[Diseases of the nervous system as the underlying cause of death]

OBJECTIVE

To identify the leading causes of death in the adult population from the class of diseases of the nervous system (DNS, class G) according to medical death certificates (MDC) and to discuss the problems of their assessment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The source of information was the electronic database of the Main Department of the Civil Registry Office of the Moscow Region. All cases of class G deaths were selected (total 10.739), an analysis was carried out according to underlying cause of death (UCD) codes and the immediate cause of death.

RESULTS

In 2022, mortality from diseases included in the DNS amounted to 130.7 per 100 000 of the population over 18 years old (100.3 among men, 191.0 among women). The average age of men is 74.3±14.1, women - 83.5±9.9 years (p<0.0001) due to the younger age of death of men from «G31.2 Degeneration of the nervous system caused by alcohol» and a higher contribution of this cause to male mortality; 82.5% of deaths were for codes G90-G99 («Other disorders of the nervous system»); 15.5% were neurodegenerative diseases (G10-G32). Sixty-six percent of all UCD in both women and men accounted for «unspecified encephalopathy» (G93.4), in 2nd place (10.5%) was «cerebral cyst» (G93.0). In 45 cases, code G93.6 (cerebral edema) was mistakenly used as UCD. Differences in the structure of causes of death at home, in hospital and elsewhere are statistically significant (p<0.00001). In 58.3%, cerebral edema and herniation were indicated as the immediate cause of death (G93.6 and G93.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Nosologically unfounded, insufficiently well-defined UCD were established in most cases of death from DNS, In 0.5% of the total number of deaths from DNS, an erroneous presentation as UCD of transient disorders of cerebral circulation or cerebral edema was noted. The results indicate the need for an analysis of the causes of death based on a comparison of medical records and MDC.

[The use of Mexidol in patients with mild (moderate) cognitive impairment: results of a meta-analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Mexidol therapy in patients with chronic brain ischemia (CBI) and cognitive disorders (CD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This meta-analysis included the results of studies on the effectiveness of Mexidol in patients with CD measured with Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA). The pooled effect assessment included all publications from independent clinical trials that provided efficacy data on the MoCA scale with a level of detail sufficient for further mathematical analysis. The main result of the meta-analysis was obtained for the final values of the effectiveness indicator in the Mexidol groups compared with the basic therapy groups. Data from 10 prospective randomized trials containing information on the final scores on the MoCA scale after therapy was analyzed.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis of ten prospective clinical studies of the effectiveness of Mexidol against the background of basic therapy in patients with CCI and CD was carried out. The total number of patients taking Mexidol was 482; the comparison group consisted of 455 patients. According to the results of a statistical model of random effects, the effect size was 2.06; 95% confidence interval for the difference in effectiveness between the groups of the study drug and the control groups [0.98; 3.14] (p=0.0002).

CONCLUSION

A statistically significant and clinically significant improvement in the cognitive functions of patients with CBI, was demonstrated after treatment with Mexidol.

[Drug-induced cognitive impairment and dementia]

One of the reasons for the development or worsening of cognitive impairment (CI) may be the use of a number of drugs: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants, glucocorticosteroids, antitumor drugs and a number of others. The negative effect of drugs on cognitive functions is realized due to many pathophysiological mechanisms: disruption of hormonal regulation, decreased neuronal excitability, increased activity of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors, decreased cerebral circulation, atrophic changes in the brain; many mechanisms have not been fully established. Risk factors for the development of drug-induced CIs are: old age or childhood, brain damage, chronic diseases, genetic factors, the patient's initial CI, polypharmacy, dose and duration of drug use, acute infectious diseases, metabolic disorders, dehydration, acute urinary retention, etc. To diagnose and differentially diagnose drug-induced CI, it is necessary to establish a connection between the start of taking a suspected drug-inducer and a decrease in cognitive functions. The first step in the treatment of drug-induced CI is the abolition of an inducer drug or a reduction in its dose, in cases where it is impossible to discontinue the drug and there is no replacement, special slow-release dosage forms can be considered. The main measures to prevent drug-induced CI include the use of drugs with the lowest risk of their development, assessment of drug interactions, and the use of modern scales to assess the risk of developing this side-effect (anticholinergic burden scale, etc.).

[Observational study of the efficacy and safety of the drug Ampasse in patients with moderate cognitive impairment in chronic cerebral ischemia]

OBJECTIVE

The study of the efficacy and safety of drug Ampasse in the treatment of mild cognitive impairment syndrome (MCI) in patients with chronic cerebral ischemia (CCI) and as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of chronic pain syndromes of various origins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

50 patients with an average age of 67±7.4 years with MCI syndrome against the background of CCI, suffering from chronic pain syndromes of various origins, received the drug Ampasse at a dose of 25 mg per day intravenously by bolus for 15 days. At the screening visit, day 15 of therapy, day 30, and day 180 of the observation period, cognitive functions, emotional sphere, severity of pain syndrome, sleep quality, and quality of life were assessed.

RESULTS

In 95% of patients during therapy, an improvement in cognitive functions was noted (increase by 2 points on scales MoCA and MMSE, p<0.05). The maximum severity of cognitive improvement was achieved by the 30th day of observation. By the 180th day of observation, 5% of patients had returned to their original cognitive status, which is probably due to the need for a repeated course of therapy to maintain the clinical effect. The antiamnestic effect of Ampasse was also manifested in patients with a multifunctional amnestic phenotype of MCI, which may indicate a comorbidity with a neurodegenerative disease. A total of 84% of patients experienced a decrease in pain intensity during treatment (decrease by 2.3 points on VAS, decrease in consumption of analgesics by 1.5 tablets per day, p<0.05). This effect persisted throughout the observation period and was associated with improved sleep quality. In the course of treatment, no cases of anxiety or depression were detected. All patients showed an improvement in their quality of life according to the scale SF-36. The use of Ampasse showed a good level of tolerability and safety.

CONCLUSION

The use of Ampasse is effective and safe in the treatment of MCI in CCI and helps to reduce the clinical manifestations of pain syndromes of various origins. The mechanism of the analgesic action of Ampasse, as well as the need for and optimal timing of repeated courses of therapy, require further study.

[The relationship of vascular complications with cerebrovascular reactivity and endothelial dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship of vascular complications with cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and endothelial dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and twelve patients were examined. The patients were stratified into the main group with moderate and severe OSA and the control group without apnea. All patients underwent anthropometry, polysomnography, transcranial dopplerography and duplex scanning of the brachial artery.

RESULTS

Patients with OSA showed a more frequent decrease in post-occlusive vascular dilatation. The CVR indices in the hypercapnic test in the main group were in the range of 0.91-0.97 and significantly lower after 1 minute on the left, after 5 minutes on both sides and after 10 minutes on the left. A positive correlation during a hypercapnic test between the CVR on the left after 10 minutes and the desaturation index (r=0.287, p=0.021), between the CVR on the left after 5 and 10 minutes and acute cerebrovascular accident (r=0.248, p=0.048 and r=0.285, p=0.022, respectively), as well as a negative correlation between the indicators of the middle cerebral artery and chronic cerebral ischemia were established in patients with apnea.

CONCLUSION

Timely assessment of pathological changes in central and peripheral hemodynamics in patients with OSA will allow diagnosing early signs of vascular complications, which will further improve the personalized strategy for the prevention of stroke and chronic cerebral ischemia.

[Results of an international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with Mexidol and Mexidol FORTE 250 in patients with chronic brain ischemia (MEMO)]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with Mexidol solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration, 50 mg/ml and Mexidol FORTE 250 film-coated tablets, 250 mg in patients with chronic brain ischemia (CBI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in 15 clinical centers located in Russian Federation and Republic of Uzbekistan, included 318 patients with CBI aged 40 to 90 years. The patients were randomized into 2 groups, the patients of the 1-st group received Mexidol intravenously 500 mg once daily for 14 days, followed by Mexidol FORTE 250 - 250 mg 3 times a day orally for 60 days; patients of the 2-nd group received a placebo in a similar mode. The primary endpoint was the mean value of difference by MoCA scale at the point of completing the therapy comparing to initial value.

RESULTS

According to the results of the assessment of the primary endpoint, statistically significant changes in the MoCA scores at the stage of completion of study were revealed when comparing the dynamics between the 1-st and 2-nd groups (p<0.000001). The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in the average of the main efficacy endpoint between the 1-st and 2-nd groups was 1.51, which allows to state a higher efficacy of the use of Mexidol. According to the estimates of secondary endpoints, a statistically significant advantage over placebo at the last visit achieved while evaluation by the following scales and tests: digit symbol substitution test, MFI-20 asthenia assessment scale, Beck anxiety scale, Vane questionnaire, Tinetti scale, SF-36 questionnaire (mental component of health), CGI scale. The comparable nature of the safety profile of Mexidol and Placebo was established.

CONCLUSION

The validity and expediency of the use of Mexidol and Mexidol FORTE 250 in the treatment of patients with CBI has been demonstrated.

Pathogenetic mechanisms of ischemic stroke: from verification to secondary prevention

Ischemic stroke is an extremely heterogeneous disease: there are more than 200 causes of cerebral catastrophe. Early identification of the pathogenetic mechanism (subtype) of ischemic stroke allows planning an individual secondary prevention strategy, which includes a wide range of pharmaceutical and surgical methods. The article presents the characteristics of cardioembolic (associated with atrial fibrillation and flutter, prosthetic valves, chronic heart failure, left ventricle thrombus, infective endocarditis, open foramen ovale, etc.), atherothrombotic (due to extra- and intracranial atherosclerosis), lacunar and cryptogenic stroke, as well as less common causes of the disease, in particular cervical or cerebral artery dissection. Issues of secondary prevention of stroke according to the pathogenetic subtype are described and summarized as an algorithm. The article is illustrated with clinical examples.

[Efficacy and safety of treatment with ampasse: the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with chronic cerebrovascular disorders]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of the drug ampasse in the treatment of patients with chronic cerebrovascular disorders (CCVD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, confirmatory study of the efficacy and safety of ampasse (phase III) was conducted in 124 patients aged 50 to 75 years. The main group (MG) - 62 patients, received the test drug ampasse, solution for intravenous administration, 5 mg/ml, at a dose of 5 ml (25 mg), intravenously bolus slowly, the duration of treatment was 15 days. Control group (CG) - 62 patients, received comparison drug: placebo (0.9% sodium chloride-5 ml).

RESULTS

All 124 patients fully completed the procedures and visits, there were no dropouts from the study. The proportion of patients who reached the primary endpoint (an increase in the score by 2 or more points on the MoCA scale) was 83.87% in MG and 22.58% in CG, that is, the efficacy of therapy in MG was 61.29% higher than in CG (p<0.001), and good tolerability of the drug was proved. The secondary endpoint is an increase in quality of life (QOL) on the SF-36 V2 scale on Day 31. In MG, there was a statistically significant improvement in all indicators of QOL compared to the baseline. When assessing the safety spectrum, the proportion of patients who had adverse events was 14.52% in MG and 8.06% in CG (p=0.395).

CONCLUSION

Ampasse has a positive effect on cognitive functions and QOL, does not increase the frequency of adverse events in patients with CCVD compared to placebo, does not cause significant side effects, and is well tolerated by patients.