Difficulties, Challenges, and the Learning Curve of Avoiding Complications in Lumbar Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Attitudes regarding barriers to entry and the learning curve associated with endoscopic decompression-only surgery: an international survey

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Endoscopic spine decompression surgery (ESDS) offers numerous benefits, including reduced tissue damage, smaller incisions, shorter recovery times, and a lower risk of complications. However, its adoption among spine surgeons in the United States has been slow. The reluctance to adopt ESDS can be attributed to factors such as the learning curve, cost of equipment and training, and limited access to necessary resources.

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study is to assess attitudes toward barriers to and reasons for not adopting ESDS. A secondary objective is to further identify the learning curves, challenges, and common concerns of surgeons considering ESDS adoption.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

An international survey of fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (SMISS).

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 171 fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery voluntarily and anonymously responded to our survey via the RedCap platform. Surgeons were located across the globe, representing six regions.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data on current region of practice, specialty training, time in practice, practice type, and surgical volume was obtained for each surgeon who responded to the survey. Additionally, we obtained data on perceived benefits, barriers to entry, and the learning curve of endoscopic techniques.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, with questions focusing on perceived benefits, barriers to adoption, and the learning curve of endoscopic techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 171 surgeons responded to the survey, representing six regions: North America (48.0%), Asia Pacific (28.7%), and Europe (11.7%). Respondents were trained in Orthopaedic Surgery (59.1%) and Neurological Surgery (35.7%). Experience varied, with 35.9% having over 20 years in practice. Most respondents were in Private Practice (59.6%) or Academic/University settings (39.2%), with the majority practicing in urban areas (67.8%). Surgeons were categorized into the EG (50.3%) who used endoscopic techniques and the NEG (49.7%) who did not. There were no significant differences in training types or work settings between the groups. For the NEG, 23.5% were exposed to endoscopic techniques during training, and 50.6% received specific training in practice, mainly through formal industry courses (76.7%). The primary barriers to adopting ESDS were lack of training (55.3%), unavailability of equipment (50.6%), and financial concerns. EG surgeons cited minimizing tissue trauma, improved access to foraminal pathology, and minimizing recovery time as critical factors for using ESDS. Challenges included concerns for incomplete decompression and the duration of surgery, with significant variation in perceived difficulty during the learning curve.

CONCLUSION

Despite the recognized benefits of ESDS, barriers such as training deficiencies and equipment costs hinder its widespread adoption. Addressing these barriers through enhanced training opportunities and hospital system support could increase the adoption of ESDS, benefiting both surgeons and patients by reducing recovery times and complications.

Applications of endoscopic techniques in spinal oncology: A systematic review of the contemporary literature

INTRODUCTION

At the time of its origination, endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) was introduced to advance minimally invasive spine surgical (MISS) techniques, aiming to reduce tissue traumatization and improve clinical outcomes. Initially, ESS was primarily applied to transforaminal diskectomies for treating low back pain and radiculopathy caused by lateral or posterolateral disc herniations. Early challenges included limited visualization, suboptimal camera systems, and restricted maneuverability of rigid endoscopes. Technological advancements, such as angled endoscopes and interlaminar approaches, have led to a broader adoption of ESS, particularly in Asian countries. As ESS gains traction in the United States, its potential applications continue to expand. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of ESS in the treatment of spinal column tumors.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search across three databases following PRISMA guidelines to identify studies describing the use of spinal endoscopy for procedural or diagnostic management (e.g., biopsy) of spinal and vertebral column tumors, including both primary neoplasms and metastatic lesions. Studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and relevant data were extracted for qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies, encompassing 147 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The most commonly treated tumor types included schwannomas (37.4 %), spinal metastases (15.0 %), meningiomas (7.5 %), and osteoid osteomas (6.8 %). Tumors were most frequently located in the lumbar spine (38.8 %), followed by the thoracic (29.9 %), cervical (12.9 %), craniospinal junction (6.8 %), and sacral regions (6.1 %). Surgical outcomes demonstrated a high rate of neurological improvement (100 %) across all cases. Among studies reporting pain scores, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores showed consistent improvement. The mean follow-up duration was 13.6 ± 10.1 months. Complication rates were low (6.8 %), with transient radiculopathy, pseudomeningocele, and postoperative hematoma among the reported adverse events. The overall mortality rate was 10.9 %, primarily reflecting patients with metastatic disease rather than procedure-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

ESS has demonstrated its utility as a viable and effective option for managing select spinal metastases and intradural-extramedullary tumors of the spinal column. The technique offers minimally invasive access to tumors with low complication rates and meaningful clinical benefits, particularly for frail patients requiring palliative treatment. Future studies with larger cohorts and comparative analyses are needed to further validate ESS as a mainstream approach in spinal oncology.

Evolving Role of Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review

Traditional open lumbar decompression techniques have long been used to relieve spinal canal pressure caused by lumbar spinal stenosis. However, these procedures are associated with significant postoperative pain and prolonged recovery. Over the past few decades, there has been a shift toward minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques designed to minimize tissue trauma, postoperative pain, and recovery time. These advancements represent a major step forward, offering smaller incisions and direct visualization of the spinal canal. Despite the clear benefits of MIS and endoscopic techniques, they also present challenges such as a steep learning curve for surgeons and a risk of incomplete decompression. The present review examines the historical progression from open to MIS and endoscopic lumbar decompression techniques, assessing their clinical outcomes, benefits, and limitations. It highlights the ongoing need for careful application of these methods based on individual patient factors and emphasizes the importance of balancing innovative techniques with evidence-based practices to enhance patient care in spine surgery. The future of lumbar decompression will likely be shaped by further technological advancements, including navigation systems, robotic assistance, and augmented reality, which promise to improve surgical precision and outcomes.

Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant and aggregated data.

OBJECTIVES

To define the learning curves of endoscopic discectomies using unified statistical methodologies.

METHODS

Searches returned 913 records, with 118 full-text articles screened. Studies of endoscopic lumbar spine surgery reporting outcomes by case order were included. Mixed-effects nonlinear, logistic, and beta meta-regressions prdwere conducted to define the learning curves.

RESULTS

13 studies involving 864 patients among 15 surgeons were included in total. For transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, the estimated operating time for the first case was 95 min [CI: 87-104], and the estimated plateau was 66 minutes [CI: 51-81]. An estimated 21 cases [CI: 18-25] were required to overcome 80% of this deficit, but near-plateau performance was expected only after 59 cases [CI: 51-70]. The estimated risk of surgical complications on the first case was 25% [CI: 11%-46%], with an 80% reduction in relative risk requiring an estimated 41 cases. The expected postoperative VAS leg pain score after the first case was 2.7 [CI: 1.8-3.8], with an 80% improvement requiring an estimated 96 cases. Similar numbers were required to overcome the learning curves in interlaminar and biportal endoscopic discectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 60 cases are required to achieve proficiency in endoscopic lumbar spine surgery, although the greatest part of the learning curve can be overcome with 20 cases. This should be considered when designing implementation programmes for surgeons and service providers that wish to incorporate endoscopic spinal surgery into their practice.

Evaluating the learning curve and operative time of interlaminar and transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Introduction

Lumbar disc herniation is common in spine surgery, and endoscopic lumbar discectomy (ELD) offers a minimally invasive alternative with reduced complications. However, the learning curve of ELD, particularly between interlaminar and transforaminal techniques, remains a challenge.

Research question

To determine the learning curve for both interlaminar and transforaminal ELD in terms of operative time, and analyze factors that affect it.

Materials and methods

Single-center retrospective study of 376 patients who underwent ELD between January 2013 and March 2024. In the cohort, 319 were in the interlaminar group and 57 in the transforaminal group. The learning curves were analyzed by CUSUM. The data regarding surgical technique, operative time, and postoperative outcome were analyzed.

Results

The learning curve reached a plateau at 50 cases for the interlaminar technique and 23 cases for the transforaminal technique. Operative time was significantly lower for the transforaminal approach compared to the interlaminar approach: 69.18 ± 28.85 min versus 78.71 ± 28.86 min, p = 0.022. A second learning curve could not be demonstrated for the interlaminar approach in the long term. Operative time was influenced variably by factors such as age, gender, and level of herniated disc between the two techniques.

Discussion and conclusion

Both the interlaminar and transforaminal ELD are minimally invasive techniques with different learning curves. The transforaminal approach shows a steeper learning curve and shorter operative time. The interlaminar approach did not show a second learning curve in the long term.

Endoscopic transfacet Decompression for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Technical Note, Illustrative Clinical Series, and Surgeon Survey Regarding Post-Decompression Instability

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) remains a predominant cause of debilitating back and leg pain, affecting many aging populations. Traditional decompression surgeries can be invasive and pose significant risks and recovery time. This study elucidates the techniques and preliminary outcomes of endoscopic transfacet decompression in treating severe LSS. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 65 patients with severe LSS who underwent endoscopic transfacet decompression. The patient outcomes were analyzed using the VAS for leg pain and the modified Macnab criteria. Pre-operative and post-operative scores were compared, and any complications were analyzed. An online survey was administered to 868 surgeons using Likert-scale ratings to evaluate surgeons' experience with endoscopic decompression in patients with painful spondylolisthesis. The survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Polytomous Rasch analysis to evaluate surgeon endorsement. Results: The study included 65 patients, of which 29 (44.6%) were female and 36 (55.4%) were male, with a mean age of 65.79 ranging from 38 to 84 years. The available mean post-operative follow-up period was 31.44 months, ranging from 24 to 39 months. The VAS score for leg pain reduced significantly from pre-operative 7.54 ± 1.67 to 2.20 ± 1.45 by 5.34 ± 2.03 (p < 0.001) with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 2.626). At the final follow-up, functional Macnab outcomes were reported as excellent by 20 (30.8%), good by 37 (56.9%), fair by 5 (7.7%), and poor by 3 (4.6%) of patients. There were no incidental durotomies, nerve root injuries, wound complications, or instances of post-operative instability. Only five patients (7.7%) developed post-operative dysesthesia. Incomplete decompression led to fair and poor outcomes in 8 (12.3%) patients. No revision surgeries were performed. post-operative instability was not observed. The surgeon survey corroborated these observations, where the polytomous Rasch analysis showed consensus on the effectiveness of the percutaneous endoscopic decompression of low-grade spondylolisthesis. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis showed no significant bias in item responses between orthopaedic and neurosurgeons. Conclusions: The endoscopic transfacet decompression technique delineated herein showcased excellent Macnab outcomes in managing severe LSS, with a combined success rate of 87.7%. Patients also experienced a statistically significant reduction in leg pain. Dysesthesia rates were lower than with the transforaminal approach, likely because of limited exiting and traversing nerve root manipulation. This technique might represent a viable, less invasive alternative to open microsurgical dissection and decompression for patients with severe LSS, where fusion may be required. This approach was found to be highly accepted among endoscopic spine surgeons.

Modified single-incision MIS-TLIF with expandable tubular assistance for degenerative lumbar spine diseases

Objective

Evaluating the clinical value of the modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance for lumbar interbody fusion in managing degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

Method

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 121 patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spine disease treated in our spine surgery department from January 2017 to December 2021. Of these, 72 patients underwent a modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion (single-incision MIS-TLIF group), while 49 patients received the classic open posterior median incision P-TLIF (open surgery group). We collected basic demographic data including age, gender, BMI, and surgical level. Surgical-related indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Laboratory results [whole blood C-reactive protein (CRP), serum creatine kinase (CK)] and clinical outcomes [VAS scores for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), excellent and good rate according to the modified MacNab criteria, and interbody fusion rate according to the Brantigan criteria] were also evaluated.

Result

There were no significant differences in the basic demographics between the two groups. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital costs were also similar between the groups. However, significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and complication rates. On postoperative days 1 and 3, whole blood CRP and CK levels showed marked differences between the groups. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, the single-incision MIS-TLIF group had lower ODI scores and VAS scores for back pain compared to the open surgery group. The excellent and good rate according to the MacNab criteria was higher in the single-incision MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences in leg pain VAS scores and interbody fusion rates at 12 months postoperatively between the groups.

Conclusion

The modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion is highly effective in treating degenerative lumbar spine diseases. It results in less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and significant improvement in postoperative functional outcomes, making it a valuable treatment option.

Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques

Our research examines the learning curves of various minimally invasive lumbar surgeries to determine the benefits and challenges they pose to both surgeons and patients. The advent of microsurgical techniques since the 1960s, including advances in fluoroscopic navigation and intraoperative computed tomography, has significantly shifted spinal surgery from open to minimally invasive methods. This study critically evaluates surgical duration, intraoperative conversions to open surgery, and complications as primary parameters to gauge these learning curves. Through a comprehensive literature search up to March 2024, involving databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, this paper identifies a steep learning curve associated with these surgeries. Despite their proven advantages in reducing recovery time and surgical trauma, these procedures require surgeons to master advanced technology and equipment, which can directly impact patient outcomes. The study underscores the need for well-defined learning curves to facilitate efficient training and enhance surgical proficiency, especially for novice surgeons. Moreover, it addresses the implications of technology on surgical accuracy and the subsequent effects on complication rates, providing insights into the complex dynamics of adopting new surgical innovations in spinal health care.

Impact of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging registration on rehabilitation after percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar stenosis: Retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) shows promise for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treatment, but its use is limited by the disease's complexity and procedural challenges.

AIM

In this study, the effects of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) registration techniques on PELD for LSS and postoperative rehabilitation outcomes were evaluated.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted with data from patients who underwent PELD for LSS between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were assigned to preoperative CT/MRI registration and control groups. Data collected included the operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar spine score. Differences between groups were assessed using Student’s t test.

RESULTS

Data from 135 patients (71 in the CT/MRI registration group, 64 in the control group) were analyzed. The operative time was significantly shorter in the CT/MRI registration group (P = 0.007). At 2 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in VAS leg and low back pain scores (all P < 0.001) and improvements in the JOA score (both P < 0.001). No complication or death occurred. Preoperatively, pain and JOA scores were similar between groups (P = 0.830, P = 0.470, and P = 0.287, respectively). At 2 months postoperatively, patients in the CT/MRI registration group reported lower leg and low back pain levels (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) and had higher JOA scores (P = 0.004) than did patients in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CT/MRI registration for PELD for LSS reduced the operative time and VAS pain scores at 2 months and improved JOA scores, demonstrating enhanced effectiveness and safety.

Evaluating the efficacy of a cost-effective, fully three-dimensional-printed vertebra model for endoscopic spine surgery training for neurosurgical residents

STUDY DESIGN

A fused deposition modeling three-dimensional (3D)-printed model of the L4-5 vertebra for lumbar discectomy was designed. The model included separately printed dura mater, spinal cord, ligamentum flavum, intervertebral disc (from thermoplastic polyurethane), and bony structures (from polylactic acid), and the material cost approximately US$ 1 per model. A simple plumbing endoscope was used for visualization. Dura mater injury was assessed by painting two layers on the dura mater, which peeled off with trauma.

PURPOSE

Endoscopic spine surgery is a subject of high interest in neurosurgery given its minimally invasive nature; however, it has a steep learning curve. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a cost-efficient 3D-printed model when teaching this technique to neurosurgery residents.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Only a few studies have investigated the efficacy of such a model.

METHODS

Eight residents with >2 years of training participated. Residents performed the procedure bilaterally and twice at 1-week intervals.

RESULTS

From the 32 surgeries, four were excluded because of facet removal (as it widened the surgical corridor), leaving 28 surgeries for analysis. Initial surgeries demonstrated a mean operation time of 21 minutes 18 seconds (standard deviation [SD], 2 minutes 32 seconds), which improved to a mean of 6 minutes 45 seconds (SD, 37 seconds) in the fourth surgery (F(3, 17)=19.18, p <0.0001), demonstrating a significant reduction in surgical time over successive surgeries. The median area with the paint removed decreased, from 161.80 (85.55-217.83) to 95.13 mm2 (12.62-160.54), (F(2.072, Inf)=2.04, p =0.128); however, this was not significant. Resident feedback indicated high satisfaction with the educational value of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed fully 3D-printed model provides a viable and scalable option for neurosurgical training programs, enhancing the learning experience while maintaining low costs. This model may be an excellent stepping stone for learning lumbar spine endoscopy, acclimating to the two-dimensional view, progressing to cadaver models, and, eventually, independent surgery.

The First Years of Practice of Young Spine Surgeons in Latin America

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experiences and current situation of AO Spine Fellows in Latin America, as well as the concerns of junior spine surgeons in their first 3 years of practice.

METHODS

A multiple-choice questionnaire was sent to AO Spine Associate Fellows who completed their studies within the past 5 years. This survey aimed to gather information on their professional activities during the initial 3 years of practice following their fellowship. By comparing the responses and activities undertaken by surgeons on a country-by-country basis, it will be possible to describe and analyze the local and regional outcomes in Latin America.

RESULTS

The countries with the highest participation in the AO Spine Fellowship program are currently Argentina (30.7%), Brazil, and Colombia (28.21%). Participants aged 36 to 45 are the age group with the highest engagement (30.7%). Among program participants, 75% are orthopedists. Other notable findings include that 95% of respondents have greater experience and feel more comfortable working in degenerative spine pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, junior fellows in the AO Spine program report a high level of comfort with the initiative. However, our study reveals valuable insights that can contribute to its improvement. It is worth noting that there is a clear preference for the standard posterior approach persists. Nevertheless, there is a growing interest among junior surgeons in endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques. This study serves as a gateway to essential data for future studies and the enhancement of the Fellowship education program in Latin America.

Is Close Supervision by a Senior Surgeon Necessary During the Initial Days of Performing Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy? A Retrospective Comparative Study between Two Fellowship Trained Surgeons to Assess the Learning Curve

Objectives

Endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a minimally invasive technique with a steep learning curve. The studies in the literature base the learning curve on the operative duration. We conducted this study to determine the learning curve based on the presence or absence of supervision by an experienced surgeon.

Materials and Methods

This study involved two spine surgeons (surgeon A and surgeon B), who after their fellowship training from the same institute started practising in two different hospitals with different settings. The data of the first 80 patients operated by these two surgeons were extracted, and the patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. The data were split into first 30 cases and late 50 cases, which were compared to see the difference between the two surgeons.

Results

The first 30 cases were evaluated between the two surgeons, and the most significant difference between the two was the operative duration. There was difference between the two surgeons in approach towards migrated and foraminal/extra foraminal discs (P = 0.02). The surgeon B started operating on upper lumbar levels in his later 50 cases, but the foraminal and extraforaminal disc herniations were rarely treated by surgeon B.

Conclusions

Endoscopic discectomy when supervised by senior faculty helps to reduce the operative duration especially in the initial phases of a surgeon's career. The surgeon under the supervision of a senior faculty performs more of migrated and foraminal herniated discs.

Challenges in Contemporary Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical, Technological, and Patient-Specific Issues

Spine surgery has significantly progressed due to innovations in surgical techniques, technology, and a deeper understanding of spinal pathology. However, numerous challenges persist, complicating successful outcomes. Anatomical intricacies at transitional junctions demand precise surgical expertise to avoid complications. Technical challenges, such as underestimation of the density of fixed vertebrae, individual vertebral characteristics, and the angle of pedicle inclination, pose additional risks during surgery. Patient anatomical variability and prior surgeries add layers of difficulty, often necessitating thorough pre- and intraoperative planning. Technological challenges involve the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced visualization systems. AI offers predictive capabilities but is limited by the need for large, high-quality datasets and the "black box" nature of machine learning models, which complicates clinical decision making. Visualization technologies like augmented reality and robotic surgery enhance precision but come with operational and cost-related hurdles. Patient-specific challenges include managing postoperative complications such as adjacent segment disease, hardware failure, and neurological deficits. Effective patient outcome measurement is critical, yet existing metrics often fail to capture the full scope of patient experiences. Proper patient selection for procedures is essential to minimize risks and improve outcomes, but criteria can be inconsistent and complex. There is the need for continued technological innovation, improved patient-specific outcome measures, and enhanced surgical education through simulation-based training. Integrating AI in preoperative planning and developing comprehensive databases for spinal pathologies can aid in creating more accurate, generalizable models. A holistic approach that combines technological advancements with personalized patient care and ongoing education is essential for addressing these challenges and improving spine surgery outcomes.

Enhancing Cadaver Labs for Endoscopic Spine Surgery: The Glove as the "Lesion"

OBJECTIVE

We describe a novel yet simple training exercise for residents who are being introduced to endoscopic spine surgery.

METHODS

Prior to residents training on the endoscopic interlaminar approach, the course faculty performed an endoscopic transforaminal approach and inserted a small piece of a surgical glove into the ventral epidural space of a cadaveric torso. The transforaminal approach did not alter the anatomy of the interlaminar approach, so the residents were able to practice as if it were a de novo situation. Placing the small "lesion" provided an exercise to confirm the residents were able to safely access the area and provided practice for them to carefully grasp the "lesion" and remove it. Prior to resident training on the endoscopic transforaminal approach, the course faculty utilized an interlaminar approach to place the "lesion." A questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale of agreement was completed by the residents to assess their experience with the training exercise.

RESULTS

Five residents attended the cadaver lab, and 100% strongly agreed that the cadaver lab provided a realistic representation of the procedure demonstrated, the "lesion" removal added to their educational experience, and they were overall satisfied with the educational session.

CONCLUSIONS

One of the lessons learned with this exercise that we will consider in future courses would be to place a radiodense "lesion" that could be visualized on fluoroscopy and serve as a radiologic target to find. This can help guide the trainee in knowing where to search if the "lesion" is more difficult to find.

Establishing case volume benchmarks for ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery of the spine fellowship training

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There has been increasing scrutiny on the standardization of surgical training in the US.

PURPOSE

This study provides case volume benchmarks for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopedic spine surgery fellowship training.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of fellows at ACGME-accredited orthopedic spine surgery fellowships (2017-2022).

PATIENT SAMPLE

N/A.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reported case volume during fellowship training.

METHODS

Case volume percentiles were calculated across ACGME-defined case categories and temporal changes assessed via linear regression. Variability between the highest and lowest deciles by case volume was calculated as fold-differences (90th percentile/10th percentile). Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential targets for case minimum requirements.

RESULTS

A total of 163 spine surgery fellows were included in this study. Total mean reported spine surgery case volume increased from 313.2±122 in 2017 to 382.0±164 in 2022 (p=.19). Most cases were classified as adult (range, 97.2%-98.0%) over pediatric cases (range, 2.0%-2.8%). An average of 322.0 cases were reported and most were classified as laminectomy (32%), posterior arthrodesis (29%), and anterior arthrodesis (20%). Overall variability in total case volume was 2.4 and the greatest variability existed for posterior instrumentation (38.1), application of cage (34.6), anterior instrumentation (20.8), and fractures and dislocations (17.3). If case minimum requirements for total reported cases was assumed at 200 cases, then all spine fellows included in this study would achieve this requirement. However, if case minimum requirements were assumed at 250 total cases, then approximately thirty percent of fellows (n=49) would not achieve this requirement for graduation.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasingly, national societies and accrediting bodies for surgical education recognize the need for standardized training. This study provides benchmarks to inform potential case minimum requirements and help reduce variability during spine fellowship training. Future studies are needed to establish case minimum requirements for spine surgery fellowship training across comprehensive and granular case categories that cover the full gamut of orthopedic spine surgery.

Combined Microscopic Tubular and Endoscopic Approach for Calcified Midline Thoracic Disc Herniation: A Bridge to Endoscopic Discectomy

Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is relatively uncommon and can present with thoracolumbar pain, myelopathy, bladder dysfunction, and motor dysfunction. Midline TDHs and calcified discs are more challenging to access and treat compared to the cervical or lumbar region due to the narrow working corridor around the lungs, ribs, and thoracic spinal cord. Open approaches such as the transthoracic or retropleural approach are particularly morbid. Minimally invasive endoscopic techniques offer decreased tissue dissection and manipulation of the thecal sac but involve a more difficult learning curve. We present a posterolateral approach using a minimally invasive tubular retractor and microscope, which is like minimally invasive techniques many surgeons are already accustomed to using, combined with an endoscope through the tubular retractor. The patient is a 57-year-old female who presented with gait instability due to balance problems and mild bilateral leg "heaviness" and weakness. Her neurologic exam was remarkable for bilateral leg weakness, decreased sensation at the T12 level, hyperreflexia in the bilateral lower extremities, a positive Romberg test, and a wide-based gait. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed disc extrusion at T11-T12 and ligamentum flavum infolding causing mild central canal narrowing, resulting in a mass effect on the cord. We performed a minimally invasive discectomy using a tubular approach combined with an endoscope to access the ventral midline without manipulation of the spinal cord. A combined microscopic and endoscopic may allow surgeons already comfortable with microscopic surgery to master the learning curve of endoscopic techniques.

Outcomes and Complications Associated With the Learning Curve for Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine the impact of the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for clinical outcomes and patient safety.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Endoscopic cervical foraminotomy is a minimally invasive surgical technique emerging in the literature for surgical management of cervical radiculopathy without the use of open incision. The adoption of endoscopic cervical foraminotomy may be hindered by the learning curve, although no review and meta-analysis exists to date on the topic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from database inception until July 11, 2023. Inclusion criteria were articles that examined endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, reported outcomes, and/or complications for endoscopic cervical spine surgery relevant to the learning curve and had full-text. A random effects meta-analysis was performed for outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A total of three articles (n=203 patients) were included from 792 articles initially retrieved. The learning curves from four surgeons were examined with a FWM 21 procedures until the competency phase. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospitalization length ( P =0.669), postoperative recovery room time ( P =0.415), intraoperative blood loss ( P =0.064), and total complication rates (10.9% vs . 1.2%, P =0.139) between endoscopic cervical foraminotomy procedures performed in the learning phase as compared with the competency phase of the learning curve. There was a significant decrease in operative time from the learning phase to the competency phase ( P =0.005).

CONCLUSION

Competency was achieved on the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy after about 21 procedures. There is no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative recovery room time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication rates between the learning phase and the competency phase of the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, noting the relatively small sample size of this study that may underpower this finding.

Outcome of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in Relation to the Surgeon's Experience: Propensity Score Matching

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) presents a challenging learning curve, and the correlation between surgeon experience and clinical outcomes remains contentious. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of PELD performed by a single surgeon at beginner and experienced stages. Propensity score matching selected 150 patients (75 per group) with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Clinical and radiological outcomes, perioperative complications, and adverse events were assessed. Baseline characteristics, pain improvement, patient satisfaction, and radiological outcomes did not differ between the groups. However, operation time was longer in the beginner group than in the experienced group (57.5 min [IQR, 50.0-70.0] versus 50.0 min [IQR, 45.0-55.0], p < 0.001). The beginner group had higher perioperative complication rates (eight patients [10.7%] versus one patient [1.3%], with a hazard ratio of 8.836 [95% CI, 1.077-72.514], p = 0.034) and lower 3-year survival without adverse events (19 patients [25.3%] in the beginner group and 10 patients [13.3%] in the experienced group, p = 0.045). Our findings indicate that the clinical outcomes were more favorable in patients operated on at the experienced stage compared to those treated at the beginner stage.

The challenges of nursing care for patients with lumbar discectomy: A qualitative study

AIM

Patients with lumbar disc surgery experience many different problems during their hospital stay. Nurses also face different challenges in providing care to them. Nonetheless, no study has yet specifically addressed these challenges to the best of our knowledge. This study aimed at exploring the challenges of nursing care for patients with lumbar discectomy.

DESIGN

This qualitative study was conducted in 2022 using content analysis.

METHODS

Eight nurses, three patients with lumbar discectomy, and one physician were purposively selected from the neurosurgery wards of the hospitals affiliated to Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. Semi-structured interviews were conducted for data analysis and the content analysis method recommended by Elo and Kyngas was used for data analysis. The main phases of this method are open coding, grouping, categorization, and abstraction. The MAXQDA 10 software was employed to facilitate data management. Data collection continued to reach data saturation.

RESULTS

The challenges of nursing care for patients with lumbar discectomy were categorized into eleven subcategories and three main categories, namely dominant routine-based practice in the healthcare system, futile attempt for team-based care, and shortages as a major barrier to quality care. There are different personal, professional, financial, structural, and organizational challenges in nursing care for patients with lumbar discectomy which can negatively affect postoperative patient recovery.

Predictors of Clinical Failure after Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery During the Initial Learning Curve

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify clinical factors that may predict failed endoscopic lumbar spine surgery to guide surgeons with patient selection during the initial learning curve.

METHODS

This is an Australasian prospective analysis of the first 105 patients to undergo lumbar endoscopic spine decompression by 3 surgeons. Modified MacNab outcomes, visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were utilized to evaluate clinical outcomes at 6 months postoperatively. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA t tests were performed to measure statistically significant (P < 0.05) associations between variables using GraphPad Prism v10.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing endoscopic lumbar surgery via an interlaminar or transforaminal approach have overall good/excellent modified MacNab outcomes and a significant reduction in postoperative VAS and ODI scores. Regardless of the anatomic location of disc herniations, good/excellent modified MacNab outcomes and significant reductions in VAS and ODI were reported post-operatively, however, not in patients with calcified disc herniations. Patients with central and foraminal stenosis overall reported poor/fair modified MacNab outcomes, however, there were significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively. Patients with subarticular stenosis or an associated spondylolisthesis reported good/excellent modified MacNab outcomes and significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively. Patients with disc herniation and concurrent degenerative stenosis had generally poor/fair modified MacNab outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of endoscopic spine surgery are encouraging with low complication and reoperation rates. However, patients with calcified disc herniations, central canal stenosis, or disc herniation with concurrent degenerative stenosis present challenges during the initial learning curve and may benefit from traditional open or other minimally invasive techniques.

Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery: where are we now?

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that offers comparable efficacy and safety with less collateral damage compared to conventional surgery. To achieve clinical success, it is imperative to stay abreast of technological advancements, modern surgical instruments and technique, and updated evidence.

PURPOSES

To provide a comprehensive review and updates of ESS including the nomenclature, technical evolution, bibliometric analysis of evidence, recent changes in the spine communities, the prevailing of biportal endoscopy, and the future of endoscopic spine surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on ESS for the mentioned topics from January 1989 to November 2022. Three major electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. Covidence Systematic Review was used to organize the eligible records. Two independent reviewers screened the articles for relevance.

RESULTS

In total, 312 articles were finally included for review. We found various use of nomenclatures in the field of ESS publication. To address this issue, we proposed the use of distinct terms to describe the biportal and uniportal techniques, as well as their specific approaches. In the realm of technical advancement, ESS has rapidly evolved from addressing disc herniation and spinal stenosis to encompassing endoscopic fusion, along with technological innovations such as navigation, robotics, and augmented reality. According to bibliometric analysis, China, South Korea, and the USA have accounted for almost three-quarters of total publications. The studies of the biportal endoscopy are becoming increasingly popular in South Korea where the top ten most-cited articles have been published. The biportal endoscopy technique is relatively simple to adopt, as it relies on a more familiar approach, requires less expensive instruments, has a shorter learning curve, and is also well-suited for interbody fusion. The uniportal approach provided the smallest area of soft tissue dissection. While robotics and augmented reality in ESS are not widely embraced, the use of navigation in ESS is expected to become more streamlined, particularly with the emergence of recent electromagnetic-based navigation technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of ESS, as well as an updated summary of current trends in the field, including the biportal and uniportal approaches. Additionally, we summarize the nomenclature used in ESS, present a bibliometric analysis of the field, and discuss future directions for the advancement of the field.

Transforaminal endoscopic thoracic discectomy: surgical technique

The major challenge inherent to the surgical treatment of thoracic disc herniations is that the disc herniation is often ventral to the spinal cord. Posterior approaches are difficult and dangerous due to the morbidity associated with retraction of the thoracic spinal cord. A ventral approach is not feasible due to the thoracic viscera. A lateral transcavitary approach is the standard for treating ventral thoracic disc pathology but is also quite morbid. Transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive technique for treating thoracic disc pathology and it can be performed in the outpatient setting even with the patient awake. Advances in endoscopic camera technologies as well as the availability of specialty instruments that can be used down a working channel endoscope has now made a myriad of spine pathologies accessible to the minimally invasive spine surgeon. The transforaminal approach and the angled endoscopic camera are an ideal combination for creating a technical advantage to accessing thoracic disc pathology in a minimally invasive fashion. The principal challenges to the approach are needle targeting and understanding the endoscopic visual anatomy. Many surgeons interested in pursuing this technique are often deterred by the burden of the cost and time it takes to become adept and performing the technique. Detailed here are the authors' step-by-step technique and illustrative video that demonstrate transforaminal endoscopic thoracic discectomy (TETD).

Endoscopic Techniques for Spinal Oncology: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Due to its ultraminimally invasive nature, endoscopic spinal surgery is an attractive tool in spinal oncologic care. To date, there has been no comprehensive review of this topic. The authors therefore present a thorough search of the medical literature on endoscopic techniques for spinal oncology.

METHODS

A systematic review using PubMed was conducted using the following keywords: endoscopic spine surgery, spinal oncology, and spinal tumors.

RESULTS

Collectively, 19 cases described endoscopic spine surgery for spinal oncologic care. Endoscopic spine surgery has been employed for the care of patients with spinal tumors under the following 4 circumstances: (1) to obtain a reliable tissue diagnosis; (2) to serve as an adjunct during traditional open surgery; (3) to achieve targeted debulking; or (4) to perform definitive resection. These cases employing endoscopic techniques highlight the versatility of this approach and its utility when applied to the right patient and with an experienced surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review suggests that, given the right patient and an experienced surgeon, endoscopic spine surgery should be considered in the armamentarium for spinal oncologic care for both staging and definitive resection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This systematic literature review showed that endoscopic techniques have been successfully applied across the spectrum of care in spinal oncology, from diagnosis to definitive treatment.

Full Endoscopic Transpedicular Technique in the Treatment of High Grade Down Migrated Herniated Disc: An Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes at 12 Months Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

High-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH) such as up-migrated and down-migrated discs are challenging pathologies to treat. High-grade migrated discs are usually sequestered and situated adjacent to the medial pedicle wall. This can be easily addressed if the pedicle is used as an access route. The authors present a retrospective case series of high-grade migrated LDH treated using a full endoscopic transforaminal approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective case series. The clinical outcomes in the patients were evaluated according to improvement in the symptoms as suggested by improvement in Visual Analog Score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores in the immediate postoperative period and at the final follow-up. The radiological outcomes were evaluated using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. After the data were collected and tabulated, descriptive statistics were used for continuous variables. The t test was used to determine the significance of changes in the VAS and ODI scores. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Five patients underwent discectomy using the transpedicular technique, and the mean preoperative VAS scores for the back and leg were 7.2 ± 0.83 and 8.4 ± 0.54, respectively. The mean VAS scores at the final follow-up for the back was 0.2 ± 0.4 and 0 for the leg (P < 0.05). The mean preoperative ODI score was 72 ± 8.3, which improved to 6 ± 4.69 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). All patients had a hospital stay of 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

The full endoscopic transpedicular approach is a good option for treating highly migrated LDH. Surgical planning, including pedicle morphometry and the angle of the approach, should be undertaken preoperatively for the best results.

Clinical Consequences of Incidental Durotomy during Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery in Relation to Intraoperative Epidural Pressure Measurements

Background: Seizures, neurological deficits, bradycardia, and, in the worst cases, cardiac arrest may occur following incidental durotomy during routine lumbar endoscopy. Therefore, we set out to measure the intraoperative epidural pressure during lumbar endoscopic decompression surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study to obtain intraoperative epidural measurements with an epidural catheter-pressure transducer assembly through the spinal endoscope on 15 patients who underwent lumbar endoscopic decompression of symptomatic lumbar herniated discs and spinal stenosis. The endoscopic interlaminar technique was employed. Results: There were six (40.0%) female and nine (60.0%) male patients aged 49.0667 ± 11.31034, ranging from 36 to 72 years, with an average follow-up of 35.15 ± 12.48 months. Three of the fifteen patients had seizures with durotomy and one of these three had intracranial air on their postoperative brain CT. Another patient developed spinal headaches and diplopia on postoperative day one when her deteriorating neurological function was investigated with a brain computed tomography (CT) scan, showing an intraventricular hemorrhage consistent with a Fisher Grade IV subarachnoid hemorrhage. A CT angiogram did not show any abnormalities. Pressure recordings in the epidural space in nine patients ranged from 20 to 29 mm Hg with a mean of 24.33 mm Hg. Conclusion: Most incidental durotomies encountered during lumbar interlaminar endoscopy can be managed without formal repair and supportive care measures. The intradural spread of irrigation fluid and intraoperatively used drugs and air entrapment through an unrecognized durotomy should be suspected if patients deteriorate in the recovery room. Ascending paralysis may cause nausea, vomiting, upper and lower motor neuron symptoms, cranial nerve palsies, hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory and cardiac arrest. The recovery team should be prepared to manage these complications.

THE ACADEMIC IMPACT OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON ENDOSCOPY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE SURGERY OF THE MEXICAN ASSOCIATION OF SPINE SURGEONS – AMCICO

ABSTRACT Introduction: The interest in spinal endoscopy is rising, particularly among younger spine surgeons. Formalized postgraduate training programs for endoscopic spinal surgery techniques are lacking behind. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective survey study amongst participants of the 2022 AMCICO endoscopic surgery symposium. Descriptive and correlative statistics were done on the surgeon’s responses recorded in multiple-choice questions. In addition, surgeons were asked about their clinical experience and preferences with spinal endoscopy, training background, the types of lumbar endoscopic decompression they perform by approach, and future training requirements. SPSS (version 27) statistical software package was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistic measures were used to count responses and calculate the mean, range, standard deviation, and percentages. In addition, chi-square statistics were used to determine the strength of the association between factors. Results: The online survey was accessed by 321 surgeons, of which 92 completed it (53.4%). Demographic data showed the majority of responding surgeons being orthopedic surgeons (73.6%) and under the age of 50 (69.2%), with over half (51.1%) having less than three months of formalized training in endoscopic spinal surgery techniques. Most surgeons practiced uni-portal (58.9%) versus bi-portal (3.4%) spinal endoscopy. The transforaminal approach (65.5%) was preferred over the interlaminar method (34.4%). The bi-portal technique was indicated almost exclusively for the lumbar spine (94.8%). For endoscopically assisted spinal fusions, a uni-portal approach was preferred by 72% of surgeons over a bi-portal procedure (24.5%). 84.1% of respondents were interested in navigation, of which 30.7% preferred optical over electromagnetic technology (18.2%). Robotics was of interest to 51.1% of survey participants. Respondents’ bias was estimated with course attendance assessments, with 37% of surgeons having attended all three days, 27.2% two days, and 16.3% one day. One-fifth of responding spine surgeons did not participate in any curriculum activities but completed the survey. The academic impact of the AMCICO endoscopy symposium was high, with 68.1% of respondents indicating interest in continued training and 61.1% of trainees ready to apply their newly acquired knowledge base to clinical practice. Conclusion: The interest in spinal endoscopy surgery techniques and protocols is high among AMCICO members. Many surgeons are interested in learning advanced endoscopic surgical techniques to integrate the technology into their surgical procedure portfolio to address common painful conditions of the degenerative spine beyond herniated discs and foraminal stenosis. The authors concluded that its academic impact was high based on the responses given by the participating surgeons. Level of evidence III; Retrospective study.

Training to be a spinal endoscopic surgeon: What matters?

Objective

Spinal endoscopic surgery has been promoted rapidly in the past decade, attracting an increasing number of young, dedicated surgeons. However, it has long been denounced for its long learning curve as a factor impeding the development of this state-of-the-art technique. The aim of the present study was to discover what really matters in the educational process of becoming a spinal endoscopic surgeon.

Methods

An online survey consisting of 14 compulsory questions was distributed in April and May 2022 through the First Chinese Spinal Endoscopic Surgeons Skills Competition. Reminders were sent to increase response rates.

Results

Of the 893 emails that were sent, we received 637 responses. A total of 375 (76.7%) surgeons most frequently used endoscopic techniques in their practices. Regardless of their different backgrounds, 284 (75.7%) surgeons thought it would be necessary for a young spinal endoscopic surgeon to perform 300 cases independently in order to become proficient, followed by 500 (n=43, 11.5%), 100 (n=40, 10.7%), and 1,000 (n=8, 2.1%) cases. According to the surgeons, the most difficult aspect of mastering the endoscopic technique is a disparate surgical view (n=255, 68%), followed by adaption to new instruments (n=86, 22.9%) and hand-eye coordination (n=34, 9.1%). The most helpful training method for helping the spinal endoscopic surgeons of younger generations improve is operating on simulation models or cadaver courses (n=216, 57.6%), followed by online or offline theoretical courses (n=67, 17.9%), acquiring opportunities during surgeries (n=51, 13.6%), and frequently participating in surgeries as an assistant (n=41, 10.9%).

Conclusion

From the perspective of surgeons, to be skilled in spinal endoscopic surgery means overcoming a steep learning curve. However, training systems should be given more attention to make them more accessible to younger surgeons so they can work on simulation models or take cadaver courses.

Surgeons’ Perspective, Learning Curve, Motivation, and Obstacles of Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Thailand: Results From A Nationwide Survey

Objective

To report a nationwide survey of the endoscopic spine surgeons across Thailand. Furthermore, the survey will be focused on the perspective of experience, learning curve, motivations, and obstacles at the beginning of their practices.

Materials and Methods

The online survey consisting of 16 items was distributed to spine surgeons who are performing endoscopic spine surgery in Thailand via the Google forms web-based questionnaire to investigate participants' demographics, backgrounds, experience in endoscopic spine surgery, motivations, obstacles, and future perspectives. The data was recorded from January 7, 2020 to January 21, 2022. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results

A total of 42 surveys were submitted by 6 neurosurgeons (14.3%) and 36 orthopedic surgeons (85.7%). From the surgeons' perspective, the average number of cases that should be performed until one feels confident, consistently good outcomes, and has minimal complications was 27.44 ± 32.46 cases. For surgeons who starting the endoscopic spine practice, at least 3 workshop participation is needed. Personal interest (39 selected responses) and trending marketing or business purpose (25 selected responses) were the primary motivators for endoscopic spine surgery implementation. Lack of support (18 selected responses) and afraid of complications (16 selected responses) were pertinent obstacles to endoscopic spine surgery implementation.

Conclusions

The trend of endoscopic spine surgery has continued to grow in Thailand, shown by the rate of implementation of endoscopic spine surgery reported by Thai spine surgeons. The number of appropriate cases until one feels confident was around 28 cases. The primary motivator and obstacles were personal interest and lack of support.