Genomic and Molecular Characterization of Brain Tumors in Asian and Non-Asian Patients of Los Angeles: A Single Institution Analysis

Associations of race and socioeconomic status with outcomes after intracranial meningioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Social determinants of health broadly affect healthcare access and outcomes. Studies report that minorities and low socioeconomic status (SES) patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection demonstrate worse outcomes and higher mortality rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the available research reporting racial and SES disparities in intracranial meningioma resection outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines and included peer-reviewed, English-language articles from the United States between 2000 and 2022 that reported racial and SES disparities in meningioma outcomes. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), extent of resection (EOR), hospitalization costs, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, recurrence, and receipt of surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed only on survival outcomes by race. All other variables were summarized as a systematic review.

RESULTS

633 articles were identified; 19 studies met inclusion criteria. Black or low SES patients were more likely to have increased hospitalization costs, rates of 30-day readmission, LOS, recurrence and less likely to undergo surgery, gross total resection, and adjuvant radiotherapy for their tumors. Six studies were used for the quantitative meta-analysis of race and OS. Compared to White patients, Black patients had significantly worse survival outcomes, and Asian patients had significantly better survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Disparities in outcomes exist for patients who undergo surgery for meningioma, such that Black and low SES patients have worse outcomes. The literature is quite sparse and contains confounding relationships not often accounted for appropriately. Further studies are needed to help understand these disparities to improve outcomes.

Geographic disparities in access to glioblastoma treatment based on Hispanic ethnicity in the United States: Insights from a national database

BACKGROUND

Access to treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) can be impacted by multiple demographic parameters. Barriers specific to the Hispanic population of the United States (US) are not fully understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate geographic disparities for access to GBM treatment in the US Hispanic population.

METHODS

All GBM patients with known Hispanic ethnicity status (and Caucasian race) in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) between the years 2005-2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment statuses of surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and triple therapy (resection, chemotherapy and radiation) were summarized, and analyzed by comparison and regression analyses over US Census regions.

RESULTS

A total cohort size of 40,232 Caucasian GBM patients were included, with 3,111 (8%) identifying as Hispanic. The odds of treatment by chemotherapy (OR 0.78, P < 0.01), radiation therapy (OR 0.82, P < 0.01) and triple therapy (OR 0.84, P < 0.01) were all significantly lower in the Hispanic group versus non-Hispanic group. The odds of being treated in the Hispanic group were significantly lower in multiple Census regions with respect to surgical resection (New England, OR 0.51; Mountain, OR 0.68), chemotherapy (East North Central, OR 0.77; Middle Atlantic, OR 0.71; Pacific, OR 0.77), radiation therapy (Middle Atlantic, OR 0.77) and triple therapy (New England, OR 0.49; Middle Atlantic, OR 0.87; Pacific, OR 0.84). Significant barriers to triple therapy in the Hispanic group within these regions were older age (OR 0.97; P < 0.01), treatment in a community facility (OR 0.85, P = 0.03), lack of insurance (OR 0.71, P = 0.03), yearly income < $40,227 (OR 0.69, P < 0.01), low education levels (OR 0.75, P = 0.03) and presence of co-morbidity (OR 0.82; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Currently in the US, there exists heterogenous geographic disparities for Hispanic GBM patients to access different treatments compared to non-Hispanic patients. Multiple circumstances can influence access to treatment within the Hispanic community of these regions, and greater investigation with more granularity required to reveal mechanisms in which these disparities may be addressed in the future.

The effect of race on the prognosis of the glioblastoma patient: a brief review

Objectives: Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, and despite decades of intensive research regarding its pathophysiology and treatment, the prognosis for glioblastoma patients remains poor. While many studies have analyzed various factors that may influence survival outcomes, the focus of this brief review is to discuss the influence that apatient's race/ethnicity has on survival. This factor has been investigated in large population-based studies and in smaller institutional analyses, but the prognostic utility of this factor has been inconsistent. Discussion of this topic is therefore warranted to better equip providers to counsel and treat patients with glioblastoma, as well as to identify areas of future research. Methods: A comprehensive literature search is performed to identify studies that reported GBM survival outcomes by race/ethnicity. Results: Although some discrepancies exist, asignificant survival benefit is associated with the Asian or Pacific Islander (API) race, whereas white patients have the poorest survival and highest incidence. Hispanic patients tend to fare better than white patients but have worse survival than APIs. Discussion: Further analysis into the differences in survival among different races may lead to an increased understanding of potential molecular and genetic targets, thus guiding future treatment plans for these patients. Abbreviations: AAAIR: Average Annual Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate; AI/AN: American Indian or Alaska Native; API: Asian or Pacific Islander; CBTRUS: Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States; CUMC: Columbia University Medical Center; EOR: Extent of Resection; Exc: Excluded; GBM: Glioblastoma; GTR: Gross Total Resection; IDH-1: Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1; MGMT: O6-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase; NCDB: National Cancer Database; OS: Overall Survival; O/U: Other/Unknown; PFS: Progression-Free Survival; SEER: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; S&W BTR: Scott & White Brain Tumor Registry; UCLA: University of California Los Angeles; UM: University of Miami.