Prostate cancer screening in BRCA and Lynch syndrome mutation carriers

Early diagnosis of prostate cancer in healthy men with germline mutations in DNA Damage Response (DDR) pathways: A literature review and proposal for a screening strategy

INTRODUCTION

Men with mutations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways have a higher risk of developing prostate neoplasia compared to the general population. The best studied alterations are mutations in BRCA1/2, ATM and MMR-Lynch syndrome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review of the clinical and prognostic implications of mutations in DDR pathways, as well as an evaluation of the different screening strategies available for affected patients.

OBJECTIVE

To propose an early diagnostic strategy for men with mutations in DDR pathways.

RESULTS

Current guidelines do not provide clear, specific recommendations for this subgroup of men. Among mutations in the MMR pathway, the germline MSH2 mutation is most strongly associated with prostate cancer. Men with germline mutations in BRCA1/2, ATM, and MSH2 have a higher incidence of prostate neoplasia, tend to develop the disease at a younger age, and are more likely to have aggressive forms of the disease. Furthermore, men with BRCA1/2 mutations have a lower cancer-specific survival rate compared to the general population. In these patients, PSA levels have important limitations in detecting prostate cancer. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate may be more effective than periodic PSA testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mutations in DDR pathways are at increased risk for aggressive prostate neoplasms and require earlier and more intensive screening. PSA-based screening has notable limitations. A screening strategy incorporating multiparametric MRI could offer a more effective strategy for this patient group.

Prostate Cancer: genetics in practice now and in the future

Prostate Cancer (PrCa) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and causes a significant healthcare burden. Recent predictions estimate the incidence of new cases of PrCa will double from 1.4 million in 2020 to 2.9 million by 2040.The known risk factors for PrCa are increasing age, family history, ancestry and genetics. PrCa is one of the most heritable of the more common cancers. The heritability of PrCa is due to both rare moderate to high-risk monogenic variants and more common variants known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which can be used to calculate a polygenic risk score (PRS) for PrCa, while there is some of the genetic risk as yet unexplained. In recent years more PrCa risk-associated SNPs have been identified, increasing over time with the inclusion of more persons of diverse ancestry in studies. The identification of germline variants known to be associated with increased PrCa risk and disease aggressiveness has led to targeted treatments for certain pathogenic variant carriers.This is a mini review of how the genetics of PrCa can impact on screening and early detection of the disease and the treatment and management of the disease when diagnosed.

Prostate Cancer: A Review of Genetics, Current Biomarkers and Personalised Treatments

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men, second only to lung cancer. Despite this, diagnosis and prognosis methods remain limited, with effective treatments being few and far between. Traditionally, prostate cancer is initially tested for through a prostate serum antigen (PSA) test and a digital rectum examination (DRE), followed by confirmation through an invasive prostate biopsy. The DRE and biopsy are uncomfortable for the patient, so less invasive, accurate diagnostic tools are needed. Current diagnostic tools, along with genes that hold possible biomarker uses in diagnosis, prognosis and indications for personalised treatment plans, were reviewed in this article.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several genes from multiple families have been identified as possible biomarkers for disease, including those from the MYC and ETS families, as well as several tumour suppressor genes, Androgen Receptor signalling genes and DNA repair genes. There have also been advances in diagnostic tools, including MRI-targeted and liquid biopsies. Several personalised treatments have been developed over the years, including those that target metabolism-driven prostate cancer or those that target inflammation-driven cancer.

CONCLUSION

Several advances have been made in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, but the disease still grows year by year, leading to more and more deaths annually. This calls for even more research into this disease, allowing for better diagnosis and treatment methods and a better chance of patient survival.

Prostate Cancer: Advances in Genetic Testing and Clinical Implications

The demand for genetic testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is expanding, but there is limited knowledge about the genetic counseling (GC) needs of men. A strong-to-moderate inherited genetic predisposition causes approximately 5–20% of prostate cancer (PCa). In men with prostate cancer, germline testing may benefit the patient by informing treatment options, and if a mutation is noticed, it may also guide screening for other cancers and have family implications for cascade genetic testing (testing of close relatives for the same germline mutation). Relatives with the same germline mutations may be eligible for early cancer detection strategies and preventive measures. Cascade family testing can be favorable for family members, but it is currently unutilized, and strategies to overcome obstacles like knowledge deficiency, family communication, lack of access to genetic services, and testing expenses are needed. In this review, we will look at the genetic factors that have been linked to prostate cancer, as well as the role of genetic counseling and testing in the early detection of advanced prostate cancer.

Hereditary Prostate Cancer: Genes Related, Target Therapy and Prevention

Prostate cancer (PCa) is globally the second most diagnosed cancer type and the most common cause of cancer-related deaths in men. Family history of PCa, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and Lynch syndromes (LS), are among the most important risk factors compared to age, race, ethnicity and environmental factors for PCa development. Hereditary prostate cancer (HPCa) has the highest heritability of any major cancer in men. The proportion of PCa attributable to hereditary factors has been estimated in the range of 5–15%. To date, the genes more consistently associated to HPCa susceptibility include mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) and homologous recombination genes (BRCA1/2, ATM, PALB2, CHEK2). Additional genes are also recommended to be integrated into specific research, including HOXB13, BRP1 and NSB1. Importantly, BRCA1/BRCA2 and ATM mutated patients potentially benefit from Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase PARP inhibitors, through a mechanism of synthetic lethality, causing selective tumor cell cytotoxicity in cell lines. Moreover, the detection of germline alterations in MMR genes has therapeutic implications, as it may help to predict immunotherapy benefits. Here, we discuss the current knowledge of the genetic basis for inherited predisposition to PCa, the potential target therapy, and the role of active surveillance as a management strategy for patients with low-risk PCa. Finally, the current PCa guideline recommendations are reviewed.

DNA damage repair gene mutation testing and genetic counseling in men with/without prostate cancer: a systematic review

Background: Ongoing clinical trials are investigating PARP inhibitors to target the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway in prostate cancer. DDR mutation screening will guide treatment strategy and assess eligibility for clinical trials. Materials & methods: This systematic review estimated the rate of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling among men with or at risk of prostate cancer. Results: From 6856 records, one study fulfilled the inclusion criteria and described men undiagnosed with prostate cancer with a family history of BRCA1/2 mutation who received DDR mutation testing. Conclusion: With only one study included in this first systematic review of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling in men with or at risk of prostate cancer, more research is warranted.