US LI-RADS visualization score: diagnostic outcome of ultrasound-guided focal hepatic lesion biopsy in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma

US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2017: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) includes an assessment category (US-1, negative; US-2, subthreshold; and US-3, positive) and a visualization score reflecting image quality (VIS-A, no or minimal limitations; VIS-B, moderate limitations; and VIS-C, severe limitations). The US-3 and VIS-C impact patient treatment. Purpose To establish the distributions of categories and visualization scores, estimate the proportions of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall malignancy in the US-3 category, and identify variables associated with the VIS-C score by conducting a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods A systematic search of articles published between January 1, 2017, and September 17, 2023, identified studies reporting distributions of US LI-RADS version 2017 categories or visualization scores. Characteristics of the study design, patient cohorts, and outcomes of interest (distributions of US categories and visualization scores, percentages of probable or definite HCC and malignancy in US-3 category, and variables associated with VIS-C) were extracted. For the meta-analysis, estimates were established with random-effects models. Results Fifteen studies comprising 39 166 US examinations were included. Of all examinations, 89.7% (95% CI: 86.8, 91.8) were categorized US-1; 4.4% (95% CI: 2.8, 6.2), US-2; and 5.9% (95% CI: 4.1, 8.0), US-3. Of the US-3 examinations, 25.9% (95% CI: 17.1, 34.7) had probable or definite HCC and 26.4% (95% CI: 18.4, 34.5) had overall malignancy. Among all examinations, 59.7% (95% CI: 46.9, 67.8) were assigned VIS-A; 32.5% (95% CI: 21.9, 41.6), VIS-B; and 7.8% (95% CI: 2.8, 14.3), VIS-C. Obesity (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% CI: 1.57, 3.59), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.64, 3.06), and Child-Pugh B or C (OR, 2.41; 95% CI: 1.43, 4.06) were associated with VIS-C score. Conclusion Overall, 90% of surveillance US results were negative (US-1), and 92% were of adequate quality (VIS-A or VIS-B); 26% of patients with US-3 results had HCC. VIS-C was associated with obesity, NAFLD, and cirrhosis. Systemic review registry no. CRD42022384925 © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy for suspected viable hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment: a single-arm prospective study

PURPOSE

The utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-guided liver biopsy in patients with treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was evaluated.

METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled 36 patients (mean age±standard deviation [SD], 65.3±9.2 years; 31 men) who underwent CEUS-guided biopsy for treated HCC between September 2020 and April 2022, constituting the CEUS group. An additional 60 patients (mean age±SD, 60.7±12.3 years; 50 men) who underwent B-mode image-guided biopsy for treated HCC between January 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively enrolled in the B-mode, or control, group. Biopsy success rates were compared between CEUS and B-mode groups using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

The biopsy success rate in the CEUS group was 88.9% (32 of 36 patients), which was significantly higher than the 70.0% (42 of 60 patients) observed in the B-mode group (P=0.044). No significant difference was found between CEUS and B-mode groups in the size of the lesions targeted for biopsy (mean±SD, 3.8±2.3 cm vs. 3.7±3.3 cm, respectively; P=0.332). For both the whole tumor and the viable tumor, conspicuity scores were significantly higher on CEUS than on grayscale ultrasound in the CEUS group (whole tumor: 2.7±0.5 vs. 1.8±0.9, P<0.001; viable tumor: 2.6±0.7 vs. 1.4±0.8, P<0.001). Relative to non-diagnostic results, diagnostic results more frequently exhibited a late mild washout pattern (87.5% [28 of 32] vs. 25.0% [1 of 4], P=0.004). No significant difference in the arterial enhancement pattern was noted between these subgroups (P=0.415).

CONCLUSION

By increasing the viable-tumor conspicuity, CEUS-guided biopsy is useful for confirmative histopathologic diagnosis in patients with treated HCC.

Utility of fusion imaging for the evaluation of ultrasound quality in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the quality of surveillance ultrasound (US) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) utilizing fusion imaging.

METHODS

This research involved a secondary analysis of a prospectively recruited cohort. Under institutional review board approval, participants referred for surveillance US who had undergone liver computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within the past year were screened between August 2022 and January 2023. After patient consent was obtained, the US visualization score in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System was assessed with fusion imaging at the time of examination. This score was compared to that of conventional US using the extended McNemar test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with a US visualization score of B or C. Factors limiting visualization of focal lesions were recorded during fusion imaging.

RESULTS

Among the 105 participants (mean age, 59±11 years; 66 men), US visualization scores of B and C were assigned to 57 (54.3%) and 17 (16.2%) participants, respectively, by conventional US and 54 (51.4%) and 32 (30.5%) participants, respectively, by fusion imaging. The score distribution differed significantly between methods (P=0.010). Male sex was independently associated with US visualization scores of B or C (adjusted odds ratio, 3.73 [95% confidence interval, 1.30 to 10.76]; P=0.015). The most common reason (64.5%) for lesion nondetection was a limited sonic window.

CONCLUSION

Conventional US may underestimate the limitations of the sonic window relative to real-time fusion imaging with pre-acquired CT or MRI in the surveillance of HCC.

Ultrasound LI-RADS Visualization Scores on Surveillance Ultrasound for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the proportions of each surveillance ultrasound (US) visualization score for hepatocellular carcinoma based on the US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and to identify the factors associated with visualization score C. Original publications reporting US LI-RADS visualization scores were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1, 2017, to November 25, 2022. The meta-analytic pooled proportion of each visualization score based on US examination was calculated using the DerSimonian‒Laird random-effects model. Subgroup meta-regression analyses were performed to explore study heterogeneity. US LI-RADS visualization scores were reported from a total of 25,698 US examinations across 12 studies. The pooled proportions of visualization scores A, B and C were 56.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.6-73.2%, I2 = 99.2%), 30.3% (95% CI: 21.5-40.7%, I2 = 98.8%) and 6.9% (95% CI: 3.9-11.7%, I2 = 97.7%), respectively. Significantly higher proportions of visualization score C were found in studies that exclusively enrolled cirrhosis patients and a study in which the disease etiology was non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (p < 0.05). In addition, the pooled proportion of visualization score C was higher in studies with a mean or median body mass index >25 kg/m2 (10.7%, 95% CI: 4.3-24.3%). In conclusion, a substantial proportion of surveillance US examinations exhibited moderate to severe limitations on visualization. There was a tendency toward higher proportions of US LI-RADS visualization score C in patients with cirrhosis, NAFLD and obesity.

Refining Liver Biopsy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An In-Depth Exploration of Shifting Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications

The field of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has faced significant change on multiple levels in the past few years. The increasing emphasis on the various HCC phenotypes and the emergence of novel, specific therapies have slowly paved the way for a personalized approach to primary liver cancer. In this light, the role of percutaneous liver biopsy of focal lesions has shifted from a purely confirmatory method to a technique capable of providing an in-depth characterization of any nodule. Cancer subtype, gene expression, the mutational profile, and tissue biomarkers might soon become widely available through biopsy. However, indications, expectations, and techniques might suffer changes as the aim of the biopsy evolves from providing minimal proof of the disease to high-quality specimens for extensive analysis. Consequently, a revamped position of tissue biopsy is expected in HCC, following the reign of non-invasive imaging-only diagnosis. Moreover, given the advances in techniques that have recently reached the spotlight, such as liquid biopsy, concomitant use of all the available methods might gather just enough data to improve therapy selection and, ultimately, outcomes. The current review aims to discuss the changing role of liver biopsy and provide an evidence-based rationale for its use in the era of precision medicine in HCC.

Dynamic Changes in Ultrasound Quality for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening in Patients With Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Identifying patients in whom ultrasound may be inadequate to exclude the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can inform interventions to improve screening effectiveness. We aimed to characterize correlates of suboptimal ultrasound quality and changes in ultrasound quality over time in patients with cirrhosis undergoing HCC screening.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis who underwent ultrasound examination at 2 large health systems between July 2016 and July 2019. Exam adequacy was graded by radiologists using the LI-RADS Visualization Score (A, B, C); we evaluated changes in visualization over time among patients with >1 ultrasound exams. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with limited ultrasound visualization (scores B or C).

RESULTS

Of 2053 cirrhosis patients, 1685 (82.1%) had ultrasounds with score A, 262 (12.8%) had score B, and 106 (5.2%) had score C. Limited visualization was associated with alcohol-related or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease cirrhosis and presence of class II-III obesity. Among 1546 patients with >1 ultrasounds, 1129 (73.0%) had the same visualization score on follow-up (1046 score A, 60 score B, 23 score C). However, 255 (19.6%) of 1301 with score A at baseline had limited visualization when repeated (230 score B, 25 score C), and 130 (53.1%) of 245 patients with baseline limited visualization had good visualization when repeated.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 1 in 5 patients with cirrhosis had moderately-severely limited ultrasound visualization for HCC nodules, particularly those with obesity or alcohol-related or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease cirrhosis. Ultrasound quality can change between exams, including improvement in many patients with limited visualization.

Association between ultrasound quality and test performance for HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound visualisation is limited in approximately 20% of patients with cirrhosis undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance; however, it is unknown if impaired visualisation directly impacts test performance. We aimed to evaluate the association between ultrasound visualisation and surveillance test performance.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study among patients with cirrhosis, with or without HCC, who underwent ultrasound-based surveillance at two large health systems between July 2016 and July 2019. Ultrasound visualisation assessment was recorded by interpreting radiologists using the ultrasound LI-RADS Visualisation score. We performed logistic regression analyses to evaluate the association between ultrasound visualisation and diagnostic test performance. We assessed sensitivity for HCC detection among ultrasounds performed in the year prior to HCC diagnoses and specificity using ultrasounds in those without HCC.

RESULTS

Among 186 patients with HCC, severely limited visualisation (Vis Score C) on ultrasound prior to HCC diagnosis was associated with increased odds of false-negative results, that is lower sensitivity (OR 7.94, 95% CI 1.23-51.16) in multivariable analysis. Ultrasound sensitivity with visualisation scores A or B exceeded 75%, compared to only 27.3% with visualisation score C. Among 2052 cirrhosis patients without HCC, moderate visualisation limitations (Vis score B) were associated with increased odds of false-positive results (OR 1.60, 1.13-2.27), although specificity exceeded 95% across all visualisation scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired ultrasound visualisation is associated with worse surveillance test performance. Alternative blood-based biomarkers and imaging strategies are needed for patients at risk for ultrasound-based surveillance failure.

Current status of image-based surveillance in hepatocellular carcinoma

Although the overall prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poor, curative treatment may improve the survival of patients diagnosed at an early stage through surveillance. Accordingly, ultrasonography (US)-based HCC surveillance programs proposed in international society guidelines are now being implemented and regularly updated based on the latest evidence to improve their efficacy. Recently, other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging have shown potential as alternative surveillance tools based on individualized risk stratification. In this review article, we describe the current status of US-based surveillance for HCC and summarize the supporting evidence. We also discuss alternative surveillance imaging modalities that are currently being studied to validate their diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness.