Ontario wait times for delayed surgical treatment of traumatic peripheral nerve injury

Assessment, management, and rehabilitation of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries for non-surgeons

Electrodiagnostic evaluation is often requested for persons with peripheral nerve injuries and plays an important role in their diagnosis, prognosis, and management. Peripheral nerve injuries are common and can have devastating effects on patients' physical, psychological, and socioeconomic well-being; alongside surgeons, electrodiagnostic medicine specialists serve a central function in ensuring patients receive optimal treatment for these injuries. Surgical intervention-nerve grafting, nerve transfers, and tendon transfers-often plays a critical role in the management of these injuries and the restoration of patients' function. Increasingly, nerve transfers are becoming the standard of care for some types of peripheral nerve injury due to two significant advantages: first, they shorten the time to reinnervation of denervated muscles; and second, they confer greater specificity in directing motor and sensory axons toward their respective targets. As the indications for, and use of, nerve transfers expand, so too does the role of the electrodiagnostic medicine specialist in establishing or confirming the diagnosis, determining the injury's prognosis, recommending treatment, aiding in surgical planning, and supporting rehabilitation. Having a working knowledge of nerve and/or tendon transfer options allows the electrodiagnostic medicine specialist to not only arrive at the diagnosis and prognosticate, but also to clarify which nerves and/or muscles might be suitable donors, such as confirming whether the branch to supinator could be a nerve transfer donor to restore distal posterior interosseous nerve function. Moreover, post-operative testing can determine if nerve transfer reinnervation is occurring and progress patients' rehabilitation and/or direct surgeons to consider tendon transfers.

Epidemiology of peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries in a trauma population

BACKGROUND

Understanding patterns of peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) and brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) is essential to preventing and appropriately managing nerve injuries. We sought to assess the incidence, cause, and severity of PNIs and BPIs sustained by patients with trauma.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the Trauma Registry Database (January 2002 to December 2020) to identify patients with PNIs or BPIs.

RESULTS

We evaluated data from 24 905 patients with trauma; 335 (1.3%) sustained PNIs (81% male; mean age 36 yr, standard deviation [SD] 16 yr) and 64 (0.3%) sustained BPIs (84% male; mean age 35, SD 15 yr). Nerves in the upper extremities were more commonly affected than those in the lower extremities. Sharp injuries (39.4%) and motorcycle accidents (32.8%) were the most frequent causes of PNIs and BPIs, respectively. Other common causes of PNI were motor vehicle collisions (16.7%) and gunshot wounds (12.8%). Many patients with PNIs (69.0%) and BPIs (53%) underwent operative management. The most frequent reconstruction for PNI was primary nerve repair (66%), while nerve transfers (48%) were more frequently used for BPI.

CONCLUSION

Nerve injuries in the trauma population have decreased over the last 3 decades with shifts in mechanisms of injury and use of imaging, electrodiagnostic tests, and surgery. Nerve injuries are often complex and time-sensitive to treat; understanding changes in trends is important to ensure optimal patient management.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Surgical Wait Times for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in Ontario

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on surgical wait times for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Ontario's wait time data has fourteen reporting categories for PRS. For each category, the mean wait time for consultation and for surgery were reported. Each category was given a priority ranging from 1 to 4. Two periods, three-month and six-month, were selected and compared to the same calendar months of the previous year. Wait times, surgical volume and percent change to the provincial wait time target were reported and compared to the baseline data. Results: This study reviewed 9563 consults and 15,000 operative cases. There was a 50% reduction in the volume of surgical consults during the study period compared to the baseline period (P = 0.004). The reduction ranged from 46% to 75% based on the reporting category. The volume of surgical cases decreased by 43% during the study period compared to the baseline period (P = 0.005). A statistically significant increase in the mean wait times for surgery was observed, involving priorities 2 to 4 (overall mean = 32 days, P ≤ 0.01). There was a 15% decrease in the percentage of surgeries meeting the provincial target times (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: COVID-19 has caused a significant reduction in the volume of cases performed in the majority of PRS categories with an overall increase in the wait times for consultation and for surgery. Recovery following COVID-19 will require strategies to address the growing volume of cases and wait times for surgery across all PRS categories.

Social determinants of access to timely elective surgery in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional population level study

BACKGROUND

Equitable access to surgical care has clinical and policy implications. We assess the association between social disadvantage and wait times for elective surgical procedures in Ontario.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using administrative data sets of adults receiving nonurgent inguinal hernia repair, cholecystectomy, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, arthroscopy, benign uterine surgery and cataract surgery from April 2013 to December 2019. We assessed the relation between exceeding target wait times and the highest versus lowest quintile of marginalization dimensions by use of generalized estimating equations logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 1 385 673 procedures included, 174 633 (12.6%) exceeded the target wait time. Adjusted analysis for cataract surgery found significantly increased odds of exceeding wait times for residential instability (adjusted odd ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.21) and recent immigration (adjusted OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18). The highest deprivation quintile was associated with 18% (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.24) and 20% (adjusted OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.28) increased odds of exceeding wait times for knee and hip arthroplasty, respectively. Residence in areas where higher proportions of residents self-identify as being part of a visible minority group was independently associated with reduced odds of exceeding target wait times for hip arthroplasty (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.91), cholecystectomy (adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.79) and hernia repair (adjusted OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.77) with an opposite effect in benign uterine surgery (adjusted OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17-1.40).

INTERPRETATION

Social disadvantage had a small and inconsistent impact on receiving care within wait time targets. Future research should consider these differences as they relate to resource distribution and the organization of clinical service delivery.