Ultrasonographic features of vascular closure devices: initial and 6-month follow-up results

Arterial Complications Assessed by Duplex Ultrasound After Decannulation of Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications are common and can be fatal even after successful decannulation in patients with peripherally cannulated veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Therefore, we aimed to accurately determine the incidence of arterial complications assessed by Duplex ultrasound following peripheral VA-ECMO decannulation. In addition, we investigated the predictors of severe complications requiring intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 1,350 adult patients who underwent ECMO between January 2012 and April 2023. Of 839 patients treated with peripherally cannulated VA-ECMO, 596 were successfully weaned off and 212 underwent Duplex ultrasound for final analysis. The primary outcome was arterial complications requiring vascular intervention. Thirty-three (15.6%) patients experienced such complications after decannulation. Acute limb ischemia due to thrombotic occlusion was the most common complication, occurring in 23 (10.8%) patients, followed by stenosis (3.8%), pseudoaneurysm (3.8%), arteriovenous fistula (0.9%), and dissection (0.9%). No significant differences in complication rates were found between the percutaneous and surgical decannulation groups in the propensity score-matched population (12.7% vs. 15.9%, respectively; P=0.799). Multivariable analysis revealed disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; odds ratio 2.6; 95% confidence interval 1.17-5.69; P=0.019) as the only predictor of arterial complications after decannulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial complications requiring vascular intervention frequently occur following successful weaning from VA-ECMO regardless of the decannulation strategy. In this setting, DIC appears to be associated with an increased rate of arterial complications.

Factors related to insufficient hemostasis using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device with five-minutes compression for femoral artery punctures after neuro-endovascular therapy: A retrospective, single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to identify the factors related to inadequate hemostasis with five minutes of manual compression using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device (VCD), and to evaluate the optimal time to hemostasis (TTH).

METHODS

A total of 119 consecutive patients who underwent neuro-endovascular therapy via common femoral arterial puncture between February 2019 and August 2021 were included. These patients underwent hemostasis using an EXOSEAL with manual compression for five minutes. In this retrospective study, the 119 patients were divided into two groups: (1) achieved hemostasis with five minutes (n = 76); and (2) required more than five minutes to achieve hemostasis (n = 43, Add group). In both groups, patient's characteristics, endovascular procedures, and closure procedures were assessed.

RESULTS

On univariable analysis, activated clotting time (ACT), multiple antiplatelets, closure with an under-sized EXOSEAL VCD (U-VCD), endovascular procedure, and use of a 7Fr. VCD were significantly associated with additional compression (p < 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following three factors were found to be associated with additional compression: pre-closure ACT (adjusted OR, 0.136; 95% CI, 1.017-1.056; p < 0.001); multiple antithrombotics (adjusted OR, 12.843; 95% CI, 3.458-47.693; p < 0.001); and closure with a U-VCD (adjusted OR, 5.653; 95% CI, 1.751-18.151; p = 0.004). On the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for prediction of the need for additional compression, the cutoff point for pre-closure ACT was calculated to be 268 s. In the Add group, mean TTH was 9.8 ± 1.5 min.

CONCLUSION

Multiple antiplatelets and closure with a U-VCD may increase the risk of insufficient hemostasis with five-minutes compression using an EXOSEAL VCD for femoral puncture sites if the pre-closure ACT is greater than 268 s. In these patients, mean TTH was 9.8 ± 1.5 min.

Flip-over of blood vessel intima caused by vascular closure device: A case report

BACKGROUND

Complications of vascular closure devices mainly include bleeding, vascular injury, and trapped device that cannot be removed percutaneously. However, arterial stenosis or occlusion induced by vascular injury is rare. This article introduces a rare case with severe acute limb ischemia after using the vascular closure device (StarClose).

CASE SUMMARY

A 54-year-old man was admitted because of necrosis of the second toe of the left foot for 2 mo. Ultrasound showed left femoral artery stenosis, and occlusion of the left popliteal, posterior tibial, peroneal, anterior tibial and dorsalis pedis arteries, suggesting arteriosclerosis obliterans of low extremities, gangrene and type 2 diabetes. He underwent an interventional procedure of drug-eluting balloon in the left lower limb via antegrade puncture of the left common femoral artery. He developed acute limb ischemia after 1 h, and severe pain, numbness, pale skin, low skin temperature and weakened sensation in the left foot. Injury of the common femoral artery intima was considered. Exploratory surgery showed occlusion at the puncture point accompanied with bulged vascular lumen and flipped vascular intima caused by StarClose. The flipped intima was removed. The limb blood supply was restored and the limb was saved post-surgery. He recovered well at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Incorrect use of the vascular closure device was the main cause of severe acute limb ischemia in this case.

Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Repeat Access and Repeat Closure With an ExoSeal Vascular Closure System in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided repeat access and repeat closure with an ExoSeal vascular closure system.

METHODS

A total of 123 endovascular therapy (EVT) procedures were performed in 59 patients (65 limbs) with ultrasound-guided repeat access and repeat implantation of an ExoSeal vascular closure system between January 2019 and March 2021. The procedural details and postprocedural outcomes of EVT with repeat access and use of ExoSeal (RE group) were compared with those of EVT with initial use of ExoSeal (IE group) in the same patients. In a subgroup analysis, these outcomes were also compared in early repeat (within 3 months) and late repeat (over 3 months) cases.

RESULTS

The technical success rate of ultrasound-guided access in the RE group was 100%. The procedural success rate of EVT and deployment success rate of ExoSeal in the RE group were 93% and 94%, respectively, which were not significantly different to those in the IE group. Access site complications in the RE group occurred in 2 cases (2%), again with no significant difference with the IE group. The median puncture, procedural, and hemostasis times in the RE group were 3 [2-5], 36.5 [29-54], and 7 [5-10] min, respectively, which were not significantly longer than those in the IE group. In the RE group, early and late repeat closure was performed in 66 (54%) and 57 (46%) cases, respectively, and there were no significant differences in the technical success of ultrasound-guided access, procedural success of EVT, deployment success of ExoSeal, and access site complication rates in these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided access facilitated higher technical success of repeat access and fewer access site complications in EVT with repeat use of ExoSeal, regardless of the interval between procedures.

Could real-time ultrasonography guidance be useful for the effective deployment of FemoSeal in common femoral arteriotomy?

A vascular closure device is used for hemostasis after a procedure involving an arterial puncture. The increasing frequency of endovascular arterial interventions has caused these devices to play a more important role in clinical practice. FemoSeal is a popular vascular closure device, and its safety and effectiveness have been verified. However, complications still occur in some cases, including even disastrous complications on occasion. Even with little experience, it is possible to reduce the complication rate by using real-time ultrasonography monitoring during the deployment of this device. Based on our experiences, presented herein, we suggest that complications related to FemoSeal could be reduced by using our method.

A Retrospective Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of EXOSEAL Vascular Closure Device to Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Transbrachial Procedures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of EXOSEAL vascular closure device (EVCD) insertion by comparing its performance with manual compression (MC) in achieving hemostasis at the brachial artery puncture site.

METHODS

A retrospective study of brachial artery access by using either MC or EVCD for achieving hemostasis from March 2016 to October 2017 was conducted. Patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing percutaneous transbrachial procedures were included. Time to hemostasis (TTH) was the primary efficacy end point. Seven-day incidence of major access site-related complications was the primary safety end point. TTH and major and minor complications associated with treatment of these 2 groups were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients with TBAD undergoing percutaneous transbrachial procedures entered the analysis. Of these, 107 patients underwent EVCD insertion and 50 patients underwent MC. The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. TTH was significantly shorter for EVCD over MC (P < 0.05). The TTH ≥10 min in the MC group was 100.0% (n = 50), but in the EVCD group, it was ≤2 min, 87.9% (n = 107); 2-5 min, 7.5% (n = 107); and ≥10 min, 4.7% (n = 107). The EVCD group had several major complications, while the MC group had none. Two patients (1.9%, n = 107) required vascular repair, one patient (0.6%, n = 107) required blood transfusion, and 1 patient (0.6%, n = 107) developed upper limb numbness and weakness after EVCD deployment. Minor complication such as the occurrence of hematoma (≤5 cm) in the MC group was 4 (8.0%) but was also 4 (3.7%) in the EVCD group, showing statistically significant difference (P = 0.030). The incidence of ecchymosis was 8 (7.5%) in the EVCD group when compared with 13 (26.0%) in the MC group, which showed statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). Other major and minor complications showed no significant differences between these 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After invasive procedures by 6F percutaneous access via the brachial artery in preprocedurally fully anticoagulated patients, TTH was significantly reduced in patients who underwent EVCD when compared with patients who underwent MC. MC is a safer and more convenient way to achieve hemostasis but has higher incidence of minor complications.

Acute limb ischemia caused by incorrect deployment of a clip-based arterial closure device

Failure of a vascular closure device most commonly results in a hemorrhage or pseudoaneurysm formation. In this paper a rare case of severe acute limb ischemia following incorrect deployment of a clip-based closure device (Starclose SE, Abbott Vascular) in a 31-year-old woman is presented. Symptoms of acute limb ischemia occurred at the start of the ambulation, 6 h after completion of the procedure. Because of the severity of ischemia the patient was treated surgically, and limb perfusion was successfully restored. An attempt of closure of an inadvertently punctured narrow superficial femoral artery was identified as the cause of this complication.