Does combination of "cold" and "hot" somatostatin analogs prolong survival of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms?

Targeting neuroendocrine tumors with octreotide and lanreotide: Key points for clinical practice from NET specialists

Octreotide and lanreotide are the two somatostatin analogs (SSA) currently available in clinical practice. They have been approved first to control the clinical syndrome (mainly carcinoid syndrome) associated with functioning neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and later for tumor growth control in advanced low/intermediate grade NET. Although evidence regarding their role, especially as antiproliferative therapy, has been increasing over the years some clinical indications remain controversial. Solicited by AIOM (Italian Association of Medical Oncology) a group of clinicians from various specialties, including medical oncology, endocrinology, and gastroenterology, deeply involved in NET for their clinical and research activity, addressed eight open questions, critically reviewing evidence and guidelines and sharing clinical take-home messages. The questions regarded the use of long-acting octreotide and lanreotide in the following settings: functioning and non-functioning NET refractory to label dose, first-line metastatic pulmonary NET, combination with other therapy with an antiproliferative intent, maintenance in NET responding to other therapies, adjuvant treatment, Ki-67-related cut-off, somatostatin receptor imaging, safety, and feasibility. The level of evidence is not absolute for the majority of these clinical contexts, so it is recommended to distinguish routine versus sporadic utilization in very selected cases. Mention of such specific issues by the main European guidelines (ENETS, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and ESMO, European Society for Medical Oncology) was explored and their position reported. However, different clinical decisions on single patients could be made if the case is carefully discussed within a NET-dedicated multidisciplinary team.

In patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, there is no apparent benefit of somatostatin analogues after disease control by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly combined as primary treatment for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), and SSAs given as maintenance. We sought to evaluate whether sequential therapy with PRRT followed by SSAs has progression or survival benefits in patients with NEN after disease control by PRRT.

METHODS

This prospective, randomised, single-centre study had as principal eligibility criteria: unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic, histologically confirmed well-differentiated NEN; no symptoms/biochemical diagnosis of carcinoid syndrome; no SSAs or ≤ 3 months of SSAs before PRRT; and stable disease or partial or complete response after PRRT. Altogether, 115 patients were randomised 2:1 to an SSA group (n = 74) given octreotide acetate LAR every 4 weeks, or a control group (n = 41) receiving only best supportive care. Octreotide treatment was to stop upon intolerable toxicity or patient refusal, or, at physician/patient discretion, upon NEN progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoint, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up from the first PRRT activity to death or latest observation was 6.6 (3.18-10.22) years. During that time, 71/115 patients (62%) progressed, 52/74 (70%) in the SSA group, and 19/41 (46%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Eighty-eight/115 patients (76%) died, 58/74 (78%) in the SSA group, and 30/41 (73%) in the control group (p = 0.52). Median (95% CI) PFS was 4.7 (2.8-7.7) years in the SSA group, and 6.4 (4.1-not reached) years in controls. Overall, median OS was 6.6 years. Neither PFS nor OS differed between groups (p = 0.129, p = 0.985, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with disease control after PRRT, subsequent SSA treatment appeared not to be associated with better PFS or OS. Whether to continue SSA administration upon progression after PRRT requires evaluation in a prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study with a relatively homogeneous sample.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recent Insights

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a paradigm shifting approach to the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Although there are no prospective randomized trials directly studying PRRT in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), there are data to suggest benefit in this patient population. Collectively, the data, consisting of two prospective and six retrospective studies, show a median PFS ranging from 20 to 39 months and a median OS ranging from 37 to 79 months. There are ongoing (and upcoming) prospective, randomized trials of PRRT in panNETs, which will provide further evidence to support this approach.