Can We Predict the Progression of Vertebral Collapse in Conservative Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures? A 3-Year Retrospective Study of 180 Patients From the Emergency Department

The influence of sintering of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on the sagittal lumbar profile and degenerative changes

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis, a skeletal disorder affecting nearly 20% of the global population, poses a significant health concern, with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures (VBF) representing a common clinical manifestation. The impact of osteoporotic sintering fractures in the thoracolumbar spine on the sagittal lumbar profile is incompletely understood and may lead to the onset of clinical symptoms in previously asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study analyzed data from patients presenting with osteoporotic spine fractures between 2017 and 2022. Patient selection involved stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on radiologically documented osteoporotic sintering fractures in the thoracolumbar junction (TH11-L2). Clinical parameters were recorded and analyzed, alongside lateral-view radiographic assessments utilizing the IDS 7-PACS®-System (Sectra, Linköping, Sweden). Measurements included total lumbar lordosis, lordosis caudal to the fracture, kyphosis of the fractured vertebra, and sacral slope. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 27 (IBM, Armonk, USA).

RESULTS

Thirty patients (73.3% female, 26.7% male) met the inclusion criteria, with an average age of 82.4 years. Analysis revealed a significant increase in kyphosis of the fractured vertebra in the thoracolumbar spine (p < 0.0001) following further sintering of osteoporotic VBF with increased lordosis caudal to the fracture (p < 0.0001). Total lumbar lordosis remained unchanged, alongside sacral slope measurements (p = 0.612 and p = 0.863, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Progressive sintering of osteoporotic fractures in the thoracolumbar junction accentuates lordosis in underlying segments, potentially exacerbating degenerative changes and symptomatic manifestations. Thus, prioritizing interventions aimed at preventing progressive sintering and restoring sagittal balance is paramount in optimizing treatment outcomes for affected individuals.

Synthetic lumbar MRI can aid in diagnosis and treatment strategies based on self-pix networks

CT and MR tools are commonly used to diagnose lumbar fractures (LF). However, numerous limitations have been found in practice. The aims of this study were to innovate and develop a spinal disease-specific neural network and to evaluate whether synthetic MRI of the LF affected clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies. A total of 675 LF patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. For each participant, two mid-sagittal CT and T2-weighted MR images were selected; 1350 pairs of LF images were also included. A new Self-pix based on Pix2pix and Self-Attention was constructed. A total of 1350 pairs of CT and MR images, which were randomly divided into a training group (1147 pairs) and a test group (203 pairs), were fed into Pix2pix and Self-pix. The quantitative evaluation included PSNR and SSIM (PSNR1 and SSIM1: real MR images and Pix2pix-generated MR images; PSNR2 and SSIM2: real MR images and Self-pix-generated MR images). The qualitative evaluation, including accurate diagnosis of acute fractures and accurate selection of treatment strategies based on Self-pix-generated MRI, was performed by three spine surgeons. In the LF group, PSNR1 and PSNR2 were 10.884 and 11.021 (p < 0.001), and SSIM1 and SSIM2 were 0.766 and 0.771 (p < 0.001), respectively. In the ROI group, PSNR1 and PSNR2 were 12.350 and 12.670 (p = 0.004), and SSIM1 and SSIM2 were 0.816 and 0.832 (p = 0.005), respectively. According to the qualitative evaluation, Self-pix-generated MRI showed no significant difference from real MRI in identifying acute fractures (p = 0.689), with a good sensitivity of 84.36% and specificity of 96.65%. No difference in treatment strategy was found between the Self-pix-generated MRI group and the real MRI group (p = 0.135). In this study, a disease-specific GAN named Self-pix was developed, which demonstrated better image generation performance compared to traditional GAN. The spine surgeon could accurately diagnose LF and select treatment strategies based on Self-pix-generated T2 MR images.

Vertebral compression fractures: pain relief, progression and new fracture rate comparing vertebral augmentation with brace

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is the third most frequent fragility fracture in the world. Conservative treatment, vertebroplasty, and kyphoplasty are all recognized therapies. However, diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations must be more consistent when comparing clinical guidelines. This study aims to compare the efficacy of vertebral augmentation therapy and conservative management for treating VCFs, the risk of subsequent complications, and the length of hospital stay.

METHOD

All patients over 50 years old with a diagnosis of thoracic or lumbar VCF without underlying oncological process, treated conservatively or surgically, and consecutively attended at our department from January 2017 to June 2021 were retrospectively selected for analysis. Patients who missed follow-up or died during the first three months were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 573 cases were selected for analysis. Most patients were treated conservatively (85.3%). Both groups were homogenous regarding epidemiological and clinical features. The median time elapsed to achieve pain relief was significantly lower in the surgical cohort (4.5 vs. 10 weeks, p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients reporting pain at the first outpatient visit was also significantly lower with a vertebral augmentation procedure (p = 0.004). The new fracture rate and the adjacent level rate did not differ significantly when comparing both treatments, whereas the progression of the diagnosed fracture was more frequent in the conservative group (4.8% vs. 29.7%; p < 0.001). The median hospital stay was significantly lower in the conservative group (3 vs. 10 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment (vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty) of VCFs was associated with sooner pain relief without an increased risk of new or adjacent fractures. Moreover, the progression of treated fractures was significantly lower in the surgical cohort. The only unfavorable aspect was the more extended hospital stay compared with the conservative treatment group.

Vertebral compression fractures managed with brace: risk factors for progression

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for vertebral compression fracture (VCF) progression in patients treated conservatively with a brace. Then, a case-control study was designed.

METHODS

All patients over 50 years old with diagnosis of thoracic or lumbar VCF (T5 to L5) in absence of underlying oncological process, treated conservatively with brace, and consecutively attended at our department from January 2017 to June 2021 were retrospectively selected for analysis. Patients missed for follow-up or dead during the first 3 months of follow-up were excluded.

RESULTS

Five hundred and eighty-two consecutive patients were recorded. Incomplete follow-up excluded 74 patients and other 19 died in the first three months after diagnosis, so 489 cases were finally analyzed. Median follow-up was 21 (IQR 13;30) weeks. Increased collapse of the vertebral body was found in 29.9% of VCFs with a median time to progression of 9 (IQR 7;13) weeks. Male gender (OR 1.6), type A3 fracture of the AOSpine classification (OR 2.7), thoracolumbar junction location (OR 1.7), and incorrect use of the brace (OR 3.5) were identified as independent risk factors for progression after multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Male gender, type A3 fracture of the AOSpine classification, thoracolumbar junction location, and incorrect use of the brace were identified as independent risk factors for VCF progression, which resulted in worse pain control, when treated with brace. Thus, other treatments such as percutaneous vertebral augmentation could be considered to avoid progression in selected cases, since collapse rate has been demonstrated lower with these procedures.

Geriatric spine fractures - Demography, changing trends, challenges and special considerations: A narrative review

The aim of this manuscript was to summarize the demography and changing trends of geriatric spinal injuries and to enumerate the challenges and special considerations in the care of geriatric spinal injuries. PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases were searched for literature on geriatric spine fractures using MeSH terms 'aged', 'aged, 80 and over', 'elderly', 'spinal fracture/epidemiology', spinal fracture/therapy∗' and keywords pertaining to the same. The search results were screened for appropriate articles and reviewed. There is a high community prevalence of elderly vertebral fractures ranging from 18% to as high as 51%. The proportion of older patients among the spinal injured is rising as well. There is a higher chance of missing spinal injuries in the elderly and clinical guidelines may not be applicable to this patient group. Classification and surgical treatment are different from younger adult counterparts as the elderly osteoporotic spine behaves differently biomechanically. There is a high incidence of respiratory complications both for surgically and conservatively managed groups. Older age generally is associated with a higher complication rate including mortality.

Therapeutic Effects of Conservative Treatment with 2-Week Bed Rest for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study

UPDATE

This article was updated on October 19, 2022, because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 1787, in the legend for Figure 2, the sentence that had read "The vertebral collapse rate (in %) was defined as 1 - (A/P) × 100, and vertebral instability (in %) was defined as the difference in vertebral collapse rate between the loaded and non-loaded images." now reads "The vertebral collapse rate (in %) was defined as (1 - [A/P]) × 100, and vertebral instability (in %) was defined as the difference in vertebral collapse rate between the loaded and non-loaded images." On page 1788, in the section entitled "Data Collection," the sentence that had read "The vertebral collapse rate (in %) was defined as 1 - (anterior vertebral wall height/posterior vertebral wall height) × 100, and vertebral instability (in %) was defined as the difference in vertebral collapse rate between the loaded and non-loaded images 9 ." now reads "The vertebral collapse rate (in %) was defined as (1 - [anterior vertebral wall height/posterior vertebral wall height]) × 100, and vertebral instability (in %) was defined as the difference in vertebral collapse rate between the loaded and non-loaded images 9 ." Finally, on page 1791, in Table IV, the footnote for the "Primary outcome" row that had read "N = 113 in the rest group and 99 in the no-rest group." now reads "N = 116 in the rest group and 108 in the no-rest group."