Potential coeliac disease in children: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

Potential coeliac disease (PCD) is defined by the presence of positive CD-specific autoantibodies with a normal/extremely mildly damaged intestinal mucosa. This study sought to examine the progression of PCD in children maintaining a gluten-containing diet and to identify risk factors associated with the onset of CD. A comparative literature review was conducted to assess the results in the context of existing evidence.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 67 children diagnosed with PCD between January 2005 and January 2022, with a maximum follow up of 53 months. The associations between baseline clinical characteristics and the development of CD were assessed using hazard ratios (HR).

RESULTS

Nineteen percent (19 %) (12/67, cumulative incidence) of PCD children, with a median age of 4.3 years, progressed to CD during a median follow up period of 30 months. A fluctuating trend in tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) levels was observed in 35.8 % (24/67) of the children, while 46.2 % (31/67) showed tTG-IgA negativization. In univariable analysis, the presence of autoimmune disease and one-year increase in age at diagnosis were significantly associated with CD progression [HR=17.7 (95%CI: 3.0-106.8; p=0.0017) and HR=1.3 (95%CI: 1.1-1.5; p=0.0125), respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that only a small proportion of PCD children progress to CD. It also highlights that advancing age and the presence of autoimmune disease are the main risk factors for the development of villous atrophy. A better understanding of tTG-IgA trend during follow up could help in the management of PCD children.

Do Serological Tests Eliminate the Need for Endoscopic Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Patients with Celiac Disease? A Retrospective Study with Review of Literature

Background: Celiac disease is one of the most common genetic allergies worldwide. The prevalence of celiac disease in Iran is similar to or even higher than the global prevalence. Celiac disease is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the small intestine. Affected patients are allergic to gluten protein that exists in some grains, such as wheat and barley. Methods: Serological endomysial IgA antibody (EMA-AB) and tissue transglutaminase IgA antibody (TTG-IgA) tests were performed on 114 patients aged the ages of 0-18 years with histopathological findings of celiac disease. The results of these tests were compared to the results of the histopathological study of the duodenal biopsy. Results: Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calculation of the TTG-IgA test's sensitivity and specificity, the best diagnostic limit for the TTG-IgA test is 144, which has the best sensitivity and specificity. At this value (cut-off), the test's sensitivity was 62%, and the specificity was 93.7%. For the endomysial test, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 80%, 93%, 90%, and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the endomysial test is better than that of the TTG-IgA test in general for diagnosing patients with celiac disease. In the TTG-IgA test, false-positive cases are high due to a cut-off of 20, reducing the test's specificity. In these false-positive cases, the endomysial test helps in better diagnosis.

Clinical, Methodological, and Practical Considerations for Algorithmic Testing in Autoimmune Serology

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune serology tests are central to the classification, screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of a variety of autoimmune disorders. To improve the appropriateness of serologic evaluation and support laboratory resource utilization, reflex testing approaches have been proposed and implemented across clinical laboratories. Reflex testing involves a staged approach where an initial test result triggers subsequent tests based on prespecified rules.

CONTENT

Various reflex testing approaches in the context of antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic disease, antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis, celiac disease, and myasthenia gravis are reviewed here. Clinical, analytical, and practical considerations of reflex testing implementation are addressed as well as associated limitations and challenges.

SUMMARY

Serology reflex testing algorithms for the evaluation of autoimmune diseases can support clinical diagnosis and laboratory resource use but may be challenging to implement and are often applied variably across institutions. Assessments of evidence-driven guidelines, clinical impact, and impact on laboratory workflow are essential to this task.

Positive tissue transglutaminase antibodies with negative endomysial antibodies: Unresolved issues in diagnosing celiac disease

BACKGROUND

The serological screening for celiac disease (CD) is currently based on the detection of anti-transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibodies, subsequently confirmed by positive endomysial antibodies (EMA). When an anti-tTG IgA positive/EMA IgA negative result occurs, it can be due either to the lower sensitivity of the EMA test or to the lower specificity of the anti-tTG test. This study aimed at verifying how variation in analytical specificity among different anti-tTG methods could account for this discrepancy.

METHODS

A total of 130 consecutive anti-tTG IgA positive/EMA negative samples were collected from the local screening routine and tested using five anti-tTG IgA commercial assays: two chemiluminescence methods, one fluoroimmunoenzymatic method, one immunoenzymatic method and one multiplex flow immunoassay method.

RESULTS

Twenty three/130 (17.7%) patients were diagnosed with CD. In the other 107 cases a diagnosis of CD was not confirmed. The overall agreement among the five anti-tTG methods ranged from 28.5% to 77.7%. CD condition was more likely linked to the positivity of more than one anti-tTG IgA assay (monopositive = 2.5%, positive with ≥ three methods = 29.5%; p = 0.0004), but it was not related to anti-tTG IgA antibody levels (either positive or borderline; p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with positive anti-tTG/negative EMA have a low probability of being affected by CD. Given the high variability among methods to measure anti-tTG IgA antibodies, anti-tTG-positive/EMA-negative result must be considered with extreme caution. It is advisable that the laboratory report comments on any discordant results, suggesting to consider the data in the proper clinical context and to refer the patient to a CD reference center for prolonged follow up.

Challenges in the Standardization of Autoantibody Testing: a Comprehensive Review

Standardization and harmonization are complementary tools to achieve higher testing quality in laboratory medicine. Both are of great relevance and are strongly needed in autoimmune diagnostics, due to the impressive advance in basic research and technological development observed in this diagnostic field in recent years that has led to the introduction of many new tests and new analytical methods. It is, therefore, essential that this strong innovative thrust is translated into clinical practice in a coordinated way to avoid confusion and the risk of potentially harmful errors for the patient. However, while standardization of antibody assays is a very complex task, harmonization of procedures and behaviors is a more feasible target and should necessarily include all the phases of the total testing process-in the pre-analytical phase, appropriateness of test requests, harmonization of autoantibody terminology, and adoption of uniform nomenclature for laboratory tests; in the analytical phase, harmonization of measurements, and sharing of test profiles and diagnostic algorithms; and in the post-analytical phase, harmonization of data reporting, and criteria for interpreting immunoserological results, especially harmonization of units, reference intervals, decision limits, and definition and notification of critical values. We here provide and discuss some examples of harmonization initiatives related to anti-nuclear antibodies, TSH receptor, and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies and to antibodies associated with autoimmune hepatitis and with celiac disease. These initiatives could be the starting steps to achieve a wider consensus and a closer interaction among stakeholders in the path of autoimmune diagnostics harmonization to enhance clinical effectiveness and provide greater patient safety.

Undetectable negative tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies predict mucosal healing in treated coeliac disease patients

BACKGROUND

Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immunoglobulin A (IgA) testing is a sensitive adjunct to the diagnosis of coeliac disease. The threshold for positivity was developed for diagnosis, with negative results reported as below the reference value (<4 U/mL).

AIM

To investigate if an undetectable (tTG IgA<1.2 U/mL) is more predictive of healing compared to patients with negative but detectable serology (1.2-3.9 U/mL).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 402 treated coeliac disease patients seen at the Mayo Clinic with negative tTG IgA values drawn within 1 month of duodenal biopsy between January 2009 and December 2015. The Corazza-Villanacci score was used to assess mucosal healing. The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms was also collected. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of clinical variables with a normal biopsy.

RESULTS

Patients with undetectable titres more frequently had normal duodenal histology compared to patients with detectable tTG IgA levels (117/240 vs. 53/162; OR=1.96; 1.292, 2.961). Asymptomatic patients more frequently had normal duodenum as compared to symptomatic patients (88/163 vs. 82/239; OR=2.25; CI: 1.494, 3.377). Patients with undetectable serology and on a gluten-free diet for ≥2 years were more likely to have no villous atrophy compared to patients with detectable serology (148/192 vs. 55/88; OR=2.02; CI: 1.17, 3.49).

CONCLUSION

In subjects recovering from coeliac disease with negative tTG IgA serology, an undetectable titre is associated with normal histology on follow-up biopsy.