1
|
Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Eight Commercial Assays for the Detection of Measles Virus-Specific IgM Antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59:JCM.03161-20. [PMID: 33731415 PMCID: PMC8315954 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.03161-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) has targeted measles for global eradication through mass immunization. For effective monitoring of eradication targets, high-quality surveillance is needed. The detection of IgM antibodies, specific to the measles virus, with the use of commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA or EIA) is broadly used within the WHO global measles and rubella laboratory network for laboratory confirmation, and in particular, ELISA kits manufactured by Siemens (Enzygnost kits) have been primarily used. Spurred by the discontinuation of these kits, this study aims to report on the clinical sensitivity and specificity of comparable commercial ELISA kits and one automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) method. A panel of 239 serum samples was assembled that included sera from confirmed measles cases (n = 50) and probable post-MMR vaccine response (n = 2). Measles-negative sera (n = 187) were collected from individuals presenting with other fever and rash illnesses. A total of 7 ELISA kits (Euroimmun native antigens and recombinant nucleoprotein, IBL, Clin-Tech Microimmune, NovaTec NovaLisa, Serion, and Siemens Enzygnost) and one CLIA method (DiaSorin LIAISON XL) were evaluated. The ELISA kits included two IgM capture methods and five indirect methods. Calculated sensitivities and specificities ranged from 75.0% to 98.1% and 86.6% to 99.5%, respectively. The parvovirus B19 IgM positive sera were noted to cause false-positive results, particularly for the ELISA kits from Serion and NovaLisa; specificities for this subset of samples ranged from 51.4% to 100.0%. The capture IgM ELISA methods provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramsay LC, Crowcroft NS, Thomas S, Aruffo E, Teslya A, Heffernan JM, Gournis E, Hiebert J, Jaeger V, Jiaravuthisan M, Sharron J, Severini A, Deeks SL, Gubbay J, Mazzulli T, Sander B. Cost-effectiveness of measles control during elimination in Ontario, Canada, 2015. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 24. [PMID: 30892178 PMCID: PMC6425553 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2019.24.11.1800370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundGiven that measles is eliminated in Canada and measles immunisation coverage in Ontario is high, it has been questioned whether Ontario's measles outbreak response is worthwhile.AimOur objective was to determine cost-effectiveness of measles containment protocols in Ontario from the healthcare payer perspective.MethodsWe developed a decision-analysis model comparing Ontario's measles containment strategy (based on actual 2015 outbreak data) with a hypothetical 'modified response'. The modified scenario assumed 10% response costs with reduced case and contact tracing and no outbreak-associated vaccinations; it was based on local and provincial administrative and laboratory data and parameters from peer-reviewed literature. Short- and long-term health outcomes, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs discounted at 1.5%, were estimated. We conducted one- and two-way sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe 2015 outbreak in Ontario comprised 16 measles cases and an estimated 3,369 contacts. Predictive modelling suggested that the outbreak response prevented 16 outbreak-associated cases at a cost of CAD 1,213,491 (EUR 861,579). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was CAD 739,063 (EUR 524,735) per QALY gained for the outbreak response vs modified response. To meet the commonly accepted cost-effectiveness threshold of CAD 50,000 (EUR 35,500) per QALY gained, the outbreak response would have to prevent 94 measles cases. In sensitivity analyses, the findings were robust.ConclusionsOntario's measles outbreak response exceeds generally accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds and may not be the most efficient use of public health resources from a healthcare payer perspective. These findings should be balanced against benefits of increased vaccine coverage and maintaining elimination status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Ramsay
- University Health Network, Eaton Building, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha S Crowcroft
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Effie Gournis
- Toronto Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne Hiebert
- Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Alberto Severini
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Shelley L Deeks
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tony Mazzulli
- University Health Network, Eaton Building, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beate Sander
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University Health Network, Eaton Building, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Science M, Savage R, Severini A, McLachlan E, Hughes SL, Arnold C, Richardson S, Crowcroft N, Deeks S, Halperin S, Brown K, Hatchette T, Gubbay J, Mazzulli T, Bolotin S. Measles Antibody Levels in Young Infants. Pediatrics 2019; 144:peds.2019-0630. [PMID: 31753911 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-0630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infants are often assumed to be immune to measles through maternal antibodies transferred during pregnancy and, in many countries, receive their first measles-containing vaccine at 12 to 15 months. Immunity may wane before this time in measles-eliminated settings, placing infants at risk for measles and complications. We investigated humoral immunity to measles in infants <12 months of age in Ontario, Canada. METHODS We selected sera collected at a tertiary pediatric hospital from infants <12 months who were born at ≥37 weeks' gestational age. We excluded infants with conditions that affect antibody levels. We selected ≤25 sera from 8 predetermined age bands and tested them for measles-neutralizing antibody using the plaque-reduction neutralization test. We calculated the proportion immune at each age band, and predictors of infant susceptibility were assessed by using multivariable logistic regression and Poisson regression. RESULTS Of 196 infant sera, 56% (110 of 196) were from boys, and 35% (69 of 196) were from infants with underlying medical conditions. In the first month, 20% (5 of 25) of infants had antibodies below the protective threshold, which increased to 92% (22 of 24) by 3 months. By 6 months, all infants had titers below the protective threshold. In a multivariable analysis, infant age was the strongest predictor of susceptibility (odds ratio = 2.13 for each additional month increase; 95% confidence interval: 1.52-2.97). CONCLUSIONS Most infants were susceptible to measles by 3 months of age in this elimination setting. Our findings inform important policy discussions relating to the timing of the first dose of measles-containing vaccine and infant postexposure prophylaxis recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Science
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, and .,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Departments of Paediatrics and
| | - Rachel Savage
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alberto Severini
- National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Elizabeth McLachlan
- National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Callum Arnold
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, and
| | - Susan Richardson
- Division of Microbiology, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha Crowcroft
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shelley Deeks
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology (CCfV), IWK Health Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA), and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada; and
| | - Kevin Brown
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Todd Hatchette
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology (CCfV), IWK Health Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA), and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada; and
| | - Jonathan Gubbay
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, and.,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Departments of Paediatrics and.,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada
| | - Tony Mazzulli
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shelly Bolotin
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; .,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tustin JL, Crowcroft NS, Gesink D, Johnson I, Keelan J, Lachapelle B. User-Driven Comments on a Facebook Advertisement Recruiting Canadian Parents in a Study on Immunization: Content Analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2018; 4:e10090. [PMID: 30249585 PMCID: PMC6231725 DOI: 10.2196/10090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 06/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background More people are searching for immunization information online and potentially being exposed to misinformation and antivaccination sentiment in content and discussions on social media platforms. As vaccination coverage rates remain suboptimal in several developed countries, and outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases become more prevalent, it is important that we build on previous research by analyzing themes in online vaccination discussions, including those that individuals may see without actively searching for information on immunization. Objective The study aimed to explore the sentiments and themes behind an unsolicited debate on immunization in order to better inform public health interventions countering antivaccination sentiment. Methods We analyzed and quantified 117 user-driven open-ended comments on immunization posted in the Comments section of a Facebook advertisement that targeted Canadian parents for recruitment into a larger study on immunization. Then, 2 raters coded all comments using content analysis. Results Of 117 comments, 85 were posted by unique commentators, with most being female (65/85, 77%). The largest proportion of the immunization comments were positive (51/117, 43.6%), followed by negative (41/117, 35.0%), ambiguous (20/117, 17.1%), and hesitant (5/117, 4.3%). Inaccurate knowledge (27/130, 20.8%) and misperceptions of risk (23/130, 17.7%) were most prevalent in the 130 nonpositive comments. Other claims included distrust of pharmaceutical companies or government agencies (18/130, 13.8%), distrust of the health care system or providers (15/130, 11.5%), past negative experiences with vaccination or beliefs (10/130, 7.7%), and attitudes about health and prevention (10/130, 7.7%). Almost 40% (29/74, 39%) of the positive comments communicated the risks of not vaccinating, followed by judgments on the knowledge level of nonvaccinators (13/74, 18%). A total of 10 positive comments (10/74, 14%) specifically refuted the link between autism and vaccination. Conclusions The presence of more than 100 unsolicited user-driven comments on a platform not intended for discussion, nor providing any information on immunization, illustrates the strong sentiments associated with immunization and the arbitrariness of the online platforms used for immunization debates. Health authorities should be more proactive in finding mechanisms to refute misinformation and misperceptions that are propagating uncontested online. Online debates and communications on immunization need to be identified by continuous monitoring in order for health authorities to understand the current themes and trends, and to engage in the discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Lee Tustin
- School of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Natasha Sarah Crowcroft
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dionne Gesink
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ian Johnson
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Keelan
- Department of Public Health, Concordia University of Edmonton, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brower JL. The Threat and Response to Infectious Diseases (Revised). MICROBIAL ECOLOGY 2018; 76:19-36. [PMID: 27480226 PMCID: PMC7080028 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-016-0806-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The threat from microorganisms is complex, and the approaches for reducing the challenges the world is facing are also multifaceted, but a combination approach including several simple steps can make a difference and reduce morbidity and mortality and the economic cost of fighting infectious diseases. This paper discusses the continually evolving infectious disease landscape, contributing factors in the rise of the threat, reasons for optimism, and the policies, technologies, actions, and institutions that might be harnessed to further reduce the dangers introduced by pathogens. It builds upon and updates the work of other authors that have recognized the dangers of emerging and re-emerging pathogens and have explored and documented potential solutions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Thomas S, Hiebert J, Gubbay JB, Gournis E, Sharron J, Severini A, Jiaravuthisan M, Shane A, Jaeger V, Crowcroft NS, Fediurek J, Sander B, Mazzulli T, Schulz H, Deeks SL. Measles Outbreak with Unique Virus Genotyping, Ontario, Canada, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 2018. [PMID: 28628461 PMCID: PMC5512469 DOI: 10.3201/eid2307.161145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The province of Ontario continues to experience measles virus transmissions despite the elimination of measles in Canada. We describe an unusual outbreak of measles in Ontario, Canada, in early 2015 that involved cases with a unique strain of virus and no known association among primary case-patients. A total of 18 cases of measles were reported from 4 public health units during the outbreak period (January 25–March 23, 2015); none of these cases occurred in persons who had recently traveled. Despite enhancements to case-patient interview methods and epidemiologic analyses, a source patient was not identified. However, the molecular epidemiologic analysis, which included extended sequencing, strongly suggested that all cases derived from a single importation of measles virus genotype D4. The use of timely genotype sequencing, rigorous epidemiologic investigation, and a better understanding of the gaps in surveillance are needed to maintain Ontario’s measles elimination status.
Collapse
|
7
|
Waning of measles maternal antibody in infants in measles elimination settings - A systematic literature review. Vaccine 2018; 36:1248-1255. [PMID: 29398276 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Revised: 12/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most infants are born with immunity to measles through maternal antibodies transferred in pregnancy, which decay over time. However, in measles elimination settings, where measles does not circulate endemically and most immunity is from immunization rather than infection, maternal antibody levels are lower. This results in infant immunity that wanes earlier, and a wider susceptibility gap between maternal antibody decay and infant immunization than in non-eliminated settings. We aimed to systematically quantify the extent and duration of protection from measles in infants in settings that have sustained measles elimination. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies of measles maternal antibody waning in infants in measles elimination settings. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, BIOSIS Previews, and Global Health databases for relevant studies. Studies were included if they were set in countries that had eliminated measles for ≥3 years, and if the study cohort included healthy, full-term, unvaccinated infants ≤12 months, born to healthy mothers, and reported a relevant measure of measles maternal antibody in infants. We assessed study quality using the MetaQAT tool. RESULTS We identified 4692 unique citations, eight of which met inclusion criteria. One study reported anti-measles antibody in cord blood, six reported antibody in infant sera, and one reported both. Two studies reported that 80 and 100% of infants were protected from measles at birth. One study reported no protection amongst 3-7 month old infants, and another reported limited protection in infants >4 months. The remaining studies reported the proportion of infants with detected antibody, but not the proportion immune. CONCLUSION Although limited, these data suggest that in settings that have sustained measles elimination, some infants are susceptible to measles well before the age of routine measles immunization. Setting-specific seroprevalence and vaccine effectiveness studies are required to evaluate this in different jurisdictions.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bolotin S, Lim G, Dang V, Crowcroft N, Gubbay J, Mazzulli T, Schabas R. The utility of measles and rubella IgM serology in an elimination setting, Ontario, Canada, 2009-2014. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0181172. [PMID: 28850604 PMCID: PMC5574571 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In Canada, measles was eliminated in 1998 and rubella in 2000. Effective measles and rubella surveillance is vital in elimination settings, hinging on reliable laboratory methods. However, low-prevalence settings affect the predictive value of laboratory tests. We conducted an analysis to determine the performance of measles and rubella IgM testing in a jurisdiction where both infections are eliminated. 21,299 test results were extracted from the Public Health Ontario Laboratories database and 1,239 reports were extracted from the Ontario Integrated Public Health Information System (iPHIS) from 2008 and 2010 for measles and rubella, respectively, to 2014. Deterministic linkage resulted in 658 linked measles records (2009-2014) and 189 linked rubella records (2010-2014). Sixty-six iPHIS measles entries were classified as confirmed cases, of which 53 linked to laboratory data. Five iPHIS rubella entries were classified as confirmed, all linked to IgM results. The positive predictive value was 17.4% for measles and 3.6% for rubella. Sensitivity was 79.2% for measles and 100.0% for rubella. Specificity was 65.7% for measles and 25.8% for rubella. Our study confirms that a positive IgM alone does not confirm a measles case in elimination settings. This has important implications for countries that are working towards measles and rubella elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelly Bolotin
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gillian Lim
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vica Dang
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha Crowcroft
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Gubbay
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tony Mazzulli
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard Schabas
- Hastings Prince Edward Public Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sherrard L, Hiebert J, Cunliffe J, Mendoza L, Cutler J. Measles surveillance in Canada: 2015. CANADA COMMUNICABLE DISEASE REPORT = RELEVE DES MALADIES TRANSMISSIBLES AU CANADA 2016; 42:139-145. [PMID: 29770019 PMCID: PMC5757721 DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v42i07a01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measles has been eliminated in Canada since 1998. Every year, the Public Health Agency of Canada presents epidemiologic evidence to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) to verify that measles elimination continues in Canada. OBJECTIVE To describe measles activity in Canada for 2015 as updated evidence for continued measles elimination status. METHODS Measles surveillance data were captured by the Canadian Measles and Rubella Surveillance System (CMRSS) and the Measles and Rubella Surveillance (MARS) pilot project and assessed for distribution by demographics and risk factors. Outbreak characteristics were summarized and genotypic and phylogenetic analyses were conducted and described. Surveillance data for 2015 were evaluated against PAHO's essential criteria for measles elimination status. RESULTS In 2015, the incidence of measles in Canada was 5.5 cases per 1,000,000 population, with 196 cases across four provinces. The majority of cases (87.2%, n=171) were not immunized and both age-specific incidence rates and case counts were highest among those aged 10 to 14 years (29.5 cases per 1,000,000 population, n=55). This was due in large part to a sizeable outbreak in a non-immunizing religious community. Overall, 10.7% (n=21) of cases were hospitalized. Genotype information was available for 100% of measles events (4/4 outbreaks and 6/6 sporadic cases). Canada met or partially met most of PAHO's criteria for verification of measles elimination. CONCLUSION Although importations and areas of low immunization coverage continue to challenge Canada's elimination status, surveillance data for 2015 provides strong evidence that measles elimination has been maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Sherrard
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - J Hiebert
- National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB
| | - J Cunliffe
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - L Mendoza
- National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB
| | - J Cutler
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sherrard L, Hiebert J, Squires S. Measles surveillance in Canada: Trends for 2014. CANADA COMMUNICABLE DISEASE REPORT = RELEVE DES MALADIES TRANSMISSIBLES AU CANADA 2015; 41:157-168. [PMID: 29769947 PMCID: PMC5864420 DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v41i07a01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measles elimination status was achieved in Canada in 1998. The Public Health Agency of Canada compiles evidence for the Pan American Health Organization to confirm that criteria for the verification of measles elimination continue to be met. OBJECTIVE To describe measles activity in Canada for 2014 in order to support Canada's ongoing measles elimination status. METHODS Using data captured by the Canadian Measles and Rubella Surveillance System and the Measles and Rubella Surveillance pilot project during 2014, the distribution of measles cases by demographics, immunization status and hospitalization were assessed, outbreak characteristics were summarized and genotypic and phylogenetic analyses were conducted and described. RESULTS During 2014, 418 measles cases were reported by five provinces and territories for an overall incidence rate of 11.8 cases per 1,000,000 population. Case counts and incidence rates were highest among those five to 14 years of age and the majority of cases were not immunized. Overall, five percent of cases were hospitalized, most frequently the youngest and oldest age groups. Eighteen outbreaks were reported, the largest of which occurred in a non-immunizing religious community in British Columbia. Genotype information was available for 98% of measles events (18/18 outbreaks and 31/32 sporadic cases). Canada continued to meet or partially meet all four of PAHO's criteria for verification of measles elimination. CONCLUSION Despite significant measles activity in 2014, Canada continues to provide strong evidence that measles elimination status is being maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Sherrard
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - J Hiebert
- National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB
| | - S Squires
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eccles KM, Bertazzon S. Applications of geographic information systems in public health: A geospatial approach to analyzing MMR immunization uptake in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2015; 106:e355-61. [PMID: 26680425 DOI: 10.17269/cjph.106.4981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Revised: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 05/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the temporal, spatial, and spatio-temporal variation of immunization rates for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) immunization in the province of Alberta. The study uses yearly immunization rate data for Health Zones and Local Geographic Areas (2004-2012), which were obtained from Alberta Health's Interactive Health Data Application (IHDA). METHODS Spatial analyses include a global spatial analysis, Moran's I, and local indicators of spatial association (LISA) analysis - Getis and Ord's G* - to identify clusters of high or low immunization rates. Spatial methods are then applied to a time series analysis to examine how the immunization rates change over time in conjunction with space. RESULTS Mapped results indicate decreasing immunization rates over time for the majority of the province where most local geographic areas (LGAs) fall short of the 95% herd immunity threshold. Clusters of high immunization rates in the metropolitan centres, and clusters of low immunization rates in the southern and northern region of the province exist spatially and spatio-temporally. Over time, the high rate clusters are decreasing in size and the low rate clusters are increasing. CONCLUSION This research provides a localized geographic approach to assessing MMR immunization rates in Alberta. Findings from this research can be used to target public health interventions to specific areas that exhibit the lowest immunization rates. These results can also be used for hypothesis generation in future research on barriers to immunization uptake.
Collapse
|