A Robust Faculty Development Program for Medical Educators: A Decade of Experience

Disentangling faculty development: A scoping review towards a rich description of the concept and its practice

BACKGROUND

There is wide variation in how faculty development (FD) is practiced globally and described in the literature. This scoping review aims to clarify how FD is conceptualised and practiced in health professions education.

METHODOLOGY

Using a systematic search strategy, 418 papers, published between 2015-2023, were included for full text review. We extracted data using closed and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics and qualitative data synthesised using content analysis.

RESULTS

Faculty development was the most frequently used term encompassing a range of understandings and practices. Many papers focused on educators' enhanced understanding of teaching, learning, and assessment. Several highlighted the social context of collaborative practice and organisational learning. FD formats included workshops, courses, longitudinal programs, and coaching and mentoring. Dominant conceptual frameworks included Kirkpatrick's model of evaluation, communities of practice theory, adult learning theory, and experiential learning.

CONCLUSIONS

Although FD continues to evolve in response to the dynamic HPE landscape, this growth needs to be accelerated. To facilitate meaningful collaboration across professions, contexts, and countries, attention must be paid to terms used and meanings ascribed to them. Those responsible for FD need to think anew about its purpose and practice, demonstrating flexibility as the ever-changing context demands.

Measuring the added value of virtual communities of practice for developing the educator role of critical care professionals

In healthcare settings, workplace learning is often supported by clinicians who strive to combine service provision and educator roles. We evaluated an international 12-month programme that supports widely distributed critical care health professional educators (HPEs) through a virtual community of practice (vCoP). Specifically, we evaluate if and how the vCoP approach affects learning experiences using an innovative evaluation framework in medical education-the value-creation framework (VCF). We used a mixed-methods approach to evaluation, including an anonymous survey and semistructured interviews. Themes from data sources were identified using the VCF as the common thread. Themes discussed by at least two-thirds of interview participants were analysed using narrative inquiry. 27 of 66 participants responded to the survey, and 15 participated in interviews. Positive and negative indicators of value creation were extracted and organised according to the framework's eight value cycles. Framework analysis made value-creation and potential flow-on effects in one value-creation cycle to another visible, offering insight into relationships. Themes from narrative inquiry elaborated on the results of the framework analysis. Using the VCF to evaluate the Incubator programme brings to bear the complexity of boundary-crossing HPE faculty development for critical care educators. The framework can be a valuable tool for evaluating a vCoP associated with faculty development programmes.