Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery Among Alabama Providers

Factors affecting the use of antibiotics and antiseptics to prevent maternal infection at birth: A global mixed-methods systematic review

Background

Over 10% of maternal deaths annually are due to sepsis. Prophylactic antibiotics and antiseptic agents are critical interventions to prevent maternal peripartum infections. We conducted a mixed-method systematic review to better understand factors affecting the use of prophylactic antibiotics and antiseptic agents to prevent peripartum infections.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, CINAHL, Global Health, Global Index Medicus, and Maternity and Infant Care for studies published between 1 January 1990 and 27 May 2022. We included primary qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies that focused on women, families, and healthcare providers’ perceptions and experiences of prophylactic antibiotic and antiseptics during labour and birth in health facilities. There were no language restrictions. We used a thematic synthesis approach for qualitative evidence and GRADE-CERQual approach for assessing confidence in these review findings. Quantitative study results were mapped to the qualitative findings and reported narratively.

Results

We included 19 studies (5 qualitative, 12 quantitative and 2 mixed-methods studies), 16 relating to antibiotics, 2 to antiseptic use, and 1 study to both antibiotic and antiseptic use. Most related to providers’ perspectives and were conducted in high-income countries. Key themes on factors affecting antibiotic use were providers’ beliefs about benefits and harms, perceptions of women’s risk of infection, regimen preferences and clinical decision-making processes. Studies on antiseptic use explored women’s perceptions of vaginal cleansing, and provider’s beliefs about benefits and the usefulness of guidelines.

Conclusion

We identified a range of factors affecting how providers use prophylactic antibiotics at birth, which can undermine implementation of clinical guidelines. There were insufficient data for low-resource settings, women’s perspectives, and regarding use of antiseptics, highlighting the need for further research in these areas. Implications for practice include that interventions to improve prophylactic antibiotic use should take account of local environments and perceived infection risk and ensure contextually relevant guidance.

Is It Necessary to Perform a Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis before an Elective Surgery of Cesarean Section?

INTRODUCTION: According to the data by World Health Organization, the broad and often insufficiently substantiated prescription of antibiotics, including for prophylactic purposes, has led to the growth of antibiotic-resistant microflora, which is a dangerous and intractable problem of modern medicine. Despite the undoubted benefits of antibiotics in the management of wound infection and endometritis after cesarean section, the routine prophylactic administration of antibacterial drugs can not only carry the risk of growth of resistant nosocomial microflora, but also have doubtful effects on the health of a newborn. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of the study was to justify the possibility of carrying out elective cesarean section operations without routine antibiotic prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis of 333 cases of elective cesarean section operations carried out in the obstetric department in the period from 2017 to 2019 was performed. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery was not prescribed in 118 healthy patients with an uncomplicated history and a smooth course of the gestational process. The remaining 215 women received a single intravenous injection of 1 g of cefazolin sodium intraoperatively, after extraction of the fetus. A comparative analysis of the clinical groups was carried out according to the following criteria: vaginal microbiocenosis before surgical delivery, duration, and features of the operation, clinical blood count on days 1 and 5 of the post-operative period, condition of postoperative sutures, the presence of discharge from the wound, signs of infectious complications from the uterus or other organs, uterine involution rate, duration of hospital stay before and after surgery, follow-up history for 1 month after discharge from the maternity ward. The data obtained were subjected to statistical processing. RESULTS: We have found no significant differences in the course and number of complications in the postpartum period in the compared clinical groups. The statistically significant transient leukocytosis observed on the 1st day of the postoperative period in patients who did not undergo antibiotic prophylaxis before the surgery seems to be associated with a more pronounced adaptive reaction and was not combined with any clinical symptoms of development of infection. CONCLUSION: No relationship has been identified between the routine prescription of antibiotics before or during an elective cesarean section and the risk of developing infectious complications in the post-operative period. Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery should be carried out differentially, taking into account the history and features of the course of this pregnancy.

Adherence to Guideline-Based Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Gynecology among Alabama Providers

OBJECTIVES

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a preventable cause of postoperative morbidity. The appropriate use of perioperative antibiotics for prevention of SSIs is a well-established quality metric. Little is known about the adherence to guidelines-based antibiotic prophylaxis among Alabama obstetricians and gynecologists. Our aims were to determine their adherence to guidelines-based antibiotic prophylaxis and identify the factors that are predictive of nonadherence.

METHODS

Online, self-administered survey of Alabama obstetricians and gynecologists.

RESULTS

Providers reported not providing the indicated antibiotics and/or giving nonindicated antibiotics in almost all surgical scenarios. The exceptions included hysterectomies, in which almost all (96%) providers routinely gave indicated antibiotics. No providers reported giving antibiotics during intrauterine device placement or endometrial biopsies, which is appropriate. The only factor predictive of inappropriate antibiotic use was the absence of a standing antibiotic protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Alabama gynecologic surgeons can and should improve their compliance with guidelines-based antibiotic prophylaxis. More research is needed to determine which interventions would improve adherence in this provider population; our study suggests that the implementation of a standing antibiotic protocol may be a reasonable first step.