Handling of hemolyzed serum samples in clinical chemistry laboratories: the Nordic hemolysis project

Behind the scenes of EQA - characteristics, capabilities, benefits and assets of external quality assessment (EQA)

External quality assessment (EQA) enhances patient safety through the evaluation of the quality of laboratory-based and point of care testing. Regulatory agencies and accreditation organizations utilize the results and the laboratory's response to them as part of assessing the laboratory's fitness to practice. In addition, where EQA samples are commutable and the assigned value has been determined using reference measurement procedures (RMPs), EQA data contributes to the verification of metrological traceability of assays as part of the post-market surveillance of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices (IVD-MDs). More broadly, the scientific and medical communities use EQA data to demonstrate that medical laboratory examination procedures are fit for clinical purposes, to evaluate common reference intervals, and inclusion of data in clinical databases. Scientific groups, the IVD industry, reference laboratories and National Metrology Institutes can work with EQA providers to identify measurands, which should urgently be supported by the development of reference materials or methods. The ability of health systems to respond effectively to fast-evolving medical challenges, such as the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, is reliant on EQA to demonstrate confidence in the performance of new laboratory methods and testing services. EQA providers are uniquely positioned to assess the performance of IVD-MDs in addition to individual laboratories and testing sites. Although the primary focus of EQA providers remains the improvement of the performance of individual laboratories, there are many stakeholders who benefit from EQA performance data.

Behind the scenes of EQA - characteristics, capabilities, benefits and assets of external quality assessment (EQA)

This is the first in a series of five papers that detail the role and substantial impact that external quality assessment (EQA) and their providers' services play in ensuring in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) performance quality. The aim is to give readers and users of EQA services an insight into the processes in EQA, explain to them what happens before EQA samples are delivered and after examination results are submitted to the provider, how they are assessed, what benefits participants can expect, but also who are stakeholders other than participants and what significance do EQA data and assessment results have for them. This first paper presents the history of EQA, insights into legal, financing and ethical matters, information technology used in EQA, structure and lifecycle of EQA programs, frequency and intensity of challenges, and unique requirements of extra-examination and educational EQA programs.

The preanalytical phase – from an instrument-centred to a patient-centred laboratory medicine

In order to guarantee patient safety, medical laboratories around the world strive to provide highest quality in the shortest amount of time. A major leap in quality improvement was achieved by aiming to avoid preanalytical errors within the total testing process. Although these errors were first described in the 1970s, it took additional years/decades for large-scale efforts, aiming to improve preanalytical quality by standardisation and/or harmonisation. Initially these initiatives were mostly on the local or national level. Aiming to fill this void, in 2011 the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group “Preanalytical Phase” (WG-PRE) was founded. In the 11 years of its existence this group was able to provide several recommendations on various preanalytical topics. One major achievement of the WG-PRE was the development of an European consensus guideline on venous blood collection. In recent years the definition of the preanalytical phase has been extended, including laboratory test selection, thereby opening a huge field for improvement, by implementing strategies to overcome misuse of laboratory testing, ideally with the support of artificial intelligence models. In this narrative review, we discuss important aspects and milestones in the endeavour of preanalytical process improvement, which would not have been possible without the support of the Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) journal, which was one of the first scientific journals recognising the importance of the preanalytical phase and its impact on laboratory testing quality and ultimately patient safety.

Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis

OBJECTIVES

Hemolysis is associated with erroneous or delayed results. Objectives of the study were to compare four different methods for obtaining hemolysis in vitro on three different analyzers.

METHODS

Hemolysis was prepared with addition of pure hemoglobin into serum pool, osmotic shock, aspiration through blood collection needle, freezing/thawing of whole blood. Biochemistry parameters were measured in duplicate at Architect c8000 (Abbott, Abbott Park, USA), Beckman Coulter AU680 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, USA) and Cobas 6000 c501 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), according to manufacturers' declarations. Cut-off value was defined as the highest value of H index with corresponding bias lower than acceptance criteria.

RESULTS

We were not able to obtain results with freezing protocol. On all three platforms, lowest number of analytes were sensitive to hemolysis at H=0.5 using method of adding free hemoglobin. When osmotic shock was used, cut-off values for the most analytes were generally met at lower values. Hemolysis significantly interfered with measurement of potassium and lactate dehydrogenase (LD) at H=0.5 on all platforms. The most of the tested analytes had the lowest acceptable H index when aspiration method was used. At the low level of hemolysis (H=0.8) glucose, sodium, potassium, chloride, phosphate, and LD were affected on all analyzers, with some additional analytes depending on the manufacturer.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemolysis interference differs on different analyzers and according to protocol for obtaining hemolysis. Aspiration method was generally the most sensitive to hemolysis interference, while addition of free Hb was the most resistant.

Demonstrating the feasibility of accurately and reliably correcting potassium results for mildly hemolytic samples using a new experimental design

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

For several decades, there has been an ongoing debate about the appropriateness and reliability of correcting potassium concentration results for hemolyzed samples. As part of implementing a new Roche Cobas Pro analyzer system the possibility of correcting potassium results in hemolytic samples using a new, thorough experimental design, was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The relationship between hemolytic index (HI) and increases in potassium concentration was studied by performing a linear regression on hemolysate dilution series (HI 0-160 mg/dL) from 20 left-over patient samples. The obtained correction procedure was validated using another 20 left-over patient samples. Corrections were accepted according to a correction concordance of 100% within the total allowable error criterion of 4.85%.

RESULTS

The obtained reporting procedure was: HI 0-17 quantitative potassium reporting, HI 18-100 correct potassium for HI, and report as text including a disclaimer for in vivo hemolysis; samples were rejected for HI > 100. In the validation cohort, 70/70 samples eligible for correction were within the TEa criterion. The maximum negative and positive errors were -2.8% and 2.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Correcting potassium concentration results in a designated HI range is feasible and increases the accuracy the potassium results in samples with mild in vitro hemolysis.

Impact of managing affected results in haemolysed samples of an infant-maternity hospital using an unconventional approach

BACKGROUND

The management of affected results in haemolysed samples (HS) is debated. In an infant-maternity setting, for reporting interfered test results, we provided the result itself, the degree of haemolysis (as free haemoglobin concentration), and a warning recommending sample recollection. We investigated the impact of this approach on sample quality and clinicians' decision-making.

METHODS

Free haemoglobin was measured on Beckman Coulter AU680 as haemolytic index. We estimated the total HS number, the clinical wards more affected by HS, the most interfered analytes, and the retesting rate of interfered tests, by comparing data from Apr-Dec 2017, the period just after the introduction of the new policy, vs. Apr-Dec 2018.

RESULTS

One year after the new report introduction, a significant HS decrease (5.8% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001) was detected, together with a reduction of the frequency by which haemolysis affected results. The most affected wards, i.e., Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units, showed an improvement in sample quality (HS rate, 30.6% to 16.1%, P < 0.001, and 25.2% to 20.9%, P = 0.048, respectively). We noted a significant decrease in retesting after an alerted result for aspartate aminotransferase, magnesium, potassium, conjugated bilirubin, and lactate dehydrogenase.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach led to a HS decrease, suggesting that the provided report could be a driving force for improvement of phlebotomy quality, also helping clinicians in deciding if retesting is essential or not.

Integrating quality control and external quality assurance

Effective management of clinical laboratories relies upon an understanding of Quality Control and External Quality Assurance principles. These processes, when applied effectively, reduce patient risk and drive quality improvement. In this Review, we will describe the purpose of QC and EQA and their role in identifying analytical and process error. The two concepts are linked, and we will illustrate that linkage. Some EQA providers offer far more than analytical surveillance. They facilitate training and education and extend quality improvement and identify areas where there is potential for patient harm into the pre-and post-analytical phases of the total testing process.

A Reference chart for clinical biochemical tests of hemolyzed serum samples

Background

Although the effect of hemolysis has been extensively evaluated on clinical biochemical tests, a practical guidance for laboratory staff to rapidly determine whether a hemolyzed blood sample is acceptable and how to interpret the results is lacking. Here, we introduce a chart as a convenient reference for dealing with such samples.

Methods

Serum samples with 0.1%, 0.3%, 1%, 3%, and 10% hemolysis were prepared from sonicated endogenous red blood cells and received 35 wet and 22 dry clinical biochemical tests, respectively. The contributing part in the biochemical test result at each hemolysis condition was derived by subtracting the original test result of this sample with no hemolysis. The net results were used for analyses and preparation of the reference chart.

Results

The reference chart displayed the analytically calculated hemolysis interference and related statistical analyses. The chart also provided the color appearance of serum samples at each hemolysis condition for clinical staffs to determine whether a hemolyzed sample could be accepted.

Conclusion

In clinical laboratories, preparation of such a reference chart is extremely useful in dealing with hemolyzed blood samples for clinical biochemical tests.