Devastating late complication for repair of type A acute aortic dissection with usage of gelatin-resorcinol-formalin glue

A decade of surgical therapy in an all-comer cohort with type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

We reported on a decade of aortic surgery for type A aortic dissection to assess surgical techniques employed and outcomes over time in an all-comer analysis of a mid-size university cardiosurgical center.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2018, 283 patients (189 males and 94 females, mean age 62 years, range 30-85 years), who underwent surgical therapy for type A aortic dissection in our institution were included in a retrospective statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Among all the patients, 55.5% of them were hemodynamically stable, 10.3% came in intubated. A neurological deficit was present in 18.9% of cases, extremity malperfusion was noted in 17.4%, and abdominal malperfusion detected in 8.2%. The extent of the aortic dissection corresponded to DeBakey type I in 88% of cases, a thoracoabdominal involvement was seen in 64%. In 51.9% of patients, only the ascending aorta replaced, another 40.6% of patients had proximal arch replacement too. A separate stent placement into the descending aorta was achieved in 13.4% of patients, during surgery (5.7%) or thereafter (7.7%). Overall survival to discharge was 79.5%. Most frequent complications were stroke and paralysis (15.2%), but only visceral malperfusion (OR 9.0) and heart failure mandating ECMO therapy (OR 29.5) were associated with significantly increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for type A aortic dissection is still challenging. Along with the refinement of surgical techniques, the indication for the various procedures has moved from a simplified general strategy to a more individualized concept.

Short-term outcomes of a simple and effective approach to aortic root and arch repair in acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate short-term outcomes following direct aortic root and arch repair in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) without technical adjuncts.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2016, 94 consecutive patients with ATAAD underwent surgical repair, including aortic root repair (n = 45), root replacement (n = 39), or no root procedure (n = 10). Aortic root repair was achieved by running approximation of the dissected aortic wall circumferentially at the sinotubular junction and reinforcing the coronary ostia with 5-0 Prolene. The aortic root and arch were anastomosed to the Dacron graft with 5-0 Prolene without Teflon felt or biological glue.

RESULTS

Postoperative new-onset myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, and complete heart block occurred in 0%, 4%, 13%, and 0% of patients, respectively, whereas 30-day mortality was 4%. The incidences of permanent neurologic deficit and renal failure were 1% and 2%, respectively. Up to 5 years, the aortic root repair group was free from residual or recurrent aortic root dissection, major change in the aortic root diameter, and moderate to severe aortic regurgitation; the entire cohort was free of anastomotic pseudoaneurysm and reoperation for proximal aortic pathology or significant change in diameter of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta. Overall survival was 85% at 4 years and was significantly enhanced in the aortic root repair group compared with the Bentall group (n = 24) (93% vs 57%; P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct aortic root and arch repair with approximation of the aortic wall without use of technical adjuncts is safe and effective for patients with ATAAD. If warranted, preservation of the native aortic valve should be considered for a potential survival benefit.

Hybrid debranching and TEVAR of the aortic arch off-pump, in re-do patients with complicated chronic type-A aortic dissections: a critical report

Background

Patients suffering from acute type A aortic dissection undergo replacement of the ascending aorta, the proximal hemiarch or complete aortic arch, depending on the extent of the individual pathology. In a subset of these treated patients, secondary pathologies of the distal anastomosis or the remaining distal part of the aorta occur. The treatment of these pathologies is challenging, requiring major surgical re-do procedures with aortic arch replacement under extracorporeal circulation and hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Methods

We report our experience of five patients with complex aortic pathologies after previous aortic surgery treated with a single stage re-do hybrid procedure, consisting of bypass grafting of the supraaortic branches off-pump, stent graft placement for endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and surgical debranching of the aortic arch.

Results

In all patients the surgical vascular grafts and stent grafts were deployed successfully, there were no intraoperative deaths. Four out of five patients were discharged from hospital in good clinical condition. One patient died postoperatively due to cardiac tamponade. In one patient a type I endoleak persisted leading to occlusion of a bypass branch requiring surgical revision at one year after debranching.

Conclusion

We discuss the prerequisites, all steps and potential pitfalls of this hybrid aortic arch replacement. The current procedure avoids cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest, which may benefit early patient outcome; however, patient and device selection plays a key role for immediate success and midterm outcomes. In addition, precise procedural planning and development of customized stents may help to develop this procedure into a true alternative for conventional aortic arch replacement.