Vaginal breech delivery in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates: experience of a single center

Effect of mode of delivery on perinatal outcome in severe preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence on the effect of mode of delivery on perinatal outcome of fetuses born before 32 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and gray literature sources were searched, starting from the year 2000 to reflect contemporary practice in perinatal care. Non-randomized or randomized studies that included singleton fetuses without chromosomal abnormality or major congenital defect delivered vaginally or via Cesarean section were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Primary outcomes were neonatal death, defined as death in the first 28 days of age, and survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes were other adverse perinatal events. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The overall quality of evidence for the outcomes was assessed according to GRADE. Summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated, and random-effects models were used for data synthesis. Subgroup analysis was performed for delivery before 28 weeks, delivery between 28 and 32 weeks and according to fetal presentation at delivery.

RESULTS

A total of 27 retrospective studies (22 887 neonates) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, all of which reported on singleton pregnancies. Among cases born before 28 weeks, vaginal delivery significantly increased the risk of neonatal death of fetuses with any type of presentation (n = 1496) (OR 1.87 (95% CI, 1.05-3.35); I2  = 65%, very low quality of evidence) and of fetuses with breech presentation (n = 733) (OR 3.55 (95% CI, 2.42-5.21); I2  = 21%, moderate quality of evidence). The odds of survival to discharge were significantly decreased among fetuses with breech presentation delivered before 28 weeks (n = 646) (OR 0.36 (95% CI, 0.24-0.54); I2  = 21%, low quality of evidence). Among breech fetuses born between 28 and 32 weeks, vaginal delivery increased the odds of perinatal death (intrapartum and neonatal) (n = 1581) (OR 3.06 (95% CI, 1.47-6.35); I2  = 0%, high quality of evidence). In non-cephalic fetuses born between 24 and 32 weeks, vaginal delivery decreased the odds of survival to discharge (n = 1030) (OR 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19-0.40); I2  = 0%, moderate quality of evidence). No significant effect on mortality of mode of delivery was observed in cephalic fetuses at any gestational age.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that vaginal delivery in severe preterm birth is associated with an increased risk of neonatal and perinatal death in breech fetuses, while no significant association was observed for cephalic fetuses. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide cesarean birth had increased over the past three decades and in the USA, the overall rate of cesarean birth has increased from 23.8% in 1989 to 31.9% in 2018. Moreover, the substantial increase of preterm infants delivered by cesarean section had reached anywhere from 45% to 72% for gestational age <33 weeks. There is a considerable debate on whether cesarean section confers a survival advantage for preterm infants. Published data on the relationship between mode of delivery and survival rate were inconsistent and there is a lack of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have investigated this important clinical concern. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of cesarean section on the survival rate of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of ≤32 weeks VLBW infants born alive and admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Jeddah (KAMC-Jeddah) between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome of interest was the survival rate to discharge of VLBW infants delivered by cesarean section compared to delivered vaginally. Relevant demographic and clinical variables were assessed and its association to survival to discharge of VLBW infants were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 1055 ≤32 weeks VLBW infants included in the study, 559 (53%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 496 (47%) were delivered vaginally. Cesarean delivery had increased from 44.2% to 66% between 1994-1998 and 2014-2019, respectively. The rise of cesarean delivery compared with the vaginal delivery was more profound for gestational age ≤26 weeks and birth weight ≤800 g. The VLBW infants delivered by cesarean section had a higher survival rate when compared to infants delivered vaginally (87.29% vs 71.77%, P<0.001). The survival advantage was statistically significant in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (801-1000 g) and infants with birth weight ≤800 g, 86.73% vs 73.62%, P=0.018 and 58.02% vs 40.52, P=0.001, respectively. Moreover, VLBW infants ≤26 weeks gestational age delivered by cesarean section had a higher survival rate of 69.15% vs 44.5%, P<0.001.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that cesarean birth is associated with higher survival for VLBW infants with birth weight ≤800 g and ELBW infants and gestational age ≤26 weeks compared to vaginal birth.

Comparison of cesarean versus vaginal delivery of extremely preterm gestations in breech presentation: retrospective cohort study

Objective: As survival increases at earlier gestational ages, the optimal mode of delivery, especially in cases of breech presentation, is of increasing importance. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of vaginal delivery (VD) and cesarean section (CS) births for infants in breech presentation at borderline viability. Study design: A retrospective chart review of live breech births between 23 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks gestation at a tertiary university center from 2003 to 2013 was conducted. Those delivered vaginally were compared with those delivered by CS. Stillbirths and deliveries where no resuscitation was intended were removed from the analysis. Variables were compared using a Student t-test (continuous), Mann-Whitney U test (categorical), or a Chi-squared test (count). Logistic regression analysis was performed to further evaluate the results. Results with p < .05 were considered significant. Results: One hundred seventy-six births were included, 36 VD and 140 CS. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Gestational age at delivery was significantly higher in CS deliveries (24.9 ± 0.6 versus 24.5 ± 0.7, p = .0007). The rate of neonatal death (23.6% versus 44.4%, p = .0127) was significantly lower in those born by CS. All other neonatal outcomes including Apgar scores at one and 5 min, cord gases, birth weight, length of stay in NICU, incidence of respiratory complications, and incidence of high-grade IVH demonstrated no significant differences. Logistic regression suggested that male sex, lower birth weight, and earlier gestational age are significantly associated with neonatal mortality. Thirty percent of uterine incisions were of the classical, high transverse or inverted-T types. The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in CS births (706.6 ± 226.4 versus 327.4 ± 174.1 mL, p < .0001), but there was no difference in the rate of blood transfusion. Conclusion: CS delivery of breech infants at borderline viability had a protective effect on neonatal mortality compared to VD depending on the regression model utilized. Infant sex, birth weight, and gestational age also contribute significantly to neonatal mortality. A prospective study of planned method of delivery is recommended to further explore this finding.

What is the safest mode of birth for extremely preterm breech singleton infants who are actively resuscitated? A systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

The safest delivery mode of extremely preterm breech singletons is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To determine safest delivery mode of actively resuscitated extremely preterm breech singletons.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1994 to May 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies comparing outcomes by delivery mode in actively resuscitated breech infants between 23⁺⁰ and 27⁺⁶ weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We synthesised data using random effects, generated odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals and number-needed-to-treat (NNT). Our primary outcomes were death (neonatal, before discharge, or by 6 months) and severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grades III/IV), stratified by gestational age (23⁺⁰ -24⁺⁶ , 25⁺⁰ -26⁺⁶ , 27⁺⁰ -27⁺⁶ weeks).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 studies with 12 335 infants. We found that caesarean section was associated with a 41% decrease in odds of death between 23⁺⁰ and 27⁺⁶ weeks [odds ratio (OR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.95, NNT 8], with the greatest decrease at 23⁺⁰ -24⁺⁶ weeks (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.75, NNT 7). The OR at 25⁺⁰ -26⁺⁶ and 27⁺⁰ -27⁺⁶ weeks were 0.72 (95% CI 0.34-1.52) and 2.04 (95% CI 0.20-20.62), respectively. We found that caesarean section was associated with 49% decrease in odds of severe intraventricular haemorrhage between 23⁺⁰ and 27⁺⁶ weeks (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.91, NNT 12), whereas the OR at 25⁺⁰ -26⁺⁶ and 27⁺⁰ -27⁺⁶ was 0.29 (95% CI 0.07-1.12) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.27-3.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Caesarean section was associated with reductions in the odds of death by 41% and of severe intraventricular haemorrhage by 49% in actively resuscitated breech singletons < 28 weeks of gestation. The data are mostly observational, which may be inherently biased, and scarce on other morbidities, necessitating thorough discussion between parents and clinicians.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Caesarean section associated with lower odds of death and severe intraventricular haemorrhage in actively resuscitated breech singletons <28 weeks.

[Mode of delivery in spontaneous preterm birth]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefit/risk balance of way of birth according to fetal presentation, to assess monitoring during preterm labor, to discuss method of delivery and practice of delayed cord clamping in case of spontaneous preterm birth.

METHODS

Bibliographic research from the Pubmed database and recommendations issued by the main scientific societies, and assignment of a level of evidence and a recommendation grade.

RESULTS

In case of vertex presentation, no studies suggest that cesarean section improve neonatal outcome during spontaneous preterm birth (LE4). Nevertheless, cesarean is associated with higher maternal morbidity than vaginal delivery. Thus, routine cesarean is not recommended simply because of a spontaneous preterm labor (professional consensus). The available data do not allow specific recommendations about the choice of mode of delivery for preterm breech presentation in view of the low levels of proof (Professional consensus). Fetal rate monitoring is necessary during preterm labor (Professional consensus). Current data about second lines method for fetal surveillance (fetal scalp blood for pH or lactates) are insufficient to recommend their use before 34 WG (Professional consensus). Systematic assisted vaginal delivery is not recommended during preterm birth (Professional consensus). Use of vacuum is possible after 34 WG when cranial vertex ossification is considered satisfactory (Professional consensus). Systematic use of episiotomy in case of preterm birth is not recommended (Professional consensus). A delayed cord clamping is possible if the neonatal or maternal state so permits (Professional consensus). The available data are insufficient to recommend a systematic use of this procedure (LE3).

CONCLUSION

In case of preterm delivery, the available data do not allow specific recommendations about the choice of mode of delivery regardless of fetal presentation.

The influence of mode of birth on neonatal survival and maternal outcomes at extreme prematurity: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of published clinical data to guide obstetric decision-making regarding mode of birth at extreme prematurity.

AIMS

To evaluate whether neonatal survival or maternal outcomes were affected by the decision to perform a caesarean section (CS) between 23 + 0 and 26 + 6 weeks' gestation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-centre retrospective cohort study of all liveborn infants born with a plan for active resuscitation at 23-26 weeks' gestation was performed. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses compared outcomes after vaginal birth and CS. Subgroup analyses of nonfootling breech presentations, multiple pregnancies and singleton pregnancies in spontaneous preterm labour were performed.

RESULTS

Outcomes for 625 neonates delivered by 540 mothers were analysed. A total of 300 (48%) neonates were born vaginally and 325 (52%) by CS. Mode of birth was not associated independently with survival for any multivariate analysis; gestational age at birth was an independent predictor across all analyses. Adverse maternal outcomes were documented in 112 (21%) pregnancies; the rate of severe maternal complications was low. Maternal morbidity was not affected by mode of birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Mode of birth did not affect neonatal survival or the rate of maternal morbidity for deliveries at 23-26 completed weeks' gestation.

[Below 26 gestational week prematurity: What support?]

Management and decision whether to begin intensive care for very preterm infants below 26 WG and at borderline viability remains controversial, and survival rates for these children vary greatly and justify discussion with regards to literature data and according to the experience of others countries. If active management is more difficult with very preterm infants 24-25 WG, mortality is increased comparing with newborns of more than 26 WG. This is partly explained by limitations of active neonatal intensive care. Nevertheless, neurocomportemental and cognitive results are not so unfavorable. This justifies a human, medical, and ethical multidiciplinary discussion including the parents' wishes for an active resuscitation or a palliative management. Using the only criteria of gestational age is not a reliable tool to predict survival and neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants. It is very important to identify other prenatal factors such prenatal corticosteroid administration, gender, fetal estimated weight, amniotic fluid and absent/reverse end diastolic flow umbilical doppler. Implication and listening the parents' preferences are essential after individual information, objective and a honest counseling including mortality, morbidity and risks of neurocomportmental impairments. Birth and counseling should be done in reference maternofetal center with obstetricians and neonatalogist specialized in this topic. A real difficulty is to consider the route of delivery and the possibility that caesarean section could improve survival rates. Induction of labour is very often a high risk of failure and route of delivery remains controversial and this is a real question in order to improve survival rates. Literature is poor and conflicting without randomized trials. Caesarean section presents maternal risks such as pathologic placentation, haemorrhage delivery and increasing risks for the subsequent gestation. So, if it is not a good idea to recommend a systematic caesarean delivery, it is not ethical to refuse this route of delivery only because of the gestational age even in extremely premature birth.

Morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery for breech periviable deliveries

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the odds of morbidity and death that are associated with cesarean delivery, compared with vaginal delivery, for breech fetuses who are delivered from 23-24 6/7 weeks' gestational age.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of state-level maternal and infant hospital discharge data that were linked to vital statistics for breech deliveries that occurred from 23-24 6/7 weeks' gestation in California, Missouri, and Pennsylvania from 2000-2009 (N = 1854). Analyses were stratified by gestational age (23-23 6/7 vs 24-24 6/7 weeks' gestation).

RESULTS

Cesarean delivery was performed for 46% (335 fetuses) and 77% (856 fetuses) of 23- and 24-week breech fetuses. In multivariable analyses, overall survival was greater for cesarean-born neonates (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.24-7.06; AOR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.76-4.81, respectively). When delivered for nonemergent indications, cesarean-born survivors were more than twice as likely to experience major morbidity (intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, asphyxia composite; AOR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.37-5.84; AOR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.11-3.86 at 23 and 24 weeks' gestation, respectively). Among intubated neonates, despite a short-term survival advantage, there was no difference in survival to >6-month corrected age (AOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.83-3.74; AOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.81-2.76, respectively). There was no difference in survival for intubated 23-week neonates who were delivered by cesarean for nonemergent indications or cesarean-born neonates who weighed <500 g.

CONCLUSION

Cesarean delivery increased overall survival and major morbidity for breech periviable neonates. However, among intubated neonates, despite a short-term survival advantage, there was no difference in 6-month survival. Also, cesarean delivery did not increase survival for neonates who weighed <500 g. Patients and providers should discuss explicitly the trade-offs related to neonatal death and morbidity, maternal morbidity, and implications for future pregnancies.

[Delivery of premature infants]

Prematurity is a frequent event and clearly raises an issue concerning how these fetuses with multiple weaknesses should be delivered. Although, a systematic abdominal approach has no scientific basis, there are cases where the caesarean is chosen because of other factors associated to prematurity such as any maternal or fetal indication to terminate the pregnancy while labour induction remains impossible. However, in case of breech presentation, which is often delivered by caesarean, the literature does recommend neither the vaginal nor the abdominal approach. Caesarean in case of prematurity is more difficult because of the absence of any inferior segment and implies making a large incision so as to easily extract these weak fetuses. Increased maternal morbidity related to preterm caesarean sections has been reported through out literature. The viability gestational age limit represents a confounding factor in most studies since caesarean is rarely chosen for these fetuses because of a very low expected survival rate, while it is probably in this situation that the abdominal approach could provide a real benefit. Larger studies are required to show potential advantages. Systematic use of episiotomies or instrumental deliveries in case of vaginal births is not recommended in case of prematurity. Protecting the fetal head with spatulas still requires further evaluations.

Perinatal risk factors and mode of delivery associated with mortality in very low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of perinatal risk factors including delivery mode with mortality in very low birthweight (VLBW) in a tertiary hospital setting.

METHODS

Medical records of 241 live-born VLBW infants (≤1500 g) were retrospectively reviewed. Details of maternal, obstetrical, perinatal risk factors and their associations with infant mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall infant mortality rate was 23.2%. Mortality was significantly higher for infants born at ≤27 gestational weeks and with a birthweight of ≤750 g (p = 0.000 and p = 0.000, respectively), showing a steep decrease thereafter. On ROC analysis, a cut off of 26.5 weeks was determined for mortality with a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 90.3% (area under the curve = 0.792, 95% CI: 0.719-0.866). On multivariate regression analysis, gestational week at birth, birthweight, antenatal steroid treatment and pathologic Doppler ultrasound findings were found as independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational week at birth, birthweight and antenatal steroid treatment remain the most important perinatal risk factors for infant mortality in VLBW infants. Mode of delivery does not seem to be associated with mortality when adjusted for other perinatal risk factors.

A moving line in the sand: a review of obstetric management surrounding periviability

Periviable birth poses numerous clinical and ethical challenges for the practicing clinician. We review the data surrounding the administration of corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity, antibiotics in the case of preterm premature rupture of membranes, magnesium sulfate for cerebral palsy prophylaxis, fetal monitoring, and cesarean delivery. The ethical complexities of patient counseling are also reviewed with a recommendation toward shared decision making between patient and physician.

The impact of staffing on central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections in preterm neonates - results of nation-wide cohort study in Germany

Background

Very low birthweight (VLBW) newborns on neonatal intensive care units (NICU) are at increased risk for developing central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC BSI). In addition to the established intrinsic risk factors of VLBW newborns, it is still not clear which process and structure parameters within NICUs influence the prevalence of CVC BSI.

Methods

The study population consisted of VLBW newborns from NICUs that participated in the German nosocomial infection surveillance system for preterm infants (NEO-KISS) from January 2008 to June 2009. Structure and process parameters of NICUs were obtained by a questionnaire-based enquiry. Patient based date and the occurrence of BSI derived from the NEO-KISS database. The association between the requested parameters and the occurrance of CVC BSI and laboratory-confirmed BSI was analyzed by generalized estimating equations.

Results

We analyzed data on 5,586 VLBW infants from 108 NICUs and found 954 BSI cases in 847 infants. Of all BSI cases, 414 (43%) were CVC-associated. The pooled incidence density of CVC BSI was 8.3 per 1,000 CVC days. The pooled CVC utilization ratio was 24.3 CVC-days per 100 patient days. A low realized staffing rate lead to an increased risk of CVC BSI (OR 1.47; p=0.008) and also of laboratory-confirmed CVC BSI (OR 1.78; p=0.028).

Conclusions

Our findings show that low levels of realized staffing are associated with increased rates of CVC BSI on NICUs. Further studies are necessary to determine a threshold that should not be undercut.

Neonatal mortality by attempted route of delivery in early preterm birth

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study neonatal outcomes in early preterm births by delivery route.

STUDY DESIGN

Delivery precursors were analyzed in 4352 singleton deliveries, 24 0/7 to 31 6/7 weeks' gestation. In a subset (n = 2906) eligible for a trial of labor, neonatal mortality in attempted vaginal delivery (VD) was compared to planned cesarean delivery stratified by presentation.

RESULTS

Delivery precursors were classified as maternal or fetal conditions (45.7%), preterm premature rupture of membranes (37.7%), and preterm labor (16.6%). For vertex presentation, 79% attempted VD and 84% were successful. There was no difference in neonatal mortality. For breech presentation, at 24 0/7 to 27 6/7 weeks' gestation, 31.7% attempted VD and 27.6% were successful; neonatal mortality was increased (25.2% vs 13.2%, P = .003). At 28 0/7 to 31 6/7 weeks' gestation, 30.5% attempted VD and 17.2% were successful; neonatal mortality was increased (6.0% vs 1.5%, P = .016).

CONCLUSION

Attempted VD for vertex presentation has a high success rate with no difference in neonatal mortality unlike breech presentation.