The value proposition of integrative diagnostics for (early) detection of cancer. On behalf of the EFLM interdisciplinary Task and Finish Group "CNAPS/CTC for early detection of cancer"

Multiparametric MRI for characterization of the tumour microenvironment

Our understanding of tumour biology has evolved over the past decades and cancer is now viewed as a complex ecosystem with interactions between various cellular and non-cellular components within the tumour microenvironment (TME) at multiple scales. However, morphological imaging remains the mainstay of tumour staging and assessment of response to therapy, and the characterization of the TME with non-invasive imaging has not yet entered routine clinical practice. By combining multiple MRI sequences, each providing different but complementary information about the TME, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) enables non-invasive assessment of molecular and cellular features within the TME, including their spatial and temporal heterogeneity. With an increasing number of advanced MRI techniques bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical applications, mpMRI could ultimately guide the selection of treatment approaches, precisely tailored to each individual patient, tumour and therapeutic modality. In this Review, we describe the evolving role of mpMRI in the non-invasive characterization of the TME, outline its applications for cancer detection, staging and assessment of response to therapy, and discuss considerations and challenges for its use in future medical applications, including personalized integrated diagnostics.

Imaging-based characterization of tumoral heterogeneity for personalized cancer treatment

With personalized tumor therapy, understanding and addressing the heterogeneity of malignant tumors is becoming increasingly important. Heterogeneity can be found within one lesion (intralesional) and between several tumor lesions emerging from one primary tumor (interlesional). The heterogeneous tumor cells may show a different response to treatment due to their biology, which in turn influences the outcome of the affected patients and the choice of therapeutic agents. Therefore, both intra- and interlesional heterogeneity should be addressed at the diagnostic stage. While genetic and biological heterogeneity are important parameters in molecular tumor characterization and in histopathology, they are not yet addressed routinely in medical imaging. This article summarizes the recently established markers for tumor heterogeneity in imaging as well as heterogeneous/mixed response to therapy. Furthermore, a look at emerging markers is given. The ultimate goal of this overview is to provide comprehensive understanding of tumor heterogeneity and its implications for radiology and for communication with interdisciplinary teams in oncology. KEY POINTS::   · Tumor heterogeneity can be described within one lesion (intralesional) or between several lesions (interlesional).. · The heterogeneous biology of tumor cells can lead to a mixed therapeutic response and should be addressed in diagnostics and the therapeutic regime.. · Quantitative image diagnostics can be enhanced using AI, improved histopathological methods, and liquid profiling in the future..

Integrated diagnostics

BACKGROUND

Integrated diagnostics is increasingly gaining scientific traction as it promises to address several challenges currently facing diagnostic medicine. These challenges range from the need for improved diagnostic accuracy to optimized timing of diagnostic procedures, to the variety of diagnostic markers and thus the complexity of their interpretation, and finally to economic pressure.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

While many of these challenges may be difficult to solve with a monomodal approach, the integration of laboratory markers and imaging procedures promises to allow both disciplines to achieve their actual clinical potential. Combining complementary diagnostic approaches can help to improve the interpretation of measurements, provide a better cost-effectiveness particularly when cutting-edge techniques are used for specific indications, and facilitate optimized timing and rational choice of appropriate diagnostic approaches for disease surveillance. Furthermore, close interdisciplinary assessment of diagnostic results will increase diagnostic accuracy and will enable selection of specific patient cohorts at increased risk for certain diseases who are suitable for further testing.

CONCLUSION

The potential of an integrated diagnostic approach represents a strategic goal for diagnostic disciplines as it achieves better visibility and greater clinical impact. In addition to close collaboration among relevant diagnostic experts, an appropriate structure for integrated data evaluation needs to be established to provide actionable health guidance so that integrated diagnostics can be implemented in standard care.