Pre-Operative Autologous Blood Donation Does Not Affect Pre-Incision Hematocrit in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. A Retrospective Cohort of a Prospective Randomized Trial

Acute normovolemic hemodilution reduced the frequency and amount of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in pediatric and adolescent scoliosis surgery: a retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study is to investigate whether acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) can reduce the frequency and amount of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) (intraoperative ABT and postoperative ABT until discharge from the hospital) in pediatric and adolescent scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study included the perioperative data of 147 patients who were 18 years old or younger and underwent scoliosis surgery. Patients were divided into groups according to whether they received ANH: i.e., an ANH group and control group. Propensity-score-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether ANH can reduce the frequency of perioperative ABT.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were analyzed, 95 and 30 in the ANH and control group, respectively. The intraoperative/postoperative ABT frequency was significantly lower in the ANH group than in the control group (17.9% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.044). The amount of ABT [median (IQR): 0 (0, 0) mL/kg vs. 0 (0, 16.3) mL/kg, p = 0.033] was also significantly lower in the ANH group than in the control group. Propensity-score-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that ANH use [odds ratio: 0.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.03, 0.77; p = 0.023)] was associated with a lower risk of ABT after adjusting for intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery.

CONCLUSION

ANH use can reduce the frequency and amount of perioperative ABT in pediatric and adolescent scoliosis surgery.

Clinical utility of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

More than 7500 children undergo surgery for scoliosis each year, at an estimated annual cost to the health system of $1.1 billion. There is significant interest among patients, parents, providers, and payors in identifying methods for delivering quality outcomes at lower costs. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been suggested as one possible solution. Here the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature describing the clinical and economic benefits of ERAS protocols in pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

The authors identified all English-language articles on ERAS protocol use in pediatric spinal deformity surgery by using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, CINAHL, and OVID MEDLINE. Quantitative analyses of comparative articles using random effects were performed for the following clinical outcomes: 1) length of stay (LOS); 2) complication rate; 3) wound infection rate; 4) 30-day readmission rate; 5) reoperation rate; and 6) postoperative pain scores.

RESULTS

Of 950 articles reviewed, 7 were included in the qualitative analysis and 6 were included in the quantitative analysis. The most frequently cited benefits of ERAS protocols were shorter LOS, earlier urinary catheter removal, and earlier discontinuation of patient-controlled analgesia pumps. Quantitative analyses showed ERAS protocols to be associated with shorter LOS (mean difference -1.12 days; 95% CI -1.51, -0.74; p < 0.001), fewer postoperative complications (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.20, 0.68; p = 0.001), and lower pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 0 (mean -0.92; 95% CI -1.29, -0.56; p < 0.001) and POD 2 (-0.61; 95% CI -0.75, -0.47; p < 0.001). There were no differences in reoperation rate or POD 1 pain scores. ERAS-treated patients had a trend toward higher 30-day readmission rates and earlier discontinuation of patient-controlled analgesia (both p = 0.06). Insufficient data existed to reach a conclusion about cost differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review suggest that ERAS protocols may shorten hospitalizations, reduce postoperative complication rates, and reduce postoperative pain scores in children undergoing scoliosis surgery. Publication biases exist, and therefore larger, prospective, multicenter data are needed to validate these results.