[Staging and Treatment Response Evaluation in Malignant Lymphomas - Czech Lymphoma Study Group Recommendations According to Criteria Revised in 2014 (Lugano Classification)]

Clinicopathologic analysis of nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphomas, a multicenter retrospective study from China

Background

Nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphomas (nTFHLs) represent a new family of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs), and comparative studies of their constituents are rare.

Methods

This study retrospectively enrolled 10 patients with nTFHL-F and 30 patients with nTFHL-NOS diagnosed between December 2017 and October 2023 at six large comprehensive tertiary hospitals; 188 patients with nTFHL-AI were diagnosed during the same period at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University for comparison.

Results

Compared with nTFHL-AI, nTFHL-NOS patients exhibited better clinical manifestations, lower TFH expression levels, and a lower Ki-67 index. However, no differences in clinicopathological features were observed between nTFHL-F and nTFHL-AI patients as well as nTFHL-NOS patients. According to the survival analysis, the median OS for patients with nTFHL-NOS, nTFHL-AI, and nTFHL-F were 14.2 months, 10 months, and 5 months, respectively, whereas the median TTP were 14 months, 5 months, and 3 months, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed differences in TTP among the three subtypes(P=0.0173). Among the population of patients receiving CHOP-like induction therapy, there were significant differences in the OS and TTP among the nTFHL-NOS, nTFHL-AI, and nTFHL-F patients (P=0.0134, P=0.0205). Both the GDPT and C-PET regimens significantly improved the ORR, OS, and PFS in nTFHL patients.

Conclusion

There are significant differences in the clinical manifestations, pathology, and survival outcomes among the three subtypes of nTFHLs. However, further research with a larger sample size, and involving clinical pathology and molecular genetics is needed to determine the distinctive biological characteristics of these tumors.

Decitabine combined with RDHAP regimen in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent need for effective treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R-DLBCL). This trial investigated the efficacy of decitabine in combination with rituximab, cisplatin, cytarabine, dexamethasone (RDHAP) in R/R-DLBCL.

METHODS

56 patients were divided into two groups (decitabine-RDHAP group. n = 35; RDHAP group, n = 21). The primary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR) and duration of remission (DOR). Secondary objectives were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The ORR was 40% and 33% for decitabine-RDHAP and RDHAP groups, respectively, with no difference between the groups. The DOR for the decitabine-RDHAP regimen was higher than that for the RDHAP regimen (p = 0.044). After a median follow-up of 12.0 months, the median PFS and OS were 7.0 and 17.0 months for in the decitabine-RDHAP group and 5.0 and 9.0 months in the RDHAP group with no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.47, 0.17). The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

The decitabine-RDHAP regimen is effective and well tolerated, and is a promising salvage regimen for R/R-DLBCL.

Efficacy and safety of CD19-specific CAR-T cell-based therapy in secondary central nervous system lymphoma

Encouraging response has been achieved in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma treated by chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells. The efficacy and safety of CAR-T cells in central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) are still elusive. Here, we retrospectively analyzed 15 patients with R/R secondary CNSL receiving CD19-specific CAR-T cell-based therapy. The patients were infused with CD19, CD19/CD20 or CD19/CD22 CAR-T cells following a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. The overall response rate was 73.3% (11/15), including 9 (60%) with complete remission (CR) and 2 (13.3%) with partial remission (PR). During a median follow-up of 12 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 9 months. Of 12 patients with systemic tumor infiltration, 7 (58.3%) achieved CR in CNS, and 5 (41.7%) achieved CR both systemically and in CNS. Median DOR for CNS and systemic disease were 8 and 4 months, respectively. At the end point of observation, of the 7 patients achieved CNS disease CR, one was still alive with sustained CR of CNS disease and systemic disease. The other 6 died of systemic progression. Of the 15 patients, 11 (73.3%) experienced grades 1-2 CRS, and no patient had grades 3-4 CRS. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 3 (20%) patients, including 1 (6.6%) with grade 4 ICANS. All the CRS or ICANS were manageable. The CD19-specific CAR-T cell-based therapy appeared to be a promising therapeutic approach in secondary CNSL, based on its antitumor effects and an acceptable side effect profile, meanwhile more strategies are needed to maintain the response.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of humanized anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on the comprehensive geriatric assessment system

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has led to unprecedented results to date in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), yet its clinical application in elderly patients with R/R DLBCL remains somewhat limited. In this study, a total of 31 R/R DLBCL patients older than 65 years of age were enrolled and received humanized anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Patients were stratified into a fit, unfit, or frail group according to the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The fit group had a higher objective response (OR) rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate than that of the unfit/frail group, but there was no difference in the part response (PR) rate between the groups. The unfit/frail group was more likely to experience AEs than the fit group. The peak proportion of anti-CD19 CAR T-cells in the fit group was significantly higher than that of the unfit/frail group. The CGA can be used to effectively predict the treatment response, adverse events, and long-term survival.

[Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of 40 cases of primary systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma]

目的

分析原发系统型间变性大细胞淋巴瘤（ALCL）的临床特征及预后因素。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年12月期间在浙江大学医学院附属第一医院住院治疗的40例ALCL患者的临床资料，总结其临床特征并分析其预后相关因素。

结果

①40例患者中男29例，女11例，中位年龄41（14～67）岁，Ann Arbor分期Ⅲ～Ⅳ期36例（90.0％），IPI评分中高危、高危23例（57.5％）；25例（62.5％）有B症状，发热最为常见，其次为消瘦、盗汗；38例（95.0％）有结外侵犯；25例（62.5％）LDH升高；25例（62.5％）Ki-67≥80％；ALK阳性22例（55.0％），中位年龄29（14～67）岁，ALK阴性18例（45.0％），中位年龄51.5（19～67）岁，年龄差异有统计学意义（P＝0.003）。②40例患者均接受化疗，采用CHOP（环磷酰胺+多柔比星+长春地辛+泼尼松）方案18例，ECHOP（依托泊苷+CHOP）方案12例，其他方案10例；26例（65.0％）获得完全缓解（CR），ALK阴性（P＝0.029，OR＝13.458）和Ki-67≥80％（P＝0.04，OR＝14.453）是CR的独立影响因素，ECHOP方案的CR率高于CHOP方案［83.3％（10/12）对38.9％（7/18），P＝0.026］。③LDH水平、IPI评分、ALK表达情况以及化疗方案的选择对无进展生存（PFS）和总生存（OS）影响有统计学意义（P<0.05）。

结论

ALCL发病男性居多，青少年至中老年均有发病，ALK阳性中年轻患者居多，诊断时临床分期晚，多数患者有结外侵犯，半数以上患者有B症状、LDH升高、Ki-67高表达；ALK表达与否、Ki-67表达水平以及化疗方案的选择可影响疗效，LDH水平、IPI评分、ALK表达与否以及化疗方案的选择可影响PFS和OS；ECHOP是较优的化疗方案，可改善预后。

High expression levels of TLR9 and PD-L1 indicates a poor prognosis in patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study of 88 cases in a single center

Background: The role of TLR9 expressed by tumor cells in evading immune surveillance was confirmed. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells plays a key role in tumor immune escape, which is associated with poor prognosis. However, the clinical relevance of TLR9 and PD-L1 expression in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) has not been evaluated.

Materials and methods: In this study, we identified differentially expressed genes in AITL samples by bioinformatic analysis, and we first examined TLR9 and PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemical staining in patients with AITL and compared these data with clinical features and survival time.

Results: It was found that the expression of PD-L1 and multiple TLRs was higher in AITL than normal T-cell samples, and TLR9 and PD-L1 expression displayed complex interactions by bioinformatic analysis. The rates of TLR9 and PD-L1 high expression were 69% and 50%, respectively. High expression of either TLR9 or PD-L1 indicated a poor survival rate for patients with AITL. Multivariate analysis further confirmed that high expression levels of TLR9 and PD-L1 were unfavorable prognostic factors for AITL. We further found inferior overall survival in AITL with clinical features of ECOG status ≥ 2, advanced-stage, elevated serum LDH levels, elevated serum β₂-MG levels, and high IPI score.

Conclusion: TLR9 and PD-L1 expression may be a novel predictor of prognosis for patients with AITL and may serve as potential therapeutic strategy.