Observation of unaveraged giant MEG activity from language areas during speech tasks in patients harboring brain lesions very close to essential language areas: expression of brain plasticity in language processing networks?

We describe a series of 12 patients who suffered from lesions adjacent to the classic Broca and Wernicke areas and were examined by magnetoencephalography (MEG) for presurgical language localization while performing a protocol of different language tasks. In these patients very large MEG activity of up to 5pT was observed, which was located not only in the adjacent language processing brain areas but also in more distant areas, which are part of the language processing neuronal network. The high amplitude and the focal spatial extent of this activity allowed MEG source localization from the unaveraged data. In nine patients sources of this high amplitude activity were even found in the homologous language areas on the contralateral, the nondominant side of the brain. The physiological interrelationship of these large MEG changes needs to be investigated in more detail in further studies especially in the context of possible mechanisms for brain plasticity to overcome inhibitory activity of the impaired language area.

Magnetic source imaging combined with image-guided frameless stereotaxy: a new method in surgery around the motor strip

OBJECTIVE

In this study, information about the localization of the central sulcus obtained by magnetic source imaging (MSI) was intraoperatively translated to the brain, using frameless image-guided stereotaxy. In the past, the MSI results could be translated to the surgical space only by indirect methods (e.g., the comparison of the MSI results, displayed in surface renderings, with bony landmarks or blood vessels on the exposed brain surface).

METHODS

Somatosensory evoked fields were recorded with a MAGNES II biomagnetometer (Biomagnetic Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA). Using the single equivalent current dipole model, the localization of the somatosensory cortex was superimposed on magnetic resonance imaging with a self-developed contour fit program. The magnetic resonance image set containing the magnetoencephalographic dipole was then transferred to a frameless image-guided stereotactic system. Intraoperatively, the gyrus containing the dipole was identified as the postcentral gyrus, using neuronavigation, and the next anterior sulcus was regarded as the central sulcus. With intraoperative cortical recording of somatosensory evoked potentials, this assumption was verified in each case.

RESULTS

In all cases, the preoperatively assumed localization of the central sulcus and motor cortex with MSI agreed with the intraoperative identification of the central sulcus using the phase reversal technique.

CONCLUSION

The combined use of MSI and a frameless stereotactic system allows a fast orientation of eloquent brain areas during surgery. This may contribute to a safer and more radical surgery in lesions adjacent to the motor cortex.