Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers

Pencil beam kernel-based dose calculations on CT data for a mixed neutron-gamma fission field applying tissue correction factors

Objective.For fast neutron therapy with mixed neutron and gamma radiation at the fission neutron therapy facility MEDAPP at the research reactor FRM II in Garching, no clinical dose calculation software was available in the past. Here, we present a customized solution for research purposes to overcome this lack of three-dimensional dose calculation.Approach.The applied dose calculation method is based on two sets of decomposed pencil beam kernels for neutron and gamma radiation. The decomposition was performed using measured output factors and simulated depth dose curves and beam profiles in water as reference medium. While measurements were performed by applying the two-chamber dosimetry method, simulated data was generated using the Monte Carlo code MCNP. For the calculation of neutron dose deposition on CT data, tissue-specific correction factors were generated for soft tissue, bone, and lung tissue for the MEDAPP neutron spectrum. The pencil beam calculations were evaluated with reference to Monte Carlo calculations regarding accuracy and time efficiency.Main results.In water, dose distributions calculated using the pencil beam approach reproduced the input from Monte Carlo simulations. For heterogeneous media, an assessment of the tissue-specific correction factors with reference to Monte Carlo simulations for different tissue configurations showed promising results. Especially for scenarios where no lung tissue is present, the dose calculation could be highly improved by the applied correction method.Significance.With the presented approach, time-efficient dose calculations on CT data and treatment plan evaluations for research purposes are now available for MEDAPP.

Effects of tissue heterogeneity and comparisons of collapsed cone and Monte Carlo fast neutron patient dosimetry using the University of Washington clinical neutron therapy system (CNTS)

Fast neutron therapy is a high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation treatment modality offering advantages over low LET radiations. Multileaf collimator technology reduces normal-tissue dose (toxicity) and makes neutron therapy more comparable to MV x-ray treatments. Published clinical-trial and other experiences with fast neutron therapy are reported. Early comparative studies failed to consider differences in target-dose spatial conformality between x-ray and neutron treatments, which is especially important for organs-at-risk close to tumor targets. Treatments planning systems (TPS) for high-energy neutrons lag behind TPS tools for MV x-rays, creating challenges for comparative studies of clinical outcomes. A previously published Monte Carlo model of the University of Washington (UW) Clinical Neutron Therapy System (CNTS) is refined and integrated with the RayStation TPS as an external dose planning/verification tool. The collapsed cone (CC) dose calculations in the TPS are based on measured dose profiles and output factors in water, with the absolute dose determined using a tissue-equivalent ionization chamber. For comparison, independent (external) Monte Carlo simulation computes dose on a voxel-by-voxel basis using an atlas that maps Hounsfield Unit (HU) numbers to elemental composition and density. Although the CC algorithm in the TPS accurately computes neutron dose to water compared to Monte Carlo calculations, calculated dose to water differs from bone or tissue depending largely on hydrogen content. Therefore, the elemental composition of tissue and bone, rather than the material or electron density, affects fast neutron dose. While the CC algorithm suffices for reproducible patient dosimetry in fast neutron therapy, adopting methods that consider tissue heterogeneity would enhance patient-specific neutron dose accuracy relative to national standards for other types of ionizing radiation. Corrections for tissue composition have a significant impact on absolute dose and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of neutron treatments compared to other radiation types (MV x-rays, protons, and carbon ions).

Localized Drug Delivery Systems: An Update on Treatment Options for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world, with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy being the primary treatment modalities. The treatment for HNSCC has evolved over time, due to which the prognosis has improved drastically. Despite the varied treatment options, major challenges persist. HNSCC chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic drugs are usually administered systemically, which could affect the patient's quality of life due to the associated side effects. Moreover, the systemic administration of salivary stimulating agents for the treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia is associated with toxicities. Localized drug delivery systems (LDDS) are gaining importance, as they have the potential to provide non-invasive, patient-friendly alternatives to cancer therapy with reduced dose-limiting toxicities. LDDSs involve directly delivering a drug to the tissue or organ affected by the disease. Some of the common localized routes of administration include the transdermal and transmucosal drug delivery system (DDSs). This review will attempt to explore the different treatment options using LDDSs for the treatment of HNSCC and radiotherapy-induced damage and their potential to provide a better experience for patients, as well as the obstacles that need to be addressed to render them successful.

Fast and Furious: Fast Neutron Therapy in Cancer Treatment

Fast neutron therapy has been used for decades. In conjunction with recent advances in photonic techniques, fast neutrons are no longer of much oncologic interest, which is not unequivocally positive, given their undoubted therapeutic value. This mini-review recalls the history of medical research on fast neutrons, considers their physical and radiobiological properties alongside their benefits for cancer treatment, and discusses their place in modern radiation oncology.