A placebo-controlled, single-blind study to determine the appropriate alendronate dosage in postmenopausal Japanese patients with osteoporosis. The Alendronate Research Group

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and changes in bone metabolism associated with zoledronic acid treatment in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis

Although once-yearly intravenous administration of zoledronic acid has been reported to inhibit bone resorption and increase bone mineral density, no studies have evaluated its effectiveness in treating osteoporosis in Japanese patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and assess the safety of and changes in bone metabolism associated with zoledronic acid treatment in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. This was a single-administration study with a single-blind parallel-group design. The study participants were 24 Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. The patients were divided into two groups, with each group receiving a single injection of zoledronic acid (4 or 5 mg). Pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion were then compared, and drug-related adverse events and changes in the levels of bone turnover markers were assessed at 12 months. Mean plasma concentrations of zoledronic acid peaked in both groups immediately after administration, and decreased to 1% or less of peak levels after 24 h. Noncompartmental analysis revealed that C _max and the area under the curve from time zero to infinity increased in proportion to the dose. The levels of bone resorption and formation markers decreased from day 15 and from 3 months after administration respectively, and suppression of these markers remained constant for the entire study period. No serious adverse events were reported. There was no large difference between the 4- and 5-mg groups in terms of pharmacokinetics, changes in the levels of bone turnover markers, and safety profiles. This study demonstrated acceptable pharmacokinetics and changes in bone metabolism associated with zoledronic acid treatment in female Japanese osteoporosis patients. Both the 4-mg dose and the 5-mg dose demonstrated acceptable safety and sustained antiresorptive effects for the duration of the study.

Comparison of the effects of denosumab between a native vitamin D combination and an active vitamin D combination in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

The aim of this 12-month, retrospective study was to compare the effects of denosumab (DMAb; 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months) plus native vitamin D (VD) (cholecalciferol) combination therapy with DMAb plus active VD analog (alfacalcidol) combination therapy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Patients [N = 127; mean age 75.6 years (range 58-93 years); 28 treatment-naïve patients, 59 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, 40 patients treated with teriparatide daily] were allocated to either (1) the DMAb plus native VD group (n = 60; cholecalciferol, 10 μg, plus calcium, 610 mg/day; 13 treatment-naïve patients, 28 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, and 19 patients treated with teriparatide daily) or (2) the DMAb plus active VD group [n = 67; alfacalcidol, 0.8 ± 0.0 μg, plus calcium, 99.2 ± 8.5 mg/day; 15 treatment-naïve patients, 31 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, and 21 patients treated with teriparatide daily) on the basis of each physician's decision. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD), serum bone turnover marker levels, and fracture incidence were monitored every 6 months. There were no significant differences in baseline age, BMD, bone turnover marker levels, and prior treatments between the two groups. After 12 months, compared with the DMAb plus native VD group, the DMAb plus active VD group showed similar increases in the BMD of the lumbar spine (6.4% vs 6.5%) and total hip (3.3% vs 3.4%), but significantly greater increases in the BMD of the femoral neck (1.0% vs 4.9%, P < 0.001) and the distal part of the forearm (third of radius) (-0.8% vs 3.9%, P < 0.01). These tendencies were similar regardless of the differences in the prior treatments. The rates of decrease of bone turnover marker levels were similar for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (-49.0% vs -49.0%), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (-45.9% vs -49.3%), and undercarboxylated osteocalcin (-56.0  vs -66.5%), whereas serum intact parathyroid hormone levels were significantly lower in the DMAb plus active VD group (47.6 pg/mL vs 30.4 pg/mL, P < 0.001). The rate of hypocalcemia was 1.7% in the DMAb plus native VD group and 1.5% in the DMAb plus active VD group, and the rate of clinical fracture incidence was 8.3% in the DMAb plus native VD group and 4.5% in the DMAb plus active VD group, with no significant difference between the groups. DMAb with active VD combination therapy may be a more effective treatment option than DMAb with native VD combination therapy in terms of increasing BMD of the femoral neck and distal part of the forearm and also maintaining serum intact parathyroid hormone at lower levels.

Bone turnover markers and the factors associated with atypical femur fractures among Japanese patients

Many previous reports have indicated that atypical femur fractures (AFFs) are associated with the administration of bisphosphonates (BPs). A number of risk factors and hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis of AFFs have been reported to date. The purpose of the present study was to identify the factors associated with AFFs in Japanese individuals and to elucidate the association between bone metabolism and AFFs by evaluating bone turnover markers (BTMs). We prospectively reviewed all patients with femur fractures and identified the patients with AFFs and typical femur fractures (TFFs). We collected the demographic and clinical data that were relevant to the present study, namely age, gender, affected side, affected site, concomitant medical history, and comorbid conditions, and measured the levels of BTMs within 24h after trauma. Welch's test and Fisher's exact probability test were used for the statistical analyses. A total of 338 patients, including 10 patients with AFFs and 328 patients with TFFs, were analyzed under the inclusion criteria. The use of BPs (p<0.001) and collagen disease and chronic granulomatous disease (CD/CGD) (p=0.025) were more frequently observed in patients with AFFs than in patients with TFFs, while the levels of BTMs, including N-terminal propeptides of type 1 procollagen (P1NP), isoform 5b of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP-5b) and undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) were significantly lower in patients with AFFs than in patients with TFFs. Furthermore, the level of TRACP-5b was found to be significantly lower in patients with atypical subtrochanteric fractures than in atypical diaphyseal fractures (p=0.025). Moreover, the levels of P1NP (p=0.016) and TRACP-5b (p=0.015) were found to be significantly lower in patients with AFFs than in patients with TFFs in a subgroup analysis of BPs users. The use of BPs was considered to be a factor associated with AFFs. Our comparison of the BTMs in patients with AFFs and TFFs indicated that the severe suppression of bone turnover was associated with the pathogenesis of AFFs. The extent of the influence of suppressed turnover on the pathogenesis of AFFs may differ depending on the fracture site.

Comparison of the effects of 12 months of monthly minodronate monotherapy and monthly minodronate combination therapy with vitamin K2 or eldecalcitol in patients with primary osteoporosis

The aim of this observational, nonrandomized study was to compare the effects of 12 months of monthly minodronate (MIN; 50 mg/month) monotherapy and MIN combination therapy with vitamin K2 (VK; 45 mg/day) or eldecalcitol (ELD; 0.75 μg/day) in treatment-naïve patients with primary osteoporosis. Patients (n = 193; 178 postmenopausal women and 15 men; mean age 71.6 years) were treated with (1) MIN monotherapy (n = 63), (2) MIN plus VK combination therapy (n = 50), or (3) MIN plus ELD combination therapy (n = 80) for 12 months. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and the levels of serum bone turnover markers were monitored. No significant difference was observed in baseline BMD among the three groups. After 12 months, BMD increased by 2.93, 4.65, and 6.55 % in the lumbar spine, 0.66, 2.57, and 3.42 % in the total hip, and 0.05, 2.06, and 3.58 % in the femoral neck in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The BMD increase induced by MIN plus ELD combination therapy was significantly greater than that induced by MIN monotherapy in the lumbar spine (P = 0.0002), total hip (P = 0.003), and femoral neck (P = 0.004), and also that induced by MIN plus VK combination therapy in the lumbar spine (P = 0.03). MIN plus ELD combination therapy compared with MIN monotherapy resulted in a greater decrease in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide levels (-37.4 % vs -54.6 %; P = 0.001) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b levels (-41.1 % vs -52.9 %; P = 0.009) at 3 months, and a greater decrease in procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide levels (-64.3 % vs -50.3 %; P = 0.03) and a decrease in intact parathyroid hormone levels (-12.3 % vs 14.0 %; P = 0.01) at 12 months. Combination therapy with MIN and VK or ELD for 12 months showed additive effects in decreasing the levels of bone turnover markers compared with MIN monotherapy, whereas MIN plus ELD combination therapy resulted in the highest BMD increase compared with MIN monotherapy and MIN plus VK combination therapy.

Effects of risedronate alone or combined with vitamin K2 on serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin and osteocalcin levels in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Risedronate decreases osteoporotic fracture incidence; however, its effects remain unclear in elderly osteoporotic patients. Vitamin K mediates carboxylation of osteocalcin (OC), and high undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) levels indicate vitamin K deficiency and increased osteoporotic fracture risk. We aimed to evaluate the effects of risedronate alone or combined with vitamin K2 on serum ucOC, OC, and incidence of vertebral fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. A total of 101 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis aged >60 years were randomly stratified into two groups-R group (n = 51), treated with risedronate alone; and R + K group (n = 50), treated with risedronate and vitamin K2. Serum ucOC, OC and incidence of vertebral fractures were evaluated before treatment and at 6 and 12 months post-treatment. Decreased ucOC rates at 6 and 12 months were not significant between groups. However, at 6 and 12 months, decreased OC rates in the R group (p < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively) were significantly higher than in the R + K group, and ucOC/OC change rates in the R group (p < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively) were significantly lower than in the R + K group. Vertebral fracture incidence was not significantly different between the groups at 6 and 12 months. ucOC levels in patients with incident vertebral fractures were significantly higher than in patients without incident vertebral fractures in the R group at 6 months (p < 0.05). Although no significant difference was observed for ucOC decrease rate and incidence of vertebral fractures between treatments, ucOC levels in patients with incident vertebral fractures were significantly greater than in patients without when using risedronate alone.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of alendronate and zoledronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two bisphosphonates (alendronate and zoledronate) in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The incidence of fractures was considered as primary endpoint. Only randomized trials with a follow-up period of 1 year or more were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. We excluded studies that included patients with secondary osteoporosis especially in relation to therapy with corticosteroids or other drugs or diseases known to affect bone mineral density. Studies published as subgroup analysis, extension studies, economic evaluations, and comparisons with active control were excluded. The methodological quality of controlled clinical trials that met these inclusion criteria was evaluated. No studies were excluded from analysis due to lack of quality. The risk ratio of hip, vertebral and wrist fractures for alendronate were 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.93], 0.54 (95% CI 0.44-0.66) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.33-1.25), respectively. Zoledronate risk ratio was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.82) and 0.38 (95% CI 0.22-0.67) for hip and vertebral fractures, respectively.

Endoscopic comparison of alendronate alone and the enteric-coated alendronate with calcitriol combination in postmenopausal Korean females

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study was performed to compare the mucosal findings after esophagogastroduodenoscopy in two groups before and after the use of alendronate only and following administration of the enteric-coated alendronate (5 mg) and calcitriol (0.5 µg) combined drug (Maxmarvil, Yuyu Co.).

METHODS

The study population consisted of 33 postmenopausal healthy female volunteers, aged 50 to 70 years (mean age, 58 ± 5) without gastrointestinal symptoms and with normal baseline endoscopic findings. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed at baseline and was repeated 2 weeks later after daily intake of Maxmarvil (n = 17 subjects) or alendronate only (n = 16 subjects). Mucosal injury scores were reported by an endoscopist after 2 weeks of treatment with each medication schedule.

RESULTS

Esophageal mucosal injuries developed in two of 16 subjects in the alendronate only group and 0 of 17 in the Maxmarvil group. Gastric mucosal injuries developed in eight subjects in the alendronate group and four subjects in the Maxmarvil group; this difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The mucosal damage scores for the alendronate group (total score 24) were significantly higher than those for the Maxmarvil group (total score 9) in the esophagus and stomach. Therefore, this study suggested that enteric-coated Maxmarvil is less harmful to gastrointestinal mucosa than alendronate, and may improve the tolerability of osteoporosis medication in clinical practice.

Alendronate sodium hydrate (oral jelly) for the treatment of osteoporosis: review of a novel, easy to swallow formulation

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by loss of bone mass, decreased bone strength, and an increased risk of bone fracture. The disease progresses with age, especially in postmenopausal women. Japan is one of the most rapidly aging societies worldwide. Japanese individuals over 65 years of age constituted 23.0% of the population in 2010 and 25.1% to 25.2% as of 2013. The estimated number of people with osteoporosis in Japan is currently 13 million. Bisphosphonates increase bone mineral density by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, thereby reducing the risk of fractures. Alendronate sodium hydrate (alendronate) is a bisphosphonate that potently inhibits bone resorption and is used to treat osteoporosis. Sufficient water is required to take an alendronate oral tablet; insufficient water could result in digestive system diseases, such as esophageal ulceration. Elderly patients with swallowing difficulty may choke on the tablet. Taking a tablet with oral jelly is a method to prevent digestive system disease and reduce the choking hazard. Once-weekly alendronate oral jelly was approved in 2012 by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan as the world's first drug for osteoporosis in a jelly formulation. It consists of a jelly portion and an air portion. The jelly formulation is smoothly discharged by pushing the air portion. Therefore, elderly patients with physical disabilities are able to easily take all of the jelly formulation from the package. In this review, this new formulation of alendronate sodium hydrate (oral jelly) is introduced and discussed in terms of osteoporosis treatment. This new formulation provides an alternative so that patients may select a method of dosing tailored to their preferences. Management of osteoporosis involves assessing fracture risk and preventing fractures. Higher adherence to the treatment of patients with osteoporosis and prevention of osteoporotic fractures are issues to be resolved.

Improved dosage form of the combined alendronate and calcitriol (Maxmarvil®) on the absorption of alendronate in Korean postmenopausal women

Alendronate is one of the most potent anti-osteoporotic agents for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, high doses of alendronate cause esophageal irritation, myalgia, gastrointestinal discomfort and decrease of serum calcium level. Recently, Maxmarvil® was developed as an enteric-coated tablet containing alendronate (5 mg) and calcitriol (0.5 μg) to minimize these side effects of alendronate. In the present study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetic profile and examined the incidence of unfavorable effects after oral administration of Maxmarvil® in Korean healthy postmenopausal women without a previous history of fracture. In the in vitro dissolution test, alendronate was not released from Maxmarvil® in pH 1.2 phosphate buffer solution but released in pH 6.0 and 6.8 phosphate buffer solutions and completely dissolved in 30 min. After oral administration of Maxmarvil®, three out of 18 (16.7%) women showed mild adverse effects; two myalgia and one upper gastrointestinal discomfort without heartburn. Most of these complaints disappeared during the study without additional treatment. The peak (Umax) and the average (Uave) urinary excretion rate of alendronate and the time to reach Umax (Tmax) were 2.94 μg/h, 0.901 μg/h and 6.77 h, respectively. The total cumulative urinary excretion of alendronate (Ae₀₋₂₄ h) was 21.6 μg (0.432% of oral alendornate), which was similar to the reported values. Taken together, enteric-coated Maxmarvil® is less harmful for the esophagus and gastrointestinal mucosa, shows the same pharmacokinetic profile to conventional alendronate (70 mg) and improves the tolerability of medication in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of monthly oral minodronate in patients with involutional osteoporosis

Monthly minodronate at 30 or 50 mg had similar efficacy as 1 mg daily in terms of change in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers with similar safety profiles. This new regimen provides patients with a new option for taking minodronate.

INTRODUCTION

Minodronate at a daily oral dose of 1 mg has been proven to have antivertebral fracture efficacy. In the present study, the efficacy and safety of oral minodronate at monthly doses of either 30 mg or 50 mg were compared with a daily dose of 1 mg.

METHODS

A total of 692 patients with involutional osteoporosis were randomized to receive minodronate at either 30 or 50 mg monthly or a daily dose of 1 mg. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at 12 months. Total hip BMD, bone turnover markers, serum calcium (Ca), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Minodronate at monthly doses of 30 or 50 mg were noninferior to the 1 mg daily dose in terms of change in LS-BMD. Changes in total hip BMD were also comparable. Although a transient decrease in serum Ca and increase in PTH levels were observed in all three groups at slightly different magnitudes and time courses, changes in bone turnover markers were comparable among the different dosage groups with a similar time course. Safety profiles were also comparable.

CONCLUSION

Minodronate at monthly doses of 30 or 50 mg has similar efficacy to the daily 1 mg dose in terms of BMD and bone turnover markers with similar tolerability.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of denosumab administered subcutaneously to postmenopausal Japanese women

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that has high affinity for RANK ligand (RANKL). RANKL is the essential mediator of osteoclast formation, function and survival. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of denosumab in healthy postmenopausal Japanese women were assessed. This was a randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation study in which 40 subjects received denosumab at doses of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0mg/kg, or placebo administered subcutaneously. Blood and urine samples for determination of serum denosumab, CTX-I, NTX-I/Cr, bone specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) were collected. The PK and PD time profiles were compared to those obtained in separate studies conducted in the US. No serious adverse events occurred and all subjects completed this study. Denosumab demonstrated nonlinear PK and dose- and concentration-dependent dispositions. The maximum mean decrease from baseline ranged from 65% to 95% for CTX-I concentrations and from 50% to 85% for NTX-I/Cr. Additionally, the changes were dose-dependent. The suppression of bone turnover markers was rapid (within 2 days after dosing) and duration of suppression was dose-dependent. No marked differences in the PK and PD profiles between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects were noted. The observed results indicate that denosumab may have therapeutic potential for conditions resulting from increased bone turnover, such as osteoporosis in Japanese.

Efficacy of oral bisphosphonates for preventing hip fracture in disabled patients with neurological diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials among the Japanese population

OBJECTIVE

Neurological diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), stroke, and Parkinson's disease cause disability and immobilization that increases the risk of hip fracture. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of oral bisphosphonates for preventing hip fracture in disabled patients with such neurological diseases.

METHODS

A literature search (PubMed) was done from 1995 to the present for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and a meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs met the criteria, including two of etidronate (ALS and stroke), two of alendronate (stroke and Parkinson's disease), and three of risedronate (stroke and Parkinson's disease). All of the RCTs were performed on Japanese patients. According to the results of pooled data analysis, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) of hip fracture in patients receiving etidronate, alendronate, and risedronate treatment compared with placebo or active control treatment was 0.16 (0.03-0.87), 0.29 (0.10-0.80), and 0.24 (0.10-0.58), respectively, suggesting a reduction of risk by more than 70% with oral bisphosphonates. There was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity among RCTs, and publication bias was not identified by the funnel plot and Begg's rank correlation test. No severe adverse events due to oral bisphosphonate treatment were reported.

LIMITATION

It remains uncertain whether the findings are relevant for Western patients with an increased risk of hip fracture due to neurological diseases.

CONCLUSION

A meta-analysis of RCTs suggested that oral bisphosphonate treatment prevents hip fracture in disabled Japanese patients with neurological diseases, including ALS, stroke, and Parkinson's disease. Oral bisphosphonate treatment was well tolerated by such patients.

Clinical trial: comparison of alendronate and alfacalcidol in glucocorticoid-associated osteoporosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Bone loss is often observed in patients with ulcerative colitis, particularly if they require glucocorticoids.

AIM

To determine whether the bisphosphonate, alendronate, is safe and effective in preserving bone mass compared to the active vitamin D3, alfacalcidol, in ulcerative colitis patients receiving glucocorticoids.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with ulcerative colitis and treated with glucocorticoids were randomized to receive alendronate (5 mg/day) or alfacalcidol (1 microg/day) daily for 12 months. Loss of bone mass was evaluated by bone mineral density, bone resorption by urinary N-telopeptide for type I collagen, and bone formation by serum bone alkaline phosphatase.

RESULTS

Alendronate, but not alfacalcidol, significantly increased bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. Alendronate decreased serum bone alkaline phosphatase levels, but alfacalcidol did not. Urinary N-telopeptide for type I collagen levels decreased in both groups, but were significantly lower in the alendronate group. There were no significant differences in the adverse events in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that alendronate is a safe, well-tolerated and more effective therapy than alfacalcidol for preventing glucocorticoid-associated bone loss in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography is useful to monitor response to alendronate therapy in postmenopausal women

A forearm fracture (Colles' fracture) is often the first sign of osteoporosis and may suggest underlying skeletal fragility. Therefore, establishment of a more accurate and reliable method for the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal radius would be beneficial for patients who suffer from osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to monitor the response to alendronate therapy at the distal radius in early postmenopausal Japanese women. Thirty-two early postmenopausal women who were diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia were randomized to either alendronate or control treatment. We analyzed the BMD of the distal radius by pQCT, lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the biochemical markers of bone turnover (deoxypyridinoline) at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. The control group showed a significant decrease from baseline in the trabecular BMD of the radius at 12 months (3.5 +/- 3.7%; p < 0.01), whereas the alendronate group showed a significant increase (4.3 +/- 8.1%). The changes in the trabecular BMD of the radius between the alendronate and control groups were statistically different at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.01). However, in the total BMD at the diaphysis of the radius, no significant differences were seen in the changes in bone densities between the alendronate and control groups after 1 year of treatment. pQCT detected significant differences in BMD of the radius in early postmenopausal women after 1 year of treatment with alendronate. Collectively, our preliminary clinical trial showed that pQCT might be useful to monitor response to alendronate therapy, especially at the radius, and it might explain why alendronate prevents Colles' fracture.

Dietary l-carnitine supplementation improves bone mineral density by suppressing bone turnover in aged ovariectomized rats

Postmenopausal bone loss is a major public health concern. Although drug therapies are available, women are interested in alternative/adjunct therapies to slow down the bone loss associated with ovarian hormone deficiency. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dietary supplementation of l-carnitine can influence bone density and slow the rate of bone turnover in an aging ovariectomized rat model. Eighteen-month-old Fisher-344 female rats were ovariectomized and assigned to two groups: (1) a control group in which rats were fed ad libitum a carnitine-free (-CN) diet (AIN-93M) and (2) another fed the same diet but supplemented with l-carnitine (+CN). At the end of 8 weeks of feeding, animals were sacrificed and bone specimens were collected for measuring bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Femoral microarchitectural properties were assessed by microcomputed tomography. Femoral mRNA levels of selected bone matrix proteins were determined by northern blot analysis. Data showed that tibial BMD was significantly higher in the rat fed the +CN diet than those fed the -CN (control) diet. Dietary carnitine significantly decreased the mRNA level of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), an indicator of bone resorption by 72.8%, and decreased the mRNA abundance of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and collagen type-1 (COL), measures of bone formation by 63.6% and 61.2%, respectively. The findings suggest that carnitine supplementation slows bone loss and improves bone microstructural properties by decreasing bone turnover.

Effect of alendronate on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in Japanese women with systemic autoimmune diseases: versus alfacalcidol

Glucocorticoids-induced osteoporosis is a serious problem for patients with systemic autoimmune disease requiring relatively long-term glucocorticoid treatment. Effectiveness of alendronate for the prevention of glucocorticoids-induced osteoporosis was evaluated in comparison with that of alfacalcidol in Japanese women with autoimmune disease excluding rheumatoid arthritis. Loss of bone mass was evaluated with bone mineral density (BMD) of lumber vertebrae, bone resorption was with urinary N-telopeptide for type I collagen (NTX), and bone formation was with serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (B-ALP). A total of 33 patients who were treated with oral glucocorticoids (>or=5 mg/day of prednisolone equivalence) for more than 6 months were randomized into two groups; alendronate group (n = 17) received 5 mg/day of alendronate, and alfacalcidol group (n = 16) received 1.0 mug/day of alfacalcidol for 24 months with glucocorticoids. The dose of alendronate was the maximal dose approved in Japan. BMD had tendency to decrease with alfacalcidol, while increase with alendronate. The difference in BMD change between the two groups was significant by 4.3% at 18 months and by 4.2% at 24 months (both P < 0.05). Bone resorption was significantly reduced only with alendronate; NTX was decreased by 28 to 35% at 6 to 24 months (P < 0.05), but not changed with alfacalcidol at 24 months. The bone formation was found to be unchanged according to the B-ALP measured between the two groups. In conclusion, the treatment of 5 mg alendronate daily is more effective than alfacalcidol for preventing the glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis by the mechanism of reducing bone resorption in Japanese women with systemic autoimmune disease.

Response of serum carboxylated and undercarboxylated osteocalcin to alendronate monotherapy and combined therapy with vitamin K2 in postmenopausal women

Alendronate decreases the risk of femoral neck fracture by suppressing bone turnover, and also decreases the serum total osteocalcin level. A low serum carboxylated osteocalcin level or high undercarboxylated osteocalcin level could be risk factors for femoral neck fracture. Vitamin K mediates the carboxylation of osteocalcin, but the effect of alendronate therapy with or without vitamin K(2) supplementation remains unknown. Forty-eight postmenopausal women were enrolled in a 1-year prospective randomized trial and assigned to alendronate monotherapy (5 mg/day) (group A, n = 26) or vitamin K(2) (45 mg/day) plus alendronate (5 mg/day) (group AK, n = 22). Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 0 and 12 months; bone turnover parameters were measured at 0, 3, and 12 months. Four patients discontinued alendronate therapy, and we analyzed the remaining 44 patients (23 in group A and 21 in group AK) who completed 1 year of treatment. Alendronate decreased undercarboxylated osteocalcin; carboxylated osteocalcin was not affected. Addition of vitamin K(2) enhanced the decrease of undercarboxylated osteocalcin levels and led to a greater increase of femoral neck bone mineral density. Alendronate monotherapy does not decrease carboxylation of osteocalcin, and combination of vitamin K(2) and alendronate brings further benefits on both osteocalcin carboxylation and BMD of femoral neck in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Alendronate inhibits periprosthetic bone loss around uncemented femoral components

Periprosthetic bone loss can be severe around the femoral component after uncemented arthroplasty. This study investigated the inhibitory effect of alendronate on periprosthetic bone loss. Seventeen patients underwent arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component. Among them, 8 patients were given alendronate 5 mg once daily for 1 year (ALN group) and 9 patients received no pharmacotherapy (control group). Bone mineral density was measured in six periprosthetic zones by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The average periprosthetic bone mineral density was 0.674-0.920 g/cm(2) at 1 month after surgery. From 6 months onward, the absolute bone mineral density and the ratio relative to the 1-month value were significantly decreased in the proximal zones of the femur in the control group (the ratio decreased from 0.817 to 0.769; P = 0.0040-0.0353). In the ALN group, however, the absolute and relative bone mineral density of the proximal femur remained unchanged for 12 months. In the other femoral zones, the absolute and relative bone mineral density remained unchanged throughout the study in both groups. We concluded that alendronate significantly inhibited the decrease of periprosthetic bone mineral density in the proximal femur after uncemented arthroplasty.

Effects of a combined alendronate and calcitriol agent (Maxmarvil) on bone metabolism in Korean postmenopausal women: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

INTRODUCTION

A randomized, double-blind, prospective, 24-week clinical trial was performed to evaluate the effects of a combinative agent, Maxmarvil, of calcitriol (0.5 mug) and alendronate (5 mg) on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

A total of 217 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled; 199 patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (Maxmarvil group or alfacalcidol group). None of the patients were vitamin-D-deficient, as assessed by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), nor had they received any drugs affecting bone metabolism before enrollment. Bone mineral densities (BMD) of L1-L4 and the femur were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the initial assessment and after 6 months of treatment. Serum biochemical assays, including serum calcium, 24-h urinary calcium excretion, and bone turnover markers (both bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [bsALP] and urine N-telopeptide [NTx]), were performed at the baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment.

RESULTS

In the Maxmarvil group, the BMD of the lumbar spine increased up to 2.42+/-0.5% from the baseline after 6 months (p<0.05). On the other hand, the change in BMD in the alfacalcidol group was 0.28+/-0.5% after 6 months. There was no significant difference in femoral BMD between the two groups. The levels of bsALP and NTx were significantly lower in the Maxmarvil group than in the alfacalcidol group (-22.04+/-3.9% vs. -11.42+/-2.8% [p<0.05] and -25.46+/-5.2% vs. 1.24+/-6.2% [p<0.001], respectively). Interestingly, there was a significantly smaller amount of 24-h urinary calcium in the Maxmarvil group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that a combination of calcitriol and alendronate is quite effective in preventing bone loss, with the advantage of lesser hypercalciuric effect of calcitriol in the postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

The Prevention of Bone Fractures After Liver Transplantation: Experience With Alendronate Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to prevent fractures in the first postoperative year.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We studied 59 patients (48 men, 11 women) aged 42.6+/-11.4 years, who underwent liver transplantation. All patients received oral alendronate 70 mg weekly and calcium 1 g and calcitriol 0.5 mug daily. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and proximal femur at baseline as well as at 6 and 12 months after transplantation for comparison with an historical control group (n=31). Spinal radiographs were obtained to assess vertebral fractures at the same time. Additionally, serum osteocalcin, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and biochemical parameters were determined every 3 months.

RESULTS

At baseline, femoral total BMD of men was significantly greater than that of women (P<.05, .85+/-.1 vs .74+/-.1). A significant increase in BMD was observed at 12 months (P<.05), no patient developed a bone fracture. Comparison analysis of genders showed that there was a significant difference in favor of men (P<.05). The lumbar BMD, neck T-, and Z-scores were significantly higher among patients treated with alendronate than historical controls (P<.05). After 3 months, serum PTH was increased and serum osteocalcin and urinary DPD were reduced. No severe side effects from alendronate treatment were observed during the study.

CONCLUSION

A direct sign of the success of our study was no fracture observed during the first postoperative year. Alendronate should be considered for patients with low bone mass after liver transplantation.

Effects of alendronate on bone mineral density and bone metabolic markers in patients with liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of alendronate (ALN) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers in patients with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

In the prospective, controlled, open study with 24 months of follow-up, 98 patients with OLT were randomised to receive ALN 70 mg weekly or no ALN; calcium (Ca) 1,000 mg daily and 0.5 mcg calcitriol daily were provided to all patients. Lumbar spine (LS) and hip BMDs were measured at 6-month intervals by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Spinal radiographs were obtained to assess vertebral fractures. Additionally, bone turnover markers, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and biochemical parameters were determined every 3 months.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the ALN group showed significant increases in BMD of the LS (5.1+/-3.9% vs 0.4+/-4.2%, p<0.05 at 12 months, 8.9+/-5.7% vs 1.4+/-4.9%, p<0.05 at 24 months), femoral neck (4.3+/-3.8% vs -1.1+/-3.1%, p<0.05 at 12 months, 8.7+/-4.8% vs 0.6+/-4.5%, p<0.05 at 24 months) and total femur (3.6+/-3.8% vs -0.6+/-4.0%, p<0.05 at 12 months, 6.2+/-3.8% vs 0.3+/-4.6%, p<0.05 at 24 months). In the ALN group, osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) decreased significantly at the sixth month, with no further change, by -35.6% and -63.0%, on average, respectively (p<0.05). In the control group, a significant increase in biochemical markers of bone turnover was observed in comparison to baseline values (p<0.05). PTH increased within reference levels without a difference between groups. Two nonvertebral fractures (4.2%) and nine vertebral fractures (18.8%) in the control group and three vertebral fractures (6.8%) in the ALN group occurred during the follow-up. The weekly ALN was well tolerated, and no severe side effects occurred.

CONCLUSION

This is the first randomised study including a control group to demonstrate that weekly ALN was able to significantly increase BMD in patients with OLT when compared with Ca and calcitriol alone. However, ALN did not appear to offer protection against fractures.

Drug injury in the upper gastrointestinal tract: effects of alendronate

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by an increase in bone resorption and a decline in bone density, which leads to increased susceptibility to bone fractures. Long-term therapy is needed to increase bone mineral density and maintain bone strength. Safe and well-tolerated medical therapies are required for long-term maintenance. Alendronate, an oral bisphosphonate, has been used for treatment of osteoporosis since the mid 1990s; however, recent studies have suggested alendronate can have significant gastrointestinal side effects. Most data suggest that the risk of these effects is low and not significantly higher than with placebo but there are limited reports that suggest otherwise, in both clinical trials and animal studies. Alendronate continues to remain an important mainstay of osteoporosis therapy.

Oral alendronate treatment for polyostotic fibrous dysplasia: a case report

Recently, intravenous therapy with pamidronate has been reported to be effective for treating fibrous dysplasia. However, very little is known about the efficacy of oral alendronate for fibrous dysplasia. We describe a patient with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, who had complained of persistent pain for more than 20 years, that was treated with oral alendronate alone. Follow-up examinations were at intervals of 3 months for 2 years. The pain, radiographic findings, and bone turnover, which was monitored using various markers, improved. No adverse side effect was noted. Oral alendronate is suggested to be a useful option in the treatment of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia.

Therapeutic effects of alendronate 35 mg once weekly and 5 mg once daily in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: a double-blind, randomized study

The efficacy and safety of treatment with oral alendronate (ALN) 35 mg once weekly for 52 weeks were compared with those of ALN 5 mg once daily in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study of Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change from baseline in the lumbar spine (L1-L4) bone mineral density (BMD) after 52 weeks of treatment. In this study, 328 patients were randomized to ALN 5 mg once daily (160 patients) or ALN 35 mg once weekly (168 patients). The adjusted mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD after 52 weeks of treatment was 5.8% and 6.4% in the once-daily group and the once-weekly group, respectively (both P < 0.001). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in spine BMD change between the two treatment groups was -0.31% to 1.48%, indicating that the two regimens were therapeutically equivalent, since the confidence interval fell entirely within the predefined equivalence criterion (+/-1.5%). The time course of the spine BMD increase was also similar for both regimens. Regarding total hip BMD, mean changes from baseline at 52 weeks were 2.8% and 3.0% in the once-daily group and the once-weekly group, respectively. In addition, the bone markers (urinary deoxypyridinoline, urinary type-I collagen N-telopeptides, and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were reduced to a similar level by either treatment throughout the treatment period. The tolerability and safety profiles were also similar between the treatment groups. Taken together, we conclude that the efficacy and safety of the ALN 35-mg once-weekly regimen are therapeutically equivalent to those of the ALN 5-mg once-daily regimen.

Preventive effects of sequential treatment with alendronate and 1 alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 on bone mass and strength in ovariectomized rats

Because accumulating evidence has shown that bisphosphonates are unable to maintain their bone-sparing effects after the withdrawal of the drug, a replacement treatment is needed when bisphosphonate treatment cannot be continued for some reason. The present study investigated the preventive effects of alendronate followed by 1alpha(OH)D3 on the mass and mechanical strength of trabecular and cortical bones in ovariectomized rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were ovariectomized or sham-operated at 48 weeks of age. Ovariectomized rats treated with vehicle alone (OVX group) showed significant decreases in bone mineral density (BMD) and mechanical strength of the lumbar vertebra and the midfemur during a 20-week period after the operation as compared with sham-operated rats. These decreases were prevented by continuous treatment with alendronate (0.5 mg/kg/day, po) for 20 weeks (ALN-C group), whereas the values reverted to those of the OVX group when alendronate was withdrawn at 10 weeks (ALN-W group). The sequential treatment with alendronate and 1alpha(OH)D3 (0.05 microg/kg/day, po) for 10 weeks each (ALN --> 1alpha group) resulted in higher BMD and mechanical strength of the lumbar vertebra and the midfemur in this group than in the OVX and ALN-W groups. The increase in mechanical strength was proportional to that in BMD at both sites, suggesting that the stimulatory effects of these treatments on bone strength were due to those on bone mass. Analyses of histology, computed tomography, and biochemical markers confirmed the preventive effects of the sequential treatment. Therefore, we propose that 1alpha(OH)D3 may be a good choice to replace alendronate when alendronate treatment cannot be continued for some reason.

Curative effect of combined treatment with alendronate and 1 alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 on bone loss by ovariectomy in aged rats

We investigated the combined effects of alendronate and 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 (1alpha(OH)D3) on the bone mass and strength in aged ovariectomized rats and compared them with those of single treatments. Forty-week-old female rats underwent ovariectomy or sham operation, and after 15 weeks, ovariectomized rats were daily administered vehicle alone, alendronate (0.2 or 1.0 mg/kg,p.o.), 1alpha(OH)D3 (0.02 microg/kg, p.o.), or the combinations of 0.2 or 1.0 mg/kg of alendronate and 1alpha(OH)D3. After 12 weeks, the groups receiving combined treatments had significantly increased bone density and mechanical strength of the 4th lumbar vertebral body and the midfemur compared to the vehicle-treated group, and the effects were almost equal to or slightly less than the addition of those of the respective single treatments. The increase in mechanical strength was proportional to that in bone mineral density, suggesting that the stimulatory effects of these treatments on bone strength are ascribable primarily to those on bone mass. Analyses of histology, computed tomography, and biochemical markers confirmed the strong effect of the combined treatment on trabecular bone in particular, which was associated with increased trabecular number and decreased bone turnover. We propose that the combination of daily alendronate and 1alpha(OH)D3 is clinically promising as a curative treatment of established postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Intermittent dosing of alendronate

OBJECTIVE

To review data describing use of intermittent dosing of alendronate.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (1966-May 2001) and EMBASE (1974-May 2001) databases to identify all information regarding intermittent dosing of alendronate.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A small number of clinical studies have evaluated the use of intermittent alendronate dosing in an attempt to improve patient compliance and adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from more controlled clinical trials and postmarketing data are needed to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of intermittent alendronate dosing. The definitive role of intermittent dosing in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis remains to be determined.

Vitamin K2 (menatetrenone) effectively prevents fractures and sustains lumbar bone mineral density in osteoporosis

We attempted to investigate whether vitamin K2 (menatetrenone) treatment effectively prevents the incidence of new fractures in osteoporosis. A total of 241 osteoporotic patients were enrolled in a 24-month randomized open label study. The control group (without treatment; n = 121) and the vitamin K2-treated group (n = 120), which received 45 mg/day orally vitamin K2, were followed for lumbar bone mineral density (LBMD; measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) and occurrence of new clinical fractures. Serum level of Glu-osteocalcin (Glu-OC) and menaquinone-4 levels were measured at the end of the follow-up period. Serum level of OC and urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline (DPD) were measured before and after the treatment. The background data of these two groups were identical. The incidence of clinical fractures during the 2 years of treatment in the control was higher than the vitamin K2-treated group (chi2 = 10.935; p = 0.0273). The percentages of change from the initial value of LBMD at 6, 12, and 24 months after the initiation of the study were -1.8 +/- 0.6%, -2.4 +/- 0.7%, and -3.3 +/- 0.8% for the control group, and 1.4 +/- 0.7%, -0.1 +/- 0.6%, and -0.5 +/- 1.0% for the vitamin K2-treated group, respectively. The changes in LBMD at each time point were significantly different between the control and the treated group (p = 0.0010 for 6 months, p = 0.0153 for 12 months, and p = 0.0339 for 24 months). The serum levels of Glu-OC at the end of the observation period in the control and the treated group were 3.0 +/- 0.3 ng/ml and 1.6 +/- 0.1 ng/ml, respectively (p < 0.0001), while the serum level of OC measured by the conventional radioimmunoassay (RIA) showed a significant rise (42.4 +/-6.9% from the basal value) in the treated group at 24 months (18.2 +/- 6.1% for the controls;p = 0.0081). There was no significant change in urinary DPD excretion in the treated group. These findings suggest that vitamin K2 treatment effectively prevents the occurrence of new fractures, although the vitamin K2-treated group failed to increase in LBMD. Furthermore, vitamin K2 treatment enhances gamma-carboxylation of the OC molecule.