Geriatric oncology and clinical trials

An Annual Symposium on Disparities in Milwaukee, WI, with a 2023 Focus on Older Adults with Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer-related inequities are prevalent in Wisconsin, with lower survival rates for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer patients from marginalized communities. This manuscript describes the ongoing efforts at the Medical College of Wisconsin and potential pathways of community engagement to promote education and awareness in reducing inequities in cancer care.

RECENT FINDINGS

While some cancer inequities are related to aggressive disease biology, health-related social risks may be addressed through community-academic partnerships via an open dialogue between the community members and academic faculty. To develop potential pathways of community-academic partnerships, an annual Cancer Disparities Symposium concept evolved as a pragmatic and sustainable model in an interactive learning environment. In this manuscript, we describe the programmatic development and execution of the annual Cancer Disparities Symposium, followed by highlights from this year's meeting focused on geriatric oncology as discussed by the speakers.

Characteristics of older-patient-specif ic oncological trials: a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov

BACKGROUND

clinical trials dedicated to the older patients with cancer are essential to help to define optimal cancer therapy for this rapidly growing population. Our study aimed to analyse the characteristics and the evolution of older-patient-specific oncological trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.

METHODS

a dataset of 61,120 oncological trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov between 2000 and 2019 was downloaded. Characteristics of older-patient-specific trials were compared with characteristics of age-unspecified trials. Chronological shifts in older-patient-specific trials were also analysed.

RESULTS

of the 49,273 interventional trials eligible for analysis, only 490 (1.0%) were older-patient-specific. More than half of the older-patient-specific trials were phase 2 and enrolled less than 100 patients. Compared with age-unspecified trials, older-patient-specific trials were less likely to be funded by industry (26.9 vs 37.1%), and more likely to be conducted in Europe (44.5 vs 28.3%). During the two time periods between 2000 and 2009, and 2010 and 2019, the proportion of supportive care-oriented trials increased from 1.9 to 13.9%. Concerningly, the use of clinically meaningful end points in older patients such as disease-specific survival, patient-reported outcomes and functional status as a primary end point was uncommon (0.4, 8.1 and 7.3%, respectively). There was no correlation between the number of trials for a given cancer type and relative incidence and mortality. 196/490 (40.0%) of the trials were conducted for patients with haematological cancer.

CONCLUSION

our study helps us to better understand the current state of older-patient-specific oncological trials and provide insights for future development, resulting in the improvement of the care of older patients with cancer.

Oral targeted therapy dose adaptation in older patients with cancer: a real-life French cohort

INTRODUCTION

Oral targeted therapies (OTT) are widely used for cancer management. However, there is no consensus on OTT dose adaptation in older patients with cancer.

METHODS

This non-interventional, retrospective study was a real-life assessment of dose adaptation for six OTT (afatinib, everolimus, palbociclib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and sunitinib), at baseline and during treatment, with the reasons of such changes, in ≥70-year-old patients treated between 02/2016 and 08/2019. Data were compared with univariate models fitted with all variables.

RESULTS

Among the 986 patients treated with OTT, the group of ≥70-year-old patients (n=122) received afatinib (15.6%), everolimus (14.8%), palbociclib (50.8%), pazopanib (9.8%), sorafenib (5.8%), or sunitinib (3.2%). At baseline, the prescribed OTT dose was adapted (reduction) in 29% of ≥70-year-old patients (35/122). These 35 patients were significantly older (mean age: 80 vs 74 years, p <0.001), and had more frequently a performance status score ≥2 (p<0.01) than the other patients (n=87). In the standard dose group, higher toxicity grades (p=0.18) and subsequent dose reduction (41% of patients, 36/87) tended to be more frequent compared with the baseline adapted dose group (26%, 9/35, p=0.1). At the study end, 53% of patients of the whole cohort (65/122) were taking a lower dose than the recommended one.

CONCLUSION

At OTT initiation, dose was adapted in 29% of older adults with cancer, rarely after a formal oncogeriatric evaluation (6.5% of all patients). In the absence of recommendations, clinical studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baseline OTT dose reduction in older adults with cancer.

Treating Elderly Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer is an extremely common cancer that primarily affects individuals aged >65 years. In caring for patients with bladder cancer, clinicians must also consider care of older persons in general. Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) involves multidisciplinary treatment planning, because curative-intent therapy includes either surgery or radiation, with consideration of the role of systemic therapy. As clinicians develop a treatment plan, considering a geriatric oncology perspective may enhance patient care and influence outcomes for this large and growing population. Similarly, treatment plan development must also consider aspects unique to an older patient population, such as altered organ function, increased comorbidity, decreased functional reserve, and perhaps altered goals of treatment. Thus a thorough evaluation inclusive of disease assessment and geriatric assessment is essential to care planning. Population-based data show that as patients with MIBC age, use of standard therapies declines. Given the complexities of coordinating a multidisciplinary care plan, as well the complexities of treating a heterogeneous and potentially vulnerable older patient population, clinicians may benefit from upfront assessments to inform and guide the process. This review highlights the unique treatment planning considerations for elderly patients diagnosed with MIBC.

Real life experience with frontline azacitidine in a large series of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia stratified by MRC/LRF score: results from the expanded international E-ALMA series (E-ALMA+)

Azacitidine (AZA) prolonged overall survival (OS) in the AZA-AML-001 trial. However, few subjects were randomized to AZA or intensive chemotherapy (IC). The Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Leukemia Research Foundation (LRF) developed a score for older AML patients receiving IC or non-intensive regimens, whereas the E-ALMA study validated a score for survival and response in elderly patients receiving AZA in daily practice. Both identified three groups with different risk estimates. This analysis evaluates the efficacy of frontline AZA in older AML patients (N = 710) unfit for IC from different national registries (E-ALMA + series) stratified by the MRC/LRF risk score. Median OS of patients categorized as good, standard and poor-risk groups by the MRC/LRF score was 13.4 (95% CI, 10.8-16), 12.4 (95% CI, 9.9-14.8), and 8.1 months (95% CI, 7-9.1), respectively (p = .0001). In conclusion, this is the largest retrospective cohort of older AML patients treated with AZA.