1
|
Logullo P, van Zuuren EJ, Winchester CC, Tovey D, Gattrell WT, Price A, Harrison N, Goldman K, Chisholm A, Walters K, Blazey P. ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) explanation and elaboration: Guidance and examples to support reporting consensus methods. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004390. [PMID: 38709851 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When research evidence is limited, inconsistent, or absent, healthcare decisions and policies need to be based on consensus among interested stakeholders. In these processes, the knowledge, experience, and expertise of health professionals, researchers, policymakers, and the public are systematically collected and synthesised to reach agreed clinical recommendations and/or priorities. However, despite the influence of consensus exercises, the methods used to achieve agreement are often poorly reported. The ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) guideline was developed to help report any consensus methods used in biomedical research, regardless of the health field, techniques used, or application. This explanatory document facilitates the use of the ACCORD checklist. METHODS AND FINDINGS This paper was built collaboratively based on classic and contemporary literature on consensus methods and publications reporting their use. For each ACCORD checklist item, this explanation and elaboration document unpacks the pieces of information that should be reported and provides a rationale on why it is essential to describe them in detail. Furthermore, this document offers a glossary of terms used in consensus exercises to clarify the meaning of common terms used across consensus methods, to promote uniformity, and to support understanding for consumers who read consensus statements, position statements, or clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). The items are followed by examples of reporting items from the ACCORD guideline, in text, tables, and figures. CONCLUSIONS The ACCORD materials-including the reporting guideline and this explanation and elaboration document-can be used by anyone reporting a consensus exercise used in the context of health research. As a reporting guideline, ACCORD helps researchers to be transparent about the materials, resources (both human and financial), and procedures used in their investigations so readers can judge the trustworthiness and applicability of their results/recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Logullo
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, and EQUATOR Network UK Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Christopher C Winchester
- Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Tovey
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Amy Price
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice (TDI), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA, previously at Stanford Anesthesia, Informatics and Media Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | | | - Keith Goldman
- Global Medical Affairs, AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | | | | | - Paul Blazey
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pisani L, Quintairos A, Salluh JIF. ICU registries: From tracking to fostering better outcomes. J Crit Care 2024; 79:154462. [PMID: 37981535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Pisani
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand; Doctors with Africa - CUAMM, Padova, Italy
| | - Amanda Quintairos
- D'OR Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Critical and Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Hospital Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Jorge I F Salluh
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Williams G, Fulbrook P, Alberto L, Kleinpell R, Christensen M, Sitoula K, Kobuh ND. Critical care nursing policy, practice, and research priorities: An international cross-sectional study. J Nurs Scholarsh 2023; 55:1044-1057. [PMID: 36894518 DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the status of critical care nursing internationally, assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and identify research priorities by surveying professional critical care nursing organizations (CCNOs) worldwide. DESIGN A descriptive survey methodology was used. This study is the sixth worldwide quadrennial review to assess international critical care nursing needs and provide evidence to inform critical care nursing policy, practice and research priorities globally. METHODS The sixth World Federation of Critical Care Nurses survey of CCNOs was emailed to potential participants from countries with CCNOs or known critical care nurse leaders. Data were collected online using Survey Monkey™. Responses were entered into SPSS version 28 software (IBM Corp.) and analyzed by geographical region and national wealth group. FINDINGS Ninety-nine national representative respondents participated in the survey (70.7% response rate). The most important issues identified were working conditions, teamwork, staffing levels, formal practice guidelines, wages, and access to quality education programs. The top five CCNO services that were of most importance were providing national conferences, local conferences, workshops and education forums, practice standards and guidelines, and professional representation. Important pandemic-related services and activities provided by CCNOs included addressing emotional and mental well-being of nurses, providing guidance related to nurse staffing/workforce needs, assisting to coordinate efforts to obtain personal protective equipment supplies, serving as a country liaison with the World Health Organization's COVID-19 response activities, and assisting in the development and implementation of policies regarding standards of care. The most important contributions expected from the World Federation of Critical Care Nurses were standards for professional practice, standards for clinical practice, website resources, professional representation, and providing online education and training materials. The top five research priority areas were: stress levels (inclusive of burnout, emotional exhaustion and compassion fatigue); critical care nursing shortage, skill mix and workforce planning; recruitment, retention, turnover, working conditions; critical care nursing education and patient outcomes; and adverse events, staffing levels, patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The results highlight priority areas for critical care nursing internationally. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted critical care nurses as direct care providers. As a result, addressing the ongoing needs of critical care nurses remains a priority area of focus. The results also highlight important policy and research priorities for critical care nursing globally. Results of this survey should be incorporated into strategic action plans at the national and international levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Issues of importance to critical care nurses including research and policy priorities during and following COVID-19 are now clarified through this survey. The impact and importance that COVID-19 has had on critical care nurses and their preferences and priorities are provided. Clear guidance to leaders and policy makers on where critical care nurses would like to see greater focus and attention to help strengthen the contribution of critical care nursing practice to the global healthcare agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ged Williams
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul Fulbrook
- School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Nursing Research & Practice Development Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Laura Alberto
- Escuela de Enfermería & Instituto de Investigación en Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Salvador, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ruth Kleinpell
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Tennessee, USA
- Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Kabita Sitoula
- Regional Federation of Critical Care Nurses-South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Ntogwiachu Daniel Kobuh
- Experiential University Institute of Science and Technology, Yaoundé, Cameroon
- African Federation of Critical Care Nurses, Douala, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quach S, Veitch A, Zaccagnini M, West A, Nonoyama ML. Underrepresentation of Respiratory Therapists as Experts in Delphi Studies on Respiratory Practices and Research Priorities. Respir Care 2022; 67:1609-1632. [PMID: 36442987 PMCID: PMC9994035 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Delphi survey techniques are a common consensus method used to collect feedback from an expert panel to inform practices, establish guidelines, and identify research priorities. Collecting respiratory therapists' (RT) expertise and experiences as part of consensus-building methodologies is one way to ensure that they align with RT practices and to better influence respiratory care practice. This narrative review aimed to report the RT representation in expert panels of Delphi studies focused on respiratory therapy practices and research priorities. The research question that guided this review is: to what extent are RTs included as expert participants among published Delphi studies relate to respiratory therapy and research topics? We conducted a structured search of the literature and identified 23 papers that reported Delphi studies related to respiratory care practices and 15 that reported on respiratory-related research priorities. Delphi studies that focused on reporting consensus on respiratory care practices included the following: (1) mechanical ventilation, (2) high-flow nasal cannula therapy, (3) COVID-19 respiratory management, (4) home oxygen therapy, (5) cardiopulmonary monitoring, and (6) disease-specific guidelines. Delphi studies that focused on establishing respiratory research priorities included the following: (1) theory and practice-orientated knowledge gaps, and (2) priority research topics for empirical investigation. The results of this review suggest that RTs were rarely included as expert participants and, when involved, were minimally represented (5% to 33%). Given RTs' diverse and relevant experience in respiratory care, incorporating their perspectives to inform future education, respiratory care practices, and research priorities would allow evidence to better align with knowledge gaps deemed important for the respiratory therapy profession.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Quach
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- Respiratory Therapy Department, Hospital of Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alanna Veitch
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco Zaccagnini
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Department Respiratory Therapy, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrew West
- Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Mika L Nonoyama
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
- Respiratory Therapy Department, Hospital of Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gorman EA, O'Kane CM, McAuley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: diagnosis, outcomes, long-term sequelae, and management. Lancet 2022; 400:1157-1170. [PMID: 36070788 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01439-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterised by acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure with bilateral infiltrates on chest imaging, which is not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload. ARDS is defined by the Berlin criteria. In this Series paper the diagnosis, management, outcomes, and long-term sequelae of ARDS are reviewed. Potential limitations of the ARDS definition and evidence that could inform future revisions are considered. Guideline recommendations, evidence, and uncertainties in relation to ARDS management are discussed. The future of ARDS strives towards a precision medicine approach, and the framework of treatable traits in ARDS diagnosis and management is explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen A Gorman
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Cecilia M O'Kane
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sharpe H, Cerato L, Derech D, Guirguis L, Hayward K, Lohmann T, MacLean JE, Manafo E, Paskey J, Rasiah J, Rimkus M, Rizvi SK, Robinson G, Seefried B, Somani Z, Tindall M, Vliagoftis H, Pendharkar SR, Stickland MK. What are the respiratory health research priorities in Alberta, Canada? A stakeholder consultation. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059326. [PMID: 35738651 PMCID: PMC9226868 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Respiratory Health Strategic Clinical Network (RHSCN) was launched to facilitate respiratory and sleep health through implementation of innovative, patient-centred, evidence-informed coordinated services in Alberta. In collaboration with project partners, the RHSCN aimed to determine the respiratory research priorities for Alberta. DESIGN The four phases of this research prioritisation project were (1) identifying research questions from stakeholders, (2) determining which research questions had been answered in existing literature, (3) prioritising unanswered questions and (4) finalising the priorities through an inperson workshop. SETTING The study occurred in Alberta, Canada over a 2-year period beginning in March 2017. PARTICIPANTS A total of 448 patients, clinicians and other stakeholders consented to participate in the survey. RESULTS A total of 595 possible questions were submitted, with 343 unique questions identified. Of the questions, 94 were out of scope, 155 answered by existing literature and 10 were combined with others, while 83 were determined to be unanswered in the literature. Stakeholders were surveyed again to prioritise the remaining 83 questions and they were reviewed by the project's Steering Committee (clinicians and patients). At the inperson workshop, the Steering Committee identified 17 research topics as priority areas for respiratory and sleep research in Alberta. CONCLUSION A stakeholder-led research prioritisation process identified optimal clinical management/follow-up, equitable access to services, and management of social, psychological and mental health issues related to respiratory/sleep health as priority research areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Sharpe
- Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lisa Cerato
- Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Lisa Guirguis
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Tara Lohmann
- Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Jananee Rasiah
- Faculty of Nursing and College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mark Rimkus
- Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael K Stickland
- Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wendlandt B, Chen YT, Lin FC, Toles M, Gaynes B, Hanson L, Carson S. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Trajectories in ICU Family Caregivers. Crit Care Explor 2021; 3:e0409. [PMID: 33912839 PMCID: PMC8078333 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
To use latent class growth analysis to identify posttraumatic stress disorder symptom trajectories in ICU family caregivers. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING The medical ICU at a tertiary-care center in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients experiencing acute cardiorespiratory failure (defined as requiring at least one of the following: 1) vasopressors, 2) noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, 3) high-flow nasal cannula, or 4) mechanical ventilation) were enrolled in a pair with their primary family caregivers. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Participants were enrolled within the first 48 hours of ICU admission. Family caregiver posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms were measured using the Impact of Events Scale-Revised at four time points: at enrollment, shortly after ICU discharge, and at 3 and 6 months after ICU discharge. The data were examined using latent class growth analysis to identify posttraumatic stress disorder symptom trajectories. Two distinct symptom trajectories were identified: a persistently high trajectory, characterized by high posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms at initial assessment, which remained elevated over time, and a persistently low trajectory, characterized by low posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms at initial assessment, which remained low over time. Approximately two-thirds of caregivers belonged to the persistently high trajectory, and one-third of caregivers belonged to the persistently low trajectory. CONCLUSIONS Using latent class growth analysis to measure 6-month ICU family caregiver posttraumatic stress disorder symptom trajectories, we identified two distinct trajectories (persistently low and persistently high). A larger cohort study is warranted to further delineate posttraumatic stress disorder trajectories in this population, with the ultimate goal of targeting high-risk caregivers for interventions to reduce psychologic distress and improve long-term caregiver outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blair Wendlandt
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Yi Tang Chen
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Feng-Chang Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mark Toles
- University of North Carolina School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bradley Gaynes
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Laura Hanson
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Shannon Carson
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corrigan J, Ogah I, Ip-Buting A, Sharpe H, Laratta CR, Peller P, Tsai WH, Pendharkar SR. An evaluation of rural-urban disparities in treatment outcomes for obstructive sleep apnoea: study protocol for a prospective cohort study. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6:00141-2020. [PMID: 33043058 PMCID: PMC7534578 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00141-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common and treatable chronic condition that is associated with significant morbidity and economic cost. Geography is increasingly being recognised as a barrier to diagnosis and treatment of many chronic diseases; however, no study to date has investigated the impact of place of residence on health outcomes in OSA. Objective The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment outcomes for patients initiating continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for OSA differ between those who live in urban versus rural settings. Methods A prospective cohort design will be used. Participants will be recruited through community-based CPAP providers and assigned to either the rural or urban cohort based on residential postal code. The primary outcome will be the difference in nightly hours of CPAP use between the two groups, measured 3 months after initiation of therapy. Secondary outcomes will include symptoms, quality of life, patient satisfaction and patient-borne costs. Anticipated results This study will determine whether there are differences in CPAP adherence or patient-reported outcomes between rural and urban patients with OSA. These results will highlight potential challenges with providing OSA care in rural populations and may inform health interventions to reduce urban-rural inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Corrigan
- Dept of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Imhokhai Ogah
- Dept of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Ada Ip-Buting
- W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Heather Sharpe
- W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Cheryl R Laratta
- Dept of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Peter Peller
- Spatial and Numeric Data Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Willis H Tsai
- Dept of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.,Dept of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sachin R Pendharkar
- Dept of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.,Dept of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Almaghlouth I, Islam T, Alamro N, Alsultan A, Alfadda A, Al-Muhsen S, Almasry A, Almadi MA, Hersi A, BaHammam A. Mapping COVID-19 related research from Saudi Arabia, a scoping review. Between reality and dreams. Saudi Med J 2020; 41:791-801. [PMID: 32789418 PMCID: PMC7502955 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2020.8.25163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To map research production by Saudi-affiliated investigators in order to identify areas of strength and weakness. Method: We followed the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework. Medline and Cochrane databases were searched with a focus on identifying articles related to COVID-19 and Saudi Arabia following the PRISMA protocol. The study was conducted at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between March and May 2020. Results: A total of 53 articles were ultimately included. Most of the research production from Saudi Arabia was opinion and narrative reviews related to the clinicopathological features of COVID-19 as well as control and prevention of virus spread. Conclusion: The results of this scoping review identify a relative deficiency in original research, which requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Almaghlouth
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|