An unusal case of hermaphroditism--a 46,XX/69,XXY chimera

Virtual screening approach for the discovery of selective 5α-reductase type II inhibitors for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment

Background: 5α-Reductase type II (5αR2) inhibition is a promising strategy for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment. A computational approach including virtual screening, ligand-based 3D pharmacophore modeling, 2D quantitative structure-activity relationship and molecular docking simulations were adopted to develop novel inhibitors. Results: Hits were first filtered via the validated pharmacophore and 2D quantitative structure-activity relationship models. Docking on the recently determined cocrystallized structure of 5αR2 showed three promising hits. Visual inspection results were compared with finasteride ligand and dihydrotestosterone as reference, to explain the role of binding to Glu57 and Tyr91 for 5αR2 selective inhibition. Conclusion: Alignment between Hit 2 and finasteride in the binding pocket showed similar binding modes. The biological activity prediction showed antitumor and androgen targeting activity of the new hits.

Normal female phenotype and ovarian development despite the ovarian expression of the sex-determining region of Y chromosome (SRY) in a 46,XX/69,XXY diploid/triploid mosaic child conceived after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection

CONTEXT

Diploid/triploid mosaicism (mixoploidy) is a rare chromosomal abnormality characterized by mental and growth retardation, hypotonia, and dysmorphic features such as facial asymmetry, low-set ears, and syndactyly. All 46,XX/69,XXY cases fall into three phenotypic groups: male with testicular development, ovotestis disorder of sex development (DSD), or undervirilized male DSD. All phenotypic females with diploid/triploid mosaic reported so far had 46,XX/69,XXX karyotype.

PATIENT

We report an 8-year-old girl conceived after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection with normal internal/external genital and ovarian development despite 46,XX/69,XXY mosaicism and normal expression of sex-determining region of Y chromosome (SRY) in her gonads.

INTERVENTION

Because of the increased risk of gonadoblastoma resulting from Y chromosome mosaicism, her ovaries were removed by laparoscopy. Ovarian tissue was analyzed histologically as well as by fluorescence in situ hybridization, PCR, and RT-PCR amplification to determine the localization of Y chromosome and expression of SRY and DAX1 mRNA. Methylation-specific PCR was used to assess the inactivation pattern of X chromosomes.

RESULTS

By laparoscopy, internal female genital anatomy appeared to be normal. Cytogenetic and molecular methods confirmed the presence of intact and functionally active Y chromosome in the ovary. Strikingly, histological assessment of the gonads showed normal ovarian architecture with abundant primordial follicles despite the presence of the Y chromosome in ovarian follicles and the expression of SRY mRNA in gonadal tissue.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates that normal ovarian development is possible in the presence of Y chromosome in ovarian follicles and despite the expression of SRY in ovarian tissue. Furthermore, this is the first documented case of mixoploidy after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and the only phenotypic female with 46,XX/69,XXY karyotype.