The ever-muddled Canadian waters and elective ventilation

Deceased organ donation potential in Canada: a review of consecutive deaths in Alberta

BACKGROUND

Transplantation is the most effective treatment for many patients with end-stage organ failure. There is a gap between the number of patients who would benefit from transplantation and availability of organs. We assessed maximum potential for deceased donation in Alberta and barriers to increasing the donation rate.

METHODS

All deaths that occurred in Alberta in 2015 in areas where mechanical ventilation could be provided were retrospectively identified using administrative data. Medical records were reviewed by donation coordinators and critical care physicians with expertise in donation, using a standardized tool to determine whether deceased patients could potentially have been organ donors.

RESULTS

There were 2,706 deaths occurring in either an intensive care unit or emergency department, of which 1,252 were attributable to a non-neurologic cause: 946 involved cardiac arrests with unsuccessful resuscitation, and 57 were not mechanically ventilated. Of the remaining 451 deaths, 117 (28 donors per million population [dpmp]) either were, or could potentially have been, organ donors after neurologic determination of death (NDD). Of these, 19 (4.5 dpmp) were not appropriately identified or referred, and 45 approached families (10.8 dpmp) did not provide consent. Non-identified NDD cases accounted for a larger proportion of deaths due to neurologic causes in emergency departments (18%) than in intensive care units (2%) (P < 0.0001) and in rural (9%) compared with urban centres (3%) (P = 0.05). If routinely available, donation after circulatory death (DCD) could potentially have been possible in as many as 113 (27 dpmp) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximum deceased organ donation potential in Alberta is approximately 55 dpmp. The current donation rate has potential to increase with more widespread availability of DCD and a higher consent rate.

Organ Donation and Elective Ventilation: A Necessary Strategy

Organ transplantation is the sole treatment to improve or save the life of patients with final-stage organ failure. The shortage of available organs for transplantation constitutes a universal problem, estimating that 10% of patients on waiting lists die. Brain death is an undesirable result; nevertheless, it has beneficial side-effects since it is the most frequent source of organs for transplantation. However, this phenomenon is relatively uncommon and has a limited potential. One of the options that focuses on increasing organ donation is to admit patients with catastrophic brain injuries (with a high probability of brain death and nontreatable) to the Intensive Care Unit, with the only purpose of donation. To perform elective nontherapeutic ventilation (ENTV), a patient's anticipated willingness to donate organs and/or explicit acceptance by his/her relatives is required. This process should focus exclusively on those patients with catastrophic brain injuries and imminent risk of death which, due to its acute damage, are not considered treatable. This article defends ENTV as an effective strategy to improve donation rate, analyzing its ethical and legal basis.

Ethical and legal implications of elective ventilation and organ transplantation: "medicalization" of dying versus medical mission

A critical controversy surrounds the type of allowable interventions to be carried out in patients who are potential organ donors, in an attempt to improve organ perfusion and successful transplantation. The main goal is to transplant an organ in conditions as close as possible to its physiological live state. “Elective ventilation” (EV), that is, the use of ventilation for the sole purpose of retrieving the organs of patients close to death, is an option which offsets the shortage of organ donation. We have analyzed the legal context of the dying process of the organ donor and the feasibility of EV in the Italian context. There is no legal framework regulating the practice of EV, neither is any real information given to the general public. A public debate has yet to be initiated. In the Italian cultural and legislative scenario, we believe that, under some circumstances (i.e., the expressed wishes of the patient, even in the form of advance directives), the use of EV does not violate the principle of beneficence. We believe that the crux of the matter lies in the need to explore the real determination and will of the patient and his/her orientation towards the specific aim of organ donation.