7 laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy during 2006-2017. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the preservation (P-group; n = 33) or detachment (D-group; n = 73) of the Semispinalis cervicis muscles inserted into the C2 spinous process. Parameters of cervical sagittal alignment, range of motion, and progressive degenerative changes next to or within the range of laminoplasty were evaluated in cervical spine radiographs, and magnetic resonance images obtained during follow-up period.

RESULTS

In the D-group, the postoperative C2-7 Cobb angle significantly decreased (-0.06°/month), while the O-C2 Cobb angle significantly increased (0.07°/month). In addition, the C2-7 range of motion significantly decreased in the D-group (-0.12°/month). Degenerative changes in the laminoplasty range were found in 5 patients per group. Three patients from the D-group developed retroodontoid pseudotumors (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

To maintain horizontal gaze, the craniocervical segment can compensate for the loss of lordosis by increasing the Cobb angle. Excessive compensation may exert mechanical stress on the atlantoaxial junction, contributing to the development of a retroodontoid pseudotumor. Preservation of the semispinalis cervicis inserted into C2 is critical for the prevention of malalignment after laminoplasty.

Frailty Is a Better Predictor than Age of Mortality and Perioperative Complications after Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Analysis of 41,369 Patients from the NSQIP Database 2010-2018

Background: The ability of frailty compared to age alone to predict adverse events in the surgical management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) has not been defined in the literature. Methods: 41,369 patients with a diagnosis of DCM undergoing surgery were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database 2010–2018. Univariate analysis for each measure of frailty (modified frailty index 11- and 5-point; MFI-11, MFI-5), modified Charlson Co-morbidity index and ASA grade) were calculated for the following outcomes: mortality, major complication, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, length of hospital stay, and discharge to a non-home destination. Multivariable modeling of age and frailty with a base model was performed to define the discriminative ability of each measure. Results: Age and frailty have a significant effect on all outcomes, but the MFI-5 has the largest effect size. Increasing frailty correlated significantly with the risk of perioperative adverse events, longer hospital stay, and risk of a non-home discharge destination. Multivariable modeling incorporating MFI-5 with age and the base model had a robust predictive value (0.85). MFI-5 had a high categorical assessment correlation with a MFI-11 of 0.988 (p < 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: Measures of frailty have a greater effect size and a higher discriminative value to predict adverse events than age alone. MFI-5 categorical assessment is essentially equivalent to the MFI-11 score for DCM patients. A multivariable model using MFI-5 provides an accurate predictive tool that has important clinical applications.

Surgical Strategies for Cervical Deformities Associated With Neuromuscular Disorders

Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) are diseases involving the upper and lower motor neurons and muscles. In patients with NMDs, cervical spinal deformities are a very common issue; however, unlike thoracolumbar spinal deformities, few studies have investigated these disorders. The patients with NMDs have irregular spinal curvature caused by poor balance and poor coordination of their head, neck, and trunk. Particularly, cervical deformity occurs at younger age, and is known to show more rigid and severe curvature at high cervical levels. Muscular physiologic dynamic characteristics such as spasticity or dystonia combined with static structural factors such as curvature flexibility can result in deformity and often lead to traumatic spinal cord injury. In addition, postoperative complication rate is higher due to abnormal involuntary movement and muscle tone. Therefore, it is important to control abnormal involuntary movement perioperatively along with strong instrumentation for correction of deformity. Various methods such as botulinum toxin injection, physical therapy, muscle division technique, or intrathecal baclofen pump implant may help control abnormal involuntary movements and improve spinal stability. Surgical management for cervical deformities associated with NMDs requires a multidisciplinary effort and a customized strategy.

Multidisciplinary approach to degenerative cervical myelopathy

INTRODUCTION

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a prevalent condition causing significant impairment spanning several domains of health. A multidisciplinary approach to the care of DCM would be ideal in utilizing complex treatments from different disciplines to address broad patient needs.

AREAS COVERED

In this article the authors will discuss the importance of multidisciplinary care and establish a general framework for its use. The authors will then highlight the potential role of a multidisciplinary team in each aspect of DCM care including assessment, diagnosis, decision-making, surgical intervention, non-operative therapy, monitoring, and postoperative care.

EXPERT OPINION

In order to provide comprehensive personalized care to DCM patients, it is necessary to have a multidisciplinary team composed by a combination of the patient, surgeon, primary care practitioner, neurologist, anesthesiologist, radiologist, physiatrist, nurses, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, pain specialist, and social workers all functioning independently and communicating to achieve a common goal.

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Brief Review of Past Perspectives, Present Developments, and Future Directions

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord injury in developed countries; its prevalence is increasing due to the ageing of the population. DCM causes neurological dysfunction and is a significant cause of disability in the elderly. It has important negative impacts on the quality of life of those affected, as well as on their caregivers. DCM is triggered by a variety of degenerative changes in the neck, which affect one or more anatomical structures, including intervertebral discs, vertebrae, and spinal canal ligaments. These changes can also lead to structural abnormalities, leading to alterations in alignment, mobility, and stability. The principle unifying problem in this disease, regardless of the types of changes present, is injury to the spinal cord due to compression by static and/or dynamic forces. This review is partitioned into three segments that focus on key elements of the past, the present, and the future in the field, which serve to introduce the focus issue on "Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and the Aging Spine". Emerging from this review is that tremendous progress has been made in the field, particularly in recent years, and that there are exciting possibilities for further advancements of patient care.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of bioactive glass ceramic to allograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation

Recently, a bioactive glass ceramic (BGC) has been developed for use as intervertebral cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the effectiveness and safety of BGC cages remain to be evaluated. We completed a retrospective comparison of the radiological and clinical outcomes of 36 patients (52 levels) who underwent ACDF with a BGC cage and 35 patients (54 levels) using allograft bone. The following variables were compared between the two groups: the visual analog (VAS) neck and arm pain score and the neck disability index (NDI), measured before surgery and 1 year after; the change in Cobb's angle, between the C2 and C7 vertebrae, the global sagittal angle, and disc height compared from before surgery to 1 year after; and the rate of spinal fusion and cage subsidence at 1 and 2 years after surgery. The VAS and NDI scores were not different between the two groups. Similarly, the spinal fusion rate was not different between the BGC and allograft bone group at 1 year (73% and 87%, respectively; p = 0.07) and 2 years (94% and 91%, respectively; p = 0.54) after surgery. However, the rate of cage subsidence was higher in the allograft bone (43%) than the BGC (19%) group (p = 0.03), as was the rate of instrument-related failure (p = 0.028), with a specifically higher incidence of implant fracture or failure in the allograft bone group (p = 0.025). Overall, our findings indicate that BGC cages provide a feasible and safe alternative to allograft bone for ACDF.