The impact of an acute care surgery clinical care pathway for suspected appendicitis on the use of CT in the emergency department

Care pathways for reduced fetal movements: A cost-consequence analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the costs and consequences of a new midwife-navigator-facilitated care pathway for reduced fetal movements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at a tertiary obstetric centre in Queensland, Australia and modelling occurred for this and smaller services. Two months of data from pre (n = 112 in 2019) and post (n = 141 in 2020) implementation of the care pathway were analysed with T-tests and logistic regression models to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes. A Markov model was built to estimate the costs and consequences of the intervention. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to test various scenarios including modelling for smaller centres.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome between the intervention and usual care groups. Intervention patients spent one hour and eight minutes less time in hospital (P < 0.001). This resulted in a saving to the centre of AU$135 per patient (AU$159 083 annually). One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that cost savings would be found in all scenarios except for smaller units providing services for less than 1900 births per annum.

CONCLUSION(S)

To our knowledge, no other care pathway involving acute obstetric care has been economically evaluated to date. Our model based on real-world presentations for reduced fetal movements confirms that midwife-navigators may be an economically beneficial implementation strategy for dealing with common obstetric conditions.

Primary Care Support Tools for Digestive Health Care: A Mixed Method Study

Background

To address the increasing demands for gastroenterology specialty care and increasing wait times, centralized access and triage (CAT) systems, telephone support, and clinical care pathways were implemented to streamline referrals and support management of low-risk gastrointestinal (GI) conditions in the primary care medical home. This study aimed to understand primary care providers (PCPs) and GI specialists' perceptions of these supports, factors that affect support implementation and identify barriers and facilitators for implementing supports from both PCP and GI specialists' perspectives.

Methods

We conducted a mixed method study including surveys and interviews with PCPs and GI specialists. Online surveys and semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted from July 2022 to September 2022. All interviews were transcribed and coded to perform a thematic analysis. Survey data were analyzed in SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize and describe the data collected. Inferential statistics were used to identify associations and relationships within the dataset. T-test and chi-square tests were applied at 95% confidence level, with a p value <0.05 (two-sided) considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 36 PCPs responded to the survey. Most respondents were working full-time (73.5%, n = 25) and were female (73.5%, n = 25). Overall, 42% used the pathways regularly, 48% (n = 16) used them occasionally, and very few (9.1%, n = 3) said they were aware but had not used pathways. Overall, PCPs were satisfied with CAT processes and the use of primary care pathways, recognizing the importance of fair and equitable access to specialty care. Specific processes in CAT for vulnerable populations and patients using walk-in clinics were recognized as a limitation, given the lack of ease in completing the required testing and follow-up needed when utilizing the care pathway. Of the 112 GI specialists who received the survey, 28 (25%) completed it, with males (50.0%, n = 14) and females (39.2%, n = 11), remainder no response. Most participate in CAT (73.9%, n = 17) and were remunerated by an alternative relationship plan (ARP) (53.6%, n = 15). Overall, GIs were satisfied with central triaging and primary care pathways, reducing unnecessary time and resource expenditure for referrals. There were statistically significant differences in perceptions among fee for service and alternative relationship plan GI specialists regarding the effectiveness of CAT in improving access and use of health system resources.

Conclusion

Overall, PCPs and GI specialists believe utilizing CAT and primary care pathways improves referral quality, reduces resource expenditure, and provides fair and equitable access to GI specialty services. Improvement in CAT processes with improved pathway awareness may reduce unnecessary referrals.

Delays to Surgery in Emergency Department Cases of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Quality Improvement Study

OBJECTIVE

Create a process map for emergency department (ED) presentations of surgical ectopic pregnancy, and identify areas of management amenable to quality improvement.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing surgical management of ectopic pregnancy at a large, urban, academic tertiary care centre from 2015 to 2017 was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included. There were 6 (8.2%) unstable A cases (recommended time to operating room [OR] 0-2 hours), 23 (31.5%) stable A cases, and 44 (60%) B cases (recommended time to OR 2-8 hours). The percent of patients who were in the OR within the recommended time window were 6 (100%) for unstable A cases, 13 (56%) stable A cases, and 29 (65.9%) stable B cases, respectively (P = 0.139). Notable time delays include the time from gynaecology referral to the time seen by gynaecology (29.7% of total wait time for stable A cases from ED to OR) and the time the OR was booked to the time the patient was brought to the OR (53.2% of total wait time for stable B cases). Of the patients seen by physician at the emergency department first, the time from triage to the OR was significantly shorter for patients that received bedside ultrasound only (0.67 ± 0.5 hours vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 hours [P = 0.007]).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to map the ED presentation of surgical ectopic pregnancy. The management of ectopic pregnancy would benefit from the development of surgical triage decision aids, a surgical care pathway, and increased use of screening bedside ultrasound.

The acute surgical unit: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review comparative studies on the acute surgical unit (ASU) model.

METHODS

Searches were performed of Cochrane, Embase, Medline and grey literature. Eligible articles were comparative studies of the Acute Surgical Unit (ASU) model published 01/01/2000-12/03/2020. Amongst patients with any diagnosis, primary outcomes were length of stay, after-hours operating, complications and cost. Secondary outcomes were time to surgical review, time to theatre, mortality and re-admission for patients with any diagnosis, and cholecystectomy during index admission for patients with biliary disease. Additional analyses were planned for specific cohorts, such as patients with appendicitis or cholecystitis.

RESULTS

Searches returned 9,677 results from which 77 eligible publications were identified, representing 150,981 unique patients. Cohorts were adequately homogenous for meta-analysis of all outcomes except cost. For patients with any diagnosis, compared with the Traditional model, the introduction of an ASU model was associated with reduced length of stay (mean difference [MD] 0.68 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.98), after-hours operating rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% CI 0.46-0.69) and complications (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70). Regarding cost, two studies reported savings following ASU introduction, while one found no difference. Amongst secondary outcomes, for patients with any diagnosis, ASU commencement was associated with reduced time to surgical review, time to theatre and mortality. Re-admissions were unchanged. For patients with biliary disease, ASU establishment was associated with superior rates of index cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the Traditional structure, the ASU model is superior for most metrics. ASU introduction should be promoted in policy for widespread benefit.

Multicentre study of appendicitis management comparing a large South Island metropolitan hospital, to its referring regional and rural centres

BACKGROUND

Globally, patients presenting with acute surgical disease in rural areas have poorer outcomes when compared to urban areas; little data are available regarding outcomes for New Zealand (NZ) rural patients. This study aimed to compare the surgical management of appendicitis in a large metropolitan centre with its regional referral centres.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patient data were collated from the studied centres between November 2014 and October 2019. In addition to patient demographics, patterns of referral and presentation, the primary outcome was time to the theatre; secondary outcomes were perforation rates, length of stay and complications. Data are presented as medians (interquartile range).

RESULTS

A total of 3533 patients underwent appendicectomy over the period studied. For those presenting directly to the metropolitan centre, the median wait-time to the theatre was 16 h (9.2-23.2); if patients were transferred, they waited for 20.8 h (13.6-27). Patients presenting to regional centres waited for 7.6 h (4.5-15.4, P < 0.001). Perforation rates for transferred patients were 31% which was greater than for those presenting to the metropolitan (20%) or regional centres (17%, P = 0.014). Complications were also highest in transferred patients (20%) when compared to the metropolitan (17%) or regional centres (10%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients who were transferred to Christchurch Hospital from rural centres without surgical services had a longer wait-time than those who presented to Christchurch Hospital directly or were treated in regional centres. This was associated with higher rates of perforated appendicitis.

Complications of appendectomy and cholecystectomy in acute care surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acute care surgery (ACS) was initiated two decades ago to address timeliness and quality in emergency general surgery. We hypothesized that ACS has improved the management of acute appendicitis and biliary disease.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of outcome studies for emergent appendectomy and cholecystectomy from 1966 to 2017, comparing studies prior to and following ACS implementation, were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1,704 studies, 27 were selected for analysis (appendicitis, 16; biliary pathology, 7; both, 4). Following ACS introduction, the complication rate was significantly reduced in both appendectomy and cholecystectomy (risk ratios, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.85; I = 9.2% and relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; I = 63.5%) respectively. There was a significant reduction in the time from arrival in emergency until admission and from admission to operation (-1.37 hours: 95% CI, -1.93 to -0.80; -2.51 hours: 95% CI, -4.44 to -0.58) in the appendectomy cohort. Time to operation was shorter in the cholecystectomy group (-6.46 hours; 95% CI, -9.54 to -3.4). Length of hospital stay was reduced in both groups (appendectomy, -0.9 day; cholecystectomy, -1.09 day). There was a reduction in overall cost in cholecystectomy group (-US $854.37; 95% CI, -1,554.1 to -154.05). No statistical significance was detected for wound infection, abscess, conversion of laparoscopy to open technique, rate of negative appendectomy, after hours, readmission, and cost.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of ACS models in general surgery emergency care has significantly improved system and patient outcomes for appendicitis and biliary pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review and meta-analysis of a retrospective study, level III.

The Impact of FASTPASS: A Collaboration With Emergency Department to Improve Management of Patients With Gallbladder Disease and Acute Appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Efficient Emergency Department (ED) throughput depends on several factors, including collaboration and consultation with surgical services. The acute care surgery service (ACS) collaborated with ED to implement a new process termed "FASTPASS" (FP), which might improve patient-care for those with acute appendicitis and gallbladder disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcome of FP.

METHODS

FASTPASS is a joint collaboration between ACS and ED. ED physicians were provided with a simple check-list for diagnosing young males (<50-year old) with acute appendicitis (AA) and young males or females (<50-year old) with gallbladder disease (GBD). Once ED deemed patients fit our FP check-list, patients were directly admitted (FASTPASSed) to the observation unit. The ACS then came to evaluate the patients for possible surgical intervention. We performed outcome analysis before and after the institution of the FP. Outcomes of interest were ED length of stay (LOS), time from ED to the operating room (OR) (door-to-knife), hospital LOS (HLOS), and cost.

RESULTS

During our 1-year study period, for those patients who underwent GBD/AA surgery, 56 (26%) GBD and 27 (26%) AA patients met FP criteria. Compared to the non-FP patients during FP period, FP halved ED LOS for GBD (7.4 ± 3.0 versus 3.5 ± 1.7 h, P < 0.001) and AA (6.7 ± 3.3 versus. 1.8 ± 1.6 h, P < 0.001). Similar outcome benefits were observed for door-to-knife time, HLOS, and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the FP process improved ED throughput in a single, highly-trained ER leading to an overall improved patient care process. A future study involving multiple EDs and different disease processes may help decrease ED overcrowding and improve healthcare system efficiency.

A 30-day prospective audit of all inpatient complications following acute care surgery: How well do we really perform?

Background

Acute care surgery (ACS) and emergency general surgery (EGS) services must provide timely care and intervention for patients who have some of the most challenging needs. Patients treated by ACS services are often critically ill and have both substantial comorbidities and poor physiologic reserve. Despite the widespread implemention of ACS/EGS services across North America, the true postoperative morbidity rates remain largely unknown.

Methods

In this prospective study, inpatients at 8 high-volume ACS/EGS centres in geographically diverse locations in Canada who underwent operative interventions were followed for 30 days or until they were discharged. Readmissions during the 30-day window were also captured. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were tracked. Standard statistical methodology was employed.

Results

A total of 601 ACS/EGS patients were followed for up to 30 inpatient or readmission days after their index emergent operation. Fifty-one percent of patients were female, and the median age was 51 years. They frequently had substantial medical comorbidities (42%) and morbid obesity (15%). The majority of procedures were minimally invasive (66% laparoscopic). Median length of stay was 3.3 days and the early readmission (< 30 d) rate was 6%. Six percent of patients were admitted to the critical care unit. The overall complication and mortality rates were 34% and 2%, respectively. Cholecystitis (31%), appendicitis (21%), bowel obstruction (18%), incarcerated hernia (12%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (7%) and soft tissue infections (7%) were the most common diagnoses. The morbidity and mortality rates for open surgical procedures were 73% and 5%, respectively.

Conclusion

Nontrauma ACS/EGS procedures are associated with a high postoperative morbidity rate. This study will serve as a prospective benchmark for postoperative complications among ACS/EGS patients and subsequent quality improvement across Canada.

The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies

Background Acute care surgery (ACS) models address high volumes of emergency general surgery and emergency room (ER) overcrowding. The impact of ACS service model implementation on the quality and efficiency of care (EOC) outcomes in acute appendicitis (AA) and acute cholecystitis (AC) cohorts was evaluated. Methods A retrospective chart review (N=1,229) of adult AA and AC patients admitted prior to (pre-ACS; n=507; three hospitals; 2007) and after regionalization (R-ACS; n=722; one hospital; 2011). Results R-ACS time to ER physician assessment was significantly longer for AA (3.4 ± 2.3 versus 2.4 ± 2.6 hr; p ≤ 0.001). Surgical response times (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 4.3 hr for AA; 1.8 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 5.0 hr for AC; p ≤ 0.0001) and acquisition of imaging (4.1 ± 4.1 vs 6.9 ± 9.9 hr for AA, p ≤ 0.0001; 7.8 ± 1.9 vs 13.2 ± 18.5 hr for AC, p ≤ 0.008) occurred significantly faster with R-ACS. R-ACS resulted in a significant increase in night-time appendectomies (21.7% vs 11.1%; p ≤ 0.002), perforated appendices (29.1 % vs 18.9 %; p ≤ 0.006), 30-day readmissions (4.56% vs 0.82%; p ≤ 0.01), and lower rate of intraoperative complications for AC patients (2.78% vs 7.69%; p ≤ 0.02). Conclusions Despite the increased volume of patients seen with the implementation of R-ACS, surgical assessments and diagnostic imaging were significantly more prompt. EOC measures were maintained. Worse AA outcomes highlight areas for improvement in delivering R-ACS.

Impact of the Timing of Ureteral Stent Placement on Outcomes in Patients with Obstructing Ureteral Calculi and Presumed Infection

Objective: To understand how time to stent placement impacts outcomes in patients with obstructing ureteral stones and concern for infection. Materials and Methods: Using a prospective urology consult institutional database (2011-2016), we identified patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with an obstructing ureteral stone, met two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria (temperature [T] >38°C or <36°C, heart rate >90 beats per minute, respiratory rate >20 breaths per minute, white blood cell count >12 k/μL or <4 k/μ), and underwent stent placement. The primary outcome of interest was impact of stent timing on intensity of care (need for intensive care unit [ICU]) as well as overall length of stay (LOS). Results: Forty-eight patients were identified who met the study criteria. Overall, 58.3% had positive urine cultures. There was no difference between groups with across a range of clinical variables. While the need for ICU admission did not differ between groups, those patients who had a ureteral stent placed within 6 and 10 hours of ED arrival had a significantly decreased LOS (35.6 hours vs 71.6 hours, p = 0.01; 45.7 hours vs 82.4 hours, p = 0.04) relative to those patients who were stented outside these intervals. Conclusion: In patients with an obstructing ureteral calculus and concern for infection, there is a beneficial effect to timelier stent placement in the form of decreased overall LOS.

Identifying and classifying indicators affected by performing clinical pathways in hospitals: a scoping review

AIM

To analyse the evidence regarding indicators affected by clinical pathways (CPW) in hospitals and offer suggestions for conducting comprehensive systematic reviews.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic scoping review and searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, OVID, Science Direct, ProQuest, EMBASE and PubMed. We also reviewed the reference lists of included studies. The criteria for inclusion of studies included experimental and quasi-experimental studies, implementing CPW in secondary and tertiary hospitals and investigating at least one indicator. Quality of included studies was assessed by two authors independently using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program for clinical trials and cohort studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Quasi-Experimental Studies.

RESULTS

Forty-seven out of 2191 studies met the eligibility and inclusion criteria. The majority of included studies had pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design and had been done in developed countries, especially the United States. The investigation of evidence resulted in identifying 62 indicators which were classified into three categories: input indicators, process and output indicators and outcome indicators. Outcome indicators were more frequent than other indicators. Complication rate, hospital costs and length of hospital stay were dominant in their own category. Indicators such as quality of life and adherence to guidelines have been considered in studies that were done in recent years.

CONCLUSION

Implementing CPW can affect different types of indicators such as input, process, output and outcome indicators, although outcome indicators capture more attention than other indicators. Patient-related indicators were dominant outcome indicators, whereas professional indicators and organizational factors were considered less extensively. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC?: WHAT DOES THIS ARTICLE ADD?

Incidence of Appendicitis over Time: A Comparative Analysis of an Administrative Healthcare Database and a Pathology-Proven Appendicitis Registry

Importance

At the turn of the 21^st century, studies evaluating the change in incidence of appendicitis over time have reported inconsistent findings.

Objectives

We compared the differences in the incidence of appendicitis derived from a pathology registry versus an administrative database in order to validate coding in administrative databases and establish temporal trends in the incidence of appendicitis.

Design

We conducted a population-based comparative cohort study to identify all individuals with appendicitis from 2000 to2008.

Setting & Participants

Two population-based data sources were used to identify cases of appendicitis: 1) a pathology registry (n = 8,822); and 2) a hospital discharge abstract database (n = 10,453).

Intervention & Main Outcome

The administrative database was compared to the pathology registry for the following a priori analyses: 1) to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of administrative codes; 2) to compare the annual incidence of appendicitis; and 3) to assess differences in temporal trends. Temporal trends were assessed using a generalized linear model that assumed a Poisson distribution and reported as an annual percent change (APC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analyses were stratified by perforated and non-perforated appendicitis.

Results

The administrative database (PPV = 83.0%) overestimated the incidence of appendicitis (100.3 per 100,000) when compared to the pathology registry (84.2 per 100,000). Codes for perforated appendicitis were not reliable (PPV = 52.4%) leading to overestimation in the incidence of perforated appendicitis in the administrative database (34.8 per 100,000) as compared to the pathology registry (19.4 per 100,000). The incidence of appendicitis significantly increased over time in both the administrative database (APC = 2.1%; 95% CI: 1.3, 2.8) and pathology registry (APC = 4.1; 95% CI: 3.1, 5.0).

Conclusion & Relevance

The administrative database overestimated the incidence of appendicitis, particularly among perforated appendicitis. Therefore, studies utilizing administrative data to analyze perforated appendicitis should be interpreted cautiously.