Detection Algorithms for Gastrointestinal Perforation Cases in the Medical Information Database Network (MID-NET®) in Japan

BACKGROUND

The Medical Information Database Network (MID-NET®) in Japan is a vast repository providing an essential pharmacovigilance tool. Gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) is a critical adverse drug event, yet no well-established GIP identification algorithm exists in MID-NET®.

METHODS

This study evaluated 12 identification algorithms by combining ICD-10 codes with GIP therapeutic procedures. Two sites contributed 200 inpatients with GIP-suggestive ICD-10 codes (100 inpatients each), while a third site contributed 165 inpatients with GIP-suggestive ICD-10 codes and antimicrobial prescriptions. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of the algorithms were determined, and the relative sensitivity (rSn) among the 165 inpatients at the third institution was evaluated.

RESULTS

A trade-off between PPV and rSn was observed. For instance, ICD-10 code-based definitions yielded PPVs of 59.5%, whereas ICD-10 codes with CT scan and antimicrobial information gave PPVs of 56.0% and an rSn of 97.0%, and ICD-10 codes with CT scan and antimicrobial information as well as three types of operation codes produced PPVs of 84.2% and an rSn of 24.2%. The same algorithms produced statistically significant differences in PPVs among the three institutions. Combining diagnostic and procedure codes improved the PPVs. The algorithm combining ICD-10 codes with CT scan and antimicrobial information and 80 different operation codes offered the optimal balance (PPV: 61.6%, rSn: 92.4%).

CONCLUSION

This study developed valuable GIP identification algorithms for MID-NET®, revealing the trade-offs between accuracy and sensitivity. The algorithm with the most reasonable balance was determined. These findings enhance pharmacovigilance efforts and facilitate further research to optimize adverse event detection algorithms.

Treatment outcomes of acute appendicitis and associated factors among admitted patients with a diagnosis of acute abdomen in Debre Markos Referral Hospital, Amhara Region, North West Ethiopia

INTRODUCTION

Appendicitis is an inflammation of the vermiform appendix and is one of the most common causes of an acute abdomen in young adults. If left untreated, it can lead to appendiceal abscess, perforation and peritonitis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess treatment outcomes of acute appendicitis and associated factors among admitted patients with a diagnosis of acute abdomen. Methods and materials: A cross sectional study was employed among 169 patients using a census. Data were collected from patient medical records by using a checklist. Data were entered using Epi-data and analysed by statistical product and service solution. Logistic regression analysis was employed.

RESULTS

Among 303 patients with a diagnosis of acute abdomen, 169 (55.7%) developed acute appendicitis; of whom, 45 (26.6%) developed unfavourable treatment outcomes. Patients who had elevated white blood cell count at the time of presentation (adjusted odds ratio = 4.7; 95% confidence interval (1.95, 11.35)) and intraoperative appendiceal abscess (adjusted odds ratio = 3.8; 95% confidence interval (1.61, 9.07)) were significantly associated with an unfavourable appendicitis treatment outcome. Conclusion and recommendation: Nearly a quarter of the patients developed unfavourable treatment outcomes. Elevated white blood cell count and intraoperative appendiceal abscess were significantly associated with unfavourable appendicitis treatment outcome. Therefore, early detection and treatment of appendiceal abscess is crucial for a better outcome.

The value of the erect abdominal radiograph for the diagnosis of mechanical bowel obstruction and paralytic ileus in adults presenting with acute abdominal pain

INTRODUCTION

There is discord on the value of the erect abdominal radiograph for diagnosing acute abdominal pathologies. The erect radiograph can be uncomfortable for patients in pain and increases patient radiation dose.

AIM

To determine if including the erect abdominal radiograph in plain abdominal radiography (PAR) improved diagnostic accuracy for identifying mechanical bowel obstruction and/or paralytic ileus in adults presenting with acute abdominal pain.

METHODS

PAR of 40 consecutive adults presenting with suspected bowel obstruction or paralytic ileus was retrospectively sampled and independently reviewed by two emergency department (ED) consultants and two radiology consultants for bowel obstruction and paralytic ileus across two sessions. In session 1, the assessors assessed the supine abdominal radiographs (PAR 1) and clinical details in a randomised order, and session 2, at least 6 weeks later, they assessed the supine and erect radiographs (PAR 2) and clinical details of the randomly re-ordered cases. Computed tomography was the reference standard. Pair-wise comparisons of receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess for significant differences in participants' diagnostic accuracy using MedCalc 16.4.3.

RESULTS

Average sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were 69.7%, 61.0% and 0.642 for PAR 1, respectively, and 80.0%, 53.4% and 0.632 for PAR 2 respectively. For AUROC there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between PAR 1 and PAR 2. Intra-rater and inter-rater agreement improved in PAR 2.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy when including the erect radiograph in PAR for the acute abdomen.