Dual Tracer 99mTc-Pertechnetate/99mTc-MIBI Dual-Time-Point SPECT/CT Parathyroid Gland Assessment Regarding to Parathyroid Gland Size and Biochemical Parameters - Two Years Single Imaging Centre Experience

Update in imaging tests used for the localization of parathyroid pathology

Preoperative localization of parathyroid pathology, generally a parathyroid adenoma, can be difficult in some cases due to the anatomical variants that these glands present. The objective of this review is to analyse the different imaging techniques used for preoperative localization of parathyroid pathology (scintigraphy, ultrasound, CT, MRI and PET). There is great variability between the different tests for the preoperative localization of parathyroid pathology. The importance of knowing the different diagnostic options lies in the need to choose the most suitable test at each moment and for each patient for an adequate management of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) with surgical criteria.

Factors related to a non-localising technetium 99m sestamibi scan result during parathyroid adenoma imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate factors that are associated with having a non-localising ^99m Tc-sestamibi scan.

DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed on patients that underwent parathyroid surgery performed within a single institution between 2001 and 2018.

SETTING

Single tertiary centre for parathyroid surgery.

PARTICIPANTS

230 patients underwent surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism due to a solitary parathyroid adenoma and had preoperative ^99m Tc-sestamibi imaging.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Variables including age, gender, intra-operative location of parathyroid adenoma, adenoma weight and pre- and postoperative calcium and parathyroid hormone levels were investigated through univariate and multivariate analysis to identify any association with having a non-localising (negative) ^99m Tc-sestamibi scan result.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified that right-sided adenomas (P = .038), superior adenomas (P = .042) and a lower preoperative PTH level (P = .034) were all individual factors associated with having a negative ^99m Tc-sestamibi scan result. Although the weight of the adenoma was significant on univariate analysis (P = .029), this was not demonstrated on multivariate analysis (P = .422).

CONCLUSION

Factors that were associated with having non-localising ^99m Tc-sestamibi scan were right-sided adenomas, superior adenomas and lower preoperative PTH level. Further large prospective multicentre studies are needed to further evaluate these initial findings.

Added Value of Subtraction SPECT/CT in Dual-Isotope Parathyroid Scintigraphy

Background: Adding subtraction single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to dual isotope (I-123 and Tc-99m-sestamibi) subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy is not widely implemented. We aimed to assess the added value of dual isotope subtraction SPECT/CT over single isotope SPECT/CT as an adjunct to dual isotope planar pinhole subtraction scintigraphy. Methods: Parathyroid scintigraphies from 106 patients with an estimated total of 415 parathyroid glands who (1) were diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism, (2) underwent dual isotope subtraction scintigraphy in the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gentofte Hospital, Denmark throughout 2017 and (3) underwent subsequent parathyroidectomy, were included. The original dual isotope planar pinhole subtraction plus dual isotope subtraction SPECT/CT (dual/dual method) exams were retrospectively re-evaluated using only Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT/CT (dual/single method). Statistics were calculated per parathyroid. Surgical results confirmed by pathology served as reference standard. Results: The dual/dual method had higher sensitivity than the dual/single method (82% (95%CI 74%–88%) vs. 69% (95%CI 60%–77%)) while specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were similar (specificity 96% vs. 93%, PPV’s 87% vs. 82% and NPV’s 89% vs. 93%). Reader confidence was higher when employing the dual/dual method (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The dual/dual method can be considered superior to the dual/single method in the preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism.