The biological and clinical advances of androgen receptor function in age-related diseases and cancer [Review]

Targeting the autophagy-miRNA axis in prostate cancer: toward novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies

Since prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, a better understanding of the molecular pathways guiding its development is imperative. A key factor in prostate cancer is autophagy, a cellular mechanism that affects both cell survival and death. Autophagy is essential in maintaining cellular homeostasis. Autophagy is a physiological mechanism wherein redundant or malfunctioning cellular constituents are broken down and recycled. It is essential for preserving cellular homeostasis and is implicated in several physiological and pathological conditions, including cancer. Autophagy has been linked to metastasis, tumor development, and treatment resistance in prostate cancer. The deregulation of miRNAs related to autophagy appears to be a crucial element in the etiology of prostate cancer. These miRNAs influence the destiny of cancer cells by finely regulating autophagic mechanisms. Numerous investigations have emphasized the dual function of specific miRNAs in prostate cancer, which alter autophagy-related pathways to function as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes. Notably, miRNAs have been linked to the control of autophagy and the proliferation, apoptosis, and migration of prostate cancer cells. To create customized therapy approaches, it is imperative to comprehend the dynamic interplay between autophagy and miRNAs in prostate cancer. The identification of key miRNAs provides potential diagnostic and prognostic markers. Unraveling the complex network of lncRNAs, like PCA3, also expands the repertoire of molecular targets for therapeutic interventions. This review explores the intricate interplay between autophagy and miRNAs in prostate cancer, focusing on their regulatory roles in cellular processes ranging from survival to programmed cell death.

Maternal Protein Restriction Alters the Expression of Proteins Related to the Structure and Functioning of the Rat Offspring Epididymis in an Age-Dependent Manner

Nutrition is an environmental factor able to activate physiological interactions between fetus and mother. Maternal protein restriction is able to alter sperm parameters associated with epididymal functions. Since correct development and functioning of the epididymides are fundamental for mammalian reproductive success, this study investigated the effects of maternal protein restriction on epididymal morphology and morphometry in rat offspring as well as on the expression of Src, Cldn-1, AR, ER, aromatase p450, and 5α-reductase in different stages of postnatal epididymal development. For this purpose, pregnant females were allocated to normal-protein (NP—17% protein) and low-protein (LP—6% protein) groups that received specific diets during gestation and lactation. After weaning, male offspring was provided only normal-protein diet until the ages of 21, 44, and 120 days, when they were euthanized and their epididymides collected. Maternal protein restriction decreased genital organs weight as well as crown-rump length and anogenital distance at all ages. Although the low-protein diet did not change the integrity of the epididymal epithelium, we observed decreases in tubular diameter, epithelial height and luminal diameter of the epididymal duct in 21-day-old LP animals. The maternal low-protein diet changed AR, ERα, ERβ, Src 416, and Src 527 expression in offspring epididymides in an age-dependent manner. Finally, maternal protein restriction increased Cldn-1 expression throughout the epididymides at all analyzed ages. Although some of these changes did not remain until adulthood, the insufficient supply of proteins in early life altered the structure and functioning of the epididymis in important periods of postnatal development.

Association of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapies With Venous Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A National Cohort Study

Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been proposed to be associated with a higher risk of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), whether gonadotropin-releasing hormones (GnRHs), such as both agonists and antagonists, are also associated with VTEs remain unclear. Using the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) linked with the National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified patients diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2008 to 2015. Patients who received GnRH were 1:1 propensity score matched with non-GnRH users by age and cancer stage at diagnosis and clinical stage. Cox regression analysis was applied to estimate the incidences of VTEs with death as a competing event at the 5-year follow-up. The VTE incidence among GnRH users was 1.13% compared with 0.98% among non-users. After adjusting with potential confounding factors, the risk of VTEs showed borderline statistical significance among GnRH users and non-users. Notably, in the subgroup analysis among patients receiving GnRH therapy, those younger than 70 years old or at an earlier stage (stage I/II) were at a higher risk of VTEs. Different from previous studies, our findings highlighted critical concerns regarding the cardiac safety of GnRH therapies in prostate cancer patients at a relatively younger age or at an earlier stage.

Battle of the sexes: contrasting roles of testis-specific protein Y-encoded (TSPY) and TSPX in human oncogenesis

The Y-located testis-specific protein Y-encoded (TSPY) and its X-homologue TSPX originated from the same ancestral gene, but act as a proto-oncogene and a tumor suppressor gene, respectively. TSPY has specialized in male-specific functions, while TSPX has assumed the functions of the ancestral gene. Both TSPY and TSPX harbor a conserved SET/NAP domain, but are divergent at flanking structures. Specifically, TSPX contains a C-terminal acidic domain, absent in TSPY. They possess contrasting properties, in which TSPY and TSPX, respectively, accelerate and arrest cell proliferation, stimulate and inhibit cyclin B-CDK1 phosphorylation activities, have no effect and promote proteosomal degradation of the viral HBx oncoprotein, and exacerbate and repress androgen receptor (AR) and constitutively active AR variant, such as AR-V7, gene transactivation. The inhibitory domain has been mapped to the carboxyl acidic domain in TSPX, truncation of which results in an abbreviated TSPX exerting positive actions as TSPY. Transposition of the acidic domain to the C-terminus of TSPY results in an inhibitory protein as intact TSPX. Hence, genomic mutations/aberrant splicing events could generate TSPX proteins with truncated acidic domain and oncogenic properties as those for TSPY. Further, TSPY is upregulated by AR and AR-V7 in ligand-dependent and ligand-independent manners, respectively, suggesting the existence of a positive feedback loop between a Y-located proto-oncogene and male sex hormone/receptors, thereby amplifying the respective male oncogenic actions in human cancers and diseases. TSPX counteracts such positive feedback loop. Hence, TSPY and TSPX are homologues on the sex chromosomes that function at the two extremes of the human oncogenic spectrum.

Splicing Factors Have an Essential Role in Prostate Cancer Progression and Androgen Receptor Signaling

Although inhibition of the androgen–androgen receptor (AR) axis effectively represses the growth of prostate cancer, most of all cases eventually become castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs). Enhancement of the expression of AR and its variants along with the downstream signals is important for disease progression. AR-V7, a constitutive active form of AR, is generated as a result of RNA splicing. RNA splicing creates multiple transcript variants from one pre-messenger RNA (mRNA) by removing introns/exons to allow mRNA translation. The molecular mechanisms leading to marked increases of AR and generation of AR-V7 have been unclear. However, recent papers highlighted the roles of RNA splicing factors which promote AR expression and production of variants. Notably, a broad range of splicing components were aberrantly regulated in CRPC tissues. Interestingly, expression of various spliceosome genes is enhanced by RNA-binding protein splicing factor proline- and glutamine-rich (PSF/SFPQ), leading to changes in the expression of AR transcript variants. Moreover, inhibition of several splicing factors repressed tumor growth in vivo. Altered expression of splicing factors is correlated to biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients. Thus, these findings suggest that splicing factors would be a potential therapeutic target. This review focuses on the emerging roles of splicing factors in prostate cancer progression and AR signaling.

Integrative Genomic Analysis of OCT1 Reveals Coordinated Regulation of Androgen Receptor in Advanced Prostate Cancer

The ligand-dependent transcription factor androgen receptor (AR) plays a critical role in prostate cancer progression. We previously reported that Octamer transcription factor 1 (OCT1), an AR collaborative factor, facilitated the AR genomic bindings to regulate diverse programs of gene expression in AR-dependent prostate cancer cells. Repression of OCT1 binding can serve as a potential treatment strategy for advanced prostate cancer. However, the precise mechanism underlying the functions of OCT1 in advanced prostate cancer, especially lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), is still unclear. To uncover specific OCT1 functions in disease progression, we explored global OCT1-binding regions by performing chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing in CRPC model 22Rv1 cells. We found that the OCT1 expression level and the obtained OCT1-binding regions increased in 22Rv1 cells compared with AR-dependent prostate cancer LNCaP cells. Interestingly, microarray analysis revealed that OCT1 regulates CRPC-specific target genes in addition to representative AR-regulated genes such as ACSL3. Pathway analysis showed the importance of OCT1 in regulating cell cycle‒related genes. By performing the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we validated anillin actin-binding protein (ANLN), which is highly expressed in CRPC and robustly regulated with OCT1 recruitment to the intron and promoter regions in 22Rv1 cells in comparison with LNCaP cells. Furthermore, knockdown of ANLN exhibited impaired cell growth and cell cycle progression, suggesting an important function of ANLN in CRPC cells. In conclusion, these findings raise the possibility that OCT1 coordinates AR signaling in a specific manner that is dependent on disease stage and promotes progression to CRPC.