Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Perilesional Enhancement: A Valuable Feature for Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in CEUS LI-RADS M

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether the peritumoral enhancement feature can aid in discriminating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System M (LR-M).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2018 and July 2024, 147 LR-M and 320 LR-5. lesions with pathologically confirmed HCC and ICC diagnoses after CEUS were examined. We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of HCC with different diameters (≤3, 3-5, and 5-7cm) in the LR-M by peritumoral enhancement. We analysed the correlation between pathological perilesional hepatic sinusoid vessels and perilesional enhancement on CEUS in LR-M. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 with and without perilesional enhancement was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 93/107 HCC lesions and 1/40 ICC lesion with perilesional hepatic sinusoid vessels in LR-M. CEUS revealed perilesional enhancement in 81.31% (87/107) of HCC lesions and 10.00% (4/40) of ICC lesions. There was a correlation between perilesional hepatic sinusoid vessel and perilesional enhancement with correlation coefficients of 0.738. The diagnostic efficacy of 5-7cm lesions was the best, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC were 0.900, 0.864, 0.885, and 0.882. After perilesional enhancement was added to LR-5, 91 cases of HCC in LR-M were adjusted into LR-5. The adjusted diagnostic efficacy was significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

Perilesional enhancement on CEUS correlates with perilesional hepatic sinusoid vessel. Perilesional enhancement is a valuable feature for distinguishing HCC and ICC and could be added as a feature in CEUS LI-RADS.

The American College of Radiology contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System and its modified version in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma via Sonazoid: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The American College of Radiology (ACR) developed the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for pure blood contrast agents, but Sonazoid was not included. Modifications to LI-RADS have been proposed for Sonazoid. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to identify and compare the diagnostic efficacy of the two LI-RADS algorithms of Sonazoid.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from databases inception to August 31, 2023, to find original studies on the ACR LI-RADS and/or modified LI-RADS algorithm with Sonazoid used as the contrast agent in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A bivariate random-effects model was used. Data pooling, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were performed for meta-analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality, and the Deeks funnel plot asymmetry test was used to evaluate the publication bias.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis of 10 studies with 1,611 observations was conducted. The pooled data for ACR LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) and modified LR-5 were respectively as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-0.75] and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) (P<0.05); pooled specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.91) (P>0.05); and pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84 and 0.91. The diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category M (LR-M) of the two algorithms was comparable. Study heterogeneity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that modified LR-5 algorithm demonstrated improved diagnostic sensitivity compared with the ACR LR-5 algorithm of Sonazoid, with differences observed between the different versions. Further research is needed to validate and explore the optimal diagnostic criteria for HCC using Sonazoid. Before the database search was conducted, this study was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42023455220).

LI-RADS: Looking Back, Looking Forward

Since its initial release in 2011, the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) has evolved and expanded in scope. It started as a single algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis with CT or MRI with extracellular contrast agents and has grown into a multialgorithm network covering all major liver imaging modalities and contexts of use. Furthermore, it has developed its own lexicon, report templates, and supplementary materials. This article highlights the major achievements of LI-RADS in the past 11 years, including adoption in clinical care and research across the globe, and complete unification of HCC diagnostic systems in the United States. Additionally, the authors discuss current gaps in knowledge, which include challenges in surveillance, diagnostic population definition, perceived complexity, limited sensitivity of LR-5 (definite HCC) category, management implications of indeterminate observations, challenges in reporting, and treatment response assessment following radiation-based therapies and systemic treatments. Finally, the authors discuss future directions, which will focus on mitigating the current challenges and incorporating advanced technologies. Tha authors envision that LI-RADS will ultimately transform into a probability-based system for diagnosis and prognostication of liver cancers that will integrate patient characteristics and quantitative imaging features, while accounting for imaging modality and contrast agent.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with metastasis-like hepatic alveolar echinococcosis: a cohort study

PURPOSE

Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE) of the metastasis-like pattern, according to the Echinococcus Ulm classification, is usually discovered as an incidental finding, and the diagnostic differentiation from "true metastases" is difficult. The aim of this study was to investigate whether lesions of the "metastasis-like pattern" in HAE show a typical contrast behavior that can be used for differentiation from metastasis in malignancies.

METHODS

This prospective clinical study included 11 patients with histologically confirmed HAE of the metastasis-like pattern (7 female and 4 male; mean age, 57.1 years; mean disease duration, 59.5 months), who had been examined by B-scan sonography and CEUS, from the National Echinococcosis Registry Germany.

RESULTS

On contrast-enhanced sonography, 11/11 reference lesions showed annular rim enhancement in the arterial and portal venous phases. Throughout the entire 4-min study period, none of the reference lesions showed central contrast enhancement-i.e., all exhibited a complete "black hole sign". A small central scar was seen in 81.8% of cases.

CONCLUSION

In clinically unremarkable patients with incidentally detected metastasis-like lesions of the liver, contrast-enhanced sonographic detection of rim enhancement without central contrast uptake (black hole sign) should be considered evidence supporting a diagnosis of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis with a rare metastasis-like pattern. This can help to differentiate HAE from metastases, especially in high-endemic areas.

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using LI-RADS and Ancillary Features: A Single Tertiary Centre Experience

Clinical utility of ancillary features (AFs) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS®) is yet to be established. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic yield of CEUS LI-RADS and AFs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively included patients with risk factors for HCC and newly diagnosed focal liver lesions (FLL). All lesions have been categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS v2017 by an experienced sonographer blinded to clinical data and to the final diagnosis. From a total of 143 patients with 191 FLL, AFs favoring HCC were observed in 19.8% cases as hypoechoic rim and in 16.7% cases as nodule-in nodule architecture. From the total of 141 HCC cases, 83.6% were correctly classified: 57.4%- LR-5 and 26.2%- LR-4. In 9.21% cases, CEUS indicated LR-M; 2.12% cases- LR-3. The LR-5 category was 96.2% predictive (PPV) of HCC. LR-5 had 60.4% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity. PPV for primitive malignancy (LR-4 + LR-5) was 95.7%, with 88% sensitivity, 89.3% specificity and 88.4% accuracy for HCC. LR-4 category had 94.8% PPV and 26.2% sensitivity. CEUS LR4 + LR5 had 81,8% sensitivity for HCCs over 2 cm and 78.57% sensitivity for smaller HCCs. CEUS LR-5 remains an excellent diagnostic tool for HCC, despite the size of the lesion. The use of AFs might improve the overarching goal of LR-5 + LR-4 diagnosis of high specificity for HCC and exclusion of non-HCC malignancy.