Ectopic ACTH syndrome caused by desmopressin-responsive thymic neuroendocrine tumor

Diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in localizing ectopic ACTH syndrome: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

To elucidate the role of various imaging modalities for tumor localization in ectopic ACTH Cushing's syndrome (EAS).

DESIGN AND METHOD

Systematic review of the literature published between January 2015-2024 was performed. Patients (290 EAS patients, 23.8% Occult) who underwent contrast enhanced CT (CECT) and at least one PET/CT-scan (68Ga-SSTR, FDG and/or F-DOPA) were included.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for identifying EAS tumor was comparable across CECT (63.1%, n=290), SSTR-PET/CT (58.2%, n=187), and FDG-PET/CT (57.6%, n=191), but was poor for DOPA-PET/CT (30.8%, n=26). Sensitivity for detecting metastasis was also comparable across CECT (78%, n=73), SSTR-PET/CT (85.3%, n=41), and FDG-PET (73.7%, n=38). For localised lesions, sensitivity as per etiology and grade of NET were similar for three scans, with exception of Thymic NET and grade 1 NET where CECT was better than FDG PET/CT. In patients not localised on CECT, sensitivity of SSTR PET/CT was 33.3% (vs. 18.9% FDG-PET/CT) whereas for patients negative on CECT and FDG-PET, sensitivity of SSTR-PET/CT was 15%. In cases where CECT and SSTR-PET/CT failed to localize, the sensitivities of FDG-PET/CT and DOPA-PET/CT were only 5.7% (2/35) and 0% (0/9), respectively. SSTR-PET/CT has a distinct advantage with significantly lesser false positive (FP) lesions (2.6%, mostly in thyroid/or pancreas). In comparison, CECT and FDG-PET/CT had FP ∼11% (mostly in lung and/or mediastinum), most of which were negative on SSTR-PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

As per the current evidence, SSTR-PET/CT can be considered as the scan of choice in EAS evaluation, and further research is needed as one-fourth of the lesions remain occult.

Ectopic Cushing's syndrome due to thymic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review

Knowledge of ectopic Cushing's syndrome (CS) due to thymic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) comes from short series or single cases. Our aim is to perform a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid Medline and Biosis Previews of all cases with ectopic CS due to thymic NETs reported in the last 40 years and describe one illustrative patient attended in our institution. Search of literature: From 162 patients, 58.6% were male and mean age was 34.6 ± 13.9 years-old. Median of symptoms until diagnosis was 6 [2-24] months and 62% had aggressive CS. Imaging was positive in 93.7% (chest X-ray), 97.8% (computed tomography), 80.7% (somatostatin receptor scintigraphy) and median tumour size was 47 [25-68.5] mm. At presentation, 18% had localized disease, 26.2% locally invasive and 55.7% advanced. Eighty-eight present underwent surgery and histological subtypes were atypical (46.7%), typical (30.4%) and carcinoma (21.7%). Tumour persisted or recurred in 70.1%, 63% received radiotherapy and 45.2% chemotherapy. Follow-up median was 26.6 [14.5-57.5] months and mortality was reported in 35.8% with median survival of 38 [19-60] months. MEN-1 mutation was referred in 3.1%. Comparatively, carcinomas had aggressive CS more frequently while atypical showed advanced disease more often. In conclusion, thymic NETs causing ectopic CS are presented as aggressive hypercortisolism in the middle aged population. The disease is commonly extended at diagnosis and persists or recurs after surgery in most patients with a short term high mortality.

ACTH-producing thymic neuroendocrine tumor initially presenting as psychosis: A case report and literature review

A 32-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of severe psychosis and was found to have an ectopic ACTH-producing thymic neuroendocrine tumor. Laboratory data revealed an elevated serum cortisol and plasma ACTH level, hypokalemia, and metabolic alkalosis. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed an anterior mediastinal mass and multiple pulmonary nodules. As the patient was unable to communicate because of her consciousness disturbance, she was managed with artificial ventilation and deep sedation. Metyrapone and potassium supplementation were administered, and steroid psychosis gradually improved. Thoracic surgery was performed and the histopathological diagnosis was thymic neuroendocrine tumor with positive anti-ACTH immunohistochemical staining. Here we present details of the case and review the literature.

DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Differentiation of pathologic/neoplastic hypercortisolism (Cushing's syndrome) from physiologic/non-neoplastic hypercortisolism (formerly known as pseudo-Cushing's syndrome)

Endogenous hypercortisolism (Cushing's syndrome) usually implies the presence of a pathologic condition caused by either an ACTH-secreting neoplasm or autonomous cortisol secretion from a benign or malignant adrenal neoplasm. However, sustained or intermittent hypercortisolism may also accompany many medical disorders that stimulate physiologic/non-neoplastic activation of the HPA axis (formerly known as pseudo-Cushing's syndrome); these two entities may share indistinguishable clinical and biochemical features. A thorough history and physical examination is often the best (and sometimes only) way to exclude pathologic/neoplastic hypercortisolism. The presence of alcoholism, renal failure, poorly controlled diabetes and severe neuropsychiatric disorders should always raise suspicion that the presence of hypercortisolism may be related to physiologic/non-neoplastic Cushing's syndrome. As late-night salivary cortisol and low-dose dexamethasone suppression have good sensitivity and negative predictive value, normal studies exclude Cushing's syndrome of any form. However, these tests have imperfect specificity and additional testing over time with clinical follow-up is often needed. When there is persistent diagnostic uncertainty, secondary tests such as the DDAVP stimulation test and the dexamethasone-CRH test may provide evidence for the presence or absence of an ACTH-secreting tumor. This review will define and characterize the numerous causes of physiologic/non-neoplastic hypercortisolism and provide a rational clinical and biochemical approach to distinguish it from pathologic/neoplastic hypercortisolism (true Cushing's syndrome).